[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2754":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":22,"tags":24,"view_count":30,"doi":31,"paper":32,"created_at":50},2754,"Food safety and quality standards as trade enablers or barriers: insights from Tanzania in intra-African and European markets","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1875371","Agricultural standards are increasingly vital for global trade, yet they present a complex paradox as both trade enablers and significant barriers for developing countries. This study examines the food safety and quality regulatory frameworks in Tanzania, focusing on the horticultural sector’s engagement with intra-African and European Union (EU) markets. Despite horticulture being Tanzania’s fastest-growing agricultural sub-sector, accessing export markets remains a challenge, with only 0.3% of the produce reaching international markets. Findings reveal critical gaps in national standards. For instance, while the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) has developed over 3,000 standards, those relating to fruits and vegetables often lack specific safety limits for different hazards. This regulatory void leaves domestic consumers vulnerable to food safety hazards while forcing exporters to adhere to costly private standards like GlobalGAP for EU market access. The results highlight a heavy reliance on traditional, reactive food inspections rather than more effective risk-based approaches, with inspection efforts disproportionately focused on export produce while neglecting local markets. Furthermore, regional harmonization of standards remains fragmented. While the East African Community and the African Continental Free Trade Area have made progress in aligning regional standards, Tanzania’s inconsistent implementation creates regional trade hurdles and increases compliance costs. To overcome these barriers and boost trade, Tanzania must establish robust, transparent, and harmonized food safety standards. Further improving quality infrastructure, domestic surveillance, and resource-sharing through bodies such as the African Organization for Standardization is essential to enhance Tanzania’s competitiveness in international export markets.","农业标准对全球贸易日益重要，但对发展中国家而言却呈现出一种复杂的悖论：既是贸易的推动者，也是显著的贸易壁垒。本研究考察了坦桑尼亚的食品安全与质量监管框架，重点关注园艺部门参与非洲内部市场和欧盟（EU）市场的情况。尽管园艺业是坦桑尼亚增长最快的农业子部门，但进入出口市场仍是一大挑战，仅有0.3%的农产品进入国际市场。研究发现，国家标准存在严重缺口。例如，坦桑尼亚标准局（TBS）虽已制定超过3000项标准，但涉及水果和蔬菜的标准往往缺乏针对不同危害的具体安全限量。这一监管空白使国内消费者面临食品安全风险，同时迫使出口商为进入欧盟市场而遵守GlobalGAP等成本高昂的私人标准。研究结果还表明，坦桑尼亚严重依赖传统的、被动反应式的食品检验方式，而非更有效的基于风险的方法，检验工作不成比例地集中于出口农产品，却忽视了本地市场。此外，区域标准协调仍然碎片化。尽管东非共同体和非洲大陆自由贸易区在统一区域标准方面取得了进展，但坦桑尼亚执行不一致，造成了区域贸易障碍并增加了合规成本。为克服这些壁垒并促进贸易，坦桑尼亚必须建立稳健、透明且协调一致的食品安全标准。进一步改善质量基础设施、国内监督，并通过非洲标准化组织等机构实现资源共享，对于提升坦桑尼亚在国际出口市场中的竞争力至关重要。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,81,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":21},18,22,13,1,"以坦桑尼亚园艺出口为案例，揭示食品安全标准既是贸易门槛也是竞争力基础，数据与结论对发展中国家的农业标准化与质量基础设施建设有参考价值。",[23],{"name":10,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"非洲农业","食品安全","农产品出口","农业标准","园艺产业",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1875371",{"doi":31,"openalex_id":33,"authors":34,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":30,"oa_url":6,"card":43,"direction":47,"ingested_from":49},"W7213471644",[35,38,41],{"name":36,"orcid":37},"Nicanor Obiero Odongo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0000-5484-7387",{"name":39,"orcid":40},"Cecilia Moraa Onyango","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-2009-668X",{"name":42,"orcid":9},"Fiona Smith",{"tldr":44,"method":45,"finding":46,"direction":47,"opportunity":48},"分析坦桑尼亚食品安全标准在非洲内部与欧盟贸易中既是促进也是壁垒的双重作用。","基于坦桑尼亚园艺部门标准框架与贸易数据的案例研究。","国家标准缺具体安全限值，依赖被动检查且偏重出口，区域标准协调碎片化。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究数字化标准追溯与风险分级监管如何降低小农户出口合规成本并兼顾内销安全。","openalex","2026-09-17T23:30:07.640258Z"]