[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3755":3,"related-3755":65},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":30,"classification":31,"search_phrases":49,"slug":52,"view_count":21,"doi":53,"paper":54,"created_at":64},3755,"Crowding-in pathways in inclusive agribusiness partnerships: Towards a heuristic for responsible scaling","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104978","Crowding-in pathways in inclusive agribusiness partnerships: Towards a heuristic for responsible scaling。Agricultural Systems",null,"Agricultural Systems","2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,59,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},8,14,15,13,9,1,"核心期刊论文，提出包容性农业企业合作中“挤入”路径的启发式框架，学术价值明确但偏理论、缺乏中国本土数据，公共传播价值有限。",[24],{"name":9,"url":6},[26,27,28,29],"农业价值链","农业经营主体","包容性农业","负责任规模化",[],{"status":32,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":35},"unclassified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":36,"agricultural_evidence":47,"reason":48},[37,42],{"code":38,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":39,"abstract":40,"tags":41},"G2",[],[],[27],{"code":43,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":44,"abstract":45,"tags":46},"G3",[],[],[26],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[50,51],"农业经营主体 负责任规模化 农业价值链 包容性农业","农业经营主体 负责任规模化","农业经营主体负责任规模化农业价值链包容性农业-3755","10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104978",{"doi":53,"openalex_id":55,"authors":56,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":62,"oa_url":6,"card":8,"direction":8,"ingested_from":63},"W7214643574",[57,60],{"name":58,"orcid":59},"Marijn Faling","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8104-2602",{"name":61,"orcid":8},"Sietze Vellema",0,"openalex","2026-09-29T23:30:04.532391Z",{"total":66,"page":21,"page_size":66,"items":67},5,[68,127,164,236,296],{"id":69,"title":70,"url":71,"summary":72,"summary_zh":73,"content":8,"source_name":74,"source_url":71,"published_at":75,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":76,"score_detail":77,"sources":82,"tags":84,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":89,"classification":90,"search_phrases":104,"slug":107,"view_count":21,"doi":108,"paper":109,"created_at":126},4872,"Forest-food supply chain resilience in mountain outdoor regions: a reconfigurability perspective","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1962537","Introduction Forest-based food supply chains face ecological seasonality, dispersed production, perishability, and uneven transport access. This study examines how organizational capabilities combine to support forest-based food supply-chain resilience (FFSCR) from a reconfigurability perspective. Methods The analysis draws on 409 managerial questionnaires nested within 50 firms in Zhangjiajie, Xishuangbanna, and Changbai Mountain. Measurement quality was evaluated at the respondent level, and construct scores were aggregated to the firm level, supported by ICC(1) values of 0.251–0.342 and ICC(2) values of 0.732–0.809. Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) were applied to examine necessary constraints and sufficient configurations. Results Reconfiguration readiness was the only condition meeting both the substantive and statistical NCA criteria ( d = 0.123, p \u003C 0.001) and the fsQCA necessity criterion (consistency = 0.921; coverage = 0.848). Five intermediate configurations generated high FFSCR, with overall consistency of 0.945 and coverage of 0.883. Reconfiguration readiness appeared in all five configurations, while partner resilience was a core condition in four. Robustness checks using 90th\u002F70th\u002F10th-percentile recalibration reproduced the five configurations (consistency = 0.950; coverage = 0.886) and maintained the necessity of reconfiguration readiness (NCA d = 0.110, p \u003C 0.001; fsQCA consistency = 0.926). Discussion Reconfiguration readiness functions as an enabling constraint rather than a sufficient condition on its own. Relational, agile, financial, flexible, and technological capabilities provide alternative mechanisms through which firms convert readiness into resilient supply-chain performance.","引言 林源食品供应链面临生态季节性、生产分散性、易腐性以及运输可达性不均等挑战。本研究从可重构性视角出发，考察组织能力如何组合以支撑林源食品供应链韧性（forest-based food supply-chain resilience, FFSCR）。方法 分析基于张家界、西双版纳和长白山地区50家企业中嵌套的409份管理者问卷。测量质量在受访者层面进行评估，并将构念得分聚合至企业层面，得到ICC(1)值为0.251–0.342、ICC(2)值为0.732–0.809的支持。采用必要条件分析（Necessary Condition Analysis, NCA）与模糊集定性比较分析（fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, fsQCA）检验必要约束条件与充分组态。结果 可重构准备度是唯一同时满足NCA实质性与统计性标准（d = 0.123, p \u003C 0.001）以及fsQCA必要性标准（一致性 = 0.921；覆盖度 = 0.848）的条件。五种中间组态产生了高FFSCR，总体一致性为0.945，覆盖度为0.883。可重构准备度出现在全部五种组态中，而合作伙伴韧性在四种组态中为核心条件。采用第90\u002F70\u002F10百分位重新校准的稳健性检验复现了这五种组态（一致性 = 0.950；覆盖度 = 0.886），并维持了可重构准备度的必要性（NCA d = 0.110, p \u003C 0.001；fsQCA一致性 = 0.926）。讨论 可重构准备度发挥使能约束的作用，而非自身即为充分条件。关系能力、敏捷能力、财务能力、灵活能力与技术能力提供了替代机制，使企业将准备度转化为韧性供应链绩效。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-13T00:00:00Z",74,{"impact":78,"substance":79,"depth":80,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":81},12,22,18,"基于三地50家企业409份问卷的fsQCA实证研究，方法规范、结论有新意，但属细分领域学术成果，公共影响有限，适合作为专业向精选。",[83],{"name":74,"url":71},[85,86,27,87,88],"供应链韧性","林下经济","fsQCA","森林食品",[],{"status":91,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":92},"needs_review",{"candidates":93,"agricultural_evidence":13,"reason":103},[94,98],{"code":38,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":95,"abstract":96,"tags":97},[],[],[27],{"code":99,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":100,"abstract":101,"tags":102},"G4",[],[],[86],"农业相关性需要复核",[105,106],"张家界 西双版纳 长白山 森林食品","森林食品 供应链韧性 组织能力","张家界西双版纳长白山森林食品-4872","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1962537",{"doi":108,"openalex_id":110,"authors":111,"venue":74,"cited_by_count":62,"oa_url":71,"card":120,"direction":124,"ingested_from":63},"W7221622529",[112,114,116,118],{"name":113,"orcid":8},"Qianlan Chen",{"name":115,"orcid":8},"Huan Liang",{"name":117,"orcid":8},"Xi Deng",{"name":119,"orcid":8},"Yuelin Ren",{"tldr":121,"method":122,"finding":123,"direction":124,"opportunity":125},"基于可重构视角，研究山区林下食品供应链韧性如何由多种组织能力组合形成。","409份管理者问卷、50家企业，用NCA与fsQCA分析必要条件与充分组态。","可重构准备度是唯一必要条件，五条组态路径均含该条件，伙伴韧性在四条中为核心。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将可重构准备度与数字技术能力结合，探索山区林下食品供应链的数字化韧性组态机制。","2026-10-14T23:30:07.087827Z",{"id":128,"title":129,"url":130,"summary":131,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":132,"source_url":8,"published_at":133,"category":134,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":135,"score_detail":136,"sources":138,"tags":140,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":145,"classification":146,"search_phrases":158,"slug":161,"view_count":162,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":163},3109,"河北农林科学院旱作所举办科企(社)集中对接交流活动——24 家经营主体及衡水农商银行代表 60 余人参加 搭建科技金融产业三方联动平台","http:\u002F\u002Fhebnky.com\u002Fjishuzhidaoxinxi.aspx?jszdid=2194","9-18 河北农林科学院旱作所在旱作节水农业试验站举办科企（社）集中对接交流活动，邀请 24 家农业经营主体及衡水农商银行代表共 60 余人参加。与会人员现场观摩秋季作物田间试验，科研人员详细介绍试验进展、技术优势与成果应用情况；座谈交流环节衡水农商银行发布旱作所专属金融服务方案并针对性解读惠农信贷政策与金融产品；各参会主体围绕生产实际难题、产业发展瓶颈逐一交流，并与科研人员现场对接技术需求、探讨解决方案。所长李伟强调科研创新必须紧扣生产实际、贴合产业需求。","河北省农林科学院","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","报道",53,{"impact":12,"substance":19,"depth":12,"authority":78,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":137},"省级科研院所牵头的科企银三方对接活动，有具体参与规模与金融服务方案，属细分行业动态，但为地方性通稿，公共价值有限。",[139],{"name":132,"url":130},[141,142,27,143,144],"成果转化","科企对接","科技金融","旱作节水",[],{"status":32,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":147},{"candidates":148,"agricultural_evidence":47,"reason":48},[149,154],{"code":150,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":151,"abstract":152,"tags":153},"G1",[],[],[141],{"code":38,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":155,"abstract":156,"tags":157},[],[],[27],[159,160],"河北农林科学院 旱作所 科企对接","衡水农商银行 惠农信贷","河北农林科学院旱作所科企对接-3109",2,"2026-09-22T00:05:35.914520Z",{"id":165,"title":166,"url":167,"summary":168,"summary_zh":169,"content":8,"source_name":74,"source_url":167,"published_at":170,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":171,"score_detail":172,"sources":174,"tags":176,"primary_topic":181,"secondary_topics":187,"classification":188,"search_phrases":212,"slug":215,"view_count":193,"doi":216,"paper":217,"created_at":235},2763,"How do productive service inputs enhance a country’s position in the global agricultural value chain?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1887232","Introduction The ongoing restructuring of global agricultural value chains has reshaped the pattern of international agricultural competition. Optimizing countries’ positional structure within production networks and improving domestic value added capture capacity have emerged as central issues for advancing highquality agricultural development across economies. As modern productive services gradually penetrate agricultural production systems, they have evolved into critical endogenous drivers for optimizing agricultural factor allocation and promoting value chain upgrading. Methods Based on panel data of 55 economies from 2001 to 2020, this study employs fixed-effects models, mediation models, and moderation models to systematically explore how productive service inputs affect a country’s positions in the global agricultural value chain and clarify the underlying influencing mechanisms. Results The empirical results show that productive service input significantly improves a country’s agricultural GVC status. Mechanism tests confirm that productive services empower GVC upgrading through two core pathways: improving agricultural labor productivity and facilitating technological innovation. Meanwhile, the promotional effect is positively strengthened by increasing technical complexity in agricultural exports and human capital accumulation. Further heterogeneity analysis verifies evident differences in the empowerment effect across economic development levels, time periods, and GVC participation patterns. Discussion This study concludes that accelerating high quality productive service inputs and matching them with advanced human capital and export technology endowments provides a vital feasible path for countries to enhance their competitive advantages and achieve highvalue upgrading in global agricultural value chains.","引言 全球农业价值链的持续重构重塑了国际农业竞争格局。优化各国在生产网络中的位置结构、提升国内附加值捕获能力，已成为推动各经济体农业高质量发展的核心议题。随着现代生产性服务逐步渗透农业生产体系，其已演变为优化农业要素配置、促进价值链升级的关键内生驱动力。方法 本研究基于2001年至2020年55个经济体的面板数据，采用固定效应模型、中介模型和调节模型，系统探讨生产性服务投入如何影响一国在全球农业价值链中的位置，并阐明其潜在影响机制。结果 实证结果表明，生产性服务投入显著提升了一国的农业全球价值链地位。机制检验证实，生产性服务通过两条核心路径赋能价值链升级：提升农业劳动生产率与促进技术创新。同时，农业出口技术复杂度和人力资本积累的提高正向强化了这一促进效应。进一步的异质性分析验证了赋能效应在经济发展水平、时间段和全球价值链参与模式上存在明显差异。讨论 本研究认为，加快高质量生产性服务投入，并使其与先进人力资本和出口技术禀赋相匹配，为各国增强竞争优势、实现全球农业价值链高价值升级提供了重要的可行路径。","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":80,"substance":79,"depth":80,"authority":19,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":173},"基于55个经济体20年面板数据的实证研究，揭示生产性服务投入通过提升劳动生产率与技术创新推动农业全球价值链升级，结论对农业高质量发展有参考价值。",[175],{"name":74,"url":167},[177,178,26,179,180],"农业科技创新","农产品出口","农业生产性服务","农业人力资本",{"code":182,"slug":183,"name":184,"path":185,"parent_code":186},"J3","global-agriculture","国际合作与全球农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fpolicy\u002Fglobal-agriculture","J",[],{"status":189,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":190},"classified",{"candidates":191,"agricultural_evidence":47},[192,198,203,207],{"code":182,"score":193,"supported":47,"title":194,"abstract":195,"tags":197},3,[],[196],"全球农业",[],{"code":199,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":200,"abstract":201,"tags":202},"E5",[],[],[178],{"code":43,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":204,"abstract":205,"tags":206},[],[],[26],{"code":208,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":209,"abstract":210,"tags":211},"J2",[],[],[177],[213,214],"农业生产性服务 农业人力资本 农业科技创新 农业价值链","农业生产性服务 农业人力资本","农业生产性服务农业人力资本农业科技创新农业价值链-2763","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1887232",{"doi":216,"openalex_id":218,"authors":219,"venue":74,"cited_by_count":62,"oa_url":229,"card":230,"direction":124,"ingested_from":63},"W7213434328",[220,222,224,226],{"name":221,"orcid":8},"Longling Li",{"name":223,"orcid":8},"Xin Bai",{"name":225,"orcid":8},"Yuhan Ren",{"name":227,"orcid":228},"Qiang Jin","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-1581-1759","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1887232\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":231,"method":232,"finding":233,"direction":124,"opportunity":234},"基于55个经济体面板数据，检验生产性服务投入如何提升一国全球农业价值链地位。","2001-2020年55经济体面板数据，固定效应、中介与调节模型。","生产性服务投入通过提升农业劳动生产率和促进技术创新显著提升农业GVC地位。","可探究数字农业服务投入对GVC地位的异质性影响，及与发展中国家数字基础设施的匹配机制。","2026-09-17T23:30:08.429911Z",{"id":237,"title":238,"url":239,"summary":240,"summary_zh":241,"content":8,"source_name":74,"source_url":239,"published_at":170,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":242,"score_detail":243,"sources":247,"tags":249,"primary_topic":254,"secondary_topics":259,"classification":260,"search_phrases":272,"slug":275,"view_count":162,"doi":276,"paper":277,"created_at":295},2758,"Heterogeneous impacts and transmission mechanisms of perceived development barriers on cooperative management performance: micro evidence from Shaanxi, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606","Introduction Farmer cooperatives are key to linking smallholders with modern agriculture, yet how different development barriers affect their management performance remains unclear, as prior studies focus mainly on classifying barriers. Methods Using survey data from 1,130 cooperatives in Shaanxi Province, China, this study applies ordinal logistic regression to examine the heterogeneous effects of perceived development barriers on management performance, with stepwise regression and Sobel tests identifying the mediating role of three management practices (strategic planning, resource investment, operational management). Two-period-lagged operating endowments are controlled to address reverse causality. Results The overall effect of barriers is insignificant, but dimensions differ markedly: resource and institutional barriers significantly reduce performance, whereas product-market and human-resource barriers show no overall effect. Management practices act as a channel—resource and institutional barriers exert a negative full mediating effect, product-market barriers a positive suppression effect, and human-resource barriers no effective pathway. Discussion Resource and institutional barriers are hierarchical: members’ insufficient willingness to contribute capital is the primary performance constraint, followed by land-transfer difficulties, while other policy constraints are common baseline conditions rather than core explanatory factors. Endogeneity and robustness tests support these findings.","引言 农民合作社是连接小农户与现代农业的关键，但不同发展障碍如何影响其经营绩效仍不明确，既有研究主要集中于对障碍进行分类。方法 本研究利用中国陕西省1130家合作社的调查数据，采用有序逻辑回归考察感知发展障碍对经营绩效的异质性影响，并通过逐步回归和Sobel检验识别三种管理实践（战略规划、资源投入、运营管理）的中介作用。为处理反向因果问题，研究控制了两期滞后的经营禀赋。结果 障碍的总体效应不显著，但各维度差异明显：资源障碍和制度障碍显著降低绩效，而产品市场障碍和人力资源障碍未表现出总体效应。管理实践发挥渠道作用——资源障碍和制度障碍产生负向完全中介效应，产品市场障碍产生正向抑制效应，人力资源障碍则无有效路径。讨论 资源障碍和制度障碍具有层级性：成员出资意愿不足是首要绩效约束，其次是土地流转困难，而其他政策约束属于常见基线条件而非核心解释因素。内生性和稳健性检验支持上述发现。",75,{"impact":18,"substance":244,"depth":245,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":246},21,17,"基于陕西1130家合作社微观调查，揭示资源与制度壁垒对经营绩效的异质性影响及管理实践中介机制，样本规模与方法设计扎实，对合作社扶持政策有参考价值。",[248],{"name":74,"url":239},[250,251,252,253,27],"乡村振兴","农业社会化服务","土地流转","农民合作社",{"code":38,"slug":255,"name":256,"path":257,"parent_code":258},"farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":189,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":261},{"candidates":262,"agricultural_evidence":47},[263,268],{"code":38,"score":78,"supported":47,"title":264,"abstract":265,"tags":267},[],[252,253,266],"小农户",[251,27,253,252],{"code":258,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":269,"abstract":270,"tags":271},[],[],[250],[273,274],"农业社会化服务 农业经营主体 农民合作社 乡村振兴","农业社会化服务 农业经营主体","农业社会化服务农业经营主体农民合作社乡村振兴-2758","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606",{"doi":276,"openalex_id":278,"authors":279,"venue":74,"cited_by_count":62,"oa_url":289,"card":290,"direction":124,"ingested_from":63},"W7213418458",[280,283,285,287],{"name":281,"orcid":282},"Shihan Chen","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9790-3174",{"name":284,"orcid":8},"Sihan Jiang",{"name":286,"orcid":8},"Haiyan Wang",{"name":288,"orcid":8},"Jikun Ma","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":291,"method":292,"finding":293,"direction":124,"opportunity":294},"基于陕西1130家合作社调查，分析感知发展障碍对管理绩效的异质性影响及传导机制。","有序Logistic回归、逐步回归与Sobel检验，控制两期滞后经营禀赋。","资源与制度障碍显著降低绩效，管理实践起中介作用，成员出资意愿不足是首要约束。","可探究数字技术能否缓解资源与制度障碍，并优化合作社管理实践的中介路径。","2026-09-17T23:30:08.060675Z",{"id":297,"title":298,"url":299,"summary":300,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":74,"source_url":299,"published_at":301,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":62,"score_detail":302,"sources":304,"tags":306,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":307,"classification":308,"search_phrases":315,"slug":316,"view_count":21,"doi":317,"paper":318,"created_at":338},1245,"Institutional arrangements, social relations, and food loss and waste in Tanzania’s export avocado value chain","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834647","Food loss and waste (FLW) in low- and middle-income countries is often framed as a problem of technical inefficiency, poor infrastructure, or inadequate post-harvest handling. Such explanations, however, give insufficient attention to the institutional arrangements and social relations through which FLW is produced and unevenly distributed. This study examines how governance arrangements, power asymmetries, and risk-allocation practices shape FLW in Tanzania’s export avocado value chain. It draws on multi-sited qualitative research conducted across the Northern and Southern Highlands of Tanzania between 2018 and 2022, supplemented by follow-up interviews in 2024. A total of 114 in-depth interviews were conducted with farmers, exporters, farmer-group representatives, field officers, packhouse actors, and government stakeholders, together with 15 days of go-along participant observation during harvesting, grading, sorting, and packhouse processing. The findings identify four modes of selling relations: contracted out-grower arrangements, direct selling through non-contracted farmer groups, mediated selling through cooperatives and associations, and spot buying or side-selling. Across these arrangements, FLW resulted not only from the material perishability of avocados or failure to meet quality standards, but also from unequal control over harvesting decisions, opaque pricing and grading systems, contract sanctions, selective buying practices, delayed harvesting, and inequitable rejection-sharing mechanisms, and farmers’ own risk-avoidance strategies. The study shows that exporters and buyers often reduced their exposure to market and quality risks by shifting costs and uncertainty onto farmers. Farmers responded through strategies such as side-selling and increasing farmgate weight by harvesting immature fruit or non-exportable avocado varieties, which can generate further losses and waste. By demonstrating that FLW is a material outcome of how power, value, risk, and responsibility are organised within export-oriented horticultural chains, the paper contributes to critical FLW scholarship and calls for interventions that go beyond technical fixes to address transparent pricing and grading, farmer representation, fairer contractual arrangements, strengthened producer organisations and more equitable risk-sharing arrangements across the value chain.","2026-08-25T00:00:00Z",{"impact":62,"substance":62,"depth":62,"authority":62,"freshness":62,"relevant":62,"comment":303},"主题为坦桑尼亚牛油果价值链中的食物损耗与浪费，不涉及中国三农或农业信息化，相关性不足。",[305],{"name":74,"url":299},[26],[],{"status":91,"locked":13,"version":33,"method":34,"evidence":309},{"candidates":310,"agricultural_evidence":13,"reason":103},[311],{"code":43,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":312,"abstract":313,"tags":314},[],[],[26],[],"Institutionalarrangements,socialrelation-1245","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834647",{"doi":317,"openalex_id":319,"authors":320,"venue":74,"cited_by_count":62,"oa_url":331,"card":332,"direction":336,"ingested_from":63},"W7204176867",[321,324,326,329],{"name":322,"orcid":323},"Jonas Cromwell","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0122-2484",{"name":325,"orcid":8},"Stephen Whitfield",{"name":327,"orcid":328},"Megan Blake","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8487-8202",{"name":330,"orcid":8},"Claire Helen Quinn","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834647\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":333,"method":334,"finding":335,"direction":336,"opportunity":337},"研究坦桑尼亚出口牛油果价值链中制度安排与社会关系如何影响食物损失与浪费。","多地点定性研究，2018-2024年114次深度访谈及参与式观察。","FLW源于权力不对称、风险转移及不公平合同，而非仅技术问题。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可探索公平合同与风险共担机制对减少FLW的影响，结合数据驱动决策支持系统。","2026-09-01T04:03:09.452832Z"]