[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1407":3,"related-1407":70},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":22,"classification":23,"search_phrases":44,"slug":45,"view_count":46,"doi":47,"paper":48,"created_at":69},1407,"Navigating the digital disruption: an ontological security lens on Dutch and Danish ports","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs40152-026-00513-9","Abstract Ports are essential nodes of the global supply chain that are under pressure to become ‘smart’ ports. The digital transition and possible adoption of AI-decision support tools destabilise routine port operations, creating uncertainties about a port’s future identity narrative and resulting in potential ontological insecurities. Given the scant literature on smart port transitions from the lens of a smart port’s self-identity and ontological security, this study aims to fill this gap. The study explores how ports navigate digitalisation and AI adoption while maintaining their ontological security using Pratt’s (2016) Relational Ontological Security theory lens. We conduct a document-based comparative case study of ports in the Netherlands and Denmark, using PRISMA reporting and deductive content analysis. This study reveals that the digital and AI transition is a strategic negotiation of the institutional self to maintain the existing port identity amidst (anticipated) digital disruptions. The findings highlight a clear difference in how they secure ontological security; Dutch ports seek to set global normative standards. In contrast, Danish ports stabilise their identities by aligning with established standards to secure their specialised, customised regional niches. These findings conclusively highlight that port digitalisation and AI adoption in ports in Denmark and the Netherlands are not just a technological challenge but also a strategic re-establishment of the port’s self-identity and maintenance of ontological security.","港口是全球供应链的关键节点，正面临向“智慧”港口转型的压力。数字化转型及可能采用的人工智能决策支持工具，动摇了港口常规运营，引发了对港口未来身份叙事的种种不确定性，进而可能导致本体性不安全感。鉴于从智慧港口自我身份认同与本体性安全视角探讨智慧港口转型的文献尚显不足，本研究旨在填补这一空白。本研究运用Pratt（2016）的关系性本体安全理论框架，探讨港口如何在维持其本体性安全的同时，驾驭数字化与人工智能采纳的进程。我们选取荷兰与丹麦的港口作为案例，采用基于文献的比较案例研究方法，结合PRISMA报告流程与演绎式内容分析。研究揭示，数字与人工智能转型实质上是机构自我的一种策略性协商，旨在面对（预期中的）数字颠覆时维持既有港口身份认同。研究结果凸显了两国港口在确保本体性安全方式上的显著差异：荷兰港口力求确立全球规范性标准；相比之下，丹麦港口则通过与既有标准对齐来稳固自身身份，以保障其专业化、定制化的区域利基市场。这些发现明确表明，丹麦与荷兰港口的数字化及人工智能采纳不仅是技术挑战，更是对港口自我身份认同的策略性重塑及对本体性安全的维护过程。",null,"MAST. Maritime studies\u002FMaritime studies","2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"主题为港口数字化转型，不属于三农、农业信息化、智慧农业、数字乡村或农业科技领域，故不进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21],"智慧港口",[],{"status":24,"locked":14,"version":25,"method":26,"evidence":27},"needs_review","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":28,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":43},[29,37],{"code":30,"score":31,"supported":32,"title":33,"abstract":34,"tags":36},"I2",3,true,[],[35],"decision support",[],{"code":38,"score":31,"supported":32,"title":39,"abstract":40,"tags":42},"I7",[],[41],"研究方法",[],"农业相关性需要复核",[],"Navigatingthedigitaldisruption:anontolog-1407",1,"10.1007\u002Fs40152-026-00513-9",{"doi":47,"openalex_id":49,"authors":50,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":60,"card":61,"direction":67,"ingested_from":68},"W7204933760",[51,54,57],{"name":52,"orcid":53},"Maitrayee Mullick","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7159-1715",{"name":55,"orcid":56},"Nelson F. Coelho","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5287-2538",{"name":58,"orcid":59},"Carolijn van Noort","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8459-8860","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Fcontent\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1007\u002Fs40152-026-00513-9.pdf",{"tldr":62,"method":63,"finding":64,"direction":65,"opportunity":66},"研究荷兰和丹麦港口在数字化和AI转型中如何维护本体安全与身份认同。","基于Pratt关系本体安全理论，采用PRISMA报告和演绎内容分析的文档比较案例","港口数字化不仅是技术挑战，更是战略性地重建自我身份以维持本体安全，荷兰寻求全球标准，丹麦保持区域特色","数字乡村与农业信息化","可延伸至农业领域，研究农业组织在数字化转型中如何维护身份认同与本体安全，探索不同区域策略。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-02T23:30:12.101986Z",{"total":15,"page":46,"page_size":46,"items":71},[]]