[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1655":3,"related-1655":76},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"primary_topic":22,"secondary_topics":28,"classification":29,"search_phrases":42,"slug":43,"view_count":44,"doi":45,"paper":46,"created_at":75},1655,"Extension Economists: Valued in Mission, Penalized in Practice","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Faepp.70126","ABSTRACT As the public engagement arm of the land‐grant mission, we argue that Extension faculty in US agricultural economics departments face an identity crossroads as they struggle for institutional support. Specifically, we argue that Extension economists function as boundary‐spanning professionals within academic structures that often devalue applied engagement. Drawing on a 2025 survey of 125 members of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, this study examines how Extension is defined, practiced, and valued across career stages. Responses indicate broad conceptual agreement that Extension serves as a bridge between research and application, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, decision support, and public communication. However, faculty and graduate students differ in how they frame Extension's institutional role. Graduate students describe it as adaptable and stakeholder‐driven, while faculty anchor it in structured, metric‐based frameworks tied to the Cooperative Extension System. Quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate that Extension appointments are perceived as less prestigious than research or research‐teaching roles, exposing persistent status penalties and institutional misalignment in tenure and promotion evaluation. We conclude that current university recognition systems incentivize faculty investments away from Extension and thus require structural changes to advance Extension's part of the tripartite land‐grant mission, particularly in how Extension outputs are evaluated for tenure and promotion.","摘要 作为土地拨赠使命的公众参与分支，我们认为美国农业经济学系的推广教师正面临身份十字路口，因为他们难以获得制度性支持。具体而言，我们认为推广经济学家在学术结构中扮演着跨界专业人士的角色，而这一结构往往贬低应用型参与的价值。基于2025年对农业与应用经济学会125名成员的调查，本研究考察了推广在不同职业阶段如何被定义、实践和评价。回应显示，受访者在概念上广泛认同推广是研究与应用的桥梁，强调利益相关者参与、决策支持和公共沟通。然而，教师与研究生在如何界定推广的制度角色上存在差异。研究生将其描述为适应性强且由利益相关者驱动，而教师则将其锚定在合作推广体系下结构化、基于指标的框架中。定量与定性分析表明，推广岗位被认为不如研究或研究-教学岗位有声望，揭示了在终身教职与晋升评估中持续存在的地位惩罚和制度错位。我们得出结论，当前大学认可体系激励教师将投入从推广中转移，因此需要进行结构性变革，以推进推广在土地拨赠三重使命中的部分，特别是在推广成果如何被纳入终身教职与晋升评估方面。",null,"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","2026-09-03T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"主题为美国农业经济学推广教师的职业困境，与国内三农、农业信息化等无关，不进入精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21],"农业经济",{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},"I2","agricultural-ai","农业AI与大模型","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-ai","I",[],{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":33},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":34,"agricultural_evidence":37},[35],{"code":23,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":38,"abstract":39,"tags":41},3,true,[],[40],"decision support",[],[],"ExtensionEconomists:ValuedinMission,Pena-1655",1,"10.1002\u002Faepp.70126",{"doi":45,"openalex_id":47,"authors":48,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":6,"card":67,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7207821510",[49,52,55,58,61,64],{"name":50,"orcid":51},"Trey Malone","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8456-0862",{"name":53,"orcid":54},"Craig Wesley Carpenter","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7511-1168",{"name":56,"orcid":57},"Courtney Bir","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0862-8241",{"name":59,"orcid":60},"Andrew J. Van Leuven","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4563-0770",{"name":62,"orcid":63},"Rebecca Wasserman-Olin","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3944-3020",{"name":65,"orcid":66},"Wendong Zhang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-1244-3357",{"tldr":68,"method":69,"finding":70,"direction":71,"opportunity":72},"调查美国农业经济学系推广教师的身份困境与制度支持问题。","2025年对125名农业与应用经济学协会成员的调查，定量与定性分析。","推广职位被视为不如研究职位有威望，晋升评价存在地位惩罚。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究如何改革推广人员的晋升评价体系，以提升其制度支持与职业吸引力。","农业人工智能与决策模型","openalex","2026-09-04T23:30:58.479101Z",{"total":77,"page":44,"page_size":77,"items":78},6,[79,219,282,345,397,448],{"id":80,"title":81,"url":82,"summary":83,"summary_zh":84,"content":9,"source_name":85,"source_url":82,"published_at":86,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":87,"score_detail":88,"sources":93,"tags":95,"primary_topic":99,"secondary_topics":100,"classification":106,"search_phrases":188,"slug":191,"view_count":44,"doi":192,"paper":193,"created_at":218},1528,"AI-driven agricultural economics and farm decision support systems","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.33545\u002F26174693.2026.v10.i9sa.9803","AI is bringing transformational change to agricultural economics by facilitating data-driven decision-making in farm production, resource management, financial planning, and marketing. The combination of the recent advances in machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), computer vision, Internet of Things (IoT), remote sensing (RS), robotics, cloud computing, and big data analytics has enabled Farm Decision Support Systems (FDSS) for enhancing crop management, input-use efficiency, decreasing production cost, and increasing profit. AI-based systems also facilitate crop choice, irrigation and nutrient management, pests and diseases forecasting, yield prediction, price forecasting and market analysis, helping to reduce production risk under climate and market uncertainties. Novel technologies such as generative AI, Large Language Models, digital twins, blockchain, reinforcement learning and explainable AI further enhance decision accuracy, automation and supply chain transparency. AI is also advancing climate-smart agriculture through precision input management, diminished use of resources and GHG emissions, and enhanced climate variability resiliency. Nevertheless, adoption is still limited by lack of digital infrastructure, poor data quality, high cost of implementation, limited technical capacity, algorithmic transparency and data governance issues, particularly in developing countries. This review focuses on and recent advances in AI-enhanced agricultural economics and FDSS, highlighting key technologies, economic model applications, implementation challenges, ethical issues, and future research directions. To summarize, responsible AI deployment can enable economically feasible, climate-resilient, environmentally sustainable agriculture, promote food security, and advance evidence-based agricultural policy making.","人工智能正在通过促进农业生产、资源管理、财务规划和市场营销中的数据驱动决策，为农业经济学带来变革性影响。机器学习（ML）、深度学习（DL）、计算机视觉、物联网（IoT）、遥感（RS）、机器人技术、云计算和大数据分析等领域的最新进展相结合，推动了农场决策支持系统（FDSS）的发展，以增强作物管理、提高投入品利用效率、降低生产成本并增加利润。基于人工智能的系统还有助于作物选择、灌溉与养分管理、病虫害预测、产量预测、价格预测及市场分析，从而在气候和市场不确定性下降低生产风险。生成式人工智能、大语言模型、数字孪生、区块链、强化学习和可解释人工智能等新兴技术进一步提升了决策准确性、自动化水平及供应链透明度。人工智能还通过精准投入管理、减少资源使用和温室气体排放以及增强对气候变异的适应能力，推进了气候智慧型农业的发展。然而，其应用仍受到数字基础设施缺乏、数据质量差、实施成本高、技术能力有限、算法透明度不足以及数据治理问题等因素的限制，尤其是在发展中国家。本综述聚焦于人工智能增强型农业经济学和FDSS的最新进展，重点介绍关键技术、经济模型应用、实施挑战、伦理问题及未来研究方向。总之，负责任地部署人工智能能够实现经济可行、气候适应性强、环境可持续的农业，促进粮食安全，并推动基于证据的农业政策制定。","International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research","2026-09-01T00:00:00Z",71,{"impact":89,"substance":90,"depth":89,"authority":91,"freshness":36,"relevant":44,"comment":92},18,20,12,"综述AI在农业经济与决策支持中的应用，内容系统全面，但时效性较低，适合作为深度参考。",[94],{"name":85,"url":82},[96,97,21,98],"智慧农业","农业人工智能","决策支持系统",{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},[101],{"code":102,"slug":103,"name":104,"path":105,"parent_code":27},"I5","agricultural-iot","物联网传感与边缘计算","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-iot",{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":107},{"candidates":108,"agricultural_evidence":37},[109,120,128,136,143,150,157,164,170,176,182],{"code":23,"score":110,"supported":37,"title":111,"abstract":112,"tags":119},19,[40],[113,114,115,116,117,118,40],"深度学习","机器学习","计算机视觉","machine learning","deep learning","computer vision",[97,98],{"code":102,"score":121,"supported":37,"title":122,"abstract":123,"tags":127},9,[],[124,125,126],"物联网","internet of things","IoT",[],{"code":129,"score":130,"supported":37,"title":131,"abstract":132,"tags":135},"I1",7,[],[133,134],"数字孪生","smart agriculture",[96],{"code":137,"score":77,"supported":37,"title":138,"abstract":139,"tags":142},"A8",[],[140,141],"粮食安全","food security",[],{"code":144,"score":77,"supported":37,"title":145,"abstract":146,"tags":149},"H3",[],[147,148],"灌溉","irrigation",[],{"code":151,"score":77,"supported":37,"title":152,"abstract":153,"tags":156},"I3",[],[154,155],"遥感","remote sensing",[],{"code":158,"score":77,"supported":37,"title":159,"abstract":160,"tags":163},"J1",[],[161,162],"农业政策","agricultural policy",[],{"code":165,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":166,"abstract":167,"tags":169},"B7",[],[168],"温室",[],{"code":171,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":172,"abstract":173,"tags":175},"F3",[],[174],"养分管理",[],{"code":177,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":178,"abstract":179,"tags":181},"H7",[],[180],"气候适应",[],{"code":183,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":184,"abstract":185,"tags":187},"H8",[],[186],"sustainable agriculture",[],[189,190],"农业人工智能 决策支持系统 农业经济 智慧农业","农业人工智能 决策支持系统","农业人工智能决策支持系统农业经济智慧农业-1528","10.33545\u002F26174693.2026.v10.i9sa.9803",{"doi":192,"openalex_id":194,"authors":195,"venue":85,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":82,"card":212,"direction":217,"ingested_from":74},"W7204987631",[196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210],{"name":197,"orcid":9},"Arkit Saha",{"name":199,"orcid":9},"M. S. Lokesh",{"name":201,"orcid":9},"Katuri Ramya Sri",{"name":203,"orcid":9},"Anurag Chaturvedi",{"name":205,"orcid":9},"Reshma K",{"name":207,"orcid":9},"Devansh .",{"name":209,"orcid":9},"Shiv Lal Kumawat",{"name":211,"orcid":9},"Soumyadeep Thakur",{"tldr":213,"method":214,"finding":215,"direction":73,"opportunity":216},"综述AI在农业经济学和农场决策支持系统中的应用，涵盖技术、挑战与未来方向。","综述近年AI技术（ML、DL、CV、IoT、RS等）在农业经济与FDSS中的进展","AI可提升决策精度与效率，但受基础设施、数据质量等限制，需负责任部署。","可研究生成式AI与数字孪生在农业决策中的实际应用，以及发展中国家数据治理与可解释性挑战。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-03T23:30:13.253958Z",{"id":220,"title":221,"url":222,"summary":223,"summary_zh":224,"content":9,"source_name":225,"source_url":222,"published_at":226,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":227,"score_detail":228,"sources":232,"tags":234,"primary_topic":238,"secondary_topics":244,"classification":246,"search_phrases":262,"slug":265,"view_count":15,"doi":266,"paper":267,"created_at":281},5592,"Evaluation of Concept-Rank Collapse Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Low-Label Regimes: An Interpretability Capacity Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Selectivity","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193","Concept-based interpretability methods for plant-disease classifiers are typically evaluated by whether their concept activations correlate with human-annotated labels, but this criterion is silent on a prior question: whether the classifier's internal representation retains enough concept-rank structure for any audit to be informative. the present analysis formalises that prior question as an interpretability capacity bound. A classifier is modelled as a concept-rank operator whose singular values govern how much concept-level signal survives the projection from pixel space to class logits, and a collapse audit is defined as the ratio of retained concept-rank energy to total concept energy. Under a low-label regime, where concept annotations are scarce and the audit must be estimated from few labelled examples, the bound predicts that audit reliability degrades as a function of the concept-rank spectrum and the label budget. The analysis is a theoretical and methodological contribution: it derives the bound, states the conditions under which a collapse audit is identifiable, and characterises the operating characteristics of the audit as a decision procedure under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64). Power was estimated across 2000 design cells for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 52 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The bound reframes concept audits as capacity tests rather than fidelity tests, with consequences for how smallholder fungicide-selectivity decisions should be supported by interpretable disease classifiers.","面向植物病害分类器的基于概念的可解释性方法，通常以其概念激活是否与人工标注标签相关作为评价标准，但该标准对一个更先前的问题保持沉默：分类器的内部表征是否保留了足够的概念秩结构，从而使任何审计具有信息量。本分析将该先前问题形式化为一个可解释性容量上界。分类器被建模为概念秩算子，其奇异值支配着从像素空间到类别logits的投影中概念级信号得以保留的程度，并将坍缩审计定义为保留的概念秩能量与总概念能量之比。在低标签情形下，概念标注稀缺且审计必须由少量标注样本估计，该上界预测审计可靠性会随概念秩谱和标签预算的函数而退化。本分析是一项理论和方法论贡献：推导出该上界，陈述坍缩审计可识别的条件，并在声明的方差结构（簇间SD = 6.0，残差SD = 4.5，组内相关系数 = 0.64）下刻画审计作为决策程序的操作特征。在2000个设计单元中，针对簇数为8、16、24和32以及效应量为3、5和8个百分点的情形估计了功效；在80%功效下达到5个百分点需要52个簇。该上界将概念审计重新框定为容量检验而非保真度检验，并对可解释病害分类器应如何支持小农杀菌剂选择性决策具有启示意义。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",69,{"impact":229,"substance":230,"depth":89,"authority":91,"freshness":13,"relevant":44,"comment":231},8,21,"理论方法论文，提出可解释性容量上界并给出审计功效分析，对智慧农业病害识别可信度有参考价值，但属小众方法学研究、缺乏田间实证，暂不宜进入每日精选。",[233],{"name":225,"url":222},[96,97,235,236,237],"小农户","植物病害识别","可解释性",{"code":239,"slug":240,"name":241,"path":242,"parent_code":243},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[245],{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":247},{"candidates":248,"agricultural_evidence":37},[249,254,258],{"code":239,"score":91,"supported":37,"title":250,"abstract":252,"tags":253},[251],"smallholder",[251],[235],{"code":23,"score":13,"supported":37,"title":255,"abstract":256,"tags":257},[118],[],[97,236],{"code":129,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":259,"abstract":260,"tags":261},[],[],[96],[263,264],"农业人工智能 植物病害识别 可解释性 智慧农业","农业人工智能 植物病害识别","农业人工智能植物病害识别可解释性智慧农业-5592","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193",{"doi":266,"openalex_id":268,"authors":269,"venue":225,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":222,"card":276,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7223137323",[270,272,274],{"name":271,"orcid":9},"Akshay Ramgoolam",{"name":273,"orcid":9},"Priya Bundhoo Appadoo",{"name":275,"orcid":9},"Jean-Noël LEspérance",{"tldr":277,"method":278,"finding":279,"direction":73,"opportunity":280},"提出可解释性容量上界，评估低标签下概念秩崩溃审计的可靠性。","将分类器建模为概念秩算子，推导容量上界并做2000格功效模拟。","审计可靠性随概念秩谱与标签预算下降；5个百分点效应需52个聚类达80%功效。","可将容量上界用于小农户杀菌剂选择性决策的可解释模型审计与标签预算设计。","2026-10-22T11:21:10.425290Z",{"id":283,"title":284,"url":285,"summary":286,"summary_zh":287,"content":9,"source_name":225,"source_url":285,"published_at":226,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":227,"score_detail":288,"sources":291,"tags":293,"primary_topic":297,"secondary_topics":301,"classification":303,"search_phrases":327,"slug":330,"view_count":15,"doi":331,"paper":332,"created_at":344},5591,"Hierarchical Conformal Risk Control for Artificial Intelligence Agriculture Irrigation Scheduling Under Unmodeled Infiltration: A Computer Safety-Guarantee Evaluation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23543665","Irrigation scheduling algorithms that rely on soil-moisture forecasts are vulnerable to unmodeled infiltration, the process by which water bypasses the root zone through preferential pathways that resistance-based soil models cannot represent. The framework is evaluated through a replication-based design study that characterises the operating characteristics of the before-after-control-impact estimator used to audit scheduler performance, under a declared variance structure with between-cluster standard deviation 6.0, residual standard deviation 4.5 and intraclass correlation 0.64. Power was estimated across 2000 design cells spanning cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The analysis indicates that 54 clusters are required to detect a 5-percentage-point effect at 80% power, and that the minimum detectable effect declines steeply as cluster count rises from 8 to 32. The contribution is a formal safety guarantee for irrigation decision support that remains valid when the infiltration model is wrong, together with an audit design that makes the guarantee empirically checkable.","依赖土壤湿度预报的灌溉调度算法容易受到未建模入渗的影响，即水分通过优先路径绕过根区的过程，而基于阻力的土壤模型无法表征这一过程。该框架通过一项基于重复的设计研究进行评估，该研究刻画了用于审计调度器性能的前后对照影响估计量的运行特性，其所依据的声明方差结构为：组间标准差6.0、残差标准差4.5、组内相关系数0.64。功效估计覆盖2000个设计单元，涵盖聚类数8、16、24和32以及效应量3、5和8个百分点。分析表明，在80%功效下检测5个百分点效应需要54个聚类，且最小可检测效应随聚类数从8增至32而急剧下降。本文的贡献在于为灌溉决策支持提供了一种正式的安全保证，该保证在入渗模型错误时仍然有效，同时提出了一种使该保证可经实证检验的审计设计。",{"impact":229,"substance":289,"depth":89,"authority":91,"freshness":121,"relevant":44,"comment":290},22,"该研究提出在入渗模型失配条件下仍有效的灌溉决策安全保证框架，并给出可审计的试验设计，方法新颖、结论可靠，但属细分方法学研究，产业影响有限，适合作为专业精选而非头条。",[292],{"name":225,"url":285},[96,97,294,295,296],"灌溉决策","安全保证","试验设计",{"code":144,"slug":148,"name":298,"path":299,"parent_code":300},"水资源与灌溉","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Firrigation","H",[302],{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":304},{"candidates":305,"agricultural_evidence":37},[306,311,316,323],{"code":144,"score":307,"supported":37,"title":308,"abstract":309,"tags":310},15,[148],[147,148],[294],{"code":23,"score":91,"supported":37,"title":312,"abstract":314,"tags":315},[313],"artificial intelligence",[40],[97],{"code":317,"score":77,"supported":37,"title":318,"abstract":319,"tags":322},"H2",[],[320,321],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":129,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":324,"abstract":325,"tags":326},[],[],[96],[328,329],"灌溉调度 安全保证","农业人工智能 安全保证 智慧农业 灌溉决策","灌溉调度安全保证-5591","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23543665",{"doi":331,"openalex_id":333,"authors":334,"venue":225,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":285,"card":339,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7223131205",[335,337],{"name":336,"orcid":9},"Nassima Benkhelifa",{"name":338,"orcid":9},"Yacine Aït Ahmed",{"tldr":340,"method":341,"finding":342,"direction":73,"opportunity":343},"提出分层保形风险控制，为未建模入渗下的灌溉调度提供安全保证。","分层保形风险控制与基于重复设计的BACI审计，2000个设计单元功效分析。","检测5个百分点效应需54个集群，最小可检测效应随集群数增加陡降。","可将保形风险控制扩展到其他未建模扰动下的农业决策安全保证与审计设计。","2026-10-22T11:21:10.283561Z",{"id":346,"title":347,"url":348,"summary":349,"summary_zh":350,"content":9,"source_name":225,"source_url":348,"published_at":226,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":351,"score_detail":352,"sources":354,"tags":356,"primary_topic":359,"secondary_topics":360,"classification":362,"search_phrases":377,"slug":380,"view_count":15,"doi":381,"paper":382,"created_at":396},5590,"Evaluation of Concept-Probe Temporal-Stability Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Seasonal Phenology Drift: An Interpretability Decay Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Timing","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234","Concept-probe audits are increasingly used to certify that a crop-disease classifier's internal representations track the pathological concepts a smallholder would act on, but a probe certified at one point in the season may silently decouple from those concepts as phenology shifts the visual statistics of the field. the present analysis treats that decoupling as a formal object. It defines a temporal-stability audit as a sequence of concept-probe accuracies measured across defined phenological windows, and it derives an interpretability decay bound: the rate at which probe accuracy can fall before the fungicide-timing decision it is meant to support becomes unreliable. The bound is expressed as a function of the probe's initial margin, the drift in concept prevalence between windows, and the classifier's sensitivity to the drifted features, and it yields a certified audit interval rather than a single-point certificate. The paper then characterises the operating characteristics of the audit design under a declared variance structure, using a replication-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator with between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5 and intraclass correlation = 0.64. Power was estimated across 2000 design cells over cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 54 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The contribution is a decision-theoretic account of when a concept-probe certificate expires, and a design rule for scheduling re-audits across the season.","概念探针审计（concept-probe audit）日益被用于验证作物病害分类器的内部表征是否追踪小农户会据以采取行动的病理学概念，但在生长季某一时点获得认证的探针，可能随着物候变化改变田间的视觉统计特征而悄然与这些概念脱钩。本分析将这种脱钩视为一个形式化对象。它将时间稳定性审计（temporal-stability audit）定义为在既定物候窗口内测量的一系列概念探针准确率，并推导出一个可解释性衰减界限（interpretability decay bound）：即探针准确率在其所支持的杀菌剂施用时机决策变得不可靠之前所能下降的速率。该界限表示为探针初始裕度、窗口间概念流行率漂移以及分类器对漂移特征敏感度的函数，并给出一个经认证的审计区间而非单点认证。随后，本文在声明的方差结构下刻画该审计设计的运行特征，采用基于重复的前后对照影响估计量评估，其中组间标准差 = 6.0、残差标准差 = 4.5、组内相关系数 = 0.64。功效在 2000 个设计单元上估计，聚类数取 8、16、24 和 32，效应量取 3、5 和 8 个百分点；在 80% 功效下达到 5 个百分点需要 54 个聚类。本文的贡献在于从决策论角度阐明概念探针认证何时失效，并给出在整个生长季内安排重新审计的设计规则。",70,{"impact":229,"substance":289,"depth":89,"authority":91,"freshness":13,"relevant":44,"comment":353},"该论文提出概念探针审计的时序稳定性框架与可解释性衰减界，方法新颖、统计设计扎实，但属小众方法论研究，产业影响有限，适合作为专业精选而非头条。",[355],{"name":225,"url":348},[96,97,235,357,358],"作物病害识别","模型审计",{"code":239,"slug":240,"name":241,"path":242,"parent_code":243},[361],{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":363},{"candidates":364,"agricultural_evidence":37},[365,369,373],{"code":239,"score":307,"supported":37,"title":366,"abstract":367,"tags":368},[251],[235,251],[235],{"code":23,"score":13,"supported":37,"title":370,"abstract":371,"tags":372},[118],[],[357,97],{"code":129,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":374,"abstract":375,"tags":376},[],[],[96],[378,379],"概念探针 时序稳定性 作物病害分类器","杀菌剂 施药时机 可解释性衰减","概念探针时序稳定性作物病害分类器-5590","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234",{"doi":381,"openalex_id":383,"authors":384,"venue":225,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":348,"card":391,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7223088030",[385,387,389],{"name":386,"orcid":9},"Abdi-Basid Idriss Farah",{"name":388,"orcid":9},"Amina Abdillahi Guedi",{"name":390,"orcid":9},"Moussa Omar Youssouf",{"tldr":392,"method":393,"finding":394,"direction":73,"opportunity":395},"提出概念探针时间稳定性审计与可解释性衰减界，判断何时需重新审计。","定义跨物候窗口探针精度序列，推导衰减界，用BACI复制评估统计功效。","5个百分点效应需54个聚类达80%功效，审计证书会随物候漂移过期。","可将衰减界与再审计调度规则嵌入小农户杀菌剂时机决策支持系统，并验证跨作物泛化。","2026-10-22T11:21:08.978348Z",{"id":398,"title":399,"url":400,"summary":401,"summary_zh":402,"content":9,"source_name":225,"source_url":400,"published_at":226,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":403,"score_detail":404,"sources":407,"tags":409,"primary_topic":412,"secondary_topics":413,"classification":414,"search_phrases":432,"slug":435,"view_count":15,"doi":436,"paper":437,"created_at":447},5589,"Conformal-Risk Evaluation for Artificial Intelligence Agriculture Spray-Nozzle Fault Detection Under Label-Delay Feedback: A Computer Coverage Audit","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23544107","Spray-nozzle fault detection in precision agriculture is a classification problem in which the label that confirms a fault arrives after the spray pass, so the detector must act on unlabelled evidence and its error rate must be certified before the label exists. Conformal prediction offers distribution-free coverage guarantees, but the guarantee is stated for exchangeable calibration and test data, an assumption that label-delayed feedback violates because the calibration set is always older than the deployment set. the present analysis formalises label-delay feedback as a distribution shift in the conformity score and derives a coverage bound for split-conformal fault detectors under that shift. The bound separates the nominal miscoverage rate into an exchangeable component and a delay-induced component that scales with the total variation distance between the calibration and deployment score distributions. A replication-based evaluation of the ['Intercept', 'exposure', 'group', 'severity'] estimator was conducted: 600 data sets of N = 500 were drawn from a declared data-generating process (intercept 12.0, exposure 0.42, group -3.1, severity 1.35, error SD 4.2), and the study characterises the behaviour of the ordinary least squares estimator under the stated process. The estimator recovered the declared coefficients with estimated bias 0.01122 for the intercept and -0.0002 for exposure, root mean squared error 0.9217 and 0.01614 respectively, and empirical coverage of the nominal 95% intervals of 1.0 for both parameters across 600 replications. The coverage audit shows that the delay-induced term, not the exchangeable term, dominates the risk of a conformal spray-nozzle detector, and that the audit procedure can certify a detector before field labels return.","在精准农业中，喷雾喷嘴故障检测是一个分类问题，其中确认故障的标签在喷雾作业结束后才到达，因此检测器必须基于未标记的证据采取行动，并且其错误率必须在标签存在之前得到认证。保形预测（conformal prediction）提供了无分布覆盖保证，但该保证是针对可交换的校准数据和测试数据而言的，而标签延迟反馈违反了这一假设，因为校准集总是比部署集更旧。本分析将标签延迟反馈形式化为一致性分数中的分布偏移，并推导了在该偏移下分裂保形故障检测器的覆盖界。该界将名义错误覆盖 rate 分解为可交换分量和延迟诱导分量，后者随校准与部署分数分布之间的全变差距离而缩放。对 ['Intercept', 'exposure', 'group', 'severity'] 估计器进行了基于重复的评估：从声明的数据生成过程（截距 12.0，暴露 0.42，分组 -3.1，严重程度 1.35，误差标准差 4.2）中抽取了 600 个 N = 500 的数据集，研究刻画了普通最小二乘估计器在所述过程下的行为。该估计器恢复了声明的系数，截距的估计偏差为 0.01122，暴露为 -0.0002，均方根误差分别为 0.9217 和 0.01614，两个参数在 600 次重复中名义 95% 区间的经验覆盖率为 1.0。覆盖审计表明，延迟诱导项而非可交换项主导了保形喷雾喷嘴检测器的风险，并且该审计程序可以在田间标签返回之前对检测器进行认证。",62,{"impact":229,"substance":89,"depth":405,"authority":121,"freshness":13,"relevant":44,"comment":406},17,"论文提出标签延迟下共形预测覆盖界，方法有新意但属预印本、应用面窄，可作为专业补充而非每日精选头条。",[408],{"name":225,"url":400},[96,97,410,411],"精准施药","病虫害监测",{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},[],{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":415},{"candidates":416,"agricultural_evidence":37},[417,421,427],{"code":23,"score":121,"supported":37,"title":418,"abstract":419,"tags":420},[313],[],[97],{"code":129,"score":130,"supported":37,"title":422,"abstract":423,"tags":426},[],[424,425],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[96],{"code":428,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":429,"abstract":430,"tags":431},"F4",[],[],[410],[433,434],"农业人工智能 病虫害监测 智慧农业 精准施药","农业人工智能 病虫害监测","农业人工智能病虫害监测智慧农业精准施药-5589","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23544107",{"doi":436,"openalex_id":438,"authors":439,"venue":225,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":400,"card":442,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7223116087",[440],{"name":441,"orcid":9},"Achieng' Atim Okello",{"tldr":443,"method":444,"finding":445,"direction":73,"opportunity":446},"将标签延迟反馈建模为共形分数分布偏移，推导覆盖率界并审计喷雾喷嘴故障检测器。","分裂共形预测、总变差距离、600次重复模拟（N=500）评估OLS估计。","延迟诱导项而非可交换项主导检测器风险，审计可在田间标签返回前认证检测器。","可将该覆盖率审计框架扩展到其他标签延迟的农业传感器故障检测，并研究延迟分布估计误差对认证的影响。","2026-10-22T11:21:02.845718Z",{"id":449,"title":450,"url":451,"summary":452,"summary_zh":453,"content":9,"source_name":225,"source_url":451,"published_at":226,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":454,"score_detail":455,"sources":457,"tags":459,"primary_topic":461,"secondary_topics":462,"classification":463,"search_phrases":487,"slug":490,"view_count":15,"doi":491,"paper":492,"created_at":503},5588,"Certified Temporal Fusion of Artificial Intelligence Climate Analytics for Crop Failure Early Warning Under Sparse Agricultural Sensors: Error Bounds and Famine Relief Targeting","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545489","Sparse agricultural sensor networks across sub-Saharan Africa leave crop-failure early-warning systems with too little ground observation to support reliable famine relief targeting. The framework treats sensor sparsity as a missing-data problem with a known observation operator and propagates climate-analytics uncertainty through a temporal Kalman-Buys filter whose gain is constrained by a certified risk envelope. Using NASA POWER monthly reanalysis for Accra, Ghana (2000-2023, 312 observations), the analysis establishes a mean temperature of 26.521 C and a warming trend of 0.1622 C per decade, which calibrates the climate-analytics prior. The derived bounds show that relief-targeting error scales with the square root of sensor density and with the Lipschitz constant of the crop-response function, yielding an explicit sensor-placement rule for a target misclassification rate. The contribution is a certified, assumption-explicit bridge between climate analytics and famine relief targeting that states the conditions under which early warning is trustworthy.","撒哈拉以南非洲稀疏的农业传感器网络使得作物歉收预警系统缺乏足够的地面观测数据，难以支撑可靠的饥荒救援目标定位。该框架将传感器稀疏性视为具有已知观测算子的缺失数据问题，并通过时间Kalman-Buys滤波器传播气候分析不确定性，该滤波器的增益受经认证的风险包络约束。利用NASA POWER对加纳阿克拉的月度再分析数据（2000—2023年，312个观测值），分析确定了平均气温为26.521°C、每十年0.1622°C的增暖趋势，据此校准了气候分析先验。推导出的界限表明，救援目标定位误差随传感器密度的平方根以及作物响应函数的Lipschitz常数缩放，从而为目标误分类率给出了明确的传感器布设规则。该研究的贡献在于构建了一个经认证的、假设明确的气候分析与饥荒救援目标定位之间的桥梁，阐明了早期预警可信赖的条件。",74,{"impact":91,"substance":289,"depth":89,"authority":91,"freshness":13,"relevant":44,"comment":456},"该研究提出一种带误差界认证的时序融合方法，用于稀疏传感器条件下的作物歉收预警与饥荒救援瞄准，方法新颖、结论明确，但案例局限于加纳阿克拉，产业影响有限，适合作为技术前沿条目收录。",[458],{"name":225,"url":451},[96,97,140,154,460],"气候分析",{"code":23,"slug":24,"name":25,"path":26,"parent_code":27},[],{"status":30,"locked":14,"version":31,"method":32,"evidence":464},{"candidates":465,"agricultural_evidence":37},[466,470,475,479,483],{"code":23,"score":121,"supported":37,"title":467,"abstract":468,"tags":469},[313],[],[97],{"code":102,"score":36,"supported":37,"title":471,"abstract":472,"tags":474},[],[473],"农业传感",[],{"code":137,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":476,"abstract":477,"tags":478},[],[],[140],{"code":129,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":480,"abstract":481,"tags":482},[],[],[96],{"code":151,"score":44,"supported":14,"title":484,"abstract":485,"tags":486},[],[],[154],[488,489],"NASA POWER 加纳 气候分析","作物歉收 早期预警 传感器","NASAPOWER加纳气候分析-5588","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545489",{"doi":491,"openalex_id":493,"authors":494,"venue":225,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":451,"card":497,"direction":73,"ingested_from":74},"W7223111766",[495],{"name":496,"orcid":9},"Fatima-Zahra El Khattabi",{"tldr":498,"method":499,"finding":500,"direction":501,"opportunity":502},"提出带误差界的时间融合框架，在稀疏传感器下用气候分析预警作物歉收。","卡尔曼-布西滤波+NASA POWER再分析数据，风险包络约束增益。","救济瞄准误差随传感器密度平方根和作物响应Lipschitz常数缩放，给出布点规则。","农业遥感与作物表型","可将该认证误差界框架扩展到多作物多区域，结合卫星遥感弥补地面传感器稀疏。","2026-10-22T11:21:02.682497Z"]