[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1285":3,"related-1285":61},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":30,"classification":31,"search_phrases":38,"slug":41,"view_count":21,"doi":42,"paper":43,"created_at":60},1285,"Promoting state-owned forest farms’ participations in community forestry development in China: the roles of multiple institutional pressures","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1842842","Socio-economic transformation has posed new challenges to the effectiveness of community forestry (CF) management. In response, China has introduced the Joint Management of Forest Land between State-Owned Forest Farms and Communities (SOFFs-CJM) model, which aims to strengthen CF governance and foster the revitalization of traditional forest regions. The key to the success of this model lies in incentivizing the active participation of SOFFs. Grounded in institutional theory, this study conducts an empirical analysis of SOFFs’ joint operation decisions using data from 187 forest farms across four provinces—Fujian, Jiangxi, Guangxi, and Zhejiang. Logit models, mediation effect models, and moderation effect models are integrated to examine the decision-making behavior of SOFFs. The results show that: (1) coercive pressure, mimetic pressure, and normative pressure all positively influence SOFFs to engage in joint management with communities, with coercive pressure exerting the most significant impact. (2) Organizational legitimacy plays a mediating role in the relationship between institutional pressures and the decision-making of SOFFs. Specifically, institutional pressures indirectly affect joint management decisions through performance legitimacy, task legitimacy, and value legitimacy. (3) The management system and nature of SOFFs moderate the impact of institutional pressures on joint management decisions. County-owned SOFFs enhance the influence of mimetic pressure on joint management decisions and weaken the impact of normative pressure, while corporate-owned SOFFs reduce the influence of coercive pressure and normative pressure. (4) Coercive pressure and normative pressure have a complementary effect on joint management decisions, and normative pressure has an inverted-U-shaped relationship with joint management decisions. Therefore, the government can promote the participation of SOFFs in community forestry by improving coercive pressure, appropriately guiding normative pressure, enhancing mimetic pressure, and designing differentiated policies based on the management system and nature of the forest farms.","社会经济转型对社区森林（CF）管理的有效性提出了新的挑战。为此，中国引入了国有林场与社区联合管理（SOFFs-CJM）模式，旨在强化社区森林治理，促进传统林区振兴。该模式成功的关键在于激励国有林场（SOFFs）的积极参与。本研究基于制度理论，利用福建、江西、广西和浙江四省187个林场的数据，对国有林场的联合经营决策进行了实证分析。研究整合了Logit模型、中介效应模型和调节效应模型，考察了国有林场的决策行为。结果表明：（1）强制压力、模仿压力和规范压力均对国有林场参与社区联合经营产生正向影响，其中强制压力的影响最为显著。（2）组织合法性在制度压力与国有林场决策之间起中介作用。具体而言，制度压力通过绩效合法性、任务合法性和价值合法性间接影响联合经营决策。（3）国有林场的管理体制和性质调节了制度压力对联合经营决策的影响。县属国有林场增强了模仿压力对联合经营决策的影响，削弱了规范压力的影响，而企业属国有林场则降低了强制压力和规范压力的影响。（4）强制压力与规范压力对联合经营决策具有互补效应，且规范压力与联合经营决策呈倒U型关系。因此，政府可以通过增强强制压力、适当引导规范压力、提升模仿压力，并根据林场管理体制和性质设计差异化政策，来促进国有林场参与社区森林管理。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-08-31T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,74,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},18,22,20,12,2,1,"研究国有林场参与社区林业的决策机制，数据详实，对林业政策制定有参考价值。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29],"社区林业","国有林场","林业治理",[],{"status":32,"locked":14,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":35},"needs_review","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":36,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":37},[],"农业相关性需要复核",[39,40],"国有林场 林业治理 社区林业","国有林场 林业治理","国有林场林业治理社区林业-1285","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1842842",{"doi":42,"openalex_id":44,"authors":45,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":51,"oa_url":52,"card":53,"direction":57,"ingested_from":59},"W7204787217",[46,49],{"name":47,"orcid":48},"Shuqiang Li","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3290-5416",{"name":50,"orcid":9},"Suliman Almojel",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1842842\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":54,"method":55,"finding":56,"direction":57,"opportunity":58},"研究制度压力如何促进国有林场参与社区联合经营，基于四省187个林场数据。","使用Logit、中介效应和调节效应模型分析187个林场数据。","强制、模仿、规范压力均促进参与，强制压力影响最大，合法性起中介作用。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索数字技术如何增强制度压力传导，或设计差异化政策工具促进林场参与联合经营。","openalex","2026-09-01T23:30:07.502183Z",{"total":22,"page":22,"page_size":22,"items":62},[63],{"id":64,"title":65,"url":66,"summary":67,"summary_zh":68,"content":9,"source_name":69,"source_url":66,"published_at":70,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":71,"score_detail":72,"sources":75,"tags":77,"primary_topic":82,"secondary_topics":88,"classification":89,"search_phrases":118,"slug":121,"view_count":22,"doi":122,"paper":123,"created_at":135},4562,"Readiness and resistance : institutional adaptation of REDD+ and climate-smart agriculture in Indigenous communities of Oaxaca, Mexico","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.14288\u002F1.0456557","The effectiveness of conservation initiatives in Indigenous territories depends not only on their technical design but also on how they interact with existing governance systems, institutions, livelihoods, and relationships. Despite growing recognition of Indigenous governance in conservation, limited attention has been given to how community institutions shape readiness and resistance to external interventions and influence their adaptation. This dissertation examines these intersections through the implementation of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) and associated Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices in four Indigenous communities of Oaxaca, Mexico. Using a comparative case-study approach, the research engaged 73 participants, including community authorities, farmers, local leaders, REDD+ representatives, and implementing organizations. The study used semi-structured interviews, focus groups, household surveys, countryside visits, and community validation to examine participation in REDD+, Indigenous Governance Mechanisms, and the adaptation of conservation agriculture, agroforestry, and silvopastoral practices. The findings show that Indigenous communities were not passive recipients of REDD+ but active agents who evaluated, negotiated, adapted, or resisted interventions according to community priorities and governance processes. Readiness and resistance emerged not as opposing outcomes, but as interconnected expressions of the same governance process. Indigenous Governance Mechanisms, including the Community Assembly, Cargo system, Tequio, Guzona, and Descargo, mediated collective decision-making, responsibilities, accountability, and the legitimacy of external interventions. Conservation practices were more likely to persist when they aligned with community institutions, livelihoods, knowledge, and socio-ecological conditions; where this institutional fit was weak, participation became selective, temporary, or resistant. This dissertation contributes a governance-based understanding of conservation adaptation by showing that institutional compatibility is constructed through negotiation rather than secured through technical design alone. It also identifies sustained relationality among communities, institutions, territory, knowledge, and collective responsibilities as a condition that extends beyond formal collaboration. Therefore, the research reframes Indigenous readiness and resistance as expressions of adaptive governance and argues for conservation approaches that are co-developed through, rather than imposed upon, the institutions that already sustain community life and territorial management.","保护举措在原住民领地中的有效性不仅取决于其技术设计，还取决于它们如何与现有治理体系、制度、生计和关系互动。尽管原住民治理在保护领域日益受到认可，但关于社区制度如何塑造对外部干预的准备与抵制并影响其调适的关注仍然有限。本论文通过墨西哥瓦哈卡州四个原住民社区实施减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致排放（REDD+）及相关气候智能型农业（CSA）实践的案例，考察了这些交叉领域。研究采用比较案例研究方法，共有73名参与者，包括社区当局、农民、地方领袖、REDD+代表及实施机构。研究运用半结构化访谈、焦点小组、住户调查、田野走访和社区验证等方法，考察了REDD+参与、原住民治理机制以及保护性农业、农林业和林牧复合实践的调适。研究发现，原住民社区并非REDD+的被动接受者，而是积极的行动者，他们根据社区优先事项和治理过程对干预措施进行评估、协商、调适或抵制。准备与抵制并非对立的结果，而是同一治理过程的相互关联的表达。原住民治理机制，包括社区大会、 cargo制度、Tequio、Guzona和Descargo，调解了集体决策、责任、问责以及外部干预的合法性。当保护实践与社区制度、生计、知识和社会生态条件相契合时，其持续的可能性更大；当这种制度契合较弱时，参与便呈现选择性、暂时性或抵制性。本论文通过表明制度兼容性是通过协商建构的，而非仅靠技术设计就能确保的，为基于治理的保护调适理解做出了贡献。研究还识别出社区、制度、领地、知识和集体责任之间持续的关系性，这是一种超越正式合作的条件。因此，本研究将原住民的准备与抵制重新界定为调适的表达。","Open Collections","2026-10-09T00:00:00Z",68,{"impact":73,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":20,"freshness":73,"relevant":22,"comment":74},8,"以墨西哥瓦哈卡四个原住民社区为案例，揭示社区治理机制如何塑造对REDD+与气候智慧型农业的适应与抵制，对理解生态补偿项目落地与乡村治理有参考价值，但地域性强、与国内三农信息化关联偏弱。",[76],{"name":69,"url":66},[78,27,79,80,81],"气候智慧型农业","REDD+","原住民治理","墨西哥瓦哈卡",{"code":83,"slug":84,"name":85,"path":86,"parent_code":87},"H8","sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture","H",[],{"status":90,"locked":14,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":91},"classified",{"candidates":92,"agricultural_evidence":96},[93,101,107,113],{"code":94,"score":95,"supported":96,"title":97,"abstract":99,"tags":100},"I1",11,true,[98],"smart agriculture",[98],[],{"code":83,"score":102,"supported":96,"title":103,"abstract":104,"tags":106},3,[],[105],"conservation agriculture",[],{"code":108,"score":102,"supported":96,"title":109,"abstract":110,"tags":112},"I7",[],[111],"研究方法",[],{"code":114,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":115,"abstract":116,"tags":117},"H7",[],[],[78],[119,120],"REDD 瓦哈卡 原住民社区","气候智慧型农业 墨西哥 原住民","REDD瓦哈卡原住民社区-4562","10.14288\u002F1.0456557",{"doi":122,"openalex_id":124,"authors":125,"venue":69,"cited_by_count":51,"oa_url":66,"card":128,"direction":134,"ingested_from":59},"W7221163310",[126],{"name":127,"orcid":9},"Neftalí Hernández Martínez",{"tldr":129,"method":130,"finding":131,"direction":132,"opportunity":133},"研究墨西哥瓦哈卡原住民社区对REDD+和气候智慧农业的制度适应，揭示准备与抵抗的关联。","比较案例研究，73名参与者，半结构化访谈、焦点小组、家庭调查和社区验证。","准备与抵抗是同一治理过程的相互关联表达，制度契合度决定保护实践能否持续。","农业绿色发展与碳","探究原住民治理机制与碳项目制度兼容性的协商过程，以及制度契合度对项目长期成效的影响。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-10-10T23:30:07.855815Z"]