[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2069":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"view_count":31,"doi":32,"paper":33,"created_at":48},2069,"Nanomaterial-enabled Sensors for Soil and Crop Analysis in Agriculture: A Focused Review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Facri\u002F2026\u002Fv26i92158","Rapid, sensitive and portable measurements are important for precision agriculture, particularly when soil and crop conditions vary spatially and temporally. This focused narrative review evaluates nanomaterial-enabled sensors for soil nutrient assessment, crop physiological monitoring and plant-disease detection. Four representative studies were examined across contrasting sensing architectures involving graphene derivatives, conductive nanofibres, gold nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. The selected platforms targeted soil nitrate, indole-3-acetic acid, pathogen-associated DNA and a citrus Huanglongbing protein biomarker. Reported studies demonstrated low analytical detection limits and successful measurements in soil extracts, plant tissues or other agriculturally relevant samples. However, their evidence primarily supports analytical feasibility rather than routine field deployment or direct agronomic benefit. Important constraints include matrix interference, calibration stability, durability of biological recognition elements, electrode reproducibility, sample-preparation requirements, environmental safety and fabrication cost. Recent developments in wearable, wireless and portable sensing further indicate a shift towards integrated monitoring systems, but connectivity alone does not establish field readiness. Future work should emphasise multilocation validation, comparison with accepted reference methods, standardised calibration, long-term stability, batch reproducibility, safe device management and integration of sensor outputs with agricultural decision-support systems. Nanomaterial-enabled sensors therefore show promise as complementary analytical tools, while routine adoption requires reliable performance under real production conditions and evidence that measurements support better management decisions.","快速、灵敏且便携的测量对精准农业十分重要，尤其是当土壤和作物状况在空间和时间上存在变化时。本聚焦式叙述综述评估了用于土壤养分评估、作物生理监测和植物病害检测的纳米材料传感器。本文考察了四项代表性研究，涉及石墨烯衍生物、导电纳米纤维、金纳米颗粒和碳纳米管等不同传感架构。所选平台分别针对土壤硝酸盐、吲哚-3-乙酸、病原体相关DNA和柑橘黄龙病蛋白生物标志物。所报道的研究展示了较低的分析检测限，并成功实现了在土壤提取物、植物组织或其他农业相关样品中的测量。然而，其证据主要支持分析可行性，而非常规田间部署或直接农艺效益。重要限制包括基质干扰、校准稳定性、生物识别元件的耐久性、电极重现性、样品制备要求、环境安全性和制造成本。可穿戴、无线和便携式传感的最新进展进一步表明，传感正转向集成监测系统，但仅凭连接性并不能确立田间就绪性。未来工作应强调多地点验证、与公认参考方法的比较、标准化校准、长期稳定性、批次重现性、安全器件管理，以及将传感器输出与农业决策支持系统相整合。因此，纳米材料传感器作为补充性分析工具显示出前景，而常规采用则需要在真实生产条件下具备可靠性能，并提供测量能够支持更好管理决策的证据。",null,"Archives of Current Research International","2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,67,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":17,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},12,18,17,8,1,"综述系统梳理纳米材料传感器在土壤养分、作物生理与病害检测中的分析可行性，但作者明确指出其证据尚不足以支撑田间常规应用，属细分领域学术进展，适合主题聚合而非每日精选头条。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"智慧农业","纳米材料","农业传感器","土壤养分检测","作物病害监测",0,"10.9734\u002Facri\u002F2026\u002Fv26i92158",{"doi":32,"openalex_id":34,"authors":35,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":31,"oa_url":6,"card":40,"direction":46,"ingested_from":47},"W7212060484",[36,38],{"name":37,"orcid":9},"N. Pruthviraj",{"name":39,"orcid":9},"V. Lakshmi",{"tldr":41,"method":42,"finding":43,"direction":44,"opportunity":45},"综述纳米材料传感器在土壤养分、作物生理和病害检测中的分析可行性及田间应用瓶颈。","聚焦综述4项研究，涵盖石墨烯、导电纳米纤维、金纳米颗粒和碳纳米管传感平台。","传感器检测限低但仅证明分析可行性，田间部署受基质干扰、校准稳定性等限制。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","需开展多地点验证、标准化校准及与决策支持系统集成，以证明田间实用性和农艺效益。","农业人工智能与决策模型","openalex","2026-09-10T23:30:53.443004Z"]