[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3142":3,"related-3142":59},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"search_phrases":31,"slug":34,"view_count":35,"doi":36,"paper":37,"created_at":58},3142,"Communication channels for promoting regenerative agricultural practices among maize farmers: preferences and predictors in Ghana’s transitional belt","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960","Agricultural extension, knowledge exchange, behavioural change, and smallholder innovation are fundamental to accelerating sustainable agricultural transformation and strengthening climate-resilient food systems in Africa. Effective knowledge exchange enables farmers to adopt environmentally sustainable practices that improve soil health, enhance productivity, and contribute to food and nutrition security. However, limited evidence exists on how farmers’ communication preferences influence the adoption of regenerative agricultural practices (RAPs). This study examined determinants of maize farmers’ preferred communication channels for receiving RAP information in Ghana’s transitional belt. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 maize farmers selected through a multistage sampling procedure. Data were collected using a structured interview schedule administered to the selected respondents. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multinomial logistic regression. Mass communication emerged as the most preferred channel (38.7%), followed by individual (37.1%) and group communication (24.2%). Despite being the least preferred, group communication was associated with significantly higher adoption of RAPs than mass and individual channels. Communication preferences were significantly influenced by education, sex, farming experience, land ownership, market incentives, location, and farm fragmentation. The findings demonstrate that communication effectiveness depends not only on information access but also on opportunities for interaction, peer learning, and contextualised advisory support. The study recommends integrating mass communication with participatory group-based and targeted interpersonal extension approaches to enhance RAPs adoption. This supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action and SDG 15 [Life on Land]). By linking communication preferences with regenerative agriculture adoption, this study extends agricultural communication theory and provides evidence for designing farmer-centred extension systems that strengthen resilient agricultural and food systems across sub-Saharan Africa.","农业推广、知识交流、行为改变和小农创新是加速非洲可持续农业转型和增强气候韧性粮食系统的根本所在。有效的知识交流使农民能够采用环境可持续的做法，从而改善土壤健康、提高生产力并促进粮食和营养安全。然而，关于农民的沟通偏好如何影响再生农业实践（RAPs）采纳的证据仍然有限。本研究考察了加纳过渡带玉米农民获取再生农业实践信息时首选沟通渠道的决定因素。研究采用多阶段抽样程序选取了385名玉米农民进行横断面调查，使用结构化访谈问卷对选定受访者进行数据收集，并运用描述性统计、单因素方差分析、卡方检验和多项逻辑回归进行数据分析。大众传播是最受青睐的渠道（38.7%），其次是个体传播（37.1%）和群体传播（24.2%）。尽管群体传播最不受青睐，但其与再生农业实践采纳率显著高于大众传播和个体传播相关。沟通偏好受到教育程度、性别、务农经验、土地所有权、市场激励、地理位置和地块分散程度的显著影响。研究结果表明，沟通效果不仅取决于信息获取，还取决于互动机会、同伴学习和情境化咨询服务。研究建议将大众传播与参与式群体方法和有针对性的面对面推广方法相结合，以提高再生农业实践的采纳率。这有助于实现可持续发展目标2（零饥饿）、目标12（负责任消费和生产）、目标13（气候行动）和目标15（陆地生物）。通过将沟通偏好与再生农业采纳相联系，本研究拓展了农业传播理论，并为设计以农民为中心的推广体系提供了依据，以增强撒哈拉以南非洲地区具有韧性的农业和粮食系统。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,73,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":22},12,21,17,13,1,"基于385户加纳玉米农户调查，揭示沟通渠道偏好与再生农业采纳关系，对非洲小农推广体系有实证参考价值，但地域性强、国内关联度有限。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"加纳","农业推广","玉米种植","再生农业","农户沟通",[32,33],"加纳 玉米 农户 沟通渠道","再生农业 推广 加纳","加纳玉米农户沟通渠道-3142",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960",{"doi":36,"openalex_id":38,"authors":39,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":6,"card":51,"direction":55,"ingested_from":57},"W7213983148",[40,42,45,48],{"name":41,"orcid":9},"Fred Ankuyi",{"name":43,"orcid":44},"Ernest Laryea Okorley","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1354-7446",{"name":46,"orcid":47},"Fatimah Von Abubakari","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5485-4085",{"name":49,"orcid":50},"Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1657-1409",{"tldr":52,"method":53,"finding":54,"direction":55,"opportunity":56},"研究加纳玉米农获取再生农业信息的渠道偏好及其对采纳的影响。","对385户玉米农问卷调查，用多项逻辑回归等分析。","大众传播最受偏好，但群体传播渠道对应更高的再生农业实践采纳率。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索数字工具与群体互动结合的混合推广模式，提升小农再生农业采纳。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:07.910603Z",{"total":60,"page":21,"page_size":60,"items":61},6,[62,94,138,178,218,253],{"id":63,"title":64,"url":65,"summary":66,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":67,"source_url":9,"published_at":68,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":69,"score_detail":70,"sources":74,"tags":76,"search_phrases":81,"slug":84,"view_count":35,"doi":9,"paper":85,"created_at":93},3243,"Integrating Climate Resilience and Digital Traceability in Regenerative Agri-Food Systems: A Scenario-Based Framework for Verifiable Sustainability Claims（再生农业食品系统整合气候韧性与数字溯源：可验证可持续性声明的情景框架）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F18\u002F2024","MDPI Agriculture 16(18) 2024 发表研究：面对再生农业食品系统的可持续性声明常缺乏可验证、系统性证据的问题，构建整合情景分析、SWOT评估和案例研究的三方法框架。三种前瞻性情景——乐观、常规、悲观——基于现有气候韧性和政策文献构建；SWOT分析综合区块链、物联网和AI赋能的溯源机制影响因素；案例研究以先前记录的再生农业食品计划为基础，分析气候韧性叙事、数字验证工具和消费者信任线索的交互作用。结果表明，再生声明常与可验证数据流脱节，数字溯源采用面临结构性、成本相关障碍，消费者信任更依赖于情感和本土化线索而非正式认证；该框架为政策制定者、认证机构和农产品生产者将气候韧性战略与数字可验证可持续性声明相结合提供可复制、低资源方法。（罗马尼亚布加勒斯特国家科学技术大学Politehnica）","MDPI Agriculture","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",70,{"impact":17,"substance":71,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":72,"relevant":21,"comment":73},20,8,"论文提出情景分析、SWOT与案例研究三方法框架，指出再生农业可持续性声明与可验证数据流脱节，对农业数字化溯源有参考价值，但属学术探讨、产业落地影响有限。",[75],{"name":67,"url":65},[77,78,79,80,29],"农业人工智能","区块链","气候韧性","数字溯源",[82,83],"布加勒斯特 Politehnica 再生农业","MDPI Agriculture 数字溯源","布加勒斯特Politehnica再生农业-3243",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":86,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":9,"card":87,"direction":55,"ingested_from":92},[],{"tldr":88,"method":89,"finding":90,"direction":55,"opportunity":91},"构建情景分析、SWOT与案例研究框架，整合再生农业的气候韧性与数字溯源以验证可持续性声明。","情景分析、SWOT评估与案例研究三方法框架，结合区块链、物联网和AI溯源文献。","再生声明常与可验证数据脱节，数字溯源有成本障碍，消费者信任更依赖情感与本土线索。","可探索低成本数字溯源与本土化信任线索结合的可验证声明机制，尤其在小农户场景。","agent","2026-09-23T00:04:32.924354Z",{"id":95,"title":96,"url":97,"summary":98,"summary_zh":99,"content":9,"source_name":100,"source_url":97,"published_at":101,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":102,"is_selected":14,"score":103,"score_detail":104,"sources":108,"tags":112,"search_phrases":117,"slug":120,"view_count":35,"doi":121,"paper":122,"created_at":137},3198,"Farm Budgeting and Gross Margin Analysis as Extension Tools for Promoting Commercial Agriculture among Smallholder Farmers in Zamfara State, Nigeria.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22870012","Abstract This study assessed farm budgeting and gross margin analysis as extension tools for promoting commercial agriculture among smallholder farmers in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Specifically, the study examined farmers' knowledge and use of farm budgeting and gross margin analysis, assessed the role of agricultural extension agents in promoting their application, determined the level of commercial agriculture participation, and examined the relationship between the use of the two tools and commercial agriculture participation. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select 241 smallholder farmers from four Local Government Areas. Data were collected through a structured, pre-tested interview schedule and analysed using descriptive statistics, farm budgeting, gross margin analysis, benefit-cost ratio, and multiple linear regression estimated using the Ordinary Least Squares method. The results showed that farmers had a relatively high level of knowledge of farm budgeting and gross margin analysis (grand mean = 3.40), whereas their actual use of the tools was low (mean = 2.82), indicating a knowledge–application gap. Extension support was positively rated (mean = 3.38), although follow-up support remained limited. Commercial agriculture participation was relatively high (mean = 3.41). The regression model was statistically significant (F = 47.84, p \u003C 0.001) and explained 58.3% of the variation in commercial agriculture participation. Farm budgeting (B = 0.286, p \u003C 0.001) and gross margin analysis (B = 0.351, p \u003C 0.001) were positively and significantly associated with commercial agriculture participation. The study concluded that strengthening practical extension support for financial planning and profitability assessment could enhance informed and market-oriented farm decision-making among smallholder farmers. Keywords: Financial planning; Profitability assessment; Market orientation; Farm management; Enterprise decision-making; Extension Tools.","摘要 本研究评估了农场预算编制与毛利分析作为推广工具在尼日利亚扎姆法拉州促进小农户商业化农业方面的作用。具体而言，本研究考察了农民对农场预算编制和毛利分析的知识与使用情况，评估了农业推广人员在推动其应用中的作用，测定了商业化农业参与水平，并检验了这两种工具的使用与商业化农业参与之间的关系。采用多阶段抽样程序，从四个地方政府区域选取了241名小农户。数据通过结构化、预先测试的访谈问卷收集，并采用描述性统计、农场预算编制、毛利分析、效益成本比以及普通最小二乘法估计的多元线性回归进行分析。结果表明，农民对农场预算编制和毛利分析的知识水平相对较高（总均值=3.40），而其对工具的实际使用率较低（均值=2.82），表明存在知识—应用差距。推广支持获得正面评价（均值=3.38），但后续跟进支持仍然有限。商业化农业参与度相对较高（均值=3.41）。回归模型具有统计学显著性（F=47.84，p\u003C0.001），解释了商业化农业参与变异的58.3%。农场预算编制（B=0.286，p\u003C0.001）和毛利分析（B=0.351，p\u003C0.001）与商业化农业参与呈显著正相关。研究得出结论，加强对财务规划和盈利能力评估的实践性推广支持，可增强小农户知情且面向市场的农场决策能力。关键词：财务规划；盈利能力评估；市场导向；农场管理；企业经营决策；推广工具。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z",25,65,{"impact":72,"substance":71,"depth":105,"authority":17,"freshness":106,"relevant":21,"comment":107},16,9,"基于241户小农户调查的实证研究，揭示农业推广中财务工具的知识-应用差距，对农业信息化与推广服务有参考价值，但地域局限于尼日利亚。",[109,110],{"name":100,"url":97},{"name":100,"url":111},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22870011",[113,27,114,115,116],"小农户","尼日利亚","农场预算","农业商业化",[118,119],"Zamfara 小农户 农业推广","农场预算 毛利分析","Zamfara小农户农业推广-3198","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22870012",{"doi":121,"openalex_id":123,"authors":124,"venue":100,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":97,"card":131,"direction":136,"ingested_from":57},"W7213887499",[125,127,129],{"name":126,"orcid":9},"M.K. Idris",{"name":128,"orcid":9},"M. I. Fagge",{"name":130,"orcid":9},"U.S. Danjuma",{"tldr":132,"method":133,"finding":134,"direction":55,"opportunity":135},"研究尼日利亚小农户农场预算与毛利分析作为推广工具对商业化农业参与的影响。","多阶段抽样241户，用描述统计、农场预算、毛利分析、OLS回归。","农户知识高但使用低，两工具均显著正向关联商业化农业参与（解释58.3%）。","可探索将农场预算与毛利分析数字化、嵌入移动端推广工具，弥合知识-应用鸿沟。","农业人工智能与决策模型","2026-09-22T23:30:46.883515Z",{"id":139,"title":140,"url":141,"summary":142,"summary_zh":143,"content":9,"source_name":144,"source_url":141,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":103,"score_detail":145,"sources":148,"tags":150,"search_phrases":153,"slug":156,"view_count":35,"doi":157,"paper":158,"created_at":177},3154,"The Role of Agricultural Extension Services in Promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture Adoption among Smallholder Farmers in Mwingi West sub-county Kitui County, Kenya","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Fajaees\u002F2026\u002Fv44i103022","Agricultural extension services provide smallholder farmers with knowledge, technical guidance, and advisory support that can facilitate the adoption of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices. This study examined the role of agricultural extension services in promoting CSA adoption among smallholder farmers in Mwingi West Sub-County, Kitui County, Kenya. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected from 200 randomly selected farmers through structured questionnaires, while qualitative evidence was obtained from 10 agricultural extension officers and 10 focus group discussions with farmer groups. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test of independence. Significant associations were reported between CSA adoption and access to agricultural extension services, the source of extension information, type of extension support received, frequency of extension contact, perceived usefulness of extension services, CSA practices promoted through extension, and farmers’ perceived influence of extension services on adoption. Most respondents (82.0%) had access to extension services. Extension agents were the main information source (46.0%), and technical training was the most frequently reported support (38.0%). Conservation agriculture (30.0%), agroforestry (22.0%), and water harvesting (19.0%) were the leading practices promoted through extension activities. Nearly half of respondents (48.0%) reported that extension services had increased CSA adoption to a great extent. The findings indicate that accessible, practical, and regular extension support is closely associated with CSA adoption in the study area.","农业推广服务为小农户提供知识、技术指导和咨询服务，有助于促进气候智能型农业（CSA）实践的采纳。本研究考察了农业推广服务在促进肯尼亚基图伊县姆温吉西分区小农户采纳气候智能型农业实践中的作用。研究采用横断面混合方法设计。定量数据通过结构化问卷从200名随机抽取的农户中收集，定性证据则来自10名农业推广官员以及10次农户小组焦点小组讨论。定量数据采用描述性统计和卡方独立性检验进行分析。结果显示，气候智能型农业实践的采纳与以下因素存在显著关联：能否获得农业推广服务、推广信息来源、所获推广支持类型、推广接触频率、推广服务的感知有用性、通过推广所宣传的气候智能型农业实践，以及农户对推广服务在采纳过程中影响力的感知。大多数受访者（82.0%）能够获得推广服务。推广人员是主要的信息来源（46.0%），技术培训是最常报告的支持类型（38.0%）。通过推广活动宣传的主要实践包括保护性农业（30.0%）、农林业（22.0%）和雨水收集（19.0%）。近半数受访者（48.0%）表示推广服务在很大程度上提高了气候智能型农业实践的采纳率。研究结果表明，在研究区域内，可及、实用且定期的推广支持与气候智能型农业实践的采纳密切相关。","Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology",{"impact":72,"substance":71,"depth":146,"authority":17,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":147},15,"基于肯尼亚小农户的实证研究，数据翔实但地域性强，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限，可作国际经验收录。",[149],{"name":144,"url":141},[151,113,152,27],"肯尼亚","气候智慧农业",[154,155],"气候智慧农业 农业推广 小农户 肯尼亚","气候智慧农业 农业推广","气候智慧农业农业推广小农户肯尼亚-3154","10.9734\u002Fajaees\u002F2026\u002Fv44i103022",{"doi":157,"openalex_id":159,"authors":160,"venue":144,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":141,"card":171,"direction":176,"ingested_from":57},"W7213979623",[161,163,165,167,169],{"name":162,"orcid":9},"Simon Mbala",{"name":164,"orcid":9},"David Kawioo Mwanzia",{"name":166,"orcid":9},"Thomas Ekamais Akuja",{"name":168,"orcid":9},"Felix Ngunzo Kioli",{"name":170,"orcid":9},"Harrison Musyoka Maithya",{"tldr":172,"method":173,"finding":174,"direction":55,"opportunity":175},"研究肯尼亚小农户中农业推广服务对气候智慧型农业采纳的促进作用。","混合方法，200份农户问卷、10名推广员访谈和10组焦点小组，卡方检验。","推广服务可及性、信息源、支持类型和接触频率与CSA采纳显著相关，82%农户有推广服务。","可探索数字推广渠道（如手机短信、APP）如何替代或补充传统推广员，提升小农户CSA采纳率。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-22T23:30:10.323072Z",{"id":179,"title":180,"url":181,"summary":182,"summary_zh":183,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":181,"published_at":101,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":184,"score_detail":185,"sources":187,"tags":189,"search_phrases":193,"slug":196,"view_count":35,"doi":197,"paper":198,"created_at":217},3143,"Underutilised indigenous crop adoption and household food security: evidence from a cross-sectional study of smallholder farmers in South Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1939658","Introduction Underutilised indigenous crops (UICs) are increasingly recognised in South Africa as a potential component of resilient and nutrition-sensitive agricultural systems. However, policy recognition has not been matched by sufficient household-level evidence on the extent and distribution of UIC adoption, the factors associated with adoption, or the relationship between UIC adoption and household food access insecurity among smallholder farming households in South Africa. Methods A quantitative, cross-sectional observational design was used among 205 smallholder farming households in KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape. Household food-access insecurity was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). Logistic regression, ordinary least squares regression, propensity-score matching, chi-square tests, and descriptive analysis were used to examine adoption patterns, associated factors, and food-access security outcomes. Results UIC adoption was reported by 70.2% of respondents, with pumpkin, cowpeas, and amaranth among the most widely cultivated crops. Adopting households had lower mean HFIAS scores than non-adopting households and were less likely to be classified as severely food insecure. In the OLS model, adoption was negatively associated with HFIAS scores ( β = −2.10, p = 0.007). Propensity-score matching also estimated a lower HFIAS score among adopters than among matched non-adopters (ATT = −2.15, p = 0.006). Water sufficiency, group membership, extension contact, education, and household size were associated with food-access security. Discussion The findings indicate that UIC adoption is associated with better household food-access security, but the cross-sectional observational design does not establish a causal effect. Promoting UICs may contribute to nutrition-sensitive agricultural development when accompanied by enabling conditions such as reliable water access, extension support, social capital, and productive resources.","引言 在南非，未被充分利用的本土作物（underutilised indigenous crops, UICs）日益被视为具有韧性和营养敏感性的农业系统的潜在组成部分。然而，政策层面的认可与充分的家庭层面证据之间仍存在差距，这些证据涉及UIC采用的程度与分布、与采用相关的因素，以及UIC采用与南非小农家庭食物获取不安全状况之间的关系。方法 本研究采用定量、横断面观察性设计，在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省和东开普省的205个小农家庭中开展调查。家庭食物获取不安全状况采用家庭食物不安全获取量表（Household Food Insecurity Access Scale, HFIAS）进行测量。研究运用逻辑回归、普通最小二乘回归、倾向得分匹配、卡方检验和描述性分析，考察采用模式、相关因素及食物获取安全结果。结果 70.2%的受访者报告采用了UIC，其中南瓜、豇豆和苋菜是种植最广泛的作物。采用UIC的家庭HFIAS平均得分低于未采用家庭，且被归类为严重食物不安全的可能性更低。在OLS模型中，采用UIC与HFIAS得分呈负相关（β = −2.10，p = 0.007）。倾向得分匹配也估计出采用者的HFIAS得分低于匹配后的非采用者（ATT = −2.15，p = 0.006）。水资源充足性、群体成员身份、推广接触、教育程度和家庭规模与食物获取安全相关。讨论 研究结果表明，UIC采用与更好的家庭食物获取安全相关，但横断面观察性设计无法确立因果效应。在具备可靠水资源获取、推广支持、社会资本和生产性资源等有利条件的情况下，推广UIC可能有助于营养敏感型农业发展。",71,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":72,"relevant":21,"comment":186},"以南非205户小农为样本的实证研究，方法规范、数据具体，但属区域案例，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限。",[188],{"name":10,"url":181},[190,113,27,191,192],"粮食安全","南非农业","本土作物",[194,195],"南非 小农户 本土作物","KwaZulu-Natal 粮食安全","南非小农户本土作物-3143","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1939658",{"doi":197,"openalex_id":199,"authors":200,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":181,"card":212,"direction":55,"ingested_from":57},"W7213867432",[201,203,206,209],{"name":202,"orcid":9},"Glen Themba Mendi",{"name":204,"orcid":205},"Jan Willem Swanepoel","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0812-2657",{"name":207,"orcid":208},"Siphe Zantsi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9787-3913",{"name":210,"orcid":211},"Oluwasogo David Olorunfemi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3524-4262",{"tldr":213,"method":214,"finding":215,"direction":55,"opportunity":216},"研究南非小农户采用未充分利用本土作物与家庭食物安全的关系。","对205户小农户横截面调查，用HFIAS、逻辑回归和倾向得分匹配分析。","70.2%农户采用本土作物，采用者食物不安全评分显著更低。","可结合数字推广与遥感监测，评估本土作物采用对食物安全的长期因果效应。","2026-09-22T23:30:07.989696Z",{"id":219,"title":220,"url":221,"summary":222,"summary_zh":223,"content":9,"source_name":224,"source_url":221,"published_at":68,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":225,"score_detail":226,"sources":229,"tags":231,"search_phrases":232,"slug":234,"view_count":35,"doi":235,"paper":236,"created_at":252},3059,"Climate Smart Agriculture and Food Security among Rural Farmers in Nasarawa State, Nigeria","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.67317\u002Fijmsrt26sep046","Climate change continues to threaten agricultural productivity and household food security, particularly among rural farmers who depend on rain-fed agriculture. This study examined climate smart agriculture and food security among rural farmers in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Specifically, it assessed the extent of adoption of climatesmart agricultural practices and examined their influence on household food security. A mixed-methods descriptive survey design was adopted. Data were collected from 372 rural farming households using structured questionnaires, while Key Informant Interviews were conducted with agricultural extension officers and community leaders. Secondary data were obtained from relevant journal articles, government publications, and reports. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency tables and percentages and presented with bar charts, while qualitative data were transcribed, interpreted, and integrated with the quantitative findings. The study found that climate-smart agricultural practices significantly enhanced household food security, with 86% of the respondents indicating that the practices strengthened their resilience to climate change, while 85% reported improved household food availability. The study concludes that climate-smart agriculture is an effective approach for improving the livelihoods and food security of rural farming households in Nasarawa State. The study recommends that the Nasarawa State Agricultural Development Programme (NADP), in collaboration with the State Ministry of Agriculture and agricultural extension agencies, should strengthen extension services by providing regular farmer training, climate information, and access to climate-smart agricultural technologies to promote wider adoption and enhance household food security.","气候变化持续威胁农业生产力和家庭粮食安全，尤其是依赖雨养农业的农村农民。本研究考察了尼日利亚纳萨拉瓦州农村农民的气候智能型农业与粮食安全状况。具体而言，研究评估了气候智能型农业实践的采用程度，并考察了其对家庭粮食安全的影响。研究采用混合方法描述性调查设计。通过结构化问卷从372个农村农户收集数据，同时对农业推广官员和社区领袖进行了关键信息人访谈。二手数据来源于相关期刊文章、政府出版物和报告。定量数据采用频数表和百分比进行分析，并以柱状图呈现；定性数据经转录、解释后与定量研究结果进行整合。研究发现，气候智能型农业实践显著增强了家庭粮食安全，86%的受访者表示这些实践增强了其应对气候变化的能力，85%的受访者报告家庭粮食可获得性有所改善。研究结论认为，气候智能型农业是改善纳萨拉瓦州农村农户生计和粮食安全的有效途径。研究建议，纳萨拉瓦州农业发展计划（NADP）应与州农业部和农业推广机构合作，通过提供定期农民培训、气候信息和气候智能型农业技术获取渠道来加强推广服务，以促进更广泛的采用并增强家庭粮食安全。","International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology",56,{"impact":72,"substance":227,"depth":146,"authority":60,"freshness":106,"relevant":21,"comment":228},18,"尼日利亚地方性实证研究，样本372户、结论明确，但影响范围限于区域，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限，不宜进入每日精选。",[230],{"name":224,"url":221},[190,113,152,27,114],[233,155],"气候智慧农业 农业推广 尼日利亚 粮食安全","气候智慧农业农业推广尼日利亚粮食安全-3059","10.67317\u002Fijmsrt26sep046",{"doi":235,"openalex_id":237,"authors":238,"venue":224,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":245,"card":246,"direction":176,"ingested_from":57},"W7213778728",[239,241,243],{"name":240,"orcid":9},"ABDULLAHI YUSUF AGWAI",{"name":242,"orcid":9},"Falalu Mohommed Mohammmed",{"name":244,"orcid":9},"A. S. Ogah","https:\u002F\u002Fijmsrt.com\u002Fstorages\u002Fdownload-paper\u002FIJMSRT26SEP046",{"tldr":247,"method":248,"finding":249,"direction":250,"opportunity":251},"研究尼日利亚纳萨拉瓦州农户采用气候智慧型农业对家庭粮食安全的影响。","混合方法调查，372户问卷加关键知情人访谈，频数百分比分析。","86%受访者认为气候智慧型农业增强了气候韧性，85%报告家庭粮食供应改善。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探索气候智慧型农业技术采纳的驱动因素与推广机制，或结合数字工具提升气候信息可达性。","2026-09-21T23:30:09.323035Z",{"id":254,"title":255,"url":256,"summary":257,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":258,"source_url":9,"published_at":68,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":259,"score_detail":260,"sources":263,"tags":265,"search_phrases":269,"slug":272,"view_count":35,"doi":9,"paper":273,"created_at":280},3050,"面向再生农业与气候韧性食物系统的可解释数字孪生集成框架","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F18\u002F9645","研究提出集成全球农业基础表征模型（GAFRM）、自演化可解释数字孪生（SEDT）、自演化进化基础优化器（SEEFO）与增强型绿色再生农业可持续性指数（GRASI）的统一计算框架，显式将作物微量营养素密度纳入农业决策架构并建模其与覆盖作物、生物炭施用、免耕等再生实践的关系。框架使用多源全球数据集评估全球约60个代表性国家6大洲15个气候带2000-2026年数据，SEDT达到RMSE 3.18\u002FMAE 2.29\u002FR² 0.972\u002FNSE 0.968；SEEFO获得最高Hypervolume 0.956与最低GD 0.028；通过XAI特征归因建立全透明、可解释决策支持环境。","MDPI Sustainability 18(18):9645",80,{"impact":227,"substance":261,"depth":227,"authority":20,"freshness":106,"relevant":21,"comment":262},22,"方法新颖、数据规模大且指标可靠，属农业人工智能与气候智慧农业前沿成果，值得进入每日精选。",[264],{"name":258,"url":256},[266,267,268,79,29],"智慧农业","可解释AI","数字孪生",[270,271],"GAFRM 数字孪生 再生农业","GRASI 气候韧性","GAFRM数字孪生再生农业-3050",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":274,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":9,"card":275,"direction":136,"ingested_from":92},[],{"tldr":276,"method":277,"finding":278,"direction":136,"opportunity":279},"提出集成数字孪生与进化优化的可解释框架，将微量营养素密度纳入再生农业决策。","全球60国2000-2026多源数据，GAFRM+SEDT+SEEFO+GRAS","SEDT预测精度高（R²0.972），SEEFO优化性能最优，实现透明可解释决策支持。","可探索将微量营养素密度与再生实践耦合的实时数字孪生，并验证跨气候带可迁移性。","2026-09-21T00:04:39.490071Z"]