[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2631":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"view_count":15,"doi":24,"paper":25,"created_at":48},2631,"Examining the shades of blue in the blue economy: a perspective on disaggregating impacts on food security in Puerto Rico","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1854048","The Blue Economy has been promoted globally as a framework for sustainable ocean development, promising economic growth, conservation, and improved well-being through sectors such as tourism, fisheries, and aquaculture. It has been particularly championed as a win-win approach in low and middle-income countries and territories across the Global South. Yet its success is typically measured through narrow quantitative indicators such as production levels, revenues, and growth rates, while overlooking the social, cultural, and equity dimensions that shape how benefits and burdens are distributed across sectors and communities. As these initiatives expand, understanding their impacts on local food systems, community well-being, and equity implications becomes increasingly urgent, particularly in (neo)colonial and non-sovereign places where governance structures constrain local control, such as Puerto Rico. Yet the indicators used to evaluate progress for Blue Economy policies often fail to capture implications for wellbeing, food security, and equity. Recent scholarship on equitable Blue Economies calls for social indicators that assess differentiated impacts across groups. Building on Cisneros-Montemayor et al. (2025), this study draws from author experience and exploratory data from Puerto Rico to examine the desegregated impacts, and equity implications of tourism and aquaculture, while gesturing toward possible directions for indicator development grounded in the author’s lived Puerto Rico experience. It argues that without equity-oriented evaluation frameworks and justice-centered governance design, Blue Economy agendas risk reproducing historical inequities rather than improving livelihoods in Puerto Rico and across the Global South.","蓝色经济已在全球范围内被推广为可持续海洋发展的框架，承诺通过旅游、渔业和水产养殖等部门实现经济增长、生态保护与福祉改善。它尤其被推崇为全球南方中低收入国家和地区的一种双赢路径。然而，其成功通常以产量、收入和增长率等狭隘的量化指标来衡量，而忽视了塑造部门与社区之间利益和负担分配方式的社会、文化和公平维度。随着这些倡议不断扩展，理解其对地方粮食系统、社区福祉和公平影响变得日益紧迫，尤其是在治理结构制约地方控制权的（新）殖民和非主权地区，如波多黎各。然而，用于评估蓝色经济政策进展的指标往往无法捕捉其对福祉、粮食安全和公平的影响。近期关于公平蓝色经济的学术研究呼吁采用能够评估群体间差异化影响的社会指标。本研究以Cisneros-Montemayor等（2025）为基础，结合作者经验和来自波多黎各的探索性数据，考察旅游和水产养殖的分解影响及公平意涵，同时基于作者在波多黎各的生活经验，指向指标开发的可能方向。研究认为，若缺乏以公平为导向的评估框架和以正义为中心的治理设计，蓝色经济议程有可能在波多黎各乃至整个全球南方复制历史性的不平等，而非改善生计。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"研究聚焦波多黎各蓝色经济对粮食安全与公平的影响，属海洋经济与食物系统议题，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业等平台主题无直接关联，不建议进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21,22,23],"粮食安全","蓝色经济","渔业治理","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1854048",{"doi":24,"openalex_id":26,"authors":27,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":40,"card":41,"direction":45,"ingested_from":47},"W7213256548",[28,31,33,36,38],{"name":29,"orcid":30},"Liliana Sierra Castillo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6931-6869",{"name":32,"orcid":9},"Nicolás X. Gómez Andújar",{"name":34,"orcid":35},"Luis Alexis Rodríguez-Cruz","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2229-8448",{"name":37,"orcid":9},"Megan Elaine Considine",{"name":39,"orcid":9},"Nathania Martínez-González","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1854048\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":42,"method":43,"finding":44,"direction":45,"opportunity":46},"以波多黎各为例，探讨蓝色经济对粮食安全与公平的差异化影响。","基于作者经验与波多黎各探索性数据，分析旅游与水产养殖。","缺乏公平导向评估框架，蓝色经济可能加剧而非改善历史不平等。","其他","可开发面向小岛屿非主权地区的蓝色经济公平与粮食安全社会指标体系。","openalex","2026-09-16T23:30:08.046982Z"]