[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"daily-2026-08-21":3},{"date":4,"title":5,"highlights":6,"content":13,"items":14},"2026-08-21","棉花黄萎病防控获突破，EDV制度落地",[7,8,9,10,11,12],"我国建成全球最大最全棉花黄萎病精准鉴定病圃，首次明确8种致病型，为抗病育种提供精准靶标。","农业农村部详解EDV制度，首批覆盖10种作物，将有效遏制仿种子问题，推动育种创新。","我国肉类产量首破1亿吨，人均占有量超70公斤，生猪产能调控成效显著，实现超长盈利。","浙江发布“十五五”农业农村现代化规划，目标2030年率先基本实现现代化，科技贡献率74%。","“快递进村”试点完成94%目标，合作业务量增长217%，农村物流体系加速完善。","中国农科院发布2025农业科学重大进展，复粒稻研究等10项成果入选，彰显原始创新实力。","本期日报聚焦棉花黄萎病防控重大突破、EDV制度实施、肉蛋奶稳产保供、浙江现代化规划、快递进村进展及农业科技前沿成果，涵盖政策、产业、科技等多领域，全面反映农业农村发展动态。\n\n---\n*本日报内容整理自公开来源，外文资料已译为中文，翻译与摘要仅供参考；引用与决策请以官方原文与正式出版物为准。*",[15,77,151,203,248,298,332,369,403,450,488,545,582,623,685],{"id":16,"title":17,"url":18,"summary":19,"summary_zh":20,"content":21,"source_name":22,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":26,"score":27,"score_detail":28,"sources":36,"tags":38,"primary_topic":44,"secondary_topics":50,"classification":51,"search_phrases":71,"slug":74,"view_count":75,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":76},761,"[光明日报]攻克棉花「癌症」!我国建成全球最大最全黄萎病精准鉴定病圃——8种致病型、48亩、16个独立隔离区块","https:\u002F\u002Fipp.caas.cn\u002Fmtjj\u002Fb5e2d3f5dcef4acc9ab796a6cd254f3e.htm","中国农业科学院植物保护研究所联合西部农研中心、辽宁省农科院、石河子大学、新疆农科院植保所等多家科研院所在新疆昌吉发布棉花黄萎病防控全新解决方案,依托全球面积最大、致病型覆盖最全的精准靶向型人工病圃破解品种抗性「水土不服」难题。研究团队历时多年完成全国超1.1万株黄萎病菌菌种资源收集鉴定,首次明确黄萎病菌可分化为8种致病型,其中4种为侵染棉花的优势致病型。该病圃自2023年启动建设,总占地48亩,划分16个独立隔离区块。",null,"被称作棉花“癌症”的黄萎病，长期以来困扰我国棉花产业高质量发展，病菌致病类型复杂、品种抗性不稳定、田间防治难度大等痛点，始终是制约抗病育种与田间防控的核心难题。\n\n8月19日，中国农业科学院植物保护研究所联合多家科研单位，在新疆昌吉发布棉花黄萎病防控全新解决方案，依托全球面积最大、致病型覆盖最全的精准靶向型人工病圃，破解品种抗性“水土不服”难题，为我国棉花稳产增收筑牢科技屏障。\n\n据了解，棉花黄萎病由大丽轮枝菌引发，是棉花生产中最顽固的毁灭性病害之一。该病菌可侵入棉花维管束内部阻断养分输送，常规药剂难以渗透起效，防治效果微乎其微。同时，病菌能形成休眠微菌核长期留存土壤，逐年累积加重病害，一旦暴发便会造成大面积减产。长期以来，种植抗病品种是防控该病最经济、最高效的手段，但田间普遍存在实验室鉴定抗病、田间种植易感病的矛盾，品种抗性不稳定问题难以根治。\n\n科研团队解释，抗性不稳的核心症结源于两大技术瓶颈。一是棉花苗期与成株期的抗病遗传机制差异显著，传统苗期实验室鉴定结果无法适配田间实际生长场景，难以指导品种科学布局；二是黄萎病菌致病类型繁杂，传统病圃仅采用单一菌株开展鉴定，与田间多元混杂的病菌种群结构严重不符，导致筛选出的抗病品种落地后快速失效。\n\n为彻底破解产业痛点，中国农科院植保所联合西部农研中心、辽宁省农科院、石河子大学、新疆农科院植保所等多家科研院所，开展系统性联合攻关。科研团队历时多年完成全国超1.1万株黄萎病菌菌种资源收集鉴定，依托3624株菌株的大规模群体基因组测序与遗传进化分析，首次明确黄萎病菌可分化为8种致病型，其中4种为侵染棉花的优势致病型，厘清了长期以来模糊不清的病菌致病类型谱系。\n\n基于这一重大基础研究成果，科研团队创新提出“精准靶向致病型”的病圃构建新思路，在新疆老龙河试验站联合建成标准化新型棉花黄萎病人工病圃。该病圃自2023年启动建设，总占地48亩，划分16个独立隔离区块，实现不同致病型菌株单独规模化扩繁、分区精准接种。经过三年持续定向培育、稳定菌源，最终建成全覆盖、精准化的黄萎病鉴定平台，填补了行业精准鉴定的技术空白。\n\n经专家组核验，该病圃是目前全球范围内面积最大、致病型覆盖最全面、鉴定精度最高的棉花黄萎病人工病圃，彻底改变了传统单一菌株鉴定的片面性，可精准测定棉花品种对各类致病型的抗性谱，实现抗病性鉴定从“模糊筛查”向“精准匹配”的跨越式升级，应用场景广阔、产业价值突出。\n\n据介绍，新型病圃的落地应用，一举打通棉花抗病育种、品种布局、病害防控全链条技术壁垒。在生产应用上，可根据各地棉田病菌致病型检测结果，因地制宜匹配适配抗病品种，彻底解决品种田间抗性不稳难题；在育种科研上，可精准解析不同品种的抗病机制、挖掘优异抗病基因，为棉花抗黄萎病品种遗传改良、多抗性基因聚合育种提供核心支撑。\n\n同时，该病圃发病性状稳定、菌种类型齐全，可广泛应用于黄萎病防控药剂、生物制剂等产品的防效验证与科学评价，也能支撑无人机高光谱监测、田间预警等新型绿色防控技术的研发落地。值得一提的是，黄萎病菌寄主范围极广，可侵染38科660余种植物，该平台的建成还能为果蔬、粮油等其他作物的黄萎病抗性鉴定、种质创新、病害预警提供通用技术支撑，赋能多元农作物绿色生产。\n\n目前，这套精准防控技术已纳入农业农村部主推技术，依托国家重点研发计划“新疆棉花病虫害演替规律与全程绿色防控技术体系集成示范”项目，在新疆主棉区规模化推广应用。该技术的落地，大幅提升了我国棉花黄萎病科学化、精准化防控水平，为保障新疆棉花产业稳产提质、筑牢国家棉花安全防线提供了坚实科技保障。","光明日报\u002F中国农业科学院植物保护研究所 2026-08-20","2026-08-20T00:00:00Z","报道",10,true,95,{"impact":29,"substance":30,"depth":31,"authority":32,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":35},28,24,19,15,9,1,"国家级科研机构发布全球最大棉花黄萎病精准鉴定病圃，突破性成果，信息详实，权威性高，时效性强。",[37],{"name":22,"url":18},[39,40,41,42,43],"光明日报","棉花黄萎病","精准鉴定病圃","新疆昌吉","中国农科院植保所",{"code":45,"slug":46,"name":47,"path":48,"parent_code":49},"A6","cash-crops","棉麻糖与特色经作","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fcash-crops","A",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":56},"classified",false,"2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":57,"agricultural_evidence":26},[58,64],{"code":45,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":60,"abstract":62,"tags":63},12,[61],"棉花",[61],[40],{"code":65,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":67,"abstract":68,"tags":70},"F4",3,[],[69],"植保",[],[72,73],"中国农科院植保所 精准鉴定病圃 棉花黄萎病 光明日报","中国农科院植保所 精准鉴定病圃","中国农科院植保所精准鉴定病圃棉花黄萎病光明日报-761",4,"2026-08-21T00:05:55.725082Z",{"id":78,"title":79,"url":80,"summary":81,"summary_zh":20,"content":20,"source_name":82,"source_url":20,"published_at":83,"category":84,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":26,"score":27,"score_detail":85,"sources":88,"tags":90,"primary_topic":96,"secondary_topics":101,"classification":102,"search_phrases":145,"slug":148,"view_count":149,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":150},749,"让「换马甲式」育种无处遁形——农业农村部详解农业植物实质性派生品种(EDV)制度","https:\u002F\u002Ffinance.people.com.cn\u002Fn1\u002F2026\u002F0821\u002Fc1004-40783497.html","人民日报8月21日「三农」观察:农业农村部近日举行新闻发布会解读EDV制度,首批涵盖水稻、小麦、棉花、油菜、花生、大白菜、辣椒、谷子、蚕豆、桃共10种作物;水稻、小麦、棉花、谷子、花生、辣椒阈值90%,油菜、大白菜、蚕豆、桃阈值85%;派生品种商业化利用需经原始品种权人许可、双方协商收益分成。近年来农业农村部撤销问题品种和仿种子品种4000多个,实施EDV制度将加快推动新品种选育由「数量增长」向「质量提升」转变。","人民日报记者 晓熠 2026-08-21 第18版","2026-08-21T00:00:00Z","政策",{"impact":29,"substance":30,"depth":86,"authority":32,"freshness":25,"relevant":34,"comment":87},18,"全国性农业政策解读，含具体作物与阈值细节，央媒权威发布，时效性强。",[89],{"name":82,"url":80},[91,92,93,94,95],"EDV","农业农村部","种业知识产权","实质性派生品种","人民日报",{"code":97,"slug":98,"name":99,"path":100,"parent_code":49},"A4","soybean-oilseeds","大豆与油料","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fsoybean-oilseeds",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":103},{"candidates":104,"agricultural_evidence":26},[105,112,118,124,130,134,140],{"code":97,"score":106,"supported":26,"title":107,"abstract":108,"tags":111},6,[],[109,110],"油菜","花生",[],{"code":113,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":114,"abstract":115,"tags":117},"A1",[],[116],"水稻",[],{"code":119,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":120,"abstract":121,"tags":123},"A2",[],[122],"小麦",[],{"code":125,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":126,"abstract":127,"tags":129},"A5",[],[128],"谷子",[],{"code":45,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":131,"abstract":132,"tags":133},[],[61],[],{"code":135,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":136,"abstract":137,"tags":139},"B1",[],[138],"辣椒",[],{"code":141,"score":66,"supported":53,"title":142,"abstract":143,"tags":144},"F1",[],[],[91,94,93],[146,147],"实质性派生品种 种业知识产权 农业农村部 人民日报","实质性派生品种 种业知识产权","实质性派生品种种业知识产权农业农村部人民日报-749",11,"2026-08-21T00:05:53.580062Z",{"id":152,"title":153,"url":154,"summary":155,"summary_zh":20,"content":156,"source_name":157,"source_url":20,"published_at":158,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":26,"score":159,"score_detail":160,"sources":165,"tags":167,"primary_topic":173,"secondary_topics":178,"classification":179,"search_phrases":198,"slug":201,"view_count":59,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":202},766,"[江苏省农科院]玉米中心团队解锁糯甜同粒奥秘——育成「苏糯味甜218」新组合,论文刊发于Plant Physiology (Q1,IF=8.2)","https:\u002F\u002Fnewbiotech.jaas.ac.cn\u002Fxww\u002Fgzdt\u002Fart\u002F2026\u002Fart_83c26db4acd3444887dae9c7b9726f3a.html","江苏省农业科学院玉米研究中心联合南京市蔬菜科学研究所鲜食玉米育种团队,利用快中子诱变技术创制玉米突变体,经大规模系统筛选与精准鉴定,成功获得了「糯甜同粒」新型种质资源,实现同一籽粒中甜味与糯性的时空动态结合,最终育成性状稳定、均匀一致的新型糯甜玉米组合「苏糯味甜218」。研究成果以A novel allele of Sh1 facilitates the development of waxy-sweet corn from waxy corn为题,2026年8月18日在Plant Physiology(Q1,IF=8.2)上在线发表。","我国鲜食玉米种植面积2500万亩以上，年消费量超过750亿穗，且市场需求逐年攀升，但产业仍面临产品特色不明显、同质化严重等突出问题。目前市场上主流的甜加糯玉米，其果穗上甜、糯籽粒分离且随机排列，由于两类籽粒在灌浆速率、成熟期含水量等方面存在显著差异，常导致食用品质不稳定、加工后商品性差及耐贮运性不佳等现象，已成为制约我国鲜食玉米产业高质量发展的关键技术瓶颈。\n\n针对上述问题，江苏省农业科学院玉米研究中心联合南京市蔬菜科学研究所鲜食玉米育种团队，利用快中子诱变技术创制玉米突变体，经大规模系统筛选与精准鉴定，成功获得了“糯甜同粒”新型种质资源。该突变体在灌浆前期表现出典型的甜玉米特征，灌浆后期则呈现糯玉米特性，实现了同一籽粒中甜味与糯性的时空动态结合，为突破现有品种局限提供了理想材料。\n\n研究团队进一步通过图位克隆与等位互补测验，成功鉴定到控制该性状的关键基因，并结合转录组学与代谢组学等多组学手段，系统解析了其调控糯甜同粒表型的分子机制。在此基础上，团队针对该关键基因的优良等位变异设计功能性分子标记，通过回交选育将其导入优良糯玉米自交系，最终育成性状稳定、均匀一致的新型糯甜玉米组合--“苏糯味甜218”。\n\n该研究成果以题为“A novel allele of Sh1 facilitates the development of waxy-sweet corn from waxy corn”的论文，于2026年8月18日在国际著名植物学期刊 《Plant Physiology》（Q1，IF=8.2）上在线发表。\n\n玉米研究中心周玲副研究员、宁丽华副研究员为论文共同第一作者，赵涵研究员与南京市蔬菜科学研究所戴惠学研究员为共同通讯作者。\n\n本研究得到了国家自然科学基金项目、江苏省种业振兴“揭榜挂帅”项目和江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目的联合资助。","江苏省农业科学院玉米研究中心 2026-08-18","2026-08-18T00:00:00Z",93,{"impact":161,"substance":161,"depth":162,"authority":32,"freshness":163,"relevant":34,"comment":164},25,20,8,"重大育种突破，发表于国际权威期刊，对鲜食玉米产业有深远影响。",[166],{"name":157,"url":154},[168,169,170,171,172],"Plant Physiology","糯甜同粒","Sh1基因","江苏省农科院玉米中心","苏糯味甜218",{"code":174,"slug":175,"name":176,"path":177,"parent_code":49},"A3","maize","玉米","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fmaize",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":180},{"candidates":181,"agricultural_evidence":26},[182,188,193],{"code":174,"score":183,"supported":26,"title":184,"abstract":185,"tags":187},14,[176],[176,186],"corn",[],{"code":135,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":189,"abstract":190,"tags":192},[],[191],"蔬菜",[],{"code":141,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":194,"abstract":195,"tags":197},[],[196],"种质资源",[],[199,200],"江苏省农科院玉米中心 苏糯味甜218 糯甜同粒 Sh1基因","江苏省农科院玉米中心 苏糯味甜218","江苏省农科院玉米中心苏糯味甜218糯甜同粒Sh1基因-766","2026-08-21T00:05:55.919093Z",{"id":204,"title":205,"url":206,"summary":207,"summary_zh":20,"content":20,"source_name":208,"source_url":20,"published_at":83,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":26,"score":209,"score_detail":210,"sources":214,"tags":216,"primary_topic":222,"secondary_topics":228,"classification":229,"search_phrases":242,"slug":245,"view_count":246,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":247},747,"端牢托稳中国人的「肉盘子」和「奶瓶子」——农业农村部畜牧兽医局稳产保供纪实","https:\u002F\u002Fszb.farmer.com.cn\u002Fnmrb\u002Fhtml\u002F2026\u002F20260821\u002F20260821_1\u002Fnmrb_20260821_13383_1_2090543065341202443.html","农民日报8月21日要闻1版头条:2025年我国猪牛羊禽肉总产量首次突破1亿吨,人均肉类占有量首次迈过70公斤,肉蛋产量继续保持世界首位,奶类产量位居世界第四。农业农村部畜牧兽医局自2021年起率先实施生猪产能调控,探索「长期调母猪、中期调仔猪、短期调肥猪」路径;2024年9月起逆周期调节,从盈利期即开始去产能,推动生猪养殖从2024年5月至2025年9月实现连续17个月超长盈利,猪价「过山车」式的大幅波动得到有效遏制、波幅扁平化。","农民日报全媒体记者 冯建伟 雷少斐 2026-08-21",91,{"impact":29,"substance":211,"depth":212,"authority":183,"freshness":25,"relevant":34,"comment":213},22,17,"全国性畜牧稳产保供重大成果，数据详实，央媒权威报道，时效性强。",[215],{"name":208,"url":206},[217,218,219,220,221],"农民日报","畜牧兽医","生猪产能调控","肉牛奶牛","牧原",{"code":223,"slug":224,"name":225,"path":226,"parent_code":227},"C1","pigs","生猪","\u002Ftopic\u002Flivestock\u002Fpigs","C",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":230},{"candidates":231,"agricultural_evidence":26},[232,237],{"code":227,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":233,"abstract":235,"tags":236},[234],"畜牧",[234],[218],{"code":223,"score":106,"supported":26,"title":238,"abstract":239,"tags":241},[],[225,240],"母猪",[],[243,244],"生猪产能调控 农民日报 畜牧兽医 肉牛奶牛","生猪产能调控 农民日报","生猪产能调控农民日报畜牧兽医肉牛奶牛-747",5,"2026-08-21T00:05:53.502831Z",{"id":249,"title":250,"url":251,"summary":252,"summary_zh":20,"content":253,"source_name":254,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":84,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":255,"score_detail":256,"sources":260,"tags":262,"primary_topic":268,"secondary_topics":274,"classification":275,"search_phrases":293,"slug":296,"view_count":75,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":297},756,"浙江公布「十五五」农业农村现代化新目标——到2030年率先基本实现现代化,科技贡献率74%、城乡居民收入倍差缩小至1.77","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.farmer.com.cn\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F991026429.html","浙江省政府办公厅正式公布《浙江省「十五五」农业农村现代化规划》,作为「千万工程」重要发源地,明确到2030年全省率先基本实现农业农村现代化,农业科技进步贡献率达到74%、和美乡村覆盖率90%以上、城乡居民收入倍差缩小至1.77。「十五五」期间浙江将培育100家农业科技企业、支持牵头组建10家创新联合体,布局「概念验证—中试熟化—示范应用」全链条,打造粮油等十大千亿级产业集群,建成超百亿级全产业链20条、十亿级180条。","日前，浙江省政府办公厅正式公布《浙江省“十五五”农业农村现代化规划》（以下简称《规划》）。作为“千万工程”重要发源地，浙江明确提出，到2030年，全省将率先基本实现农业农村现代化，农业科技进步贡献率达到74%、和美乡村覆盖率90%以上、城乡居民收入倍差缩小至1.77。《规划》以深化“千万工程”为牵引，统筹谋划“强城”“兴村”“融合”三篇文章，为高质量发展建设共同富裕示范区提供有力支撑。\n\n科技赋能农业，浙江亮出“组合拳”。“十五五”时期，浙江将推动企业深度参与科技攻关，重点培育100家龙头型、高速成长型、潜力型农业科技企业，支持牵头组建10家创新联合体。围绕“概念验证—中试熟化—示范应用”全链条，浙江将布局验证中心、中试平台和应用场景，完善“先用后转”机制，让好技术不再“锁在抽屉里”。\n\n乡村片区组团发展，是浙江探索的又一重要路径。目前，省级片区已拥有水稻、茶叶、食用菌、生态鱼等特色产业183类，关联企业2537家，今年上半年带动村民就业2.8万多人。下一步，各片区将主动融入全省“土特产富·十群百链”发展体系，培育“小而美、小而精”的特色产业，坚持运营前置，完善多元利益联结模式，在抱团发展中缩小村域差距。\n\n土特产如何“出圈”又“出彩”？对此，浙江明确打造粮油、蔬菜、水果、茶叶、中药材、畜禽、海水产品、淡水产品、林产品、特色小吃等十大千亿级产业集群，到2030年，建成超百亿级全产业链20条、十亿级全产业链180条，同时做强“浙里丰物”省级农产品区域公用品牌，让好产品卖出好价钱。\n\n在林地资源盘活方面，浙江推行“一股份两平台”模式，引导林农将林地入股村合作社，由市县搭建林权流转收储和市场交易两大平台，林农可获得“保底收益+按股分红”。今年，全省已流转林地近35万亩，“十五五”将建成200个以上林业共富园区。\n\n“十五五”期间，浙江将全面推进“三电一码”数字化改革，涵盖电子票据、电子合同、电子印章和资产“浙农码”，将在全国率先全面推广村集体电子票据，让每一笔收支在阳光下运行。每宗资产将赋码登记，老百姓手机“扫一扫”，就能“看得到、看得懂、能监督”。前期在衢州试点中，村民足不出户，最快15分钟就能完成用印办理。\n\n站在“十五五”新起点，浙江正以《规划》为引领，加快推进乡村全面振兴和共同富裕先行示范。浙江省委农办主任、省农业农村厅党组书记、厅长李迎宾表示，下一步，将聚焦“落实”二字，锚定目标、攻坚克难，会同各地各有关部门全力落实落细《规划》各项任务，奋力为推动高质量发展建设共同富裕示范区取得决定性进展、率先呈现基本实现社会主义现代化生动场景贡献“三农”力量。","中国农网\u002F农民日报 2026-08-20",88,{"impact":161,"substance":257,"depth":86,"authority":258,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":259},23,13,"浙江省级农业农村现代化规划，含具体目标与创新举措，信息量大，权威性高，时效性强。",[261],{"name":254,"url":251},[263,264,265,266,267],"浙江","十五五规划","农业农村现代化","共同富裕","千万工程",{"code":269,"slug":270,"name":271,"path":272,"parent_code":273},"J2","modernization","农业强国与现代化","\u002Ftopic\u002Fpolicy\u002Fmodernization","J",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":276},{"candidates":277,"agricultural_evidence":26},[278,282,288],{"code":269,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":279,"abstract":280,"tags":281},[265],[265],[265],{"code":283,"score":284,"supported":53,"title":285,"abstract":286,"tags":287},"G4",2,[],[],[266,267],{"code":289,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},"J1",[],[],[264],[294,295],"农业农村现代化 十五五规划 共同富裕 千万工程","农业农村现代化 十五五规划","农业农村现代化十五五规划共同富裕千万工程-756","2026-08-21T00:05:53.812719Z",{"id":299,"title":300,"url":301,"summary":302,"summary_zh":20,"content":303,"source_name":304,"source_url":20,"published_at":83,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":26,"score":255,"score_detail":305,"sources":308,"tags":310,"primary_topic":20,"secondary_topics":315,"classification":316,"search_phrases":326,"slug":329,"view_count":330,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":331},750,"「快递进村」的建制村新增2244个——17个试点县兜底目标完成94%,合作业务量增长217%","https:\u002F\u002Fso.html5.qq.com\u002Fpage\u002Freal\u002Fsearch_news?docid=70000021_8936a877d2893652","人民日报8月21日报道:记者8月20日在「快递进村」邮政兜底试点工作现场会获悉,截至今年7月底,17个试点县依托邮政普遍服务网络实现「快递进村」的建制村新增2244个,已完成兜底目标的94%,合作业务量较试点前增长217%。邮政集团组织2062个县分公司制定「一县一策」方案,安排投资计划2.1亿元,其中17个试点县专项建设资金2123万元,投递汽车化率由62%提升至97%;推动客货邮融合发展,新增合作线路1124条,累计达7534条。","本报北京8月20日电 (记者韩鑫)记者20日在“快递进村”邮政兜底试点工作现场会上获悉：截至今年7月底，17个试点县依托邮政普遍服务网络实现“快递进村”的建制村新增2244个，已完成兜底目标的94%，合作业务量较试点前增长217%。\n\n自2020年“快递进村”工程实施以来，城乡末端物流通道持续打通，有效助力消费品下乡、农产品出村。但在部分区域，网络覆盖不足、末端服务不稳等挑战仍然存在。\n\n今年起，国家邮政局与中国邮政集团有限公司联合在中西部农村地区启动“快递进村”邮政兜底专项试点工作，推动依托邮政普遍服务网络破解中西部农村地区快递进村难题，畅通城乡双向流通渠道，助力农村基本具备现代生活条件。\n\n试点开展以来，17个试点省(区、市)邮政管理部门和邮政企业同向发力，邮政企业和快递企业通力合作。邮政集团组织2062个县分公司制定“一县一策”方案，安排投资计划2.1亿元，其中17个试点县专项建设资金2123万元，投递汽车化率由62%提升至97%；推动客货邮融合发展，新增邮政企业与交通运输企业合作线路1124条，累计达7534条，新增合作场站5162处，累计复用场站48952处。\n\n国家邮政局、邮政集团将进一步总结试点经验，在中西部农村地区依托邮政普遍服务网络深化“快递进村”，持续健全县乡村三级农村寄递物流体系。","人民日报记者 韩鑫 2026-08-21 第10版",{"impact":161,"substance":211,"depth":306,"authority":32,"freshness":25,"relevant":34,"comment":307},16,"全国性快递进村试点进展，数据详实，央媒权威报道，时效性强。",[309],{"name":304,"url":301},[311,95,312,313,314],"数字乡村","快递进村","邮政普遍服务","客货邮融合",[],{"status":317,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":318},"needs_review",{"candidates":319,"agricultural_evidence":53,"reason":325},[320],{"code":321,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":322,"abstract":323,"tags":324},"I6",[],[],[311],"农业相关性需要复核",[327,328],"邮政普遍服务 客货邮融合 人民日报 快递进村","邮政普遍服务 客货邮融合","邮政普遍服务客货邮融合人民日报快递进村-750",7,"2026-08-21T00:05:53.632300Z",{"id":333,"title":334,"url":335,"summary":336,"summary_zh":20,"content":20,"source_name":337,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":338,"score_detail":339,"sources":341,"tags":343,"primary_topic":348,"secondary_topics":351,"classification":352,"search_phrases":364,"slug":367,"view_count":75,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":368},758,"京郊瘠薄地何以产出千斤麦——北京复耕复垦地小麦亩产突破500-726公斤,「藏粮于地、藏粮于技」在超大城市的生动实践","https:\u002F\u002Fszb.farmer.com.cn\u002Fnmrb\u002Fhtml\u002F2026\u002F20260820\u002F20260820_1\u002Fnmrb_20260820_13382_1_2090185812226445329.html","农民日报8月20日要闻1版:北京房山长阳、通州西集、大兴瀛海、顺义李遂、平谷峪口等多处示范田接连传出高产捷报,昔日亩产三四百公斤甚至二三百公斤的复耕复垦瘠薄地块如今小麦亩产稳定在500公斤上下,部分地块突破600公斤,顺义赵全营示范点创亩产726公斤佳绩;红星农场复耕小麦百亩方亩产达519.47公斤;大兴北京首邑农业5余亩、北京亦庄绿色生态公司500亩复耕地产能稳步提升,全市大面积复制「改土培肥+适配良种+精准水肥」方案。","农民日报 2026-08-20 第1版",86,{"impact":161,"substance":211,"depth":306,"authority":183,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":340},"央媒报道北京复耕复垦地小麦高产突破，涉及农业科技与藏粮于地战略，数据详实，影响广泛。",[342],{"name":337,"url":335},[344,345,217,346,347],"高标准农田","北京","复耕复垦","小麦高产",{"code":119,"slug":349,"name":122,"path":350,"parent_code":49},"wheat","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fwheat",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":353},{"candidates":354,"agricultural_evidence":26},[355,359],{"code":119,"score":149,"supported":26,"title":356,"abstract":357,"tags":358},[122],[122],[],{"code":360,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":361,"abstract":362,"tags":363},"H1",[],[],[344],[365,366],"高标准农田 农民日报 复耕复垦 小麦高产","高标准农田 农民日报","高标准农田农民日报复耕复垦小麦高产-758","2026-08-21T00:05:53.865767Z",{"id":370,"title":371,"url":372,"summary":373,"summary_zh":20,"content":374,"source_name":375,"source_url":20,"published_at":376,"category":84,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":377,"score_detail":378,"sources":380,"tags":382,"primary_topic":20,"secondary_topics":387,"classification":388,"search_phrases":398,"slug":401,"view_count":246,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":402},753,"农业农村部印发《2026—2030年全国官方兽医培训计划》——到2030年部、省两级年度更新网络培训课程均不少于16学时","https:\u002F\u002Fxmsyj.jining.gov.cn\u002Fart\u002F2026\u002F8\u002F20\u002Fart_9388_2706649.html","农业农村部8月10日印发《2026—2030年全国官方兽医培训计划》,目标到2030年部、省两级网络培训课程年度更新量分别不少于16个学时;岗前培训、在岗培训完训率均达到100%;全面推行现场实操培训。2026年每人参加岗前培训不少于40学时(含线上),其中线下理论培训不少于16学时;2027年起每人参加岗前培训不少于48学时。国家、省两级师资库人员在「十五五」期间参加轮训不少于2次,单次轮训不少于24学时。","（一）健全师资队伍。加强官方兽医师资选拔、培训和动态管理，突出政治素质过硬、专业理论扎实、实践能力突出，兼顾师资队伍整体年龄结构，完善国家级、省级师资库。重点遴选一批在农业行业职业技能大赛中成绩优异、业务工作表现突出的人员充实到师资库。国家级师资优先从省级师资选拔，每名授课人员每年应承担不少于4学时的官方兽医培训任务。\n\n（二）开展师资轮训。健全官方兽医师资轮训制度，采取业务研讨、实操比武、现场学习、集中授课等形式，持续更新业务知识、规范实操教学标准、提升现场带教水平。国家级、省级师资库人员在“十五五”期间参加轮训不少于2次，单次轮训不少于24学时。国家级、省级官方兽医师资培训分别由农业农村部和省级农业农村部门负责，中国动物疫病预防控制中心和省级动物卫生监督机构组织实施。","农业农村部 农牧发〔2026〕8号 2026-08-10印发","2026-08-10T00:00:00Z",84,{"impact":161,"substance":211,"depth":86,"authority":32,"freshness":75,"relevant":34,"comment":379},"全国性官方兽医培训规划，政策条款具体，但发布已超一周，时效性一般。",[381],{"name":375,"url":372},[92,383,384,385,386],"动物防疫","官方兽医","培训计划","农牧发8号",[],{"status":389,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":390},"unclassified",{"candidates":391,"agricultural_evidence":26,"reason":397},[392],{"code":393,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":394,"abstract":395,"tags":396},"C5",[],[],[383],"缺少足够的主题证据",[399,400],"农业农村部 农牧发8号 动物防疫 培训计划","农业农村部 农牧发8号","农业农村部农牧发8号动物防疫培训计划-753","2026-08-21T00:05:53.724784Z",{"id":404,"title":405,"url":406,"summary":407,"summary_zh":20,"content":408,"source_name":409,"source_url":20,"published_at":410,"category":84,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":377,"score_detail":411,"sources":413,"tags":415,"primary_topic":420,"secondary_topics":425,"classification":432,"search_phrases":445,"slug":448,"view_count":284,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":449},751,"农业农村部答复刘琴代表建议:将肉牛纳入农业保险体系,中央财政已累计向安徽拨付奖补资金14.05亿元","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.163.com\u002Fdy\u002Farticle\u002FL4PIDO7S0514BL38.html","农业农村部8月20日答复关于将肉牛纳入农业保险体系的建议:肉牛保险属于地方优势特色农产品保险范畴,目前政策实施范围已覆盖全国,保险机构可结合肉牛主要生产生命周期开发专项保险产品。下一步将会同财政部、金融监管总局引导保险机构提高肉牛保险投保率,构建多层次肉牛保险体系。2022—2025年中央财政累计向安徽省拨付奖补资金14.05亿元,其中2025年为全省3000余户次肉牛养殖户提供风险保障超30亿元。","规范监管体系是促进保险市场有序发展的重要保障。目前，我国已形成由金融监管、财政、审计、农业农村等部门多方协同的保险监管格局，对包括肉牛保险在内的农业保险承保机构开展专项治理工作，重点核查业务真实性、服务实效性、档案规范性等，坚决打击虚假承保、虚假理赔等违规行为。同时，农业农村部持续完善肉牛疫病防控措施，将口蹄疫、布鲁氏菌病、牛结核病等主要牛病纳入国家动物疫病监测计划，对口蹄疫实施国家强制免疫，指导各地按免疫计划开展春秋两季集中免疫和日常补免；推进布鲁氏菌病、牛结核病等疫病净化工作，支持有条件的地区建设无疫区和无疫小区，从源头降低疫病发生风险。下一步，我部将配合有关部门，创新优化肉牛保险监管模式，强化数字化监管能力，推动肉牛信息共享平台建设，促进畜牧、财政、保险等各方数据联动，推进肉牛产业预警体系与防控能力建设，优化肉牛主要疫病监测，切实为肉牛产业高质量发展保驾护航。","农业农村部对人大建议答复 2026-08-20","2026-08-20T06:34:00Z",{"impact":161,"substance":162,"depth":32,"authority":32,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":412},"农业农村部对人大建议的正式答复，涉及肉牛保险纳入农业保险体系及中央财政奖补资金，政策层级高，信息具体，权威性强，时效性好。",[414],{"name":409,"url":406},[92,416,417,418,419],"安徽","肉牛保险","地方优势特色农产品保险","中央财政奖补",{"code":421,"slug":422,"name":423,"path":424,"parent_code":227},"C2","ruminants","草食牲畜","\u002Ftopic\u002Flivestock\u002Fruminants",[426],{"code":427,"slug":428,"name":429,"path":430,"parent_code":431},"G3","rural-finance","农村金融与保险","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-finance","G",{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":433},{"candidates":434,"agricultural_evidence":26},[435,440],{"code":421,"score":149,"supported":26,"title":436,"abstract":438,"tags":439},[437],"肉牛",[437],[],{"code":427,"score":149,"supported":26,"title":441,"abstract":443,"tags":444},[442],"农业保险",[442],[],[446,447],"地方优势特色农产品保险 中央财政奖补 农业农村部 肉牛保险","地方优势特色农产品保险 中央财政奖补","地方优势特色农产品保险中央财政奖补农业农村部肉牛保险-751","2026-08-21T00:05:53.663284Z",{"id":451,"title":452,"url":453,"summary":454,"summary_zh":20,"content":455,"source_name":456,"source_url":20,"published_at":457,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":458,"score_detail":459,"sources":461,"tags":463,"primary_topic":469,"secondary_topics":474,"classification":475,"search_phrases":483,"slug":486,"view_count":34,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":487},764,"[中国农科院农业信息研究所]2025中国农业科学重大进展发布——「破解复粒稻多粒簇生之谜」等10项成果入选","http:\u002F\u002Fnxxb.caass.org.cn\u002FCN\u002Fabstract\u002Fabstract32303.shtml","《农学学报》2026年第16卷第8期发表中国农业科学院农业信息研究所、农业农村部农业大数据重点实验室丁倩等团队文章:基于2024年中国科研机构在Web of Science平台所发表的农业领域高水平研究论文,经多维研判与专家评审,最终确定「破解复粒稻多粒簇生之谜」等10项成果为2025中国农业科学重大进展。该遴选旨在集中推介我国农业科学研究中具有开创性与引领性的代表性成果,展现农业科技原始创新成效。","基于2024年中国科研机构在Web of Science平台所发表的农业领域高水平研究论文，经多维研判与专家评审，最终确定“破解‘复粒稻’多粒簇生之谜”等10项成果为2025中国农业科学重大进展。该遴选旨在集中推介我国农业科学研究中具有开创性与引领性的代表性成果，展现农业科技原始创新成效，提升农业科研的学术影响力与社会显示度，同时弘扬科学精神，培育创新科研生态系统。","中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 农学学报 2026-08-20","2026-08-19T00:00:00Z",83,{"impact":29,"substance":211,"depth":306,"authority":32,"freshness":284,"relevant":34,"comment":460},"国家级农业科研机构发布的年度重大进展，权威性高，但时效性较差，且正文信息量有限。",[462],{"name":456,"url":453},[464,465,466,467,468],"2025中国农业科学重大进展","Web of Science","农学学报","中国农科院信息所","复粒稻",{"code":321,"slug":470,"name":471,"path":472,"parent_code":473},"digital-village","数字乡村与数据要素","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fdigital-village","I",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":476},{"candidates":477,"agricultural_evidence":26},[478],{"code":321,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":479,"abstract":480,"tags":482},[],[481],"农业大数据",[],[484,485],"2025中国农业科学重大进展 中国农科院信息所 农学学报 复粒稻","2025中国农业科学重大进展 中国农科院信息所","2025中国农业科学重大进展中国农科院信息所农学学报复粒稻-764","2026-08-21T00:05:55.850311Z",{"id":489,"title":490,"url":491,"summary":492,"summary_zh":20,"content":493,"source_name":254,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":494,"score_detail":495,"sources":497,"tags":499,"primary_topic":505,"secondary_topics":506,"classification":513,"search_phrases":540,"slug":543,"view_count":284,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":544},775,"[四川省农科院]推动科技创新 应对气候变化——第十四届亚洲玉米大会田间考察走进简阳:400余个玉米品种同台打擂","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.farmer.com.cn\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F991026446.html","8月16日下午,参加第十四届亚洲玉米大会的专家走进四川省农业科学院简阳玉米综合试验站,实地观摩玉米种质资源与新品种、抗逆高产技术示范、丘陵适用农机装备、玉米烘干加工中心。简阳禾丰镇西南品种与资源展示区400余个玉米品种同台打擂;平武镇夏播玉米抗逆高产技术展示区聚焦「伏旱绝收」难题;青龙镇联合村多元复合种植展示区玉米+花生、玉米+紫苏、玉米+大豆等带状复合模式,气候应对思路从「单作物抗逆」延伸至「系统抗风险」。四川2025年玉米面积2810.1万亩,单产402.5公斤\u002F亩,产量1131.1万吨。","平武镇的夏播玉米抗逆高产技术展示区，聚焦的是丘区最头疼的“伏旱绝收”难题。四川省农科院作物所刘永红团队研发的“夏玉米抗逆免耕机械化高产高效技术模式”，通过免耕贴茬早播让玉米扬花期错开伏旱高峰，搭配移动式水肥药一体机实现精准补水补肥，破解了丘区地块分散、灌溉设施不足的痛点。“去年伏旱一周，我种的五六百亩夏玉米几乎绝收；今年用了这套技术，一亩多花一百多块水肥成本，能多收六七百斤玉米，这笔账算得过来。”来自四川遂宁的种粮大户文斌的亲身经历，是技术落地最实在的注脚。\n\n产后环节同样是气候应对的重要一环。平武镇尤安村的烘干中心，正是针对丘区雨天晒粮难、霉变损耗大的痛点建设的。该中心日烘干峰值达600吨，年干燥粮食2万吨，可将玉米产后损耗降低8%，干燥品质提升10%；配套的初加工车间还能生产玉米粉、玉米糁等产品，把减灾与增值结合起来。\n\n而在青龙镇联合村的多元复合种植展示区，气候应对的思路从“单作物抗逆”延伸到“系统抗风险”。玉米+花生、玉米+紫苏、玉米+大豆等多种带状复合模式，在保障玉米产量基本稳定的前提下，通过经济作物提升亩均收益。“今年干旱，常规玉米亩产大概500公斤，比预期少了点；但套种的花生、紫苏能多收两三千块钱，整体收益还是托得住。”联合村党总支书记彭永的话，道出了丘区农户最朴素的需求：主粮稳底子，经作赚票子，多元结构才能扛住年景波动。\n\n四川省农科院经济作物研究所党委书记张小军表示，外宾在现场最关注的就是“亩收益”和“如何兼顾粮食安全与农民增收”。苏特克・纳卡萨廷副教授现场观摩后坦言，泰国也在探索通过间套作提升土地综合产出、对冲气候风险，四川在玉米带状复合种植上的品种搭配、农机适配经验，对泰国丘陵产区有很强的参考性，希望未来能在品种试验、丘区农机、再生农业技术等方面与四川开展深度合作，把中国的成熟经验落地到泰国生产一线。\n\n技术能落地，离不开长效的院地合作机制。简阳市与四川省农科院的合作已持续30年，从最初破解干旱制约，到推动种养循环，再到攻坚全程机械化，一步步把“低产田”种成“高产田”。简阳市副市长袁小强介绍，目前简阳玉米耕种收综合机械化率达73%，全市发展制种玉米2600多亩，收购价达13元\u002F公斤，村集体与农户实现双增收。“丘区搞农业不能靠天吃饭，要靠科技托底。”\n\n大会期间，共建“国际玉米小麦南方研究中心”成为各方共识。据了解，该中心由四川省农科院牵头建设，是CIMMYT南方试验站的迭代升级，预计年内完成顶层设计，2027年全面启动。未来它将以四川为枢纽，聚焦丘陵山地玉米技术、气候韧性育种、种质资源共享等方向，打造面向整个亚洲的南方玉米科创平台。\n\n从品种选育到栽培集成，从农机适配到产后减损，从单产提升到多元增收，中国尤其是四川的丘区实践，为亚洲60%分布在丘陵山区的玉米种植区提供了可借鉴的路径。刘永红表示：“应对气候变化没有一蹴而就的捷径，一茬接着一茬干，一代接着一代研，才能把气候的‘不确定性’，变成粮食安全的‘确定性’。”",82,{"impact":211,"substance":211,"depth":212,"authority":59,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":496},"报道亚洲玉米大会田间考察，展示四川丘区玉米抗逆高产、产后减损及多元复合种植等应对气候变化的集成技术，含具体数据与多方信源，具国际视野，对农业科技推广有较高参考价值。",[498],{"name":254,"url":491},[500,501,502,503,504],"四川省农科院","玉米抗逆","亚洲玉米大会","简阳","夏玉米",{"code":174,"slug":175,"name":176,"path":177,"parent_code":49},[507],{"code":508,"slug":509,"name":510,"path":511,"parent_code":512},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":514},{"candidates":515,"agricultural_evidence":26},[516,520,525,530,534],{"code":174,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":517,"abstract":518,"tags":519},[176],[176],[504],{"code":508,"score":163,"supported":26,"title":521,"abstract":523,"tags":524},[522],"气候变化",[],[],{"code":97,"score":106,"supported":26,"title":526,"abstract":527,"tags":529},[],[528,110],"大豆",[],{"code":141,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":531,"abstract":532,"tags":533},[],[196],[],{"code":535,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":536,"abstract":537,"tags":539},"F5",[],[538],"农机",[],[541,542],"亚洲玉米大会 四川省农科院 玉米抗逆 夏玉米","亚洲玉米大会 四川省农科院","亚洲玉米大会四川省农科院玉米抗逆夏玉米-775","2026-08-21T00:05:56.193647Z",{"id":546,"title":547,"url":548,"summary":549,"summary_zh":20,"content":550,"source_name":551,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":24,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":494,"score_detail":552,"sources":554,"tags":556,"primary_topic":562,"secondary_topics":568,"classification":569,"search_phrases":577,"slug":580,"view_count":66,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":581},762,"[中国农科院加工所]肉品加工团队系统综述Kokumi肽的分子活性、感官表现及应用潜力——Food Chemistry JCR一区IF=10.4","https:\u002F\u002Fifst.caas.cn\u002Fxwzx\u002Fkyjz\u002F2cc409c4947e4d4c9af92f2b130213da.htm","中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所肉品科学与营养工程创新团队系统综述了肉制品中Kokumi肽的分子活性、感官表现及其在产品配方重构中的应用潜力,成果发表在食品科学领域国际期刊Food Chemistry(JCR一区,IF=10.4)。加工所2024级中比联合培养博士生杨欣宇为论文第一作者,张德权研究员为通讯作者。该综述以Kokumi肽从分子活性向肉制品实际感官表现的转化为主线,系统梳理其结构特征、鉴定与感官验证方法,以及加工过程、食品基质和口腔释放等因素对感官效应的影响。","近日，中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所肉品科学与营养工程创新团队系统综述了肉制品中Kokumi肽的分子活性、感官表现及其在产品配方重构中的应用潜力，相关成果发表在食品科学领域国际期刊《Food Chemistry》（JCR一区，IF=10.4）。加工所2024级中比联合培养博士生杨欣宇为论文第一作者，张德权研究员为通讯作者。\n\n随着低盐、低脂肉制品研发需求不断增加，如何在改善产品营养组成的同时维持口腔饱满感、连续性和后味，成为肉制品品质调控的重要问题。Kokumi并非独立的基本味觉，而是一种能够增强和延续既有味觉感知的感官调节效应。该综述以Kokumi肽从分子活性向肉制品实际感官表现的转化为主线，系统梳理了其结构特征、鉴定与感官验证方法、以钙敏感受体（CaSR）为核心的作用机制，以及加工过程、食品基质和口腔释放等因素对感官效应的影响。研究进一步区分了Kokumi活性肽与Kokumi有效肽，指出质谱鉴定、分子对接和受体活性分析能够为候选肽筛选及作用机制解析提供依据，但其在肉制品中的实际感官效应仍需结合产品中的实际含量及目标产品中的感官验证进行判定。\n\n该综述认为，Kokumi肽更适合作为肉制品的感官调节因子，而非盐、脂肪或传统呈味成分的直接替代物，其应用潜力主要体现在减盐、减脂条件下对口腔饱满感、连续性和后味等感官属性的补偿与改善。未来应加强关键Kokumi肽的定量表征和因果验证，系统评价其加工稳定性、基质效应及产品适用性，为低盐、低脂营养健康肉制品的开发提供理论依据。","中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所 2026-08-20",{"impact":162,"substance":211,"depth":212,"authority":183,"freshness":33,"relevant":34,"comment":553},"国家级科研机构在食品科学顶刊发表的综述，聚焦肉制品减盐减脂的感官调控，对农业食品科技有实质贡献，但属细分领域进展，影响范围有限。",[555],{"name":551,"url":548},[557,558,559,560,561],"Kokumi肽","肉品加工","食品化学","中国农科院加工所","IF10.4",{"code":563,"slug":564,"name":565,"path":566,"parent_code":567},"E1","food-processing","加工与食品制造","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffood-supply\u002Ffood-processing","E",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":570},{"candidates":571,"agricultural_evidence":26},[572],{"code":563,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":573,"abstract":574,"tags":576},[],[575],"农产品加工",[],[578,579],"中国农科院加工所 肉品加工 食品化学 Kokumi肽","中国农科院加工所 肉品加工","中国农科院加工所肉品加工食品化学Kokumi肽-762","2026-08-21T00:05:55.774902Z",{"id":583,"title":584,"url":585,"summary":586,"summary_zh":20,"content":587,"source_name":588,"source_url":20,"published_at":589,"category":84,"cover_url":20,"hotness":161,"is_selected":53,"score":494,"score_detail":590,"sources":592,"tags":597,"primary_topic":602,"secondary_topics":606,"classification":607,"search_phrases":618,"slug":621,"view_count":66,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":622},752,"海关总署 农业农村部公告2026年第122号:防止芬兰非洲猪瘟传入我国","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.163.com\u002Fdy\u002Farticle\u002FL4P30Q280514EAHV.html","海关总署、农业农村部8月17日发布2026年第122号公告:近日芬兰向世界动物卫生组织(WOAH)报告发生非洲猪瘟,为防止疫情传入、保护我国畜牧业安全和生物安全,公告禁止直接或间接从芬兰输入猪、野猪及其相关产品;禁止寄递或携带相关产品入境;对截获的非法入境相关产品一律作销毁处理;本公告自发布之日起实施。","核心提示：近日，芬兰向世界动物卫生组织（WOAH）报告发生非洲猪瘟。为防止疫情传入，保护我国畜牧业安全和生物安全，根据相关法律法规，现公告如下。……（世界食品网-www.shijieshipin.com）\n\n近日，芬兰向世界动物卫生组织（WOAH）报告发生非洲猪瘟。为防止疫情传入，保护我国畜牧业安全和生物安全，根据相关法律法规，现公告如下：\n\n一、禁止直接或间接从芬兰输入猪、野猪及其相关产品（源于猪、野猪未经加工或者虽经加工但仍有可能传播疫病的产品）。\n\n二、禁止寄递或携带来自芬兰的猪、野猪及其相关产品入境。一经发现一律作退回或销毁处理。\n\n三、来自芬兰的进境运输工具上卸下的动植物性废弃物、泔水等，一律在海关的监督下作除害处理，不得擅自抛弃。\n\n四、对边防检查等部门截获非法入境的来自芬兰的猪、野猪及其相关产品，一律在海关的监督下作销毁处理。\n\n五、凡违反上述规定者，由海关依照《中华人民共和国海关法》、《中华人民共和国生物安全法》、《中华人民共和国进出境动植物检疫法》及其实施条例有关规定处理。\n\n六、各级海关、各级农业农村部门要分别按照《中华人民共和国海关法》《中华人民共和国生物安全法》《中华人民共和国进出境动植物检疫法》《中华人民共和国动物防疫法》等有关规定，密切配合，做好检疫、防疫和监督工作。","海关总署 农业农村部公告 2026-08-17","2026-08-17T00:00:00Z",{"impact":161,"substance":162,"depth":32,"authority":32,"freshness":330,"relevant":34,"comment":591},"全国性动植物防疫政策，涉及农业安全，信息明确，权威性高，时效性稍差。",[593,594],{"name":588,"url":585},{"name":595,"url":596},"海关总署 农业农村部公告第122号(搜狐转载)","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.sohu.com\u002Fa\u002F1067891502_121106991",[92,598,599,600,601],"海关总署","非洲猪瘟","芬兰","进口禁令",{"code":393,"slug":603,"name":604,"path":605,"parent_code":227},"animal-health","疫病防控与兽药","\u002Ftopic\u002Flivestock\u002Fanimal-health",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":608},{"candidates":609,"agricultural_evidence":26},[610,614],{"code":393,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":611,"abstract":612,"tags":613},[599],[599],[599],{"code":227,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":615,"abstract":616,"tags":617},[],[234],[],[619,620],"农业农村部 海关总署 进口禁令 非洲猪瘟","农业农村部 海关总署","农业农村部海关总署进口禁令非洲猪瘟-752","2026-08-21T00:05:53.692434Z",{"id":624,"title":625,"url":626,"summary":627,"summary_zh":20,"content":628,"source_name":629,"source_url":20,"published_at":457,"category":630,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":631,"score_detail":632,"sources":634,"tags":636,"primary_topic":641,"secondary_topics":642,"classification":643,"search_phrases":680,"slug":683,"view_count":246,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":684},791,"数字乡村发展与牧户非农就业:来自甘青川藏26县2790户牧户调查的证据(原标题:From Grasslands to Markets: Digital Rural Development and Herders' Non-Farm Employment)","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503","兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室吴忠安等团队基于2023-2025年甘青川藏26县2790户牧户调查数据,考察县级数字乡村发展与牧户非农就业关系。研究发现数字乡村发展与户主主要从事非农就业的可能性正相关,在系列稳健性和内生性检验后结果稳定;在第一产业基础较大的地区以及从事饲草种植的牧户中,正向关联较弱,表明当地生产结构和家庭劳动配置制约了数字机会向就业多元化转化。进一步分析表明数字金融和数字消费是数字乡村发展支持非农就业的两种潜在渠道。研究强调牧区就业收益既取决于数字接入,又取决于家庭劳动配置灵活性及非农机会可得性。","Logical Operator Operator\n\nSearch Text\n\nSearch Type\n\n_add\\_circle\\_outline_\n\n_remove\\_circle\\_outline_\n\n[![Image 1: sustainability-logo](https:\u002F\u002Fpub.mdpi-res.com\u002Fimg\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainability-logo.png?3798e4e58c765aed)](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002Fjournal\u002Fsustainability)\n\n## Article Menu\n\nFont Type:\n\n_Arial_ _Georgia_ _Verdana_\n\nFont Size:\n\nAa Aa Aa\n\nLine Spacing:\n\n__ __ __\n\nColumn Width:\n\n__ __ __\n\nBackground:\n\nOpen Access Article\n\nby \nZhongan Wu\n\n *[](mailto:wuzha2023@lzu.edu.cn), \nToba Stephen Olasehinde\n\n and \nYubing Fan\n\nState Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Chinese Grass Industry Development Strategy Research Center, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China\n\n*\n\nAuthor to whom correspondence should be addressed.\n\nSubmission received: 3 July 2026 \u002F Revised: 11 August 2026 \u002F Accepted: 12 August 2026 \u002F Published: 19 August 2026\n\n## Abstract\n\nAlthough natural resources and geographical factors limit herders’ employment options, the development of digital rural helps herding households compete on an equal footing by expanding employment opportunities. Using survey data collected from 2790 herder households in 26 counties across Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan and Tibet from 2023 to 2025, this study examines the relationship between county-level digital rural development and non-farm employment. We find that digital rural development is positively associated with the likelihood that household heads engage primarily in non-farm employment. This finding remains stable across a series of robustness and endogeneity checks. Moreover, the positive association is weaker in areas with a larger primary-industry base and among households engaged in forage cultivation, suggesting that local production structures and household labor commitments constrain the conversion of digital opportunities into employment diversification. Further analysis indicates that digital finance and digital consumption are two potential channels through which digital rural development supports non-farm employment. These findings highlight that the employment benefits of digital development depend not only on digital access but also on the flexibility of household labor allocation and the availability of non-farm opportunities in pastoral areas.\n\n## 1. Introduction\n\nArtificial intelligence, Big Data, and mobile internet are examples of digital technology that are spreading to all parts of the economy and society, changing how production is organized and people work [[1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B1-sustainability-18-08503)]. Given the above, China released the Digital Rural Development Plan in 2018 to promote the construction of a digital rural society and rural revitalization. As 5G networks expand into rural and pastoral areas, the all-weather demonstration project for e-commerce in rural areas continues to advance, and the coverage of digital inclusive finance is gradually expanding. At the same time, digital infrastructure and services are being rolled out in the grassland region at an ever-increasing rate [[2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B2-sustainability-18-08503)]. However, because of their remote areas, fragile ecosystems and unique cultures, these large pastoral areas have been lacking in development resources for a long time. Traditional livestock farming is limited by the productivity of natural grasslands, ecological red lines and fluctuations in market prices, and a single grazing-based livelihood model cannot provide stable income growth for herder households [[3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B3-sustainability-18-08503)]. Therefore, expanding non-farm employment opportunities and promoting the transfer of the pastoral workforce to the secondary and tertiary sectors are urgently needed to consolidate the results of poverty alleviation and prevent a relapse into poverty, as well as to achieve all-round rejuvenation of pastoral areas.\n\nNon-farm employment provides herder households with an alternative to relying entirely on traditional livestock production. This resulting income mix can reduce exposure to livestock losses and strengthen resilience to market, climatic and health shocks [[4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B4-sustainability-18-08503)]. Especially against the backdrop of increasing resource and environmental constraints in pastoral areas and shrinking growth prospects for traditional livestock farming, promoting the rational flow of labor into non-farm sectors is not only a practical necessity for herding households to enhance the resilience of their livelihoods, but also a key direction for industrial restructuring and socioeconomic transformation in pastoral areas. However, the formation of non-farm employment is not simply a matter of individual choice, as herders’ decision-making is influenced by a range of factors, including their ability to access information, job search costs, financial constraints, and the extent of market access [[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B5-sustainability-18-08503),[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B6-sustainability-18-08503)]. The reason why the development of digital rural may have an impact on herders’ non-farm employment is that it can, to some extent, alleviate these constraints.\n\nExisting research has provided a wealth of discussion on the relationship between the digital economy, information and communication technologies, and rural labor migration, as well as the growth of farm household income [[7](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B7-sustainability-18-08503),[8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B8-sustainability-18-08503),[9](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B9-sustainability-18-08503),[10](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B10-sustainability-18-08503)]. A large body of the literature indicates that digital development can improve the information environment, expand market access, alleviate financial exclusion, and, to some extent, facilitate the shift in rural labor toward the non-farm sector [[11](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B11-sustainability-18-08503),[12](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B12-sustainability-18-08503),[13](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B13-sustainability-18-08503)]. Some studies have also indicated that the development of internet usage, digital finance, and e-commerce has a positive impact on farmers’ non-farm employment, entrepreneurial activities, and income growth [[14](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B14-sustainability-18-08503),[15](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B15-sustainability-18-08503),[16](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B16-sustainability-18-08503),[17](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B17-sustainability-18-08503)]. More broadly, infrastructure development and technological progress can promote economic diversification and strengthen livelihood resilience in peripheral and resource-dependent regions [[18](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B18-sustainability-18-08503)]. In terms of research subjects, most of the existing studies have focused on farmers and have paid relatively little attention to herders, another group in pastoral areas. Herders’ employment decisions are influenced by the general labor market, but they are also restricted by other factors, such as grassland management systems, livestock production cycles, household livestock assets and grazing practices; therefore, their non-farm employment behavior is relatively context-specific and constrained [[19](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B19-sustainability-18-08503),[20](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B20-sustainability-18-08503)]. Most studies have focused on the general inclusive benefits of digital technology for research, but there is a lack of specific research on how digital rural initiatives operate in the particular spatial conditions of pastoral areas and whether their effects differ among different groups and regions.\n\nThis paper takes as its focus the non-farm employment of herders and studies the effect of digital rural development on the transformation of herders’ employment, as well as the mechanisms through which this change occurs. Based on this, this paper seeks to answer the following questions: can digital rural development promote non-farm employment among herders?; through what mechanisms does it primarily achieve this?; and does this impact vary depending on individual characteristics, spatial conditions, and the level of development in each county? This study makes three contributions. First, it conceptualizes digital rural development in pastoral areas as a mechanism for translating digital access into non-farm employment opportunities, emphasizing the role of household labor constraints in livestock-based livelihoods. In doing so, it extends the literature on digital rural development and labor transition by showing that improved digital access does not automatically lead to labor reallocation, because pastoral production commitments may constrain herders’ ability to respond to new employment opportunities. Second, it integrates survey data from 2790 herding households across Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan, and Tibet, with a county-level Digital Rural Development Index, providing evidence from underrepresented pastoral production systems. Third, it examines how structural and household-level conditions shape the relationship between digital rural development and non-farm employment, highlighting the importance of contextual heterogeneity in pastoral regions. By linking digital development with livelihood diversification, the study also contributes to the rural sustainability literature by showing that the employment benefits of digitalization depend on household labor flexibility and local economic conditions.\n\n## 2. Theoretical Framework\n\n### 2.1. Direct Effects of Digital Rural Development on Herders’ Non-Farm Employment\n\nCompared to typical rural areas, pastoral regions face long-standing constraints such as geographical dispersion, poor transportation, limited access to information and insufficient market access. As a result, employment options for herding households are often confined to traditional livestock farming. Access to non-farm employment depends largely on personal network or occasional face-to-face contact [[21](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B21-sustainability-18-08503)]. In light of the above, the construction of an information infrastructure, the extension of platform coverage and the broad application of digital tools in the development of digital rural have created new employment opportunities for herders outside of traditional sectors.\n\nAccording to the theory of information asymmetry, if market participants cannot obtain the required information in time and to their full satisfaction, they will bear a higher search cost, be less efficient in matching, and thus lose opportunities in their decision-making [[22](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B22-sustainability-18-08503),[23](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B23-sustainability-18-08503)]. The development of digital rural is changing how herders get jobs and market information. New technologies are now available to help herders stay informed about new employment prospects outside farming, wage levels, working locations and required skills [[24](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B24-sustainability-18-08503)]. In this way, information barriers between herders and the outside labor market have been reduced. Thus, employment information is no longer scarce and fragmented, but rather open and accessible. As a result, herders’ awareness of non-farm employment and their opportunities for employment have significantly increased [[25](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B25-sustainability-18-08503)].\n\nAs is well-known, non-farm employment not only involves the movement of labor across sectors, but also entails costs associated with information search, transportation, payment settlements and job matching. Transaction cost theory suggests that improvements in market efficiency depend largely on reductions in transaction costs [[26](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B26-sustainability-18-08503),[27](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B27-sustainability-18-08503)]. The development of digital rural has reduced the time costs, communication costs, and institutional friction faced by herders when seeking non-farm employment through information dissemination, digital payments and platform integration. Looking further, improvements in the information environment and reductions in transaction costs do not stop at the level of access to employment opportunities. Rather, they continue to influence labor allocation within herding households. In this context, non-farm employment reflects the reallocation of household labor from livestock production to non-farm sector [[28](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B28-sustainability-18-08503),[29](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B29-sustainability-18-08503)]. Consequently, household labor may gradually shift away from traditional livestock production toward a wider range of market-based non-farm activities. In light of the above, this paper proposes the following hypothesis:\n\n**H1.**\n\nDigital rural development is positively associated with household non-farm employment.\n\n### 2.2. Boundary Conditions of the Employment Effects of Digital Rural Development\n\nDigital rural development can improve information access, reduce job-search costs, and strengthen links to external markets. Nevertheless, these improvements do not automatically generate non-farm employment. Whether herders convert digital opportunities into employment also depends on local industrial structure and household production systems. We therefore examine the moderating roles of primary-industry development and forage cultivation.\n\nStructural transformation involves the reallocation of labor from primary production toward secondary and tertiary activities [[30](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B30-sustainability-18-08503)]. Primary-industry value added at the county level measures the absolute scale of agricultural and livestock output, rather than the sector’s share of the local economy or its relative return. A higher value may nevertheless indicate a larger agricultural and livestock production base. In such counties, digital tools may be used more extensively for production management, input procurement and product marketing within the primary sector [[31](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B31-sustainability-18-08503)]. Digitalization may lower search, matching, and market-access costs while also improving production within the primary sector. Where digital services are used mainly for production management and product marketing, these benefits may be absorbed within agricultural and pastoral activities rather than translated into labor reallocation [[32](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B32-sustainability-18-08503)]. The positive association between digital rural development and herders’ participation in non-farm employment may therefore be weaker in counties with a larger primary industry base. We propose:\n\n**H2a.**\n\nHigher primary industry value added in a county weakens the positive association between digital rural development and household non-farm employment.\n\nForage cultivation is closely integrated with livestock production and requires labor for planting, management, harvesting, transport and storage [[33](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B33-sustainability-18-08503)]. These tasks increase household labor demands, particularly during busy seasons. With limited household labor, forage cultivation may reduce the time available for non-farm employment [[34](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B34-sustainability-18-08503)]. It also binds cropland, forage, livestock and family labor into a more integrated production system. Households may therefore have less flexibility to act on digital employment information and market opportunities.\n\n**H2b.**\n\nForage cultivation weakens the positive association between digital rural development and household non-farm employment.\n\n### 2.3. Transmission Mechanisms of Digital Rural Development\n\nIn most cases, funding is a key factor limiting herders’ ability to engage in any activities. Continuing livestock production, starting a business, and seeking employment elsewhere may all require financial resources, while reliable payment services can facilitate related transactions [[35](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B35-sustainability-18-08503),[36](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B36-sustainability-18-08503)]. However, due to factors such as remote locations, a lack of financial service outlets and exclusion from the traditional financial system, herders have long faced challenges in accessing financial services [[37](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B37-sustainability-18-08503)]. The development of digital rural has driven the shift in financial services toward online, convenient and grassroots-level delivery, providing herders with more accessible channels for payments, credit and financial services. The expansion of financial services to grassroots levels represents not only an increase in the scale of financial operations but also an extension of service coverage and an improvement in the efficiency of resource allocation. Digital rural development can facilitate the expansion of digital finance. Greater access to digital financial services may ease the credit and liquidity constraints faced by herding households. This, in turn, can lower the financial barriers to participation in non-farm employment and entrepreneurial activities [[38](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B38-sustainability-18-08503)]. At the same time, development of digital finance has reduced the transaction costs for labor transfer and provided a relatively easy way for herders to access external labor markets [[39](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B39-sustainability-18-08503)]. Therefore, the development of digital rural areas should not only increase the supply of financial products but also improve the financial situation for herders’ non-market activities at a deeper level and enhance their ability to engage in non-farm employment. Based on the above analysis, this study puts forward the following hypothesis:\n\n**H3.**\n\nDigital rural development promotes herders’ non-farm employment by expanding digital finance.\n\nWith the spread of online shopping, digital payments, and platform services, herding households have become more closely connected to digital markets. These developments have changed how households purchase goods, make payments, and access consumer services [[40](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B40-sustainability-18-08503)].\n\nThe shift in consumption patterns is not merely a change in lifestyle. It also influences household employment choices through adjustments in income needs and labor allocation. Traditional herding households often rely on self-produced goods and local supplies. Digital rural development has expanded their access to external markets. Their consumption may therefore become more dependent on purchased goods and services. While households now have a wider range of choices regarding goods and services, they also have a greater need for a stable cash flow to support these choices [[41](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8503#B41-sustainability-18-08503)]. The increase in digital consumption suggests that more money will be needed by households. As a result, there has been a change in demand for labor, and many people have begun to leave traditional pastoralism for non-agricultural work in search of a more stable in","MDPI Sustainability 18(16):8503 2026-08-19","论文",81,{"impact":86,"substance":211,"depth":162,"authority":258,"freshness":163,"relevant":34,"comment":633},"基于2790户牧户调查的实证研究，揭示数字乡村对非农就业的促进作用及条件，数据详实，结论可靠，对牧区数字乡村政策有参考价值。",[635],{"name":629,"url":626},[311,637,638,639,640],"Sustainability","数字金融","非农就业","牧户",{"code":321,"slug":470,"name":471,"path":472,"parent_code":473},[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":644},{"candidates":645,"agricultural_evidence":26},[646,650,655,661,665,671,675],{"code":321,"score":59,"supported":26,"title":647,"abstract":648,"tags":649},[311],[311],[311],{"code":431,"score":163,"supported":26,"title":651,"abstract":653,"tags":654},[652],"rural development",[],[],{"code":656,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":657,"abstract":658,"tags":660},"C4",[],[659],"饲草",[],{"code":535,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":662,"abstract":663,"tags":664},[],[538],[],{"code":666,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":667,"abstract":668,"tags":670},"H6",[],[669],"农业生态",[],{"code":427,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":672,"abstract":673,"tags":674},[],[],[638],{"code":676,"score":34,"supported":53,"title":677,"abstract":678,"tags":679},"G6",[],[],[639],[681,682],"数字乡村 数字金融 非农就业 牧户","数字乡村 数字金融","数字乡村数字金融非农就业牧户-791","2026-08-21T00:05:57.571383Z",{"id":686,"title":687,"url":688,"summary":689,"summary_zh":20,"content":690,"source_name":691,"source_url":20,"published_at":23,"category":630,"cover_url":20,"hotness":25,"is_selected":53,"score":692,"score_detail":693,"sources":695,"tags":697,"primary_topic":703,"secondary_topics":709,"classification":710,"search_phrases":734,"slug":737,"view_count":66,"doi":20,"paper":20,"created_at":738},793,"氮磷钾施肥对农业的环境效应:文献计量分析与综述(原标题:Environmental Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Fertilization in Agriculture: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review)","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782","本研究结合1991-2024年Web of Science核心合集(SCIE和SSCI)索引的3649篇文章的文献计量分析与文献综述,旨在梳理农业氮磷钾施肥环境效应研究的演进、知识结构和新兴前沿,识别可持续养分管理的知识空白和优先事项。分析显示出版物持续增长、跨学科性增强,主要研究热点涉及养分循环、环境影响、可持续性和养分管理技术。综合分析识别出氮磷钾综合交互作用、精准养分管理长期评估、复合气候相关风险以及科学证据与治理之间联系的持续空白。基于此开发了连接肥料投入、养分交互、土壤过程、环境结果、管理干预和政策支持的氮磷钾环境管理综合框架。","## 1. Introduction\n\nAgriculture underpins global food security; yet, the widespread and inefficient use of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizers has placed substantial pressure on environmental systems [[1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B1-agriculture-16-01782),[2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B2-agriculture-16-01782),[3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B3-agriculture-16-01782)]. These pressures manifest as water eutrophication, soil degradation, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality impacts, and effects on biodiversity and ecosystems, which collectively constitute the “agricultural environmental effects” examined in this work. The agricultural environmental effects of these nutrients are frequently interrelated rather than isolated [[4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B4-agriculture-16-01782),[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B5-agriculture-16-01782),[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B6-agriculture-16-01782)]. For example, the synergistic N-P interactions can intensify water eutrophication, while K deficiency can limit the crop uptake of N and P. As essential nutrients, N, P, and K both enhance crop production, and, when mismanaged, generate a cascade of environmental effects that require systematic analysis [[7](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B7-agriculture-16-01782),[8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B8-agriculture-16-01782),[9](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B9-agriculture-16-01782),[10](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B10-agriculture-16-01782)].\n\nThe existing research on the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on the agricultural environment can be summarized into the following three aspects. First, the irrational use of nitrogen leads to a range of environmental challenges worldwide [[11](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B11-agriculture-16-01782)]. Especially in the production of major food crops such as rice, wheat, and corn, excessive nitrogen fertilizer is the main source of ammonia (NH 3) emissions, posing a threat to air quality and human health [[12](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B12-agriculture-16-01782),[13](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B13-agriculture-16-01782),[14](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B14-agriculture-16-01782)]. Taking China as an example, the excessive application of nitrogen fertilizer has caused serious problems such as the eutrophication of water bodies, soil acidification, and increased greenhouse gas emissions [[14](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B14-agriculture-16-01782),[15](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B15-agriculture-16-01782)]. Studies have shown that optimizing fertilization management can significantly reduce nitrogen loss and improve utilization efficiency, thus alleviating its negative impact on the environment [[15](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B15-agriculture-16-01782),[16](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B16-agriculture-16-01782)]. Secondly, phosphorus is essential to agricultural production, but the agricultural environmental effects caused by its improper management cannot be ignored [[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B5-agriculture-16-01782),[17](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B17-agriculture-16-01782),[18](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B18-agriculture-16-01782),[19](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B19-agriculture-16-01782)]. For example, in intensive breeding areas, if the high content of P in livestock and poultry manure is not properly treated, it is easy to pollute the surrounding farmland and affect agricultural systems and food security [[18](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B18-agriculture-16-01782)]. In addition, K is a key nutrient element for plant growth, but its excessive or improperly managed application raises distinct environmental concerns that differ fundamentally from those of N and P [[20](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B20-agriculture-16-01782),[21](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B21-agriculture-16-01782),[22](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B22-agriculture-16-01782)]. It should be noted that, compared with the extensive literature on the environmental effects of N and P, the direct environmental impacts of K fertilization remain considerably less studied, and most of the existing research addresses K in the context of its synergistic or antagonistic interactions with N and P rather than as an independent environmental stressor [[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B6-agriculture-16-01782)].\n\nAlthough the individual environmental effects of NPK are well-documented, the current knowledge base has critical gaps that call for an integrated assessment. Most studies focus on single nutrients or isolated environmental endpoints, yielding fragmented insights that overlook the interconnected impacts of N, P, and K interactions [[4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B4-agriculture-16-01782),[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B5-agriculture-16-01782),[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B6-agriculture-16-01782)]. While the general awareness of the NPK-related environmental harm is widespread, no systematic, quantitative mapping, and thematic evolution has yet been conducted specifically for agricultural NPK effects. For instance, P and K shortages can restrict N use efficiency, thereby reducing the fertilizer effectiveness and exacerbating environmental pollution [[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B5-agriculture-16-01782),[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B6-agriculture-16-01782)]. Significant gaps also persist in understanding integrated NPK interactions under changing climatic conditions, compound risks from multiple stressors, and the links between scientific evidence and governance systems [[7](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B7-agriculture-16-01782)]. Thus, a comprehensive evaluation of agricultural environmental effects must account for the synergistic mechanism of N, P, and K. Moreover, no previous study has proposed a unified conceptual framework that integrates fertilizer inputs, NPK interactions, soil processes, environmental outcomes, management practices, and policy support—a gap that this review precisely aims to fill.\n\nA considerable body of review literature already exists on specific environmental processes and individual nutrients related to agricultural fertilization. Process-specific reviews have examined P-driven eutrophication and N–P synergistic effects on water quality [[4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B4-agriculture-16-01782),[17](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B17-agriculture-16-01782)], N–P non-point source pollution control, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation strategies in agricultural systems [[15](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B15-agriculture-16-01782),[22](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B22-agriculture-16-01782),[23](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B23-agriculture-16-01782)]. Nutrient-specific reviews have synthesized the environmental fate of nitrogen, P solubilization and loss management, and K availability and crop responses [[18](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B18-agriculture-16-01782),[20](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B20-agriculture-16-01782),[22](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B22-agriculture-16-01782)]. Additionally, several bibliometric studies have mapped the research trends related to agricultural greenhouse gas emission reduction, carbon neutrality, and agricultural management [[23](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B23-agriculture-16-01782),[24](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B24-agriculture-16-01782),[25](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B25-agriculture-16-01782),[26](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B26-agriculture-16-01782),[27](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B27-agriculture-16-01782)]. However, these existing reviews share a common limitation: they address either a single environmental process (e.g., eutrophication or GHG emissions) or a single nutrient (N, P, or K) in isolation. No prior study has combined all three nutrients across multiple environmental processes within a unified analytical framework—synthesizing the bibliometric mapping of the research landscape with a literature review that identifies cross-cutting knowledge gaps and proposes a comprehensive management framework. This gap is significant because the environmental effects of N, P, and K are fundamentally interconnected through synergistic and antagonistic mechanisms, and understanding these interactions demands a holistic approach that transcends the boundaries of process-specific and nutrient-specific reviews. Addressing this gap will advance our understanding of the evolution, knowledge structure, emerging research priorities, and future directions of the agricultural environmental effects research related to N, P, and K.\n\nAccordingly, this study uses a combined bibliometric and literature-review approach with four specific objectives: (1) to quantify the temporal publication trends and the geographical, institutional, journal, and disciplinary structure of the field; (2) to identify the dominant and emerging research themes through citation, co-citation, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and related bibliometric analyses; (3) to synthesize substantive evidence on N, P, and K cycling, environmental effects, management technologies, and policy responses, explicitly using the bibliometric results to guide the literature discussion; and (4) to identify cross-cutting knowledge gaps and develop evidence-informed priorities and an integrated framework for sustainable nutrient management. The bibliometric analysis provides the quantitative mapping presented in [Section 3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#sec3-agriculture-16-01782), whereas [Section 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#sec4-agriculture-16-01782) interprets and synthesizes the substantive literature in relation to those mapped patterns.\n\nThe overall objective is therefore to map the evolution, knowledge structure, and emerging frontiers of research on the environmental effects of NPK fertilization in agriculture, and to translate those patterns into clearly defined knowledge gaps and strategic priorities for sustainable nutrient management. The remaining sections of the paper are organized as follows: [Section 2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#sec2-agriculture-16-01782) provides the methods and data source; [Section 3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#sec3-agriculture-16-01782) provides the bibliometric analysis; [Section 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#sec4-agriculture-16-01782) presents the literature review; and 5 gives the conclusions, respectively.\n\n## 2. Data and Methods\n\nLiterature data were collected on 10 March 2025 from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection, specifically the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). The combined use of SCIE and SSCI was intended to capture both natural-science and social-science dimensions of agricultural environmental-effects research. The retrieval formula was as follows: TI = (agriculture* OR Agro* OR husbandry) AND TS = (Nitrogen* OR Phosphorus OR Phosphor OR potassium OR Kalium OR NPK). Here, TI (Title) restricts the agricultural-context terms to article titles, whereas TS (Topic) searches titles, abstracts, author keywords, and Keywords Plus, thereby providing broader coverage for nutrient terms. The wildcard “Agro*” retrieves terms such as agronomy, agroecosystem, agroecology, agroforestry, and agrochemistry. Because this broad term can also retrieve studies outside the intended scope, all records were subsequently screened manually. The initial search yielded 3756 records from 1991 to 2024. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) indexing in SCIE or SSCI; (2) document type of article or review; (3) English language; (4) publication year 1991–2024; and (5) substantive relevance to environmental effects associated with N, P, or K fertilization in agricultural systems. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) records unrelated to agricultural environmental effects, including studies centered on brain research, drug development, DNA sequencing, medicine, or other off-topic areas; (2) non-English publications; (3) document types other than articles or reviews; and (4) duplicate records. Relevance screening and exclusion of off-topic records were conducted manually by reviewing titles and abstracts rather than by automated keyword deletion. To provide an external check on search recall, the 20 most-cited records retrieved by the search were cross-referenced against the reference lists of three relevant reviews; all 20 were captured by the search strategy.\n\nData cleaning was then performed to improve consistency in country and institutional attribution [[28](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B28-agriculture-16-01782),[29](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#B29-agriculture-16-01782)]. Country-name variants representing the same analytical national unit were consolidated before network and publication analyses. Records from mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao were grouped under China, while records from England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland were grouped under the UK. This harmonization was applied consistently to avoid splitting publication and network counts across multiple geographical labels used in WoS records; the resulting country-level indicators should therefore be interpreted according to these analytical groupings. Institution-name variants were similarly standardized using DDA. After application of the inclusion\u002Fexclusion criteria and cleaning procedures, 3649 papers were retained for analysis. In addition, 44 records were identified as “Highly Cited Papers” using the WoS designation based on Clarivate’s Essential Science Indicators (ESIs). Under this system, a Highly Cited Paper ranks within the top 1% by citation count for its ESI field and publication year, providing a field- and time-normalized indicator of citation performance.\n\nTwo software tools with complementary analytical functions were employed. VOSviewer version 1.6.16 (Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; [https:\u002F\u002Fwww.vosviewer.com\u002F](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.vosviewer.com\u002F), accessed on 25 March 2025) was used for the following: (a) co-authorship analysis (countries and institutions); (b) keyword co-occurrence analysis and clustering visualization; (c) journal co-citation analysis and mapping; and (d) bibliographic coupling analysis. Derwent Data Analyzer V7 (DDA, Clarivate Analytics, Boston, MA, USA) was used for the following: (a) data cleaning and consolidation (merging country and institution name variants); (b) publication trend analysis; (c) country and institution distribution analysis; and (d) subject category distribution analysis. The combined use of these three tools ensures both analytical depth and visual clarity while reducing tool-specific bias. The research workflow of this study is illustrated in [Figure 1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f001).\n\n**Figure 1.** The research workflow of this study.\n\n## 3. Bibliometric Analysis\n\n### 3.1. Publication Trend\n\nFrom 1991 to 2024, the research of agricultural environmental effects developed rapidly, which was fully reflected from the number of articles. An analysis of the publication trend shows that the cumulative number of articles was 3469, with annual publications ranging from 15 to 290 during 1991–2024 ([Figure 2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f002)). Annual publications ranged from 15 to 290, and the fitted exponential curve (R 2 = 0.9661) indicates an overall accelerating publication trend, despite the year-to-year fluctuations. The first stage was during 1991–2005, with a cumulative 569 publications (the annual number was 38), being 16.40% of the total. The second stage was during 2006–2024, with a cumulative 2900 publications (the annual number was 153), accounting for 83.60% of the total. From the perspective of the overall trend of the published articles in the agricultural environmental effects research, although there has been a downward trend in some years (such as 1996, 2003, et al.) comparing to the previous year, it showed varying degrees of growth trends over last 34 years. The results revealed that the research field of agricultural environmental effects has been regarded widely with concern by academic circles and society in recent years.\n\n**Figure 2.** Number of articles in the agricultural environmental effects research from 1991 to 2024.\n\n### 3.2. Analysis of Country Distribution\n\n[Figure 3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f003) depicts the number of articles published in agricultural environmental effects research by the top 10 countries, including the USA, China, and Canada, during two distinct time periods, 1991 to 2005 and 2006 to 2024, as well as their proportions of the total publications. From the changes observed in the number of published articles, China experienced a notable increase in the number of articles from 2006 to 2024, surpassing the level recorded from 1991 to 2005. This trend showed China’s rapid development in this research field. This sustained expansion is quantitatively evidenced by the pronounced increase in its average annual publication volume: the annual output of peer-reviewed papers climbed from less than 50 in the 1991–2005 period to more than 150 throughout 2006–2024. In contrast, although the USA maintained a substantial number of articles in both periods, its growth rate remained relatively modest. In other countries, such as the UK and Germany, the number of articles exhibited relatively steady changes across the two periods. From a proportion standpoint during 1991–2005, the USA held a relatively high proportion of research published articles in this field, whereas China’s proportion was exceedingly low. By the period spanning 2006 to 2024, China’s share had increased significantly, reflecting its growing influence in international research. Meanwhile, the proportions of other countries either declined to varying degrees or remained relatively stable.\n\n**Figure 3.** Number of articles in the agricultural environmental effects research from top 10 countries.\n\n[Figure 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f004) presents the national collaboration network on the agricultural environmental effects research from the (a) total publications and (b) total citations ([Figure 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f004)). As shown, the nodes represented various countries, while the lines connecting the nodes illustrated the associations between countries. From the network diagram of total publications ([Figure 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f004)a), the USA and China occupied central positions in the chart and had more connections with other countries, suggesting extensive collaboration with other nations in this research field. Other countries, such as the UK and Germany, were also connected to numerous countries, highlighting the prevalence of international collaboration in this research field. From the network diagram of total citations ([Figure 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F16\u002F1782#fig_body_display_agriculture-16-01782-f004)b), China and the USA continued to hold relatively core positions, with dense connections to other countries. This suggested that the research outcomes of these two countries were wi","MDPI Agriculture 16(16):1782 2026-08-20",80,{"impact":86,"substance":211,"depth":86,"authority":183,"freshness":163,"relevant":34,"comment":694},"系统综述氮磷钾施肥的环境效应，文献计量方法新颖，数据详实，对农业绿色发展有参考价值。",[696],{"name":691,"url":688},[698,699,700,701,702],"MDPI Agriculture","氮磷钾施肥","文献计量分析","环境效应","可持续养分管理",{"code":704,"slug":705,"name":706,"path":707,"parent_code":708},"F3","fertilizers","肥料与水肥一体化","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Ffertilizers","F",[],{"status":52,"locked":53,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":711},{"candidates":712,"agricultural_evidence":26},[713,721,728],{"code":704,"score":161,"supported":26,"title":714,"abstract":717,"tags":720},[715,716],"施肥","fertilization",[715,718,719],"肥料","养分管理",[],{"code":722,"score":31,"supported":26,"title":723,"abstract":726,"tags":727},"I7",[724,725],"文献计量","bibliometric",[724],[],{"code":729,"score":66,"supported":26,"title":730,"abstract":731,"tags":733},"H2",[],[732],"土壤",[],[735,736],"可持续养分管理 文献计量分析 氮磷钾施肥 环境效应","可持续养分管理 文献计量分析","可持续养分管理文献计量分析氮磷钾施肥环境效应-793","2026-08-21T00:05:57.642826Z"]