[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4008":3,"related-4008":110},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":30,"primary_topic":36,"secondary_topics":42,"classification":43,"search_phrases":90,"slug":93,"view_count":22,"doi":94,"paper":95,"created_at":109},4008,"Agroecology as a pathway for scaling climate-smart agriculture and strengthening food system resilience in Benin","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087822","Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) is widely promoted to address food insecurity, climate variability, and environmental degradation in sub-Saharan Africa. However, evidence on scalable and context-specific pathways for CSA adoption in smallholder systems remains limited, particularly regarding agroecological transitions. This study assesses agroecology as a pathway for scaling CSA and strengthening food system resilience in three communes of Benin (Dassa-Zoumè, Bohicon and Parakou), examining contributions to the three CSA pillars of adaptation, mitigation and productivity. A mixed-methods design combined a structured household survey (n = 210), semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 32), and secondary agricultural and climate data (2010-2024). A composite resilience index was constructed using principal component analysis (PCA) to compare agroecological and conventional systems. Results show that agroecological farms achieve a 23% higher soil fertility index, a 31% higher resilience capacity, and a 17% reduction in yield variability under climate stress, relative to conventional systems. Crop diversification is 28% higher among agroecological producers, while dependence on synthetic inputs declines by up to 40%, improving system stability and adaptive capacity. Despite these benefits, scaling remains constrained by limited access to climate information services (reported by 35% of respondents), weak extension coverage (30%), and low access to climate finance (20%). The study concludes that agroecology provides a robust, evidence-based pathway for scaling CSA in Benin, and that strengthening digital climate services, extension systems and inclusive climate finance is critical to accelerate resilient and sustainable agricultural transformation in West Africa.","气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）被广泛推广以应对撒哈拉以南非洲的粮食不安全、气候变异和环境退化问题。然而，关于小农系统中可规模化且因地制宜的CSA采纳路径的证据仍然有限，尤其是在农业生态转型方面。本研究评估了农业生态学作为贝宁三个市镇（Dassa-Zoumè、Bohicon和Parakou）推广CSA和增强粮食系统韧性的路径，考察其对CSA三大支柱——适应、减缓和生产力——的贡献。研究采用混合方法设计，结合了结构化农户调查（n = 210）、关键信息人半结构化访谈（n = 32）以及二手农业和气候数据（2010—2024年）。通过主成分分析（PCA）构建了综合韧性指数，以比较农业生态体系与常规体系。结果表明，相较于常规体系，农业生态农场实现了更高的土壤肥力指数（提高23%）、更强的韧性能力（提高31%），并在气候胁迫下将产量变异性降低了17%。农业生态生产者的作物多样化程度高出28%，而对合成投入品的依赖下降了多达40%，从而提升了系统稳定性和适应能力。尽管有这些益处，规模化推广仍受到气候信息服务获取有限（35%的受访者报告）、推广覆盖薄弱（30%）以及气候融资获取不足（20%）的制约。研究结论认为，农业生态学为在贝宁推广CSA提供了一条稳健的、基于证据的路径，而加强数字气候服务、推广体系和包容性气候融资对于加速西非韧性和可持续农业转型至关重要。",null,"Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Journal","2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","论文",40,false,77,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},16,22,18,13,8,1,"基于贝宁三省210户调查的混合方法研究，量化了生态农业对气候智慧型农业三大支柱的贡献，数据扎实、结论明确，对西非及类似小农体系有参考价值，但属区域性学术成果，公共影响层级有限。",[25,26,28],{"name":10,"url":6},{"name":10,"url":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087821",{"name":10,"url":29},"https:\u002F\u002Fjournals.unizik.edu.ng\u002Findex\u002Farticle\u002Fview\u002F9044",[31,32,33,34,35],"小农户","气候智慧型农业","生态农业","粮食系统韧性","气候信息服务",{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[],{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":47},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":48,"agricultural_evidence":51},[49,57,64,72,79,85],{"code":37,"score":50,"supported":51,"title":52,"abstract":54,"tags":56},14,true,[53],"agroecology",[55,53],"农业生态",[],{"code":58,"score":59,"supported":51,"title":60,"abstract":62,"tags":63},"I1",11,[61],"smart agriculture",[61],[],{"code":65,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":67,"abstract":68,"tags":71},"H2",6,[],[69,70],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":73,"score":74,"supported":51,"title":75,"abstract":76,"tags":78},"G2",4,[],[77],"smallholder",[31],{"code":80,"score":74,"supported":51,"title":81,"abstract":82,"tags":84},"H8",[],[83],"可持续农业",[33],{"code":86,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":87,"abstract":88,"tags":89},"H7",[],[],[32],[91,92],"贝宁 生态农业 气候智慧型农业","西非 小农户 粮食系统韧性","贝宁生态农业气候智慧型农业-4008","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087822",{"doi":94,"openalex_id":96,"authors":97,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":6,"card":101,"direction":107,"ingested_from":108},"W7215033617",[98],{"name":99,"orcid":9},"Maanzou Boukari",0,{"tldr":102,"method":103,"finding":104,"direction":105,"opportunity":106},"评估贝宁农业生态学作为气候智慧型农业推广路径，提升食物系统韧性。","混合方法：210户调查、32位关键信息人访谈、2010-2024年数据及PCA韧","农业生态农场土壤肥力高23%、韧性高31%、产量波动低17%，但推广受气候信息、推广服务和资金限制。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究数字气候信息服务与包容性气候融资如何协同破解农业生态转型的推广瓶颈。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-10-02T23:30:11.597021Z",{"total":66,"page":22,"page_size":66,"items":111},[112,183,286,378,459,512],{"id":113,"title":114,"url":115,"summary":116,"summary_zh":117,"content":9,"source_name":118,"source_url":115,"published_at":119,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":120,"is_selected":14,"score":121,"score_detail":122,"sources":126,"tags":128,"primary_topic":133,"secondary_topics":134,"classification":135,"search_phrases":156,"slug":159,"view_count":100,"doi":160,"paper":161,"created_at":182},4980,"Creating common ground: integrating transformative agroecology and extension research in undergraduate education","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768","This paper examines the Agroecology Extension (AX) summer Research Fellowship at the University of Vermont, a 5-year USDA-funded undergraduate program that intentionally integrated extension research with agroecology education within a land-grant university context. Drawing on predominantly qualitative evaluation of five cohorts (2021–2025, n = 47), we identify enabling and constraining pedagogical factors for creating common ground between two domains that remain institutionally separated at most land-grant universities. The study contributes to the emerging signature pedagogy for sustainable food systems education by documenting how three interconnected pedagogical dynamics—integrating political agroecology with extension, centering equity as a sustained commitment, and supporting participatory knowledge co-creation with students—shaped program design and evolution across 5 years. Findings demonstrate that transformative education at the intersection of agroecology and extension requires explicit engagement with the political dimensions of agroecology and extension history, relational infrastructure for equity work, and deliberate structures for co-learning. This case study offers practical pedagogical insights for land-grant universities seeking to develop sustainable programs that bridge agroecology and extension while preparing graduates to address complex agricultural and food systems challenges.","本文考察了佛蒙特大学的农业生态学推广（Agroecology Extension, AX）暑期研究奖学金项目。该项目由美国农业部资助，为期五年，是一项本科生项目，在赠地大学（land-grant university）语境下有意将推广研究与农业生态学教育相结合。基于对五届学员（2021—2025年，n = 47）的以定性为主的评估，我们识别了在大多数赠地大学中仍处于制度性分离状态的两个领域之间建立共同基础（common ground）的促进性与制约性教学因素。本研究通过记录三种相互关联的教学动态——将政治农业生态学与推广相结合、将公平作为持续承诺加以中心化、以及支持与学生共同进行参与式知识共创——如何在五年间塑造了项目设计与演变，为可持续食物系统教育的新兴标志性教学法（signature pedagogy）作出了贡献。研究结果表明，在农业生态学与推广的交汇处开展变革性教育，需要明确介入农业生态学的政治维度与推广历史、建立支持公平工作的关系性基础设施，以及为共同学习设计有意的制度结构。本案例研究为那些寻求开发可持续项目、以弥合农业生态学与推广之间鸿沟、同时培养毕业生应对复杂农业与食物系统挑战的赠地大学提供了实践性教学启示。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",10,65,{"impact":21,"substance":19,"depth":123,"authority":20,"freshness":124,"relevant":22,"comment":125},17,9,"美国赠地大学农业生态学与推广教育融合的五年期本科项目案例研究，方法扎实但属境外教育实践，对国内三农信息化仅有间接参考价值。",[127],{"name":118,"url":115},[129,130,131,33,132],"可持续食物系统","农业教育","农业推广","参与式研究",{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},[],{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":136},{"candidates":137,"agricultural_evidence":51},[138,142,147,152],{"code":37,"score":50,"supported":51,"title":139,"abstract":140,"tags":141},[53],[55,53],[],{"code":143,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":144,"abstract":145,"tags":146},"E2",[],[],[129],{"code":148,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":149,"abstract":150,"tags":151},"G1",[],[],[131],{"code":80,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":153,"abstract":154,"tags":155},[],[],[33],[157,158],"佛蒙特大学 农业推广 生态农业","可持续食物系统 参与式研究 农业推广 农业教育","佛蒙特大学农业推广生态农业-4980","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768",{"doi":160,"openalex_id":162,"authors":163,"venue":118,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":175,"card":176,"direction":180,"ingested_from":108},"W7221806502",[164,167,170,172],{"name":165,"orcid":166},"Karen L. Nordstrom","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-4326-3854",{"name":168,"orcid":169},"Victor M. Izzo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0254-1105",{"name":171,"orcid":9},"Emily Hoyler",{"name":173,"orcid":174},"V. Ernesto Méndez","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7394-5679","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":177,"method":178,"finding":179,"direction":180,"opportunity":181},"评估佛蒙特大学五年农业生态推广暑期研究奖学金，探索如何整合农业生态学与推广教育。","对2021-2025年五届47名学员进行定性评估，分析教学促进与制约因素。","需明确参与农业生态政治维度、建立公平关系基础设施和共同学习结构。","其他","可研究此类跨学科体验式教育对毕业生推广实践与农业系统转型的长期影响。","2026-10-15T23:30:06.661415Z",{"id":184,"title":185,"url":186,"summary":187,"summary_zh":188,"content":9,"source_name":189,"source_url":186,"published_at":190,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":120,"is_selected":14,"score":191,"score_detail":192,"sources":195,"tags":197,"primary_topic":202,"secondary_topics":208,"classification":216,"search_phrases":258,"slug":261,"view_count":100,"doi":262,"paper":263,"created_at":285},4570,"Agroecological practices, perceived benefits, and determinants of adoption in the Yayu Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve, Southwest Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4","Agroecology offers a promising pathway for reconciling forest conservation with rural livelihoods in biodiversity-rich tropical landscapes, yet empirical evidence on the breadth, intensity, and determinants of adoption remains limited, particularly in UNESCO biosphere reserves. This study investigates agroecological practices, perceived contributions, and determinants of adoption in the Yayu Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve (YCFBR), Southwest Ethiopia. A cross-sectional concurrent mixed-methods design was employed, combining 293 randomly selected households, complemented by key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations. Binary logistic regression identified determinants of adoption (extensive margin), while ordinal logistic regression examined adoption intensity using the Agroecological Adoption Index (AAI) (intensive margin). Number of Practices Adopted (NPA), Weighted Adoption Intensity (WAI), and Duration of Adoption (DUR) provided complementary insights into adoption breadth, intensity, and persistence. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically to contextualize quantitative findings. Results showed that 72% of households adopted at least one agroecological practice, including coffee agroforestry, homegarden agroforestry, soil and water conservation, climate-smart agriculture, intercropping, crop rotation, mixed tree planting, afforestation and reforestation, organic soil fertility management, and biological pest and disease management. Adoption intensity varied: 34.6% low, 41.2% moderate, and 24.2% high. Practices were perceived to improve soil fertility, biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, forest management, and livelihood diversification while reducing pressure on natural forests and strengthening ecological connectivity and adaptive capacity. Sex, education, farm size, extension services, training, credit access, and cooperative membership significantly determined adoption and intensity, whereas age, household size, farming experience, and distance to forest were non-significant. Agroecology provides a multifunctional, context-specific pathway for advancing sustainable forest management, biodiversity conservation, and livelihood resilience. Strengthening agroecology-oriented extension, gender-responsive training, access to finance, indigenous knowledge integration, and policy mainstreaming are essential for long-term environmental sustainability and community resilience in the YCFBR and comparable forest-dependent landscapes.","农业生态学为在生物多样性丰富的热带景观中协调森林保护与农村生计提供了一条有前景的路径，但关于其采用广度、强度及决定因素的实证证据仍然有限，尤其是在联合国教科文组织生物圈保护区中。本研究调查了埃塞俄比亚西南部亚尤咖啡森林生物圈保护区（YCFBR）的农业生态实践、感知贡献及采用决定因素。研究采用横断面同步混合方法设计，结合293户随机选取的家庭，并辅以关键知情人访谈、焦点小组讨论和实地观察。二元逻辑回归识别了采用的决定因素（外延边际），而有序逻辑回归则使用农业生态采用指数（AAI）考察了采用强度（内涵边际）。采用实践数量（NPA）、加权采用强度（WAI）和采用持续时间（DUR）为采用广度、强度和持续性提供了补充性见解。定性数据采用主题分析法，以对定量发现进行情境化解释。结果表明，72%的家庭至少采用了一项农业生态实践，包括咖啡农林复合、家庭园圃农林复合、水土保持、气候智能型农业、间作、轮作、混合植树、植树造林和再造林、有机土壤肥力管理以及生物病虫害管理。采用强度存在差异：低度34.6%、中度41.2%、高度24.2%。受访者认为这些实践改善了土壤肥力、生物多样性保护、气候韧性、森林管理和生计多样化，同时减轻了对天然森林的压力，并增强了生态连通性和适应能力。性别、教育程度、农场规模、推广服务、培训、信贷获取和合作社成员资格显著决定了采用及采用强度，而年龄、家庭规模、耕作经验和距森林距离则不显著。农业生态学为推进可持续森林管理、生物多样性保护和生计韧性提供了一条多功能、因地制宜的路径。加强面向农业生态学的推广、性别响应型培训、融资渠道、本土知识整合和政策主流化，对于YCFBR及类似依赖森林的地区实现长期环境可持续性和社区韧性至关重要。","Discover Environment","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",73,{"impact":193,"substance":18,"depth":123,"authority":20,"freshness":124,"relevant":22,"comment":194},12,"基于293户调查的实证研究，数据扎实、结论具体，对热带林区农业生态化与咖啡产业可持续发展有参考价值，但属区域性案例研究，公共影响层级有限。",[196],{"name":189,"url":186},[198,199,33,200,201],"可持续生计","咖啡产业","农林复合经营","生物多样性保护",{"code":203,"slug":204,"name":205,"path":206,"parent_code":207},"B3","tea-coffee","茶叶与咖啡","\u002Ftopic\u002Fhorticulture\u002Ftea-coffee","B",[209,215],{"code":210,"slug":211,"name":212,"path":213,"parent_code":214},"A7","forage-cropping","饲草与耕作制度","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fforage-cropping","A",{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":217},{"candidates":218,"agricultural_evidence":51},[219,226,234,240,244,250,254],{"code":203,"score":220,"supported":51,"title":221,"abstract":223,"tags":225},15,[222],"coffee",[224,222],"咖啡",[199],{"code":210,"score":124,"supported":51,"title":227,"abstract":228,"tags":233},[],[229,230,231,232],"轮作","间作","crop rotation","intercropping",[],{"code":37,"score":124,"supported":51,"title":235,"abstract":236,"tags":239},[],[237,55,238,38,53],"生物多样性","水土保持",[],{"code":65,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":241,"abstract":242,"tags":243},[],[69,70],[],{"code":86,"score":245,"supported":51,"title":246,"abstract":247,"tags":249},3,[],[248],"climate resilience",[],{"code":58,"score":245,"supported":51,"title":251,"abstract":252,"tags":253},[],[61],[],{"code":80,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":255,"abstract":256,"tags":257},[],[],[33],[259,260],"埃塞俄比亚 亚尤咖啡林 生物圈保护区","农林复合经营 采纳影响因素","埃塞俄比亚亚尤咖啡林生物圈保护区-4570","10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4",{"doi":262,"openalex_id":264,"authors":265,"venue":189,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":279,"card":280,"direction":107,"ingested_from":108},"W7221057925",[266,269,272,275,277],{"name":267,"orcid":268},"Alemayehu Abera","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6225-9304",{"name":270,"orcid":271},"Samuel Taye","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9662-3939",{"name":273,"orcid":274},"Adanech Asfaw","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-2586-0559",{"name":276,"orcid":9},"Chaluma Kicha",{"name":278,"orcid":9},"Endashew Mogessie","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Fcontent\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4.pdf",{"tldr":281,"method":282,"finding":283,"direction":105,"opportunity":284},"研究埃塞俄比亚亚尤咖啡森林生物圈保护区农户采用农业生态实践的程度、感知效益及影响因素。","混合方法：293户问卷+访谈+焦点小组，二元与有序logistic回归分析采用广","72%农户至少采用一项实践，采用强度分低中高；性别、教育、推广、信贷等显著影响采用。","可延伸研究农业生态实践采用对森林保护与生计韧性的长期因果效应及数字化推广干预。","2026-10-10T23:30:11.538537Z",{"id":287,"title":288,"url":289,"summary":290,"summary_zh":291,"content":9,"source_name":292,"source_url":289,"published_at":190,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":120,"is_selected":14,"score":293,"score_detail":294,"sources":297,"tags":299,"primary_topic":304,"secondary_topics":308,"classification":310,"search_phrases":360,"slug":363,"view_count":22,"doi":364,"paper":365,"created_at":377},4528,"Integrating indigenous knowledge systems into regenerative agriculture for sustainable crop production in southern Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs43621-026-04926-8","Abstract Agricultural production in Southern Africa is increasingly constrained by climate variability, declining soil fertility, water scarcity, biodiversity loss, and rising pest pressures, particularly within rain-fed smallholder farming systems. Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS), developed through generations of interaction between communities and local agroecosystems, offer context-specific approaches that align closely with the principles of regenerative agriculture. This review synthesizes evidence from 37 publications examining the contribution of IKS to sustainable crop production across Southern Africa. Particular attention is given to soil health, soil biological activity, water-use efficiency, ecological pest regulation, crop productivity, and climate resilience. The synthesis demonstrates that indigenous regenerative practices, including organic soil amendments, residue retention, crop diversification, intercropping, agroforestry, water harvesting, and botanical pest management, improve soil organic carbon, enhance microbial activity, increase water retention, and stabilize yields under climatic stress. Evidence further indicates that indigenous pest management strategies frequently maintain pest populations below economic injury thresholds, thereby reducing dependence on synthetic pesticides while supporting ecosystem services. The review highlights the convergence between IKS, agroecology, integrated pest management, conservation agriculture, and regenerative agriculture, and proposes pathways for integrating indigenous ecological indicators into decision-support systems, crop models, and precision agriculture technologies. Despite growing recognition of indigenous knowledge within sustainability and climate adaptation agendas, significant gaps remain in quantitative validation, longitudinal assessment, and integration into formal agricultural research and policy frameworks. The findings demonstrate that Indigenous Knowledge Systems constitute a scientifically credible and economically viable foundation for regenerative agriculture and contribute directly to Sustainable Development Goals 2 (Zero Hunger), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), 13 (Climate Action), and 15 (Life on Land). Strengthening the integration of indigenous and scientific knowledge systems will be essential for building resilient, productive, and sustainable agricultural systems across Southern Africa and the broader Global South.","摘要 南部非洲的农业生产日益受到气候变异性、土壤肥力下降、水资源短缺、生物多样性丧失和病虫害压力上升的制约，这在雨养小农耕作系统中尤为突出。本土知识体系（Indigenous Knowledge Systems, IKS）通过社区与地方农业生态系统数代互动而发展形成，提供了与再生农业原则高度契合的情境化方法。本综述综合了37篇文献的证据，考察了IKS在南部非洲可持续作物生产中的贡献。研究特别关注土壤健康、土壤生物活性、水分利用效率、生态病虫害调控、作物生产力及气候韧性。综合结果表明，本土再生实践——包括有机土壤改良、残茬保留、作物多样化、间作、农林业、集水和植物源病虫害管理——能够提高土壤有机碳、增强微生物活性、增加持水量并在气候胁迫下稳定产量。证据进一步表明，本土病虫害管理策略常能将病虫害种群维持在经济危害阈值以下，从而减少对合成农药的依赖，同时支持生态系统服务。本综述强调了IKS与农业生态学、病虫害综合治理、保护性农业和再生农业之间的趋同性，并提出了将本土生态指标纳入决策支持系统、作物模型和精准农业技术的路径。尽管本土知识在可持续发展和气候适应议程中日益受到认可，但在定量验证、长期评估以及纳入正式农业研究和政策框架方面仍存在显著空白。研究结果表明，本土知识体系构成了再生农业的科学可信且经济可行的基础，并直接有助于实现可持续发展目标2（零饥饿）、12（负责任消费和生产）、13（气候行动）和15（陆地生物）。加强本土知识与科学知识体系的整合，对于在南部非洲及更广泛的全球南方构建韧性、高产和可持续的农业系统至关重要。","Discover Sustainability",75,{"impact":220,"substance":295,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":296},21,"综述整合37篇文献，论证土著知识对再生农业与气候韧性的科学价值，具区域政策参考意义。",[298],{"name":292,"url":289},[31,300,301,302,303],"气候韧性","土壤健康","再生农业","土著知识",{"code":80,"slug":305,"name":306,"path":307,"parent_code":41},"sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture",[309],{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":311},{"candidates":312,"agricultural_evidence":51},[313,319,324,329,334,338,344,348,354],{"code":80,"score":19,"supported":51,"title":314,"abstract":316,"tags":318},[315],"regenerative agriculture",[302,317,315],"conservation agriculture",[302],{"code":37,"score":124,"supported":51,"title":320,"abstract":321,"tags":323},[],[237,55,322,38,53],"生态系统服务",[],{"code":65,"score":325,"supported":51,"title":326,"abstract":327,"tags":328},7,[],[69,70],[301],{"code":86,"score":325,"supported":51,"title":330,"abstract":331,"tags":333},[],[332,248],"气候适应",[300],{"code":210,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":335,"abstract":336,"tags":337},[],[230,232],[],{"code":58,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":339,"abstract":340,"tags":343},[],[341,342],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[],{"code":73,"score":74,"supported":51,"title":345,"abstract":346,"tags":347},[],[77],[31],{"code":349,"score":245,"supported":51,"title":350,"abstract":351,"tags":353},"F4",[],[352],"农药",[],{"code":355,"score":245,"supported":51,"title":356,"abstract":357,"tags":359},"H3",[],[358],"水资源",[],[361,362],"南部非洲 再生农业 土著知识","土著知识 土壤健康 小农户","南部非洲再生农业土著知识-4528","10.1007\u002Fs43621-026-04926-8",{"doi":364,"openalex_id":366,"authors":367,"venue":292,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":289,"card":371,"direction":376,"ingested_from":108},"W7220943031",[368],{"name":369,"orcid":370},"Albert Thembinkosi Modi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6887-1721",{"tldr":372,"method":373,"finding":374,"direction":105,"opportunity":375},"综述37篇文献，论证南部非洲本土知识可支撑再生农业与可持续作物生产。","系统综述37篇文献，聚焦土壤、水分、病虫害与气候韧性。","本土再生实践能提升土壤碳、微生物活性与水分保持，稳定产量并减少农药依赖。","可将本土生态指标量化并嵌入作物模型与精准农业决策系统，填补长期验证空白。","农业人工智能与决策模型","2026-10-09T23:30:52.261674Z",{"id":379,"title":380,"url":381,"summary":382,"summary_zh":383,"content":9,"source_name":384,"source_url":381,"published_at":190,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":120,"is_selected":14,"score":385,"score_detail":386,"sources":389,"tags":391,"primary_topic":397,"secondary_topics":402,"classification":404,"search_phrases":438,"slug":441,"view_count":100,"doi":442,"paper":443,"created_at":458},4488,"Harnessing Indigenous Knowledge for Climate-Smart Agri-Food Systems: A Review of Adaptation Strategies, Food Security, Ecosystem Services, Governance, and Digital Innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fconservation6040120","Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces escalating climate challenges that threaten agricultural productivity, food security, ecosystem sustainability, and rural livelihoods. Indigenous knowledge (IK), developed through generations of interaction with local environments, offers context-specific and culturally embedded solutions for climate adaptation and resilient agri-food systems. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on the role of indigenous knowledge in advancing climate-smart agriculture (CSA) and resilient agri-food systems across SSA. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), the review analyzed 17 studies published between 2000 and 2026. The findings reveal that indigenous knowledge contributes significantly to climate resilience through traditional weather forecasting, crop diversification, indigenous seed preservation, agroforestry, water harvesting, soil fertility management, and community-based natural resource governance. These practices enhance food security, livelihood resilience, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem service provision while strengthening adaptive capacity among smallholder farmers. The review further highlights the importance of inclusive governance frameworks, knowledge co-production, and policy support for integrating indigenous knowledge into climate adaptation and agricultural development strategies. Emerging digital technologies and innovation platforms also present opportunities for documenting, preserving, and scaling indigenous agricultural knowledge. However, challenges related to weak policy recognition, inadequate documentation, knowledge erosion, and limited digital infrastructure continue to constrain its effective utilization. The study concludes that integrating indigenous knowledge with scientific innovation is essential for building inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient agri-food systems in SSA.","撒哈拉以南非洲（Sub-Saharan Africa, SSA）面临日益加剧的气候挑战，威胁着农业生产力、粮食安全、生态系统可持续性和农村生计。土著知识（Indigenous Knowledge, IK）经由世代与当地环境的互动而积累，为气候适应和韧性农业食品系统提供了契合具体情境且深植于文化的解决方案。本范围综述综合了关于土著知识在推动撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）和韧性农业食品系统中作用的证据。在系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告条目扩展版——范围综述（PRISMA-ScR）的指导下，本综述分析了2000年至2026年间发表的17项研究。研究结果表明，土著知识通过传统天气预报、作物多样化、土著种子保存、农林业、集水、土壤肥力管理和社区为基础的自然资源治理，对气候韧性作出了显著贡献。这些实践增强了粮食安全、生计韧性、生物多样性保护和生态系统服务供给，同时强化了小农户的适应能力。本综述进一步强调了包容性治理框架、知识共同生产以及政策支持对于将土著知识纳入气候适应和农业发展战略的重要性。新兴数字技术和创新平台也为记录、保存和推广土著农业知识提供了机遇。然而，政策认可薄弱、记录不足、知识流失和数字基础设施有限等挑战持续制约着其有效利用。研究结论认为，将土著知识与科学创新相结合，对于在撒哈拉以南非洲构建包容、可持续且具有气候韧性的农业食品系统至关重要。","Conservation",76,{"impact":19,"substance":387,"depth":123,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":388},20,"系统综述揭示本土知识与数字创新融合路径，对气候适应型农业与农业信息化有参考价值，但属区域研究、非国内政策事件。",[390],{"name":384,"url":381},[392,393,394,32,395,396],"智慧农业","撒哈拉以南非洲","粮食安全","本土知识","数字创新",{"code":398,"slug":399,"name":400,"path":401,"parent_code":214},"A8","yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security",[403],{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":405},{"candidates":406,"agricultural_evidence":51},[407,412,417,421,425,429,433],{"code":398,"score":220,"supported":51,"title":408,"abstract":410,"tags":411},[409],"food security",[394,409],[394],{"code":37,"score":124,"supported":51,"title":413,"abstract":414,"tags":416},[],[237,322,38,415],"ecosystem service",[],{"code":86,"score":325,"supported":51,"title":418,"abstract":419,"tags":420},[],[332,248],[32],{"code":73,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":422,"abstract":423,"tags":424},[],[31,77],[],{"code":65,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":426,"abstract":427,"tags":428},[],[69,70],[],{"code":58,"score":74,"supported":51,"title":430,"abstract":431,"tags":432},[],[61],[392],{"code":434,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":435,"abstract":436,"tags":437},"J3",[],[],[393],[439,440],"撒哈拉以南非洲 本土知识 气候智慧型农业","撒哈拉以南非洲 气候智慧型农业 数字创新 智慧农业","撒哈拉以南非洲本土知识气候智慧型农业-4488","10.3390\u002Fconservation6040120",{"doi":442,"openalex_id":444,"authors":445,"venue":384,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":381,"card":452,"direction":107,"ingested_from":108},"W7220921430",[446,449],{"name":447,"orcid":448},"Adetomiwa Kolapo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0808-1293",{"name":450,"orcid":451},"Wale Ayojimi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0038-3462",{"tldr":453,"method":454,"finding":455,"direction":456,"opportunity":457},"综述撒哈拉以南非洲本土知识在气候智慧型农业与食物系统中的作用与挑战。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，分析2000-2026年17项研究。","本土知识通过传统预报、作物多样化等提升气候韧性，但政策认可与数字化不足制约其应用。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究本土知识与数字技术协同的知识共生产机制，及适配小农的低成本数字化记录与传播工具。","2026-10-09T23:30:07.725864Z",{"id":460,"title":461,"url":462,"summary":463,"summary_zh":464,"content":9,"source_name":118,"source_url":462,"published_at":465,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":120,"is_selected":14,"score":466,"score_detail":467,"sources":469,"tags":471,"primary_topic":475,"secondary_topics":476,"classification":477,"search_phrases":492,"slug":495,"view_count":100,"doi":496,"paper":497,"created_at":511},4411,"Agroecology in West Africa: the pathway towards a sustainable transition of agri-food systems? A review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044","This article reviews the state of the art on the potential of agroecology to contribute to the sustainable transformation of agrifood systems in West Africa. Data were retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and grey literature. The 484 publications reviewed span the last 25 years, focusing primarily on West Africa, while selected studies from other regions were included where relevant to the analysis. Over the past two decades, agroecology has gained a growing interest in different scientific fields, and is increasingly discussed as an alternative approach to conventional agricultural models. The reviewed evidence suggests that several agroecological practices are rooted in local knowledge and may contribute to addressing some of the environmental and food-systems challenges facing the region. However, the nature and the magnitude of these contributions remain context-dependent and unevenly documented across the region. Existing studies point to potential benefits for agricultural resilience, food security and nutrition, biodiversity, socioeconomic viability, human values, but the available evidence remains insufficient to highlight the potential of agroecology for food systems transformation. Scaling up agroecology is further constrained by interrelated challenges, including limited training and advisory services, restricted access to inputs and markets, and policy support. In many regions, research on agroecology has covered only a limited range of topics, highlighting the need for more context-specific and multidimensional science. Future studies should investigate the conditions under which agroecological transitions are most likely to succeed, including the interactions among policy support, training, resource access, markets, and economic incentives. Greater attention is also needed to its socioeconomic viability and to the development of locally adapted advisory and support services.","本文综述了农业生态学在西非农食系统可持续转型中潜在贡献的研究现状。数据检索自Scopus、PubMed、Google Scholar及灰色文献。所综述的484篇出版物时间跨度涵盖过去25年，主要聚焦西非，同时酌情纳入了其他区域与分析相关的精选研究。过去二十年间，农业生态学在不同科学领域日益受到关注，并越来越多地作为替代常规农业模式的方案被讨论。综述证据表明，若干农业生态实践根植于地方知识，可能有助于应对该地区面临的部分环境与食物系统挑战。然而，这些贡献的性质与程度仍取决于具体情境，且在该地区的记录并不均衡。现有研究指出了其在农业韧性、粮食安全与营养、生物多样性、社会经济可行性、人类价值等方面的潜在益处，但现有证据仍不足以凸显农业生态学对食物系统转型的潜力。农业生态学的推广还受到相互关联的制约因素限制，包括培训与推广服务有限、投入品与市场准入受限以及政策支持不足。在许多地区，农业生态学研究仅涉及有限的主题范围，凸显了开展更具情境针对性和多维度的科学研究的必要性。未来研究应探讨农业生态转型最有可能成功的条件，包括政策支持、培训、资源获取、市场与经济激励之间的相互作用。还需更多关注其社会经济可行性以及因地制宜的推广与支持服务的发展。","2026-10-07T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":193,"substance":387,"depth":19,"authority":50,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":468},"基于484篇文献的系统综述，指出生态农业在西非的潜力与证据不足，属细分领域学术进展，公共影响有限。",[470],{"name":118,"url":462},[394,472,33,473,474],"农业转型","西非农业","农食系统",{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},[],{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":478},{"candidates":479,"agricultural_evidence":51},[480,484,488],{"code":37,"score":123,"supported":51,"title":481,"abstract":482,"tags":483},[53],[237,55,38,53],[],{"code":398,"score":325,"supported":51,"title":485,"abstract":486,"tags":487},[],[394,409],[394],{"code":80,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":489,"abstract":490,"tags":491},[],[],[33],[493,494],"西非 生态农业 农食系统","农业转型 农食系统 生态农业 粮食安全","西非生态农业农食系统-4411","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044",{"doi":496,"openalex_id":498,"authors":499,"venue":118,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":505,"card":506,"direction":105,"ingested_from":108},"W7220841560",[500,502],{"name":501,"orcid":9},"Bernadin Djossou",{"name":503,"orcid":504},"Pascal Gbénou","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-8498-7390","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":507,"method":508,"finding":509,"direction":105,"opportunity":510},"综述西非农业生态学25年研究，评估其推动农食系统可持续转型的潜力与局限。","检索Scopus等数据库及灰色文献，系统综述484篇相关论文。","农业生态实践有助应对环境与粮食挑战，但证据不足且受培训、市场与政策制约。","可研究政策、培训、市场与激励的交互作用，明确农业生态转型成功的具体条件。","2026-10-08T23:30:07.324467Z",{"id":513,"title":514,"url":515,"summary":516,"summary_zh":517,"content":9,"source_name":518,"source_url":515,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":519,"is_selected":14,"score":520,"score_detail":521,"sources":523,"tags":527,"primary_topic":532,"secondary_topics":533,"classification":534,"search_phrases":562,"slug":565,"view_count":566,"doi":567,"paper":568,"created_at":578},4034,"D1.5 – Policy recommendations","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858","PrAEctiCe presents policy recommendations for advancing agroecology and climate-resilient food systems in East Africa. It highlights evidence generated through stakeholder mapping, agroecological practice profiling, co-creation, indicator framework development, digital decision-support tools, and Living Labs in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The recommendations focus on strengthening agroecology policies, integrated agriculture–aquaculture, renewable energy, circular nutrient systems, digital agriculture, data governance, inclusive financing, youth and gender participation, and justicesensitive transitions. The document also describes dissemination through national, continental and AU–EU policy events, aligning the recommendations with CAADP, Agenda 2063, the EU Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy.","PrAEctiCe提出了在东非推进农业生态学和气候韧性食物系统的政策建议。该文件重点介绍了通过利益相关者映射、农业生态实践画像、共同创造、指标框架开发、数字决策支持工具以及在肯尼亚、乌干达和坦桑尼亚开展的“生活实验室”（Living Labs）所生成的证据。建议聚焦于加强农业生态政策、农业—水产养殖一体化、可再生能源、循环养分系统、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资、青年与性别参与，以及具有正义敏感性的转型。文件还介绍了通过国家、非洲大陆及非盟—欧盟政策活动进行传播的情况，并将这些建议与CAADP、2063年议程、欧盟绿色协议和“从农场到餐桌”战略相衔接。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)",25,80,{"impact":18,"substance":387,"depth":123,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":522},"欧盟项目面向东非的生态农业与数字农业政策建议，含指标框架与决策支持工具，对农业信息化政策研究有参考价值。",[524,525],{"name":518,"url":515},{"name":518,"url":526},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082859",[528,529,530,33,531],"数字农业","农业政策","数据治理","东非农业",{"code":37,"slug":38,"name":39,"path":40,"parent_code":41},[],{"status":44,"locked":14,"version":45,"method":46,"evidence":535},{"candidates":536,"agricultural_evidence":51},[537,542,549,553,557],{"code":58,"score":325,"supported":51,"title":538,"abstract":539,"tags":541},[],[528,540],"digital agriculture",[528],{"code":543,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":544,"abstract":545,"tags":548},"D",[],[546,547],"水产","aquaculture",[],{"code":37,"score":66,"supported":51,"title":550,"abstract":551,"tags":552},[],[55,53],[],{"code":80,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":554,"abstract":555,"tags":556},[],[],[33],{"code":558,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":559,"abstract":560,"tags":561},"I6",[],[],[530],[563,564],"PrAEctiCe 政策建议","东非 生态农业 气候韧性","PrAEctiCe政策建议-4034",2,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858",{"doi":567,"openalex_id":569,"authors":570,"venue":518,"cited_by_count":100,"oa_url":515,"card":573,"direction":456,"ingested_from":108},"W7215062811",[571],{"name":572,"orcid":9},"Emmanuel Okalany",{"tldr":574,"method":575,"finding":576,"direction":456,"opportunity":577},"为东非农业生态与气候韧性食物系统提出政策建议，基于多国实证与数字工具。","利益相关者映射、共同创造、指标框架、数字决策支持与生活实验室。","建议涵盖农业生态政策、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资及青年性别参与。","可研究数字决策工具在东非小农场景的落地效果与数据治理机制。","2026-10-02T23:30:30.857763Z"]