[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2935":3,"related-2935":51},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":23,"tags":25,"search_phrases":29,"slug":32,"view_count":33,"doi":34,"paper":35,"created_at":50},2935,"Climate-smart agriculture in Gilgit- Baltistan","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.35853.50403","Climate-smart agriculture in Gilgit- Baltistan。OpenAlex",null,"OpenAlex","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,30,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},8,3,4,6,9,1,"仅标题与来源的OpenAlex条目，无摘要实质内容，信息增量极低，不建议进入每日精选。",[24],{"name":9,"url":6},[26,27,28],"农业信息化","气候智慧农业","吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦",[30,31],"吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦 气候智慧农业 农业信息化","吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦 气候智慧农业","吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦气候智慧农业农业信息化-2935",0,"10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.35853.50403",{"doi":34,"openalex_id":36,"authors":37,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":6,"card":8,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213593115",[38,40,42,44,46],{"name":39,"orcid":8},"Amjad Ali",{"name":41,"orcid":8},"Celik Dagmara",{"name":43,"orcid":8},"Saqib Katreniak",{"name":45,"orcid":8},"Alice Jafarey",{"name":47,"orcid":8},"Mesnard","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-19T23:30:11.950871Z",{"total":19,"page":21,"page_size":19,"items":52},[53,81,131,176,223,263],{"id":54,"title":55,"url":56,"summary":57,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":56,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":58,"score_detail":59,"sources":62,"tags":64,"search_phrases":66,"slug":69,"view_count":33,"doi":70,"paper":71,"created_at":80},2936,"Green Climate Smart Agriculture For Sustainable Farming","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.25577.45920","Green Climate Smart Agriculture For Sustainable Farming。OpenAlex",18,{"impact":17,"substance":60,"depth":60,"authority":17,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":61},2,"仅有标题与来源、无摘要实质内容，属空壳条目，不具备进入每日精选的信息增量。",[63],{"name":9,"url":56},[26,65,27],"可持续农业",[67,68],"气候智慧农业 农业信息化 可持续农业","气候智慧农业 农业信息化","气候智慧农业农业信息化可持续农业-2936","10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.25577.45920",{"doi":70,"openalex_id":72,"authors":73,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":56,"card":8,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213594129",[74,76,78],{"name":75,"orcid":8},"Abdussamad Saleh Saad",{"name":77,"orcid":8},"Mudassir Saad Ubale",{"name":79,"orcid":8},"Musa Muhammad Yusuf","2026-09-19T23:30:12.029309Z",{"id":82,"title":83,"url":84,"summary":85,"summary_zh":86,"content":8,"source_name":87,"source_url":84,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":88,"is_selected":13,"score":89,"score_detail":90,"sources":95,"tags":99,"search_phrases":104,"slug":107,"view_count":33,"doi":108,"paper":109,"created_at":130},2930,"SMALLHOLDER FARMERS' PERCEPTIONS AND USE OF CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832942","Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly promoted as a means of strengthening the resilience of smallholder farming systems to climate variability. Yet awareness of CSA does not necessarily translate into actual implementation, particularly where farmers face financial, technical and institutional constraints. This study examined the roles of climate experience, agricultural information and socioeconomic characteristics in CSA adoption among smallholder farmers in southwestern Nigeria. Primary data were obtained through a structured cross-sectional survey of 190 farmers in Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise respondents and examine CSA awareness, agricultural information, experience of weather variability, willingness to adopt, reported adoption and perceived constraints. Because the adoption outcome was highly imbalanced, Firth-penalised logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with actual CSA adoption. The results show that 98.4% of respondents were aware of CSA and 96.3% reported experiencing changes in weather conditions. Although 96.3% expressed willingness to adopt CSA, 88.4% reported actual use, indicating an intention–implementation gap. Water-conservation technologies received the highest proportion of “very important” responses (83.7%), followed by organic manure (80.5%), drought-resistant crops (80.0%) and crop rotation (79.5%). Government extension officers were the principal reported source of agricultural information (55.3%). Implementation cost was the leading constraint (54.7%), followed by uncertainty about effectiveness (25.8%) and difficulty learning new techniques (19.5%). In the Firth model, experience of changing weather conditions was the only statistically significant predictor of adoption (OR = 10.401, 95% CI: 3.118–34.694, p \u003C 0.001). Gender, education, farm size and extension information were not statistically significant. The findings indicate that CSA adoption in the study area is not adequately explained by awareness alone. Farmers’ direct experience of climatic variability appears to be an important stimulus for adaptation, while financial and technical constraints can restrict implementation. Climate adaptation policies should therefore move beyond general awareness creation towards practical extension, affordable inputs, locally relevant climate information and resource-supported implementation.","气候智慧型农业（climate-smart agriculture, CSA）日益被视为增强小农户耕作系统对气候变异性适应能力的手段。然而，对气候智慧型农业的认知并不必然转化为实际实施，尤其是在农户面临资金、技术和制度约束的情况下。本研究考察了气候经验、农业信息和社会经济特征在尼日利亚西南部小农户采用气候智慧型农业中的作用。原始数据通过结构化横断面调查获得，调查对象为奥约州阿基涅莱地方政府辖区的190名农户。采用描述性统计对受访者特征进行刻画，并考察气候智慧型农业认知、农业信息、天气变异性经历、采用意愿、报告采用情况及感知约束。由于采用结果高度不平衡，研究采用Firth惩罚逻辑回归识别与实际采用气候智慧型农业独立相关的因素。结果表明，98.4%的受访者知晓气候智慧型农业，96.3%报告经历了天气状况变化。尽管96.3%表示愿意采用气候智慧型农业，但88.4%报告实际使用，表明存在意愿—实施差距。节水技术获得“非常重要”评价的比例最高（83.7%），其次为有机肥（80.5%）、抗旱作物（80.0%）和轮作（79.5%）。政府推广人员是报告的主要农业信息来源（55.3%）。实施成本是首要约束（54.7%），其次是对有效性的不确定（25.8%）和学习新技术的困难（19.5%）。在Firth模型中，经历天气状况变化是采用行为的唯一具有统计学意义的预测因素（OR = 10.401，95% CI：3.118–34.694，p \u003C 0.001）。性别、教育程度、农场规模和推广信息在统计上不显著。研究结果表明，仅凭认知不足以充分解释研究区域的气候智慧型农业采用情况。农户对气候变异性的直接经历似乎是适应行为的重要刺激因素，而资金和技术约束可能限制实施。因此，气候适应政策应从一般性认知宣传转向实践推广、可负担投入、地方相关气候信息和资源支持下的实施。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)",25,65,{"impact":16,"substance":91,"depth":92,"authority":93,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":94},20,16,12,"基于190户调查的实证研究，揭示气候智慧农业意愿与实施落差，对农业信息化推广有参考价值，但属区域性研究、影响层级有限。",[96,97],{"name":87,"url":84},{"name":87,"url":98},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832941",[100,27,101,102,103],"小农户","农业推广","尼日利亚","农业信息",[105,106],"尼日利亚 小农户 气候智慧农业","Oyo State 农业推广","尼日利亚小农户气候智慧农业-2930","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832942",{"doi":108,"openalex_id":110,"authors":111,"venue":87,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":84,"card":124,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213578578",[112,114,116,118,120,122],{"name":113,"orcid":8},"Folasade J. Odekunle",{"name":115,"orcid":8},"Adedotun A. Adetunji",{"name":117,"orcid":8},"Idris O. JINADU",{"name":119,"orcid":8},"Adedayo S. Adediran",{"name":121,"orcid":8},"Gabriel O. Adebayo",{"name":123,"orcid":8},"Akeem Adewole",{"tldr":125,"method":126,"finding":127,"direction":128,"opportunity":129},"研究尼日利亚小农户对气候智慧农业的认知、采用意愿与实际使用及其影响因素。","对奥约州190户农户问卷调查，采用Firth惩罚逻辑回归分析采用因素。","认知与意愿高但实际采用存在落差，天气变化经历是唯一显著预测因素。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索农业信息传播与气候经历如何协同促进小农户从意愿到实际采用。","2026-09-19T23:30:11.305594Z",{"id":132,"title":133,"url":134,"summary":135,"summary_zh":136,"content":8,"source_name":137,"source_url":134,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":138,"score_detail":139,"sources":144,"tags":146,"search_phrases":152,"slug":155,"view_count":33,"doi":156,"paper":157,"created_at":175},2928,"Biochar 2.0 in Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Critical Review of Designer Biochars, Soil Microbiome Responses, Nutrient-Use Efficiency and Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Fajsspn\u002F2026\u002Fv12i4764","Biochar has moved from a broadly promoted soil amendment to a material that is deliberately engineered for defined agronomic and climatic functions. This transition, described here as a shift towards designer biochars, raises questions that the earlier literature was not designed to answer: whether tailoring feedstock, pyrolysis conditions and post-synthesis modification produces reproducible gains in nutrient-use efficiency, whether the accompanying soil microbiome changes are functionally meaningful or largely descriptive, and whether greenhouse-gas benefits observed in short experiments persist under field management and withstand carbon-accounting scrutiny. This critical narrative review examines the evidence linking biochar properties to soil microbial responses, nutrient retention and transformation, and the mitigation of nitrous oxide, methane and carbon dioxide in agricultural soils. Literature was identified through structured searching of open scholarly indexes, agricultural and intergovernmental repositories, and citation tracking, with every retained source verified against an authoritative bibliographic record. The synthesis indicates that the strongest and most reproducible effects are pedoclimatic rather than material-specific: responses concentrate in acidic, coarse-textured, nutrient-depleted and tropical soils, whereas temperate fertile systems frequently show negligible agronomic gain. Microbiome studies consistently report compositional turnover with little change in alpha diversity, and the functional interpretation of these shifts rests heavily on marker-gene abundance rather than demonstrated process rates. Nitrous oxide suppression is well supported in aggregate but varies by a factor of five across syntheses, and recent field work shows that freshly applied high-rate biochar can increase emissions. Methane outcomes in flooded systems depend on water management and application history. Carbon permanence remains contested because the principal proxies used for crediting are informative about carbonisation rather than about in-soil residence under field weathering. Confidence is highest for liming, cation retention and short-term nitrogen conservation, and lowest for long-term net climate benefit at landscape scale. Priorities include multi-year factorial field trials that pair engineered materials with process-level measurement, standardised reporting of biochar properties, and accounting frameworks calibrated on weathered rather than freshly produced material.","生物炭已从一种被广泛推广的土壤改良剂，转变为一种为特定农艺和气候功能而刻意设计的材料。这一转变——本文将其描述为向“设计型生物炭”的转向——提出了早期文献未曾设计回答的问题：定制原料、热解条件和合成后修饰是否能在养分利用效率上产生可重复的增益；伴随而来的土壤微生物组变化在功能上是否有意义，还是主要停留在描述层面；以及在短期实验中观察到的温室气体效益能否在田间管理下持续存在，并经受住碳核算的审视。这篇批判性叙述综述考察了将生物炭性质与土壤微生物响应、养分保持与转化，以及农业土壤中氧化亚氮、甲烷和二氧化碳减排联系起来的证据。文献通过结构化检索开放学术索引、农业和政府间知识库以及引文追踪来识别，所有保留的来源均对照权威书目记录进行了核实。综合结果表明，最强且最可重复的效应是土壤气候性的，而非材料特异性的：响应集中于酸性、粗质地、养分贫瘠和热带土壤，而温带肥沃系统往往显示可忽略的农艺增益。微生物组研究一致报告组成上的更替而α多样性变化甚微，且对这些变化的功能解读在很大程度上依赖于标记基因丰度，而非已证实的过程速率。氧化亚氮抑制在总体上得到较好支持，但不同综合研究之间相差可达五倍，且近期田间工作表明，新施用的高用量生物炭可能增加排放。淹水系统中的甲烷结果取决于水分管理和施用历史。碳永久性仍存争议，因为用于信用核算的主要替代指标所反映的是碳化程度，而非田间风化条件下的土壤内驻留时间。置信度最高的是石灰效应、阳离子保持和短期氮素保全，最低的是景观尺度上的长期净气候效益。优先事项包括：将工程化材料与过程水平测量相结合的多年度析因田间试验、生物炭性质的标准化报告，以及基于风化而非","Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition",80,{"impact":58,"substance":140,"depth":141,"authority":142,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":143},22,19,13,"系统评述设计型生物炭在土壤微生物、养分效率与温室气体减排上的证据强度与不确定性，学术增量扎实，对农业绿色低碳与土壤健康方向有参考价值。",[145],{"name":137,"url":134},[147,148,27,149,150,151],"生物炭","土壤健康","土壤微生物","温室气体减排","养分利用效率",[153,154],"生物炭 温室气体 减排","养分利用效率 气候智慧农业 温室气体减排 土壤微生物","生物炭温室气体减排-2928","10.9734\u002Fajsspn\u002F2026\u002Fv12i4764",{"doi":156,"openalex_id":158,"authors":159,"venue":137,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":134,"card":169,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213554252",[160,162,165,167],{"name":161,"orcid":8},"K. G. Rosin",{"name":163,"orcid":164},"Aditya V Machnoor","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-5777-9188",{"name":166,"orcid":8},"Rakesh Kokatnoor",{"name":168,"orcid":8},"Arun S. Kalasad",{"tldr":170,"method":171,"finding":172,"direction":173,"opportunity":174},"综述设计型生物炭在气候智慧农业中的效果，指出其农艺与减排效益高度依赖土壤气候条件。","结构化文献检索与引文追踪，整合生物炭性质、土壤微生物、养分与温室气体证据。","最强效应集中于酸性贫瘠热带土壤，温带肥沃土壤增益有限；氧化亚氮抑制变异大，碳持久性存疑。","农业绿色发展与碳","需多年多因子田间试验，结合过程速率测量与风化态碳核算，验证设计型生物炭的长期净气候效益。","2026-09-19T23:30:11.160909Z",{"id":177,"title":178,"url":179,"summary":180,"summary_zh":181,"content":8,"source_name":182,"source_url":179,"published_at":183,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":184,"score_detail":185,"sources":188,"tags":190,"search_phrases":195,"slug":198,"view_count":33,"doi":199,"paper":200,"created_at":222},2772,"Analysis of Climate‑Smart Agriculture (CSA) Adoption Level on Tidal Land and Its Effect on Household Food Security","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.22004\u002Fag.econ.410358","Climate change is a universal challenge for all those natural resource-based sectors, including agriculture. The farming community should adapt to climate change effects through Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) approaches to resolve the same. The objectives of the study are to analyze the level of technology adoption of CSA practices that have been implemented by rice farmers on tidal land, to analyze the level of household food security of rice farmers on tidal land, and to analyze the effect of the level of technology adoption of CSA practices towards household food security in Telang Jaya Village, Muara Telang District, Banyuasin Regency. Sixty farmers are used for the respondents number. A study method with a survey approach of visiting the research site directly is employed here. The outcomes of this study indicate an increased awareness of climate change among farmers; one way is by adopting CSA, which can optimize farm productivity and increase farmer income, thus positively impacting food security. The adoption rate of CSA technology, i.e., tractors, water pumps, drainage, direct seeding planting, and combined harvesters, positively influences food security.","气候变化是所有以自然资源为基础的部门（包括农业）面临的普遍挑战。农业社区应通过气候智能型农业（CSA）方法来适应气候变化的影响，以解决这一问题。本研究的目标是分析潮汐地稻农已实施的气候智能型农业实践的技术采纳水平，分析潮汐地稻农的家庭粮食安全水平，并分析气候智能型农业实践的技术采纳水平对Banyuasin县Muara Telang区Telang Jaya村家庭粮食安全的影响。研究选取60名农民作为受访者。本研究采用直接前往研究地点进行调查的研究方法。研究结果表明，农民对气候变化的意识有所提高；其中一种方式就是采纳气候智能型农业，这可以优化农业生产率并增加农民收入，从而对粮食安全产生积极影响。气候智能型农业技术的采纳率，即拖拉机、水泵、排水、直播种植和联合收割机，对粮食安全产生正向影响。","AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",60,{"impact":16,"substance":92,"depth":186,"authority":142,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":187},14,"基于60户农户调研的CSA技术采纳与粮食安全实证研究，结论明确但样本小、地域性强，属细分领域学术进展，可作为主题页聚合素材。",[189],{"name":182,"url":179},[191,27,192,193,194],"粮食安全","技术采纳","水稻种植","盐沼地",[196,197],"气候智慧农业 技术采纳 水稻种植 粮食安全","气候智慧农业 技术采纳","气候智慧农业技术采纳水稻种植粮食安全-2772","10.22004\u002Fag.econ.410358",{"doi":199,"openalex_id":201,"authors":202,"venue":182,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":179,"card":217,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213409702",[203,205,207,209,211,213,215],{"name":204,"orcid":8},"Yamin M.",{"name":206,"orcid":8},"Wahyu Swasdiningrum Putri Trisna",{"name":208,"orcid":8},"Dwi Saputri Salsabilah",{"name":210,"orcid":8},"Firdha Tafarini Meitry",{"name":212,"orcid":8},"Ayu Sulastri Merna",{"name":214,"orcid":8},"Damayanthy Dini",{"name":216,"orcid":8},"Ramadani Andelia Siti",{"tldr":218,"method":219,"finding":220,"direction":173,"opportunity":221},"分析潮汐地稻农采用气候智慧型农业技术的程度及其对家庭粮食安全的影响。","对60户稻农进行实地问卷调查，分析CSA技术采用水平与粮食安全的关系。","采用拖拉机、水泵、排水、直播和联合收割机等CSA技术能正向影响家庭粮食安全。","可探究不同CSA技术组合对粮食安全的差异化贡献，并引入遥感或物联网监测采用动态。","2026-09-17T23:30:13.841443Z",{"id":224,"title":225,"url":226,"summary":227,"summary_zh":228,"content":8,"source_name":229,"source_url":226,"published_at":183,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":230,"score_detail":231,"sources":234,"tags":236,"search_phrases":240,"slug":243,"view_count":33,"doi":244,"paper":245,"created_at":262},2769,"Climate change impacts and resilience pathways in somalia through a systematic review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs42452-026-09538-5","Somalia is among the most climate-vulnerable countries worldwide, characterized by predominantly arid and semi-arid regions increasingly affected by recurrent droughts, irregular precipitation, rising temperatures, land degradation, and water scarcity, all of which compromise livelihoods, food security, and socio-economic stability. This study addresses the limited synthesis of recent, spatially explicit evidence on climate change impacts in Somalia by bringing together current literature and institutional reports to analyze the effects of climate change and identify adaptation and resilience strategies The review is entirely desk-based and utilizes 30 secondary data articles from reputable sources such as FAO-SWALIM, the World Bank, ICPAC, FSNAU, USAID, and peer-reviewed research articles from Scopus and web of science published from 2008 to 2025. The results showed that over 60% of Somalia’s territory is categorized as arid or hyper-arid, with the southern parts seeing the most acute soil erosion and environmental deterioration. Significant drought occurrences, especially in 2010–2011 and 2016–2017, were greatly impacted by extensive climatic factors including ENSO and the Indian Ocean Dipole. Climate variability has resulted in reduced crop yields, pasture degradation, livestock mortality, persistent water shortages, and extensive food insecurity, while inadequate governance, restricted climate financing, and deficient early-warning and monitoring systems hinder effective adaptation. The review emphasizes that climate change presents a systemic threat to Somalia’s environmental and livelihood systems, highlighting the necessity for integrated, spatially informed strategies that incorporate GIS-based environmental monitoring, sustainable land and water management, climate-smart agriculture, strengthened institutions, and enhanced access to climate finance to support long-term resilience and sustainable development.","索马里是全球最易受气候变化影响的国家之一，其国土以干旱和半干旱地区为主，日益受到反复出现的干旱、降水不规律、气温上升、土地退化及水资源短缺的影响，这些问题共同威胁着生计、粮食安全和社会经济稳定。本研究针对索马里气候变化影响近期空间明确证据综合不足的问题，汇集当前文献和机构报告，分析气候变化的影响并识别适应与韧性策略。本综述完全基于案头研究，使用了来自FAO-SWALIM、世界银行、ICPAC、FSNAU、USAID等知名来源的30篇二手数据文献，以及2008年至2025年间发表于Scopus和Web of Science的同行评审研究论文。结果表明，索马里超过60%的领土被归类为干旱或极度干旱，南部地区土壤侵蚀和环境退化最为严重。重大干旱事件，尤其是2010—2011年和2016—2017年的干旱，受到包括厄尔尼诺-南方涛动（ENSO）和印度洋偶极子（IOD）在内的广泛气候因素的显著影响。气候变率导致作物减产、牧场退化、牲畜死亡、持续的水资源短缺和大范围的粮食不安全，而治理不足、气候融资受限以及预警和监测系统薄弱则阻碍了有效适应。本综述强调，气候变化对索马里的环境和生计系统构成系统性威胁，凸显了采取综合性、空间信息化策略的必要性，这些策略应包括基于GIS的环境监测、可持续土地和水资源管理、气候智慧型农业、强化制度以及增强气候融资渠道，以支持长期韧性和可持续发展。","Discover Applied Sciences",76,{"impact":58,"substance":91,"depth":232,"authority":142,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":233},17,"系统综述整合2008-2025年30篇文献，揭示索马里干旱与粮食安全影响并提出GIS监测与气候智慧农业等韧性路径，对干旱区农业信息化有参考价值。",[235],{"name":229,"url":226},[191,237,27,238,239],"气候变化","遥感监测","干旱监测",[241,242],"气候智慧农业 干旱监测 气候变化 粮食安全","气候智慧农业 干旱监测","气候智慧农业干旱监测气候变化粮食安全-2769","10.1007\u002Fs42452-026-09538-5",{"doi":244,"openalex_id":246,"authors":247,"venue":229,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":226,"card":257,"direction":48,"ingested_from":49},"W7213257664",[248,250,252,255],{"name":249,"orcid":8},"Abdiaziz Hassan Nur",{"name":251,"orcid":8},"Mohamed Osman Abdulkadir",{"name":253,"orcid":254},"Omar Ali","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-3009-1850",{"name":256,"orcid":8},"Ahmed Sodal Asir",{"tldr":258,"method":259,"finding":260,"direction":173,"opportunity":261},"系统综述索马里气候变化影响与韧性路径，基于30篇文献与机构报告。","文献综述，采用FAO-SWALIM、世行等2008-2025年30篇二手数据。","超60%国土干旱，干旱致减产、缺水与粮食不安全，治理与预警不足阻碍适应。","可结合GIS与遥感构建索马里干旱预警和气候智慧型农业适应决策模型。","2026-09-17T23:30:10.557669Z",{"id":264,"title":265,"url":266,"summary":267,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":268,"source_url":266,"published_at":183,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":269,"score_detail":270,"sources":272,"tags":274,"search_phrases":277,"slug":280,"view_count":33,"doi":281,"paper":282,"created_at":298},2745,"A novel framework for integrating diverse environmental effects of agricultural soil for sustainable remediation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104989","A novel framework for integrating diverse environmental effects of agricultural soil for sustainable remediation。Agricultural Systems","Agricultural Systems",55,{"impact":16,"substance":93,"depth":186,"authority":142,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":271},"核心期刊论文，提出农业土壤多元环境效应整合框架，方法有新意但偏学术，产业与政策影响有限，可作为专业参考而非每日精选头条。",[273],{"name":268,"url":266},[26,65,275,276],"土壤修复","农业环境",[278,279],"农业信息化 可持续农业 农业环境 土壤修复","农业信息化 可持续农业","农业信息化可持续农业农业环境土壤修复-2745","10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104989",{"doi":281,"openalex_id":283,"authors":284,"venue":268,"cited_by_count":33,"oa_url":8,"card":8,"direction":8,"ingested_from":49},"W7213415381",[285,287,290,293,296],{"name":286,"orcid":8},"Yuanliang Jin",{"name":288,"orcid":289},"Muhan Qin","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7887-6833",{"name":291,"orcid":292},"Bin Zhao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4268-6074",{"name":294,"orcid":295},"Zhenhuan Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9932-9225",{"name":297,"orcid":8},"Shengqi Qi","2026-09-17T23:30:04.767424Z"]