[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2766":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"view_count":32,"doi":33,"paper":34,"created_at":57},2766,"Profiles of Structural Exclusion in the Twin Transition: Ideal Types, Political Disaffection, and Participatory Governance","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.17645\u002Fpag.12501","This article analyses how the simultaneous pursuit of green decarbonisation and digital transformation—the twin transition—generates disproportionate structural burdens on marginalised social groups. Drawing on Max Weber’s ideal‐type methodology (Idealtypus) and Spanish statistical evidence, it develops six prototypical profiles of structural exclusion across key twin‐transition sectors: urban mobility and transport, the platform and gig economy, rural energy and depopulation, digital public infrastructure and smart cities, digital agriculture, and urban renovation. Each profile identifies the mechanisms through which green and digital policies impose unequal costs on vulnerable groups, examining the resulting dynamics of institutional disaffection, potential political radicalisation, and common structural patterns. Comparative analysis identifies four recurring exclusion mechanisms—the upfront cost barrier, the digital literacy gateway, the geographic penalty, and knowledge disqualification—tracing a common pathway from structural exclusion to political disaffection. The article concludes by proposing five governance principles grounded in community work and participatory governance, offering a framework transferable to comparable EU contexts.","本文分析绿色脱碳与数字化转型的同时推进——即“双重转型”——如何对边缘化社会群体造成不成比例的结构性负担。基于马克斯·韦伯的理想类型方法（Idealtypus）与西班牙统计数据，本文在双重转型的关键领域构建了六种结构性排斥的典型画像：城市出行与交通、平台与零工经济、农村能源与人口流失、数字公共基础设施与智慧城市、数字农业以及城市更新。每种画像均识别了绿色与数字政策对弱势群体施加不平等成本的机制，并考察由此产生的制度疏离动态、潜在政治激进化以及共同的结构模式。比较分析识别出四种反复出现的排斥机制——前期成本壁垒、数字素养门槛、地理惩罚与知识 disqualification，并追溯了从结构性排斥到政治疏离的共同路径。文章最后提出五项基于社区工作与参与式治理的治理原则，提供了一个可迁移至可比欧盟情境的框架。",null,"Politics and Governance","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,78,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},16,21,18,14,9,1,"以韦伯理想型方法结合西班牙统计数据，构建双转型中结构性排斥的六类原型，其中数字农业与农村能源人口流失维度对农业信息化与数字乡村治理有直接参考价值，结论与治理原则可迁移至欧盟同类情境。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"数字农业","数字乡村","乡村治理","智慧城市","平台经济",0,"10.17645\u002Fpag.12501",{"doi":33,"openalex_id":35,"authors":36,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":32,"oa_url":6,"card":49,"direction":55,"ingested_from":56},"W7213460533",[37,40,43,46],{"name":38,"orcid":39},"Andrés Arias Astray","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8614-0714",{"name":41,"orcid":42},"Melisa Campana","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3988-8273",{"name":44,"orcid":45},"David Alonso González","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8876-8916",{"name":47,"orcid":48},"Juan Iglesias","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4292-5389",{"tldr":50,"method":51,"finding":52,"direction":53,"opportunity":54},"分析绿色与数字双重转型对边缘群体造成的结构性排斥，提出六种理想类型并给出治理原则。","韦伯理想类型法，结合西班牙统计数据，跨六个双转型部门比较分析。","识别出前期成本、数字素养、地理惩罚和知识剥夺四种排斥机制，导致政治疏离。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可针对数字农业中的知识剥夺与地理惩罚机制，设计参与式治理干预并评估其减贫效果。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-17T23:30:10.170805Z"]