[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2066":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"view_count":15,"doi":24,"paper":25,"created_at":47},2066,"Space Technology as a Tool for Peacebuilding and Conflict Prevention in Nigeria: Opportunities, Challenges and Policy Implications","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.64388\u002Firev10i3-1722831","Nigeria's security problems are rarely confined to one place, one cause, or one institution. Insurgency, banditry, farmer–herder violence, communal disputes, kidnapping, illegal resource extraction, climate-related displacement and election-related violence are shaped by a mixture of political, economic, environmental and social conditions. Many of these pressures are particularly difficult to monitor because they develop across large rural spaces, border areas and communities where reliable, timely information is limited. Space technology offers a way of improving that information base. Earth observation, satellite communications, global navigation satellite systems, satellite meteorology and geospatial analysis can help public institutions identify changes, assess vulnerability, maintain communication, plan humanitarian access and monitor conditions that may precede or accompany violence. This article develops the Space Technology–Peacebuilding Nexus (STPN) Model as a framework for explaining how space-derived information can contribute to prevention without turning technology itself into the supposed solution to conflict. The model is built around five linked stages: risk sensing, contextual interpretation, preventive decision, peacebuilding response, and accountability and learning. It draws on human security, conflict-transformation and systems perspectives to argue that the value of space technology depends on what happens between the production of information and the response to it. Using qualitative doctrinal and integrative literature-review methods, the article examines Nigerian space-policy institutions, relevant legislation, early-warning arrangements and scholarship on remote sensing and conflict monitoring. The analysis finds that Nigeria already has important building blocks, including the National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA), Earth-observation experience, satellite communications capabilities, the Defence Space Administration and emerging national and regional early-warning structures. At the same time, fragmented institutional mandates, financing and skills gaps, weak civil–security coordination, data-quality problems, privacy concerns and the risk of excessive surveillance can prevent space-derived information from producing peaceful outcomes. The article argues for a civilian-led geospatial peace and early-warning architecture that combines satellite evidence with community knowledge and established conflict-prevention mechanisms. It recommends stronger data governance, clear response protocols, investment in analytical and subnational capacity, responsible civilian–security coordination, and pilot testing of the STPN Model in different Nigerian conflict settings. The central argument is straightforward: satellites can help Nigeria see risks earlier, but seeing a risk is not the same as preventing violence. Prevention occurs when reliable information is interpreted in context and translated into timely, proportionate and accountable action.","尼日利亚的安全问题很少局限于某一地点、某一起因或某一机构。叛乱、匪盗活动、农牧民暴力、族群冲突、绑架、非法资源开采、气候相关流离失所以及选举相关暴力，均由政治、经济、环境和社会条件交织而成。其中许多压力尤其难以监测，因为它们发生在广阔的农村地区、边境地带和社区，而这些地方可靠、及时的信息十分有限。空间技术为改善这一信息基础提供了途径。地球观测、卫星通信、全球导航卫星系统、卫星气象学以及地理空间分析，可帮助公共机构识别变化、评估脆弱性、维持通信、规划人道主义准入，并监测可能先于或伴随暴力出现的状况。本文构建了“空间技术—建设和平 nexus”（Space Technology–Peacebuilding Nexus, STPN）模型，作为解释空间衍生信息如何有助于预防的框架，同时避免将技术本身视为冲突的所谓解决方案。该模型围绕五个相互关联的阶段构建：风险感知、情境解读、预防决策、建设和平响应，以及问责与学习。它借鉴人的安全、冲突转化和系统视角，主张空间技术的价值取决于信息生产与对其作出响应之间所发生的事情。本文运用定性教义方法和整合性文献综述方法，考察尼日利亚的空间政策机构、相关立法、预警安排以及关于遥感和冲突监测的学术研究。分析发现，尼日利亚已具备重要基础，包括国家空间研究与发展局（NASRDA）、地球观测经验、卫星通信能力、国防空间管理局以及正在形成的国家和区域预警结构。与此同时，机构职责碎片化、资金和技能缺口、民事—安全协调薄弱、数据质量问题、隐私担忧以及过度监视的风险，可能阻碍空间衍生信息产生和平成果。本文主张建立一种以民事为主导的地理空间和平与预警架构，将卫星证据与社区知识及既有的冲突预防机制相结合。",null,"Iconic Research and Engineering Journals","2026-09-08T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"主题为尼日利亚空间技术与和平建设，属安全治理领域，与三农及农业信息化无关，不建议进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21,22,23],"遥感监测","空间技术","冲突预警","10.64388\u002Firev10i3-1722831",{"doi":24,"openalex_id":26,"authors":27,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":38,"card":39,"direction":45,"ingested_from":46},"W7212020987",[28,30,32,34,36],{"name":29,"orcid":9},"Chedochukwu I. Ugochukwu",{"name":31,"orcid":9},"Safiya L. Hassan",{"name":33,"orcid":9},"Oluwatosin Adeniyi",{"name":35,"orcid":9},"Annabel N. Ani",{"name":37,"orcid":9},"Helen C. Obiekezie","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.irejournals.com\u002Fformatedpaper\u002F1722831.pdf",{"tldr":40,"method":41,"finding":42,"direction":43,"opportunity":44},"提出太空技术-建设和平关联模型，分析尼日利亚利用太空技术预防冲突的机会与挑战。","定性文献综述与政策分析，构建STPN五阶段模型。","太空信息价值取决于信息生产与响应间的制度协调，需民用主导的地缘空间预警架构。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究农业遥感与冲突预警结合，探索农村地区信息缺失下的早期风险感知机制。","农业遥感与作物表型","openalex","2026-09-10T23:30:30.486897Z"]