[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2758":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"view_count":32,"doi":33,"paper":34,"created_at":54},2758,"Heterogeneous impacts and transmission mechanisms of perceived development barriers on cooperative management performance: micro evidence from Shaanxi, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606","Introduction Farmer cooperatives are key to linking smallholders with modern agriculture, yet how different development barriers affect their management performance remains unclear, as prior studies focus mainly on classifying barriers. Methods Using survey data from 1,130 cooperatives in Shaanxi Province, China, this study applies ordinal logistic regression to examine the heterogeneous effects of perceived development barriers on management performance, with stepwise regression and Sobel tests identifying the mediating role of three management practices (strategic planning, resource investment, operational management). Two-period-lagged operating endowments are controlled to address reverse causality. Results The overall effect of barriers is insignificant, but dimensions differ markedly: resource and institutional barriers significantly reduce performance, whereas product-market and human-resource barriers show no overall effect. Management practices act as a channel—resource and institutional barriers exert a negative full mediating effect, product-market barriers a positive suppression effect, and human-resource barriers no effective pathway. Discussion Resource and institutional barriers are hierarchical: members’ insufficient willingness to contribute capital is the primary performance constraint, followed by land-transfer difficulties, while other policy constraints are common baseline conditions rather than core explanatory factors. Endogeneity and robustness tests support these findings.","引言 农民合作社是连接小农户与现代农业的关键，但不同发展障碍如何影响其经营绩效仍不明确，既有研究主要集中于对障碍进行分类。方法 本研究利用中国陕西省1130家合作社的调查数据，采用有序逻辑回归考察感知发展障碍对经营绩效的异质性影响，并通过逐步回归和Sobel检验识别三种管理实践（战略规划、资源投入、运营管理）的中介作用。为处理反向因果问题，研究控制了两期滞后的经营禀赋。结果 障碍的总体效应不显著，但各维度差异明显：资源障碍和制度障碍显著降低绩效，而产品市场障碍和人力资源障碍未表现出总体效应。管理实践发挥渠道作用——资源障碍和制度障碍产生负向完全中介效应，产品市场障碍产生正向抑制效应，人力资源障碍则无有效路径。讨论 资源障碍和制度障碍具有层级性：成员出资意愿不足是首要绩效约束，其次是土地流转困难，而其他政策约束属于常见基线条件而非核心解释因素。内生性和稳健性检验支持上述发现。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,75,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},15,21,17,13,9,1,"基于陕西1130家合作社微观调查，揭示资源与制度壁垒对经营绩效的异质性影响及管理实践中介机制，样本规模与方法设计扎实，对合作社扶持政策有参考价值。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"乡村振兴","农业社会化服务","土地流转","农民合作社","农业经营主体",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606",{"doi":33,"openalex_id":35,"authors":36,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":32,"oa_url":46,"card":47,"direction":51,"ingested_from":53},"W7213418458",[37,40,42,44],{"name":38,"orcid":39},"Shihan Chen","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9790-3174",{"name":41,"orcid":9},"Sihan Jiang",{"name":43,"orcid":9},"Haiyan Wang",{"name":45,"orcid":9},"Jikun Ma","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":48,"method":49,"finding":50,"direction":51,"opportunity":52},"基于陕西1130家合作社调查，分析感知发展障碍对管理绩效的异质性影响及传导机制。","有序Logistic回归、逐步回归与Sobel检验，控制两期滞后经营禀赋。","资源与制度障碍显著降低绩效，管理实践起中介作用，成员出资意愿不足是首要约束。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探究数字技术能否缓解资源与制度障碍，并优化合作社管理实践的中介路径。","openalex","2026-09-17T23:30:08.060675Z"]