[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3144":3,"related-3144":58},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"search_phrases":33,"slug":36,"view_count":37,"doi":38,"paper":39,"created_at":57},3144,"Community perceptions of the dairy industry and waste management technology adoption in the United States’ third largest dairy producing state","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1939015","Technological innovations to manage dairy waste and upcycle excess nutrients into value-added products in a consolidated industry raise questions about their impact on public perceptions. Using a mail survey and quantitative methods guided by the community capitals framework, this study examines public perceptions of dairy industry impacts and waste management technology adoption in Idaho, the third largest dairy producing state in the United States. The majority of respondents view the dairy industry and adoption of new waste management technology as having an overall positive community impact. Perceived impacts on financial, social, and natural community capitals are significant predictors of these views. Negative perceptions of dairy industry community impacts overall are associated with less support for waste management technology while negative perceptions of the industry’s environmental impact are associated with greater support. A positive view of the industry was found to predict a positive view of the adoption of new dairy waste management technologies, but not the reverse. Avian flu concern increased support for new waste management technologies but decreased overall industry favorability. Familiarity with anaerobic digestion increased positive perceptions of new waste management technologies. However, the majority had not heard of biochar, hydrochar, or bioplastic value-added products associated with dairy waste management innovations. Results highlight both the need for public engagement and communication about waste management innovations that can improve environmental outcomes and advance circular economies and suggest improving perceptions of the industry among those who are not already positive will require addressing not only environmental and technological concerns but community financial and social concerns as well.","在乳制品产业整合背景下，用于管理乳制品废弃物并将过剩养分升级转化为增值产品的技术创新，引发了人们对其公众认知影响的疑问。本研究以社区资本框架为指导，采用邮件调查和定量方法，考察了美国第三大乳制品生产州爱达荷州公众对乳制品产业影响及废弃物管理技术采用的认知。大多数受访者认为乳制品产业及新型废弃物管理技术的采用对社区总体具有积极影响。对金融资本、社会资本和自然资本等社区资本的感知影响是这些看法的重要预测因素。总体而言，对乳制品产业社区影响的负面认知与对废弃物管理技术的较低支持相关，而对产业环境影响的负面认知则与更高的支持相关。研究发现，对产业的积极看法能够预测对采用新型乳制品废弃物管理技术的积极看法，但反向关系不成立。禽流感担忧提高了对新型废弃物管理技术的支持，但降低了产业总体好感度。对厌氧消化（anaerobic digestion）的熟悉程度提高了对新型废弃物管理技术的积极认知。然而，大多数人未曾听说过与乳制品废弃物管理创新相关的生物炭（biochar）、水热炭（hydrochar）或生物塑料（bioplastic）增值产品。研究结果既凸显了就废弃物管理创新开展公众参与和沟通的必要性——这些创新能够改善环境结果并推进循环经济，也表明对于那些原本并不持积极态度的人群，提升其对产业的认知不仅需要解决环境和技术方面的关切，还需要回应社区的金融和社会关切。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,77,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},16,21,18,13,9,1,"基于社区资本框架的奶业废弃物管理技术公众认知调查，数据与结论具参考价值，但属美国州级研究，对国内三农信息化直接借鉴有限。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31,32],"生物炭","循环农业","畜牧养殖","厌氧消化","粪污资源化","公众认知",[34,35],"爱达荷州 奶业 粪污管理","厌氧消化 生物炭 奶业废弃物","爱达荷州奶业粪污管理-3144",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1939015",{"doi":38,"openalex_id":40,"authors":41,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":6,"card":50,"direction":54,"ingested_from":56},"W7213870251",[42,44,46,48],{"name":43,"orcid":9},"Jane Kolodinsky",{"name":45,"orcid":9},"Soren Newman",{"name":47,"orcid":9},"Darin Saul",{"name":49,"orcid":9},"Michelle Tynan",{"tldr":51,"method":52,"finding":53,"direction":54,"opportunity":55},"调查爱达荷州公众对乳业及粪污管理技术采纳的看法，分析影响因素。","邮件问卷调查与社区资本框架下的定量分析。","多数人持正面看法；环境负面感知反增技术支持，行业正面看法单向预测技术接受。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究信息传播与公众参与如何提升厌氧消化、生物炭等粪污资源化技术的认知与接受度。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:08.051714Z",{"total":59,"page":22,"page_size":59,"items":60},6,[61,103,148,190,245,284],{"id":62,"title":63,"url":64,"summary":65,"summary_zh":66,"content":9,"source_name":67,"source_url":64,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":68,"score_detail":69,"sources":73,"tags":75,"search_phrases":80,"slug":83,"view_count":37,"doi":84,"paper":85,"created_at":102},3192,"Turning Livestock Waste into Nutrient Resources: Advances in Crop–Livestock Circular Agriculture for Sustainable Farming Systems","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fagriculture16182033","The increasing specialization of crop and livestock production has disrupted traditional nutrient cycling in agricultural systems, creating a dual challenge of excessive dependence on synthetic fertilizers and inefficient utilization of livestock manure. Crop–livestock circular agriculture offers a promising pathway to address these interconnected problems by recoupling animal production, manure management, and crop cultivation within an integrated nutrient-recycling framework. This review critically synthesizes recent advances in crop–livestock circular agriculture, with particular emphasis on manure valorization, nutrient recovery and reuse, enabling treatment technologies, crop–livestock nutrient matching, and regionally adapted implementation models. Current evidence demonstrates that appropriately managed manure recycling can partially substitute synthetic fertilizers, improve soil fertility and structure, enhance nutrient-use efficiency, and reduce nutrient losses and associated environmental pressures. Technologies including solid–liquid separation, aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion, and emerging resource-recovery approaches further expand the potential for converting livestock waste into fertilizers, energy, and other value-added agricultural inputs. However, the environmental and agronomic benefits of these systems depend strongly on balancing manure-derived nutrient supply with crop demand and local land carrying capacity. This requirement is particularly important in the hilly agricultural regions of Southwest China, where fragmented farmland, dispersed livestock production, complex terrain, and high transportation costs constrain the direct adoption of large-scale centralized models. Locally adapted strategies integrating decentralized manure treatment, nearby land application, and coordinated regional nutrient allocation may therefore provide more practical solutions. Despite substantial progress, broader implementation remains limited by spatial mismatches between manure production and cropland demand, insufficient technological adaptation, economic constraints, and a lack of long-term system-level assessments. Future research should move beyond individual waste-treatment technologies toward integrated crop–livestock management that combines nutrient budgeting, precision manure application, resource recovery, digital decision support, and region-specific governance. Such advances are essential for transforming livestock manure from an environmental liability into a strategic nutrient resource and for accelerating the transition toward resource-efficient, low-impact, and resilient agricultural systems.","作物与畜牧生产的日益专业化打破了农业系统中传统的养分循环，造成了过度依赖合成肥料与畜禽粪污利用效率低下的双重挑战。农牧循环农业通过在一体化养分循环框架内重新耦合动物生产、粪污管理与作物种植，为解决这些相互关联的问题提供了有前景的路径。本综述批判性地综合了农牧循环农业的最新进展，重点关注粪污资源化、养分回收与再利用、使能处理技术、农牧养分匹配以及区域适应性实施模式。现有证据表明，合理管理的粪污循环利用可以部分替代合成肥料，改善土壤肥力与结构，提高养分利用效率，并减少养分损失及相关环境压力。固液分离、好氧堆肥、厌氧消化以及新兴的资源回收方法等技术，进一步拓展了将畜禽废弃物转化为肥料、能源及其他增值农业投入品的潜力。然而，这些系统的环境和农艺效益在很大程度上取决于粪源养分供给与作物需求及当地土地承载能力之间的平衡。这一要求在中国西南丘陵农业区尤为重要，该地区耕地破碎、畜牧生产分散、地形复杂、运输成本高，制约了大规模集中化模式的直接采用。因此，整合分散式粪污处理、就近还田与区域养分协调配置的本地化适应策略可能提供更切实可行的解决方案。尽管已取得实质性进展，更广泛的实施仍受限于粪污产生与农田需求之间的空间错配、技术适应性不足、经济约束以及缺乏长期系统层面的评估。未来研究应超越单一的废弃物处理技术，转向综合农牧管理，将养分预算、精准粪污施用、资源回收、数字化决策支持与因地制宜的治理相结合。这些进展对于将畜禽粪污从环境负担转化为有价值资源至关重要。","Agriculture",79,{"impact":19,"substance":70,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":71,"relevant":22,"comment":72},22,8,"系统综述种养循环农业的粪污增值与养分匹配技术，并提出西南丘陵地区适配模式，学术价值与产业参考性兼具。",[74],{"name":67,"url":64},[76,28,77,78,79],"农业绿色发展","养分循环","畜禽粪污资源化","种养结合",[81,82],"种养循环农业 粪污资源化","西南丘陵 畜禽粪污 养分匹配","种养循环农业粪污资源化-3192","10.3390\u002Fagriculture16182033",{"doi":84,"openalex_id":86,"authors":87,"venue":67,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":64,"card":96,"direction":54,"ingested_from":56},"W7213872058",[88,91,94],{"name":89,"orcid":90},"Bing Xiang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6534-7476",{"name":92,"orcid":93},"Jialin Xiao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1433-5437",{"name":95,"orcid":9},"Lin Bai",{"tldr":97,"method":98,"finding":99,"direction":100,"opportunity":101},"综述种养循环农业中粪污资源化、养分回收与区域适配模式的研究进展。","文献综述，聚焦粪污增值、养分匹配及西南丘陵区案例。","粪污循环可部分替代化肥并提升养分效率，但受空间错配与区域条件制约。","农业绿色发展与碳","面向丘陵山区，研发分散式粪污处理与数字化养分匹配决策支持系统。","2026-09-22T23:30:32.065619Z",{"id":104,"title":105,"url":106,"summary":107,"summary_zh":108,"content":9,"source_name":109,"source_url":106,"published_at":110,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":111,"score_detail":112,"sources":116,"tags":118,"search_phrases":123,"slug":126,"view_count":37,"doi":127,"paper":128,"created_at":147},3065,"A MULTIMODAL FRAMEWORK FOR LIVESTOCK DETECTION AND EPIZOOTIC MONITORING","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.67048\u002Fqxju2026ai128iss7m1055","This study proposes an automated computer vision framework to detect and monitor mixed herds of cattle and sheep. By integrating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery with ground-level perspectives, a multimodal dataset was curated. Using this data, a lightweight, single-stage object detector (YOLOv8n), tailored for resource-constrained edge devices, was trained and optimised. The integration of computer vision and UAV technology offers agricultural agencies a scalable tool for proactive epizootic surveillance.","本研究提出了一种自动化计算机视觉框架，用于检测和监测牛与羊的混合畜群。通过将无人机（UAV）影像与地面视角相结合，构建了一个多模态数据集。利用该数据，训练并优化了一个轻量级单阶段目标检测器（YOLOv8n），专为资源受限的边缘设备而设计。计算机视觉与无人机技术的融合为农业机构提供了一种可扩展的工具，用于主动进行动物流行病监测。","Agro ilm","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z",71,{"impact":19,"substance":113,"depth":114,"authority":71,"freshness":71,"relevant":22,"comment":115},20,17,"多模态无人机视觉框架用于牛羊混群检测与疫病预警，方法具体、面向边缘设备，对智慧畜牧有实用参考价值。",[117],{"name":109,"url":106},[119,120,121,29,122],"智慧农业","农业人工智能","无人机遥感","疫病监测",[124,125],"YOLOv8n 牲畜检测","无人机 畜牧 疫病监测","YOLOv8n牲畜检测-3065","10.67048\u002Fqxju2026ai128iss7m1055",{"doi":127,"openalex_id":129,"authors":130,"venue":109,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":140,"card":141,"direction":145,"ingested_from":56},"W7213668410",[131,134,137],{"name":132,"orcid":133},"R. N. Khadzhaev","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8124-2399",{"name":135,"orcid":136},"Sa’dulla Avezbayev","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0008-8896-7078",{"name":138,"orcid":139},"Sayfuddin Sharipov","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4232-1369","https:\u002F\u002Fqxjurnal.uz\u002Findex.php\u002Fai\u002Farticle\u002Fdownload\u002F1055\u002F936",{"tldr":142,"method":143,"finding":144,"direction":145,"opportunity":146},"提出多模态计算机视觉框架，用无人机和地面图像检测牛羊并监测疫情。","融合无人机与地面视角构建多模态数据集，训练轻量级YOLOv8n边缘检测器。","轻量级模型可在资源受限设备上实现混合畜群检测，支持主动疫情监测。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","可探索多物种、复杂地形下的实时边缘检测与疫情早期预警模型优化。","2026-09-21T23:30:13.271856Z",{"id":149,"title":150,"url":151,"summary":152,"summary_zh":153,"content":9,"source_name":154,"source_url":151,"published_at":110,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":155,"score_detail":156,"sources":159,"tags":161,"search_phrases":167,"slug":170,"view_count":37,"doi":171,"paper":172,"created_at":189},2928,"Biochar 2.0 in Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Critical Review of Designer Biochars, Soil Microbiome Responses, Nutrient-Use Efficiency and Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Fajsspn\u002F2026\u002Fv12i4764","Biochar has moved from a broadly promoted soil amendment to a material that is deliberately engineered for defined agronomic and climatic functions. This transition, described here as a shift towards designer biochars, raises questions that the earlier literature was not designed to answer: whether tailoring feedstock, pyrolysis conditions and post-synthesis modification produces reproducible gains in nutrient-use efficiency, whether the accompanying soil microbiome changes are functionally meaningful or largely descriptive, and whether greenhouse-gas benefits observed in short experiments persist under field management and withstand carbon-accounting scrutiny. This critical narrative review examines the evidence linking biochar properties to soil microbial responses, nutrient retention and transformation, and the mitigation of nitrous oxide, methane and carbon dioxide in agricultural soils. Literature was identified through structured searching of open scholarly indexes, agricultural and intergovernmental repositories, and citation tracking, with every retained source verified against an authoritative bibliographic record. The synthesis indicates that the strongest and most reproducible effects are pedoclimatic rather than material-specific: responses concentrate in acidic, coarse-textured, nutrient-depleted and tropical soils, whereas temperate fertile systems frequently show negligible agronomic gain. Microbiome studies consistently report compositional turnover with little change in alpha diversity, and the functional interpretation of these shifts rests heavily on marker-gene abundance rather than demonstrated process rates. Nitrous oxide suppression is well supported in aggregate but varies by a factor of five across syntheses, and recent field work shows that freshly applied high-rate biochar can increase emissions. Methane outcomes in flooded systems depend on water management and application history. Carbon permanence remains contested because the principal proxies used for crediting are informative about carbonisation rather than about in-soil residence under field weathering. Confidence is highest for liming, cation retention and short-term nitrogen conservation, and lowest for long-term net climate benefit at landscape scale. Priorities include multi-year factorial field trials that pair engineered materials with process-level measurement, standardised reporting of biochar properties, and accounting frameworks calibrated on weathered rather than freshly produced material.","生物炭已从一种被广泛推广的土壤改良剂，转变为一种为特定农艺和气候功能而刻意设计的材料。这一转变——本文将其描述为向“设计型生物炭”的转向——提出了早期文献未曾设计回答的问题：定制原料、热解条件和合成后修饰是否能在养分利用效率上产生可重复的增益；伴随而来的土壤微生物组变化在功能上是否有意义，还是主要停留在描述层面；以及在短期实验中观察到的温室气体效益能否在田间管理下持续存在，并经受住碳核算的审视。这篇批判性叙述综述考察了将生物炭性质与土壤微生物响应、养分保持与转化，以及农业土壤中氧化亚氮、甲烷和二氧化碳减排联系起来的证据。文献通过结构化检索开放学术索引、农业和政府间知识库以及引文追踪来识别，所有保留的来源均对照权威书目记录进行了核实。综合结果表明，最强且最可重复的效应是土壤气候性的，而非材料特异性的：响应集中于酸性、粗质地、养分贫瘠和热带土壤，而温带肥沃系统往往显示可忽略的农艺增益。微生物组研究一致报告组成上的更替而α多样性变化甚微，且对这些变化的功能解读在很大程度上依赖于标记基因丰度，而非已证实的过程速率。氧化亚氮抑制在总体上得到较好支持，但不同综合研究之间相差可达五倍，且近期田间工作表明，新施用的高用量生物炭可能增加排放。淹水系统中的甲烷结果取决于水分管理和施用历史。碳永久性仍存争议，因为用于信用核算的主要替代指标所反映的是碳化程度，而非田间风化条件下的土壤内驻留时间。置信度最高的是石灰效应、阳离子保持和短期氮素保全，最低的是景观尺度上的长期净气候效益。优先事项包括：将工程化材料与过程水平测量相结合的多年度析因田间试验、生物炭性质的标准化报告，以及基于风化而非","Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition",80,{"impact":19,"substance":70,"depth":157,"authority":20,"freshness":71,"relevant":22,"comment":158},19,"系统评述设计型生物炭在土壤微生物、养分效率与温室气体减排上的证据强度与不确定性，学术增量扎实，对农业绿色低碳与土壤健康方向有参考价值。",[160],{"name":154,"url":151},[27,162,163,164,165,166],"土壤健康","气候智慧农业","土壤微生物","温室气体减排","养分利用效率",[168,169],"生物炭 温室气体 减排","养分利用效率 气候智慧农业 温室气体减排 土壤微生物","生物炭温室气体减排-2928","10.9734\u002Fajsspn\u002F2026\u002Fv12i4764",{"doi":171,"openalex_id":173,"authors":174,"venue":154,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":151,"card":184,"direction":145,"ingested_from":56},"W7213554252",[175,177,180,182],{"name":176,"orcid":9},"K. G. Rosin",{"name":178,"orcid":179},"Aditya V Machnoor","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-5777-9188",{"name":181,"orcid":9},"Rakesh Kokatnoor",{"name":183,"orcid":9},"Arun S. Kalasad",{"tldr":185,"method":186,"finding":187,"direction":100,"opportunity":188},"综述设计型生物炭在气候智慧农业中的效果，指出其农艺与减排效益高度依赖土壤气候条件。","结构化文献检索与引文追踪，整合生物炭性质、土壤微生物、养分与温室气体证据。","最强效应集中于酸性贫瘠热带土壤，温带肥沃土壤增益有限；氧化亚氮抑制变异大，碳持久性存疑。","需多年多因子田间试验，结合过程速率测量与风化态碳核算，验证设计型生物炭的长期净气候效益。","2026-09-19T23:30:11.160909Z",{"id":191,"title":192,"url":193,"summary":194,"summary_zh":195,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":193,"published_at":110,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":196,"score_detail":197,"sources":200,"tags":202,"search_phrases":208,"slug":211,"view_count":37,"doi":212,"paper":213,"created_at":244},2917,"Confronting policy gaps between antimicrobial resistance and climate change across LMIC animal production systems","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1831307","Background Climate change and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represent intersecting risks to livestock and aquaculture systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Climate stressors drive increased antimicrobial reliance, while AMR undermines production resilience. Yet policy responses remain largely siloed: climate adaptation frameworks rarely address antimicrobial use, and AMR action plans give limited attention to climate-related drivers. This review assesses how national policies in LMICs integrate AMR control and climate change adaptation, identifying pathways to strengthen policy coherence. Methods A review of 204 national policy documents from 51 LMICs, sourced from the FAOLEX legal database and covering 2015–2025, was conducted. Documents were assessed using an intersectoral policy mention matrix across four integration levels: addressed in isolation, cross-referenced mentions, early integration, and full integration. Findings were complemented by 12 field- based community dialogues and site visits in the Philippines and 18 key informant interviews. Results Although regional patterns varied, most policies addressed AMR and climate change separately. Of 204 policies reviewed, 170 addressed the issues in isolation, 21 cross-referenced, and 13 showed early signs of integration; none met full integration. Even early integration was limited to specific activities and was not reflected across governance, financing, and monitoring. Common gaps included the absence of shared objectives, coordinated institutional responsibilities, and surveillance systems that jointly track climate variables, disease patterns, antimicrobial use, and resistance. The Philippine case reflected similar challenges, particularly in the absence of cross-sectoral coordination and surveillance systems, subnational implementation, and sustained financing, with the aquaculture sector remaining underrepresented. Discussion and policy implications Integration of AMR control and climate adaptation in animal production systems remain largely conceptual across LMICs. The One Health framework offers a practical institutional bridge, yet its environmental component remains underrepresented in policy and practice. Forthcoming revisions to National Action Plans on AMR, Nationally Determined Contributions, and National Adaptation Plans are timely entrypoints for aligning objectives, surveillance systems, and financing. Meaningful progress will require expanded One Health governance structures incorporating climate-AMR linkages, AMR projects within international climate finance mechanisms, and genuine engagement of local governments, communities, and private sector.","背景 气候变化和抗微生物药物耐药性（AMR）对畜牧和水产养殖系统构成交叉风险，尤其是在中低收入国家（LMICs）。气候胁迫因素推动抗微生物药物使用增加，而AMR则削弱生产韧性。然而，政策应对在很大程度上仍各自为政：气候适应框架很少涉及抗微生物药物使用，AMR行动计划对气候相关驱动因素的关注也有限。本综述评估了LMICs国家政策如何整合AMR防控与气候变化适应，并识别加强政策一致性的路径。方法 对来自51个LMICs的204份国家政策文件进行了综述，文件来源于FAOLEX法律数据库，覆盖2015—2025年。采用跨部门政策提及矩阵对文件进行评估，分为四个整合层级：孤立处理、交叉引用提及、早期整合和完全整合。研究结果还辅以在菲律宾开展的12次基于社区的对话和实地考察，以及18次关键知情人访谈。结果 尽管区域模式存在差异，但大多数政策将AMR和气候变化分开处理。在204份受审政策中，170份孤立处理这些问题，21份存在交叉引用，13份显示出早期整合迹象；没有任何政策达到完全整合。即便是早期整合也仅限于特定活动，并未体现在治理、融资和监测各层面。常见缺口包括缺乏共同目标、协调一致的机构职责，以及能够联合追踪气候变量、疾病模式、抗微生物药物使用和耐药性的监测系统。菲律宾案例反映了类似挑战，尤其是在缺乏跨部门协调和监测系统、地方层面实施和持续融资方面，水产养殖部门仍然代表性不足。讨论与政策启示 在LMICs的动物生产系统中，AMR防控与气候适应的整合在很大程度上仍停留在概念层面。“同一健康”框架提供了实际的制度桥梁，但其环境组成部分在政策和实践中仍然代表性不足。即将开展的AMR国家行动计划、《国家自主贡献》和国家适应计划的修订，是协调目标、监测系统和融资的及时切入点。要取得实质性进展，需要扩大“同一健康”治",85,{"impact":70,"substance":198,"depth":157,"authority":20,"freshness":71,"relevant":22,"comment":199},23,"基于51个中低收入国家204份政策文件的实证综述，揭示气候适应与抗菌药物耐药治理的政策割裂，对畜牧与水产养殖系统具有较强政策参考价值。",[201],{"name":10,"url":193},[203,204,29,205,206,207],"水产养殖","气候变化","政策协同","One Health","抗菌药物耐药性",[209,210],"LMIC 畜牧 抗菌药物耐药性 气候政策","FAOLEX 国家政策 抗菌药物 气候变化","LMIC畜牧抗菌药物耐药性气候政策-2917","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1831307",{"doi":212,"openalex_id":214,"authors":215,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":193,"card":239,"direction":100,"ingested_from":56},"W7213549810",[216,218,220,223,225,228,230,233,235,237],{"name":217,"orcid":9},"Percival Ethan Lao",{"name":219,"orcid":9},"Noelle Anne Cubacub",{"name":221,"orcid":222},"Kristina Osbjer","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0902-8232",{"name":224,"orcid":9},"Sunday Ochai",{"name":226,"orcid":227},"Cèlia Ventura-Gabarró","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4937-3874",{"name":229,"orcid":9},"Sophie Caroline Fridman",{"name":231,"orcid":232},"Mohammed Dahiru Aminu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1649-081X",{"name":234,"orcid":9},"Hazel Ann Fajardo",{"name":236,"orcid":9},"Arabelle Iza Barbin",{"name":238,"orcid":9},"Geminn Louis Apostol",{"tldr":240,"method":241,"finding":242,"direction":100,"opportunity":243},"综述51个中低收入国家204份政策，评估动物生产中抗微生物耐药与气候变化政策的整合程度。","审查FAOLEX 2015-2025年204份政策文件，辅以菲律宾社区对话和关键","多数政策将AMR与气候变化分开处理，无一实现完全整合，缺乏共同目标、协调责任和联合监测。","可研究One Health框架下AMR与气候政策协同监测指标及国家行动计划衔接机制。","2026-09-19T23:30:08.301375Z",{"id":246,"title":247,"url":248,"summary":249,"summary_zh":250,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":248,"published_at":251,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":68,"score_detail":252,"sources":254,"tags":256,"search_phrases":260,"slug":263,"view_count":37,"doi":264,"paper":265,"created_at":283},2753,"Pesticide residues in animal feed: emerging risks for animal health and crop production","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1948597","Introduction Pesticides are essential for maximizing crop yields and ensuring food security, yet concerns are growing about their accumulation in the food chain. While human dietary exposure has received considerable attention, pesticide residues in animal feed represent a critical, underexplored pathway that can affect livestock health and crop production through the reuse of contaminated manure. This review examines these emerging risks by focusing on livestock health and the cascading effects on crops. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched and synthesized literature addressing: (i) prevalence, types, and concentrations of pesticide residues in feed; (ii) toxicological effects on livestock; and (iii) environmental carryover potential via manure application to soils. Results Residues of major pesticide classes carbamates, organochlorines, organophosphates, and pyrethroids frequently enter feed through treated crops, pre-harvest desiccation, and environmental persistence. While EFSA concludes that typical exposure levels do not pose major acute risks to animal health, significant uncertainties remain regarding chronic low-dose exposures and synergistic effects of multi-residue mixtures on livestock physiology. Evidence on toxicological effects is drawn from a mixture of feed-specific, laboratory-animal, and human studies; the source of evidence for each finding is now explicitly identified throughout the Results (Section 3.3, Table 3). Discussion Experimental and field studies demonstrate that pesticide residues transfer from feed to manure and, subsequently, to soil when manure is used as fertilizer. This circular pathway creates secondary contamination, where residues are taken up by crops, causing phytotoxicity, reduced germination, and diminished performance. These findings underscore the need for strengthened regulatory frameworks addressing cumulative and carryover effects, alongside enhanced monitoring. From a One Health perspective, mitigating these risks requires broader adoption of sustainable practices, including Integrated Pest Management (IPM), safer pre-harvest protocols, and improved manure waste management to break the contamination cycle and protect animal, environmental, and human health.","引言 农药对于最大化作物产量和保障粮食安全至关重要，但人们对其在食物链中蓄积的担忧日益加剧。尽管人类膳食暴露已受到广泛关注，但动物饲料中的农药残留却是一条关键却研究不足的暴露途径，其可通过受污染粪肥的再利用影响畜禽健康与作物生产。本综述聚焦畜禽健康及其对作物的级联效应，审视这些新兴风险。方法 遵循PRISMA 2020指南，我们系统检索并综合了以下方面的文献：(i) 饲料中农药残留的流行率、类型及浓度；(ii) 对畜禽的毒理学效应；(iii) 通过粪肥施用至土壤的环境携带潜力。结果 主要农药类别——氨基甲酸酯类(carbamates)、有机氯类(organochlorines)、有机磷类(organophosphates)和拟除虫菊酯类(pyrethroids)——的残留常通过施用农药的作物、收获前干燥处理及环境持久性进入饲料。尽管欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)认为典型暴露水平不会对动物健康构成重大急性风险，但关于慢性低剂量暴露及多残留混合物对畜禽生理的协同效应仍存在显著不确定性。毒理学效应的证据来自饲料特异性研究、实验室动物研究和人体研究的混合来源；每项发现的证据来源现已在结果部分(第3.3节，表3)中明确标注。讨论 实验与田间研究表明，农药残留从饲料转移至粪肥，随后在粪肥用作肥料时进入土壤。这一循环途径造成二次污染，残留被作物吸收，导致植物毒性、发芽率降低和生长性能下降。这些发现凸显了加强监管框架以应对累积效应和携带效应的必要性，同时需强化监测。从“同一健康”(One Health)视角出发，降低这些风险需要更广泛地采用可持续实践，包括综合病虫害管理(IPM)、更安全的收获前操作规程以及改进粪肥废弃物管理，以打破污染循环，保护动物、环境和人类健康。","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z",{"impact":19,"substance":18,"depth":114,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":253},"系统综述揭示农药残留经饲料—粪肥—土壤的循环污染路径，对畜牧健康与作物生产具警示价值，但属学术综述而非政策或产业级突破。",[255],{"name":10,"url":248},[257,28,258,206,259],"绿色防控","饲料安全","农药残留",[261,262],"农药残留 循环农业 绿色防控 饲料安全","农药残留 循环农业","农药残留循环农业绿色防控饲料安全-2753","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1948597",{"doi":264,"openalex_id":266,"authors":267,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":248,"card":278,"direction":100,"ingested_from":56},"W7213471313",[268,270,272,274,276],{"name":269,"orcid":9},"Boubacar Madio dit Aladiogo Maïga",{"name":271,"orcid":9},"Aminata SISSOKO",{"name":273,"orcid":9},"Issiaka Bagayoko",{"name":275,"orcid":9},"Klema Marcel KONE",{"name":277,"orcid":9},"Fousseni Diallo",{"tldr":279,"method":280,"finding":281,"direction":100,"opportunity":282},"系统综述动物饲料中农药残留对畜禽健康及粪肥还田后作物生产的级联风险。","遵循PRISMA 2020系统检索并综合饲料残留、毒理效应与粪肥环境迁移文献。","残留经饲料-粪肥-土壤循环造成二次污染，致作物药害、发芽率与长势下降。","可量化饲料-粪肥-作物残留传递系数，构建One Health风险模型并评估IPM干预效果。","2026-09-17T23:30:07.540144Z",{"id":285,"title":286,"url":287,"summary":288,"summary_zh":289,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":287,"published_at":290,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":291,"score_detail":292,"sources":295,"tags":297,"search_phrases":302,"slug":305,"view_count":37,"doi":306,"paper":307,"created_at":332},2626,"Life-cycle assessment of tomato value chain—from farms to upcycling waste","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1908474","Introduction Tomato production and processing represent an important agri-food system with substantial environmental relevance, yet integrated evidence for the Croatian context remains limited. This study addresses that gap by applying life cycle assessment (LCA) to the full tomato value chain, including primary production in open fields and greenhouses, tomato processing, and different end-of-life scenarios of tomato pomace. Methods The study uses a cradle-to-gate and gate-to-grave LCA framework, with data collected from Croatian producers and processors and modeled in accordance with ISO 14040\u002F14044 principles. Environmental performance is evaluated with the ReCiPe midpoint method across climate change, acidification, eutrophication, toxicity, water use, land occupation, and fossil resource depletion indicators. Results and discussion The results show that open-field tomato production has a lower environmental burden than greenhouse production, while processing and waste management are strongly influenced by energy demand. Among end-of-life scenarios, composting performs better than disposal and incineration, and microwave-assisted pectin extraction shows a lower environ mental footprint than conventional extraction, demonstrating the environmental potential of valorizing tomato pomace as a by-product. The study provides primary data and a system-wide perspective on the Croatian tomato sector, highlighting the general importance of integrating agricultural production, processing, and circular waste management in sustainability assessments. Its findings support more informed decision-making for tomato production and processing in Croatia and provide evidence for the environmental value of upcycling tomato residues rather than landfill disposal.","引言 番茄生产和加工是一个重要的农业食品系统，具有显著的环境相关性，但针对克罗地亚背景的综合证据仍然有限。本研究通过将生命周期评价（LCA）应用于番茄全价值链来填补这一空白，涵盖露地和温室初级生产、番茄加工以及番茄皮渣的不同末端处置情景。方法 本研究采用从摇篮到大门和从大门到坟墓的LCA框架，数据采集自克罗地亚生产商和加工商，并依据ISO 14040\u002F14044原则进行建模。环境绩效采用ReCiPe中点法进行评估，涵盖气候变化、酸化、富营养化、毒性、水资源使用、土地占用和化石资源耗竭等指标。结果与讨论 结果表明，露地番茄生产的环境负荷低于温室生产，而加工和废物管理则受能源需求的强烈影响。在末端处置情景中，堆肥优于填埋和焚烧，微波辅助果胶提取的环境足迹低于传统提取，表明将番茄皮渣作为副产品进行增值利用具有环境潜力。本研究提供了克罗地亚番茄行业的原始数据和全系统视角，凸显了在可持续性评估中整合农业生产、加工和循环废物管理的一般重要性。其研究结果支持克罗地亚番茄生产和加工领域更明智的决策，并为番茄残渣升级利用而非填埋处置的环境价值提供了证据。","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",73,{"impact":293,"substance":18,"depth":114,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":294},12,"以克罗地亚番茄全链条LCA数据论证露天优于温室、堆肥优于焚烧、番茄渣高值化利用的环境价值，方法规范、结论可靠，但属区域性研究，产业影响有限。",[296],{"name":10,"url":287},[28,298,299,300,301],"绿色低碳","生命周期评价","番茄产业链","农业废弃物利用",[303,304],"农业废弃物利用 生命周期评价 番茄产业链 循环农业","农业废弃物利用 生命周期评价","农业废弃物利用生命周期评价番茄产业链循环农业-2626","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1908474",{"doi":306,"openalex_id":308,"authors":309,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":287,"card":327,"direction":100,"ingested_from":56},"W7213298700",[310,312,315,318,321,324],{"name":311,"orcid":9},"Ilija Djekić",{"name":313,"orcid":314},"Nada Šmigić","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5245-1239",{"name":316,"orcid":317},"Tomislav Vinković","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7769-132X",{"name":319,"orcid":320},"Božidar Benko","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9358-8787",{"name":322,"orcid":323},"Branimir Urlić","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4690-0181",{"name":325,"orcid":326},"Dubravka Vitali Čepo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5887-4198",{"tldr":328,"method":329,"finding":330,"direction":100,"opportunity":331},"对克罗地亚番茄全价值链进行生命周期评价，涵盖种植、加工及番茄渣废弃物处理。","采用ISO 14040\u002F14044的LCA框架与ReCiPe中点法，基于克罗地亚","露地种植环境负担低于温室；堆肥优于填埋焚烧；微波辅助提取果胶环境足迹更低。","可拓展至其他农业废弃物高值化利用的LCA比较，或结合物联网数据实现动态碳足迹评估。","2026-09-16T23:30:07.583950Z"]