[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2633":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"view_count":15,"doi":25,"paper":26,"created_at":47},2633,"Nurturing people and planet: the role of breastfeeding in climate mitigation and adaptation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1919608","Infant feeding practices have environmental consequences that are largely absent from climate policy discussions. Breastfeeding relies on maternal metabolism and local support systems, whereas commercial milk formula depends on dairy production, industrial processing, packaging, and extensive supply chains. Comparative analyses report higher greenhouse-gas and water burdens for commercial milk formula than for breastfeeding. Globally, commercial milk formula use among infants under 6 months of age adds roughly 5.9–7.5 billion kg of carbon dioxide equivalents annually. Pumping and bottle-feeding add material, electricity, and cleaning-related burdens relative to feeding at the breast, but available evidence generally indicates lower impacts than commercial milk formula, although estimates depend strongly on assumptions about maternal diet and pumping practices. Climate change and water insecurity can also threaten breastfeeding through heat stress, food insecurity, and disruptions during disasters and emergencies. Moreover, uncontrolled formula donations during upheavals, while well-intended, impede continuation of breastfeeding. Collectively, these pressures can generate a reinforcing feedback loop: climate shocks undermine breastfeeding, increasing reliance on resource-intensive substitutes that further strain water and energy systems. Recognizing breastfeeding as both a mitigation and resilience issue highlights co-benefits for maternal and child health and climate action and points to practical policy levers, including paid maternity leave, workplace lactation protections, responsible marketing of commercial milk formula, and continuity of lactation support during emergencies that are needed to align optimal infant feeding with climate adaptation planning.","婴儿喂养方式对环境的影响在很大程度上未纳入气候政策讨论。母乳喂养依赖母亲代谢和本地支持系统，而商业配方奶粉则依赖乳制品生产、工业加工、包装和广泛的供应链。比较分析报告显示，商业配方奶粉的温室气体和水资源负担高于母乳喂养。在全球范围内，6个月以下婴儿使用商业配方奶粉每年约增加59亿至75亿千克二氧化碳当量。与直接哺乳相比，泵奶和奶瓶喂养增加了材料、电力和清洁相关的负担，但现有证据普遍表明其影响低于商业配方奶粉，尽管估算结果在很大程度上取决于对母亲饮食和泵奶方式的假设。气候变化和水资源不安全也可能通过热应激、粮食不安全以及灾害和紧急情况期间的中断来威胁母乳喂养。此外，动荡期间不受控制的配方奶粉捐赠虽出于善意，却会阻碍母乳喂养的持续。总体而言，这些压力可形成一种强化的反馈循环：气候冲击削弱母乳喂养，增加对资源密集型替代品的依赖，进而进一步加剧水资源和能源系统的压力。将母乳喂养视为既是减缓问题也是韧性议题，凸显了其对母婴健康和气候行动的协同效益，并指出了切实可行的政策杠杆，包括带薪产假、工作场所哺乳保护、商业配方奶粉的负责任营销，以及紧急情况下哺乳支持的连续性，这些措施是将最佳婴儿喂养与气候适应规划相协调所必需的。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"主题为母乳喂养与气候减缓，属公共卫生与营养领域，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业无直接关联，不建议进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21,22,23,24],"气候变化","母乳喂养","婴幼儿营养","食品系统","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1919608",{"doi":25,"openalex_id":27,"authors":28,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":39,"card":40,"direction":44,"ingested_from":46},"W7213291957",[29,31,33,36],{"name":30,"orcid":9},"Justin E. Silpe",{"name":32,"orcid":9},"Karla Damian-Medina",{"name":34,"orcid":35},"Sarah M. Reyes","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5804-4338",{"name":37,"orcid":38},"Bonnie L. Bassler","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0043-746X","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1919608\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":41,"method":42,"finding":43,"direction":44,"opportunity":45},"论文论证母乳喂养兼具气候减缓与适应价值，并指出配方奶粉的高碳排放与气候冲击的恶性循环。","对比分析母乳与配方奶粉的温室气体、水足迹及应急喂养政策证据。","6月龄内配方奶粉年增约59-75亿千克CO2当量，气候冲击又会削弱母乳喂养形成恶性循环。","农业绿色发展与碳","可量化不同喂养方式的碳足迹并评估产假、哺乳支持等政策在气候适应中的协同减排潜力。","openalex","2026-09-16T23:30:08.179274Z"]