[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3149":3,"related-3149":56},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"search_phrases":32,"slug":35,"view_count":36,"doi":37,"paper":38,"created_at":55},3149,"Measurement of interest linkage level between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers in China: based on TOPSIS method with comprehensive weighting","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931691","The cooperative outcomes between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers have fallen substantially short of expectations due to trust deficits, factor mismatches, and imbalances in benefit distribution. The root cause of this paradox lies in the absence or weakness of interest linkage mechanisms. Measuring the interest linkage level and optimizing the interest linkage mechanism are therefore key to resolving this issue, yet existing research has paid insufficient attention to this problem. Accordingly, first, this study innovatively constructs an indicator system for measuring the interest linkage level in land trusteeship based on the interest linkage theory. Second, the AHP and Entropy method was used to determine the subjective and objective weights. Finally, we use the TOPSIS method to measure the interest linkage level, analyze its spatio-temporal characteristics and heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) Overall, the interest linkage level between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers stands at 0.516, representing a moderate level. Among the three sub-dimensions, resource sharing is relatively high, mutual benefit is moderate, and cooperative trust is comparatively low, indicating that weak trust constitutes the most prominent shortcoming of the current interest linkage mechanism. (2) In terms of temporal changes, between 2021 and 2022, the levels of interest linkage, cooperative trust, resource sharing, and mutual benefit all exhibited an upward trend, with resource sharing recording the fastest rate of increase. In terms of regional disparities, Jining city of China exhibits the highest level of interest linkage, whereas Weifang city records the lowest. (3) Regarding heterogeneity, the interest linkage level is highest for small-scale pure farmers, followed in descending order by part-time farmers and large-scale specialized farmers. The interest linkage level increases as the number of trusteeship service links expands. Among the three principal trusteeship models, differences in interest linkage levels exist but are not pronounced. The findings contribute to the theoretical development of interest linkage mechanisms and offer actionable policy implications for improving enterprise–farmer cooperative arrangements.","土地托管企业与农户的合作成效因信任缺失、要素错配与利益分配失衡而显著低于预期，这一悖论的根源在于利益联结机制的缺位或薄弱。因此，测度利益联结水平并优化利益联结机制是破解该问题的关键，但现有研究对此关注不足。据此，本研究首先基于利益联结理论，创新性地构建了土地托管利益联结水平测度指标体系；其次，采用层次分析法与熵权法确定主客观权重；最后，运用TOPSIS法测度利益联结水平，并分析其时空特征与异质性。结果表明：（1）总体而言，土地托管企业与农户的利益联结水平为0.516，处于中等水平。在三个子维度中，资源共享水平相对较高，互利共赢处于中等水平，合作信任水平相对较低，表明信任薄弱是当前利益联结机制最为突出的短板。（2）从时间变化来看，2021—2022年间，利益联结水平、合作信任、资源共享与互利共赢均呈上升趋势，其中资源共享增速最快。从区域差异来看，中国济宁市的利益联结水平最高，潍坊市最低。（3）从异质性来看，小规模纯农户的利益联结水平最高，其次依次为兼业农户和大规模专业农户。利益联结水平随托管服务环节数量的增加而提高。在三种主要托管模式中，利益联结水平存在差异但并不显著。研究结论有助于推动利益联结机制的理论发展，并为完善企业与农户合作安排提供可操作的政策启示。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,72,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},12,21,17,13,9,1,"基于AHP-熵权TOPSIS构建土地托管利益联结测度体系，方法有新意、结论具体，但属区域实证研究，公共影响有限。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"农业社会化服务","土地托管","利益联结","农户合作","TOPSIS",[33,34],"土地托管 利益联结 农户","济宁 潍坊 土地托管","土地托管利益联结农户-3149",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931691",{"doi":37,"openalex_id":39,"authors":40,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":36,"oa_url":6,"card":48,"direction":52,"ingested_from":54},"W7213937854",[41,43,46],{"name":42,"orcid":9},"Shan Zheng",{"name":44,"orcid":45},"Guoqing Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-6629-846X",{"name":47,"orcid":9},"Yu Lianghong",{"tldr":49,"method":50,"finding":51,"direction":52,"opportunity":53},"构建指标体系并用组合赋权TOPSIS测度中国土地托管企业与农户的利益联结水平。","基于利益联结理论构建指标体系，AHP与熵权法组合赋权，TOPSIS测度。","利益联结整体处中等水平，合作信任最弱；小规模纯农户联结水平最高，托管环节越多水平越高。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将信任缺失作为切入点，探索数字平台与契约治理如何提升托管利益联结的信任维度。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:08.537335Z",{"total":57,"page":22,"page_size":57,"items":58},6,[59,84,106,152,172,214],{"id":60,"title":61,"url":62,"summary":63,"summary_zh":9,"content":64,"source_name":65,"source_url":9,"published_at":11,"category":66,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":67,"sources":72,"tags":74,"search_phrases":79,"slug":82,"view_count":36,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":83},3221,"湖南杂交水稻研究中心授予屈原管理区\"全域水稻单产提升合作示范单位\"——科技兴农 数智赋能单产提升 2025年双季稻亩产提升40.9%","https:\u002F\u002Fyy.rednet.cn\u002Fcontent\u002F646043\u002F65\u002F16299864.html","9-21 红网岳阳站报道：9-21 屈原管理区2026年\"科技兴农提单产 和美屈原庆丰年\"中国农民丰收节在凤凰乡河泊潭村启幕。湖南省农业科学院党委委员、湖南杂交水稻研究中心党委书记许靖波授予屈原管理区\"全域水稻单产提升合作示范单位\"。湖南杂交水稻研究中心副研究员魏中伟向大户们讲解自序机抛秧的门道；区农业农村局农艺师王有成讲起秋粮\"一喷多促\"。现场播放的《数智农业赋能单产提升》短片将数字农田、智慧管护的鲜活现场直观呈现眼前。朝阳农机专业合作社负责人曹勇表示，\"以前种田靠经验、靠天吃饭，现在靠数据、靠科技。十个人，能管上千亩地。\" 2025年双季稻平均亩产1104.7公斤，较行动前的2022年亩产提升320.7公斤、增长40.9%，2026年早稻单产562.9公斤，较行动前提升44.7%。今年来，全区农户金融授信额度近9亿元，覆盖农户90%以上。","**红网时刻新闻9月21日岳阳讯**（记者 赵曼 通讯员 姜瑶 周洋 何宇）9月21日，岳阳市屈原管理区凤凰乡河泊潭村的田埂上，植保无人机腾空而起，掠过稻浪均匀播撒；一旁的水稻自序机抛秧展示基地前，种粮大户们俯身细看稻穗，听得仔细。当天，屈原管理区2026年“科技兴农提单产、和美屈原庆丰年”中国农民丰收节在此启幕——比起庆典，田里“晒”出的种田新变化，更抢眼。\n\n![Image 1](https:\u002F\u002Fpic-public.rednet.cn\u002Fbucketmam-1254231242\u002F6ab0d97fe4b062ff7a3eeaec.png)\n\n9月21日，屈原管理区2026年“科技兴农提单产、和美屈原庆丰年”中国农民丰收节现场。\n\n这场“变化”，有了省级支撑。活动现场，湖南省农业科学院授予屈原管理区“全域水稻单产提升合作示范单位”，屈原的水稻单产提升，从此将有省级科研力量持续加持；金融护航同步到位，今年来，全区农户金融授信额度近9亿元，覆盖农户90%以上。\n\n![Image 2](https:\u002F\u002Fpic-public.rednet.cn\u002Fbucketmam-1254231242\u002F6ab0da3be4b01c9c05d1361c.png)\n\n授牌仪式上，湖南省农业科学院党委委员、湖南杂交水稻研究中心党委书记许靖波湖授予屈原管理区“全域水稻单产提升合作示范单位”。\n\n田垄，是这堂“科技课”的第一教室。“这秧抛下去，根系扎得深、分蘖快，比传统机插省时又省工。”湖南杂交水稻研究中心副研究员魏中伟站在田埂边，向大户们讲解自序机抛秧的门道。区农业农村局农艺师王有成接过话头，讲起秋粮“一喷多促”：一次喷施，促壮苗、促灌浆、促成熟，还能防病虫害——一次下地，多重效果。\n\n成果展示区里，手摇风车、老式谷耙与插秧机、植保无人机同台陈列，不禁引人发问，数智农业，究竟给田埂一线带来了什么？\n\n朝阳农机专业合作社曹勇的账本最直观：“以前种田靠经验、靠天吃饭，现在靠数据、靠科技。”从播种到田管、从植保到收割，全程有数字化、机械化的“帮手”——十个人，能管上千亩地。用工省了，成本降了，稻谷的产量和品质反而上去了。\n\n![Image 3](https:\u002F\u002Fpic-public.rednet.cn\u002Fbucketmam-1254231242\u002F6ab0d98ae4b00ae231e4a5b0.png)\n\n9月21日丰收节现场，植保无人机在稻田上空喷洒农药。\n\n更深的变化，藏在数据里：2025年双季稻平均亩产1104.7公斤，较行动前的2022年亩产提升320.7公斤、增长40.9%，2026年早稻单产562.9公斤，较行动前提升44.7%。\n\n丰收的“后勤”也在场：屈原农文旅精品线路现场发布；政策咨询台前，粮食生产补贴、农机购置补贴、农业保险等惠农政策，被宣讲团“翻译”成大白话，宣传手册发了一摞又一摞；电商专区里，群众扫码下单，丰收的果实从田头“飞”进千家万户。","湖南红网","报道",{"impact":68,"substance":69,"depth":70,"authority":13,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":71},18,20,15,"省级科研机构授牌叠加双季稻亩产提升40.9%的实测数据，属智慧农业与单产提升的实质性进展，具备精选价值。",[73],{"name":65,"url":62},[75,76,77,78,27],"数字乡村","智慧农业","种业振兴","水稻单产提升",[80,81],"屈原管理区 水稻单产提升","湖南杂交水稻研究中心 示范单位","屈原管理区水稻单产提升-3221","2026-09-23T00:04:29.645046Z",{"id":85,"title":86,"url":87,"summary":88,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":89,"source_url":9,"published_at":11,"category":66,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":90,"score_detail":91,"sources":96,"tags":98,"search_phrases":101,"slug":104,"view_count":36,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":105},3220,"指尖办农事，数字助粮安——齐鲁现代农事综合服务中心管理平台上线，水肥智慧大模型助力农户算好\"浇水账 施肥账\"","https:\u002F\u002Fnew.qq.com\u002Frain\u002Fa\u002F20260921A06Z6K00","9-21 大众新闻报道：齐鲁现代农事综合服务中心管理平台上线首发选择在德州——全国首个百万亩大面积\"吨半粮\"引领区，2026年省委一号文件明确要求布局建设现代农事综合服务中心，全省新增水肥一体化推广面积300万亩；德州计划到2030年水肥一体化面积达到200万亩。省农业科学院作物研究所副所长李娜娜带来了水肥智慧大模型，这项汇聚土壤、墒情、气象、苗情等海量数据的技术，能针对不同地块、不同作物，智能输出个性化的灌溉施肥方案。齐鲁现代农事综合服务中心管理平台把政府政策、农户需求、金融资源、社会服务有效贯通，推动农业社会化服务从\"碎片化供给\"向\"集成化服务\"跃升。","腾讯新闻·大众新闻",76,{"impact":92,"substance":18,"depth":93,"authority":21,"freshness":94,"relevant":22,"comment":95},22,16,8,"省级政策落地叠加水肥智慧大模型首发，数据与背景扎实，具备智慧农业主题聚合价值。",[97],{"name":89,"url":87},[75,76,99,100,27],"农业大模型","水肥一体化",[102,103],"水肥智慧大模型 德州","农业社会化服务 农业大模型 水肥一体化 数字乡村","水肥智慧大模型德州-3220","2026-09-23T00:04:29.579062Z",{"id":107,"title":108,"url":109,"summary":110,"summary_zh":111,"content":9,"source_name":112,"source_url":109,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":113,"score_detail":114,"sources":118,"tags":120,"search_phrases":124,"slug":127,"view_count":36,"doi":128,"paper":129,"created_at":151},3193,"Does Agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Use Improve Grain Production Efficiency? Evidence from Rural China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.foodpol.2026.103196","Enhancing grain production efficiency (GPE) is critical for ensuring food security and promoting a more resource-efficient agricultural transformation, particularly in smallholder systems where conventional machinery faces scale and terrain constraints. China’s rapid adoption of agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) offers an opportunity to assess whether digital machinery can improve efficiency without relying on farm expansion. Yet evidence on how UAV use intensity affects GPE, and on the conditions under which gains emerge, remains limited. Using data from 2,030 grain-producing households across nine provinces in the 2022 China Rural Revitalisation Survey, we measure GPE using a super-efficiency slacks-based measure model and estimate the effects of UAV use intensity. The results show a significant U-shaped relationship between UAV use intensity and GPE, with efficiency gains emerging only after UAV use intensity exceeds a certain threshold. UAV use affects GPE primarily through labour substitution and is nonlinearly associated with pesticide inputs. Besides, village-level agricultural service organisations strengthen the positive effects of UAV use, indicating that service provision complements the use of technology. The efficiency effects are stronger in western China and rice production systems, where conventional machinery is relatively constrained. These findings suggest that the benefits of agricultural UAVs depend not simply on adoption, but on sufficiently intensive use and supportive service institutions. Policies that expand access to UAV services and promote their effective integration into farm operations can improve factor allocation and grain production efficiency, especially in areas where conventional mechanisation is less adaptable. More broadly, these efforts can support agricultural digitalisation and sustainable agricultural modernisation.","提升粮食生产效率（GPE）对于保障粮食安全和推动资源节约型农业转型至关重要，尤其是在常规机械面临规模和地形约束的小农户体系中。中国农业无人机（UAV）的快速普及，为评估数字机械能否在不依赖农场规模扩大的情况下提升效率提供了契机。然而，关于无人机使用强度如何影响粮食生产效率以及增益在何种条件下显现的证据仍然有限。基于2022年中国乡村振兴调查中九个省份2030个粮食种植户的数据，我们采用超效率松弛测度模型测算粮食生产效率，并估计无人机使用强度的影响。结果表明，无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率之间呈显著的U型关系，效率增益仅在无人机使用强度超过一定阈值后才会显现。无人机使用主要通过劳动替代影响粮食生产效率，并与农药投入呈非线性关联。此外，村级农业服务组织强化了无人机使用的正向效应，表明服务供给与技术使用具有互补性。效率效应在中国西部和水稻生产体系中更强，这些地区常规机械受约束相对较大。这些发现表明，农业无人机的效益不仅取决于是否采用，还取决于足够密集的使用和支持性服务制度。扩大无人机服务可及性并促进其有效融入农场经营的政策，可以改善要素配置和粮食生产效率，尤其是在常规机械化适应性较差的地区。更广泛而言，这些努力能够支持农业数字化和可持续农业现代化。","Food Policy",86,{"impact":92,"substance":115,"depth":68,"authority":116,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":117},23,14,"基于2030户九省调查的实证研究，揭示无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率的U型关系及服务组织互补作用，方法规范、结论有政策价值，值得进入每日精选。",[119],{"name":112,"url":109},[76,121,122,27,123],"农业无人机","农业数字化","粮食生产效率",[125,126],"农业无人机 粮食生产效率","中国农村振兴调查 无人机","农业无人机粮食生产效率-3193","10.1016\u002Fj.foodpol.2026.103196",{"doi":128,"openalex_id":130,"authors":131,"venue":112,"cited_by_count":36,"oa_url":109,"card":145,"direction":52,"ingested_from":54},"W7213921092",[132,134,137,139,142],{"name":133,"orcid":9},"Xia Xu",{"name":135,"orcid":136},"Xianhui Geng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3998-7589",{"name":138,"orcid":9},"Zhenzhen Liu",{"name":140,"orcid":141},"Guangqiao Cao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9364-3376",{"name":143,"orcid":144},"Peng Yuan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3019-0688",{"tldr":146,"method":147,"finding":148,"direction":149,"opportunity":150},"基于中国农村调查数据，研究无人机使用强度对粮食生产效率的影响及条件。","2022年中国乡村振兴调查2030户数据，超效率SBM模型测效率。","无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率呈U型关系，需超过阈值才增效，主要通过劳动替代。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","可探究无人机服务组织与农户技术采纳的协同机制，及不同作物和区域的最优使用强度阈值。","2026-09-22T23:30:32.180844Z",{"id":153,"title":154,"url":155,"summary":156,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":157,"source_url":9,"published_at":158,"category":66,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":159,"score_detail":160,"sources":163,"tags":165,"search_phrases":167,"slug":170,"view_count":36,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":171},2899,"佳木斯国家农高区伏羲大脑智慧农服APP累计服务600多万亩:覆盖6万多户农民","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gskjb.cn\u002Fgskjb\u002F20260914\u002Fhtml\u002Fcontent_20260914003003.htm","在黑龙江佳木斯国家农业高新技术产业示范区,中国科学院研发的伏羲大脑农业大模型搭建的普惠式智慧农业服务体系正在改变传统农耕模式。农事综合服务手机APP成为农户的新农具,涵盖农事指导、农资直供、农机呼叫、卖粮、补贴、培训、金融保险等10项功能。农户上传地块信息后系统自动地块智能体检;系统每3-7天更新一次遥感数据。去年服务佳木斯100多万亩农田,一年半时间扩大到600多万亩,覆盖佳木斯6万多户农民。","甘肃科技报\u002F农民日报","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z",74,{"impact":92,"substance":69,"depth":70,"authority":17,"freshness":161,"relevant":22,"comment":162},5,"国家级科研机构大模型落地农业社会化服务的规模化案例，数据具体、可复制性强，值得进入每日精选。",[164],{"name":157,"url":155},[75,76,166,99,27],"农业人工智能",[168,169],"佳木斯农高区 伏羲大脑 智慧农服APP","中国科学院 伏羲大脑 农业大模型","佳木斯农高区伏羲大脑智慧农服APP-2899","2026-09-19T00:06:07.688523Z",{"id":173,"title":174,"url":175,"summary":176,"summary_zh":177,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":175,"published_at":178,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":179,"score_detail":180,"sources":182,"tags":184,"search_phrases":188,"slug":191,"view_count":36,"doi":192,"paper":193,"created_at":213},2759,"Impact of digital infrastructure on agricultural green transformation: theory and China’s experience","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1869475","The digital infrastructure is the core support of promoting rural revitalization and agricultural green transformation. However, the impact and implementation pathways through which digital infrastructure affect the agricultural green transformation remain insufficiently explored and require in-depth empirical investigation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese counties spanning 2013 to 2023, treating the pilot policy of digital rural construction as a quasi-natural experiment, and employs a difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine the impact and underlying mechanisms of digital infrastructure on agricultural green transformation. The results indicate that digital infrastructure have a significant positive effect on agricultural green transformation, and this conclusion remains robust across multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analysis indicates that digital infrastructure influences the agricultural green transformation through three primary pathways: facilitating agricultural green technological innovation, improving the resource allocation efficiency, and enhancing the agricultural socialized services. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the driving effect of digital infrastructure is significant in eastern regions, low-altitude counties, and major grain-producing areas, and the impact in other regions is relatively weak. This paper provides empirical evidence and policy implications for leveraging digital infrastructure to promote the agricultural green transformation.","数字基础设施是推动乡村振兴与农业绿色转型的核心支撑。然而，数字基础设施对农业绿色转型的影响及其实现路径尚缺乏充分探讨，有待深入的实证研究。本文利用2013至2023年中国县域面板数据，将数字乡村建设试点政策视为准自然实验，采用双重差分（DID）模型考察数字基础设施对农业绿色转型的影响及其内在机制。结果表明，数字基础设施对农业绿色转型具有显著正向效应，且该结论在多种稳健性检验下依然成立。机制分析表明，数字基础设施通过三条主要路径影响农业绿色转型：促进农业绿色技术创新、提高资源配置效率以及增强农业社会化服务。异质性分析显示，数字基础设施的驱动效应在东部地区、低海拔县域及粮食主产区显著，而在其他地区影响相对较弱。本文为利用数字基础设施推动农业绿色转型提供了经验证据与政策启示。","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",84,{"impact":92,"substance":92,"depth":68,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":181},"基于2013—2023年中国县域面板数据与数字乡村试点准自然实验，实证揭示数字基础设施通过绿色技术创新、资源配置效率和社会化服务三条路径推动农业绿色转型，方法规范、结论可靠，对数字乡村政策具有参考价值。",[183],{"name":10,"url":175},[75,185,186,27,187],"数字基础设施","农业绿色转型","县域面板数据",[189,190],"农业社会化服务 农业绿色转型 县域面板数据 数字基础设施","农业社会化服务 农业绿色转型","农业社会化服务农业绿色转型县域面板数据数字基础设施-2759","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1869475",{"doi":192,"openalex_id":194,"authors":195,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":36,"oa_url":206,"card":207,"direction":211,"ingested_from":54},"W7213421769",[196,199,201,204],{"name":197,"orcid":198},"Guoqun Ma","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9619-8423",{"name":200,"orcid":9},"Qin Su",{"name":202,"orcid":203},"Yan Luo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9731-4983",{"name":205,"orcid":9},"Wenying Xiao","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1869475\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":208,"method":209,"finding":210,"direction":211,"opportunity":212},"基于中国县域面板数据，用DID模型检验数字基础设施对农业绿色转型的影响与机制。","2013-2023年县域面板数据，数字乡村试点作准自然实验，DID模型。","数字基础设施显著促进农业绿色转型，通过绿色技术创新、资源配置效率、社会化服务三条路径。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究数字基础设施对农业碳排放与绿色全要素生产率的非线性影响及空间溢出效应。","2026-09-17T23:30:08.126393Z",{"id":215,"title":216,"url":217,"summary":218,"summary_zh":219,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":217,"published_at":178,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":220,"score_detail":221,"sources":223,"tags":225,"search_phrases":230,"slug":233,"view_count":36,"doi":234,"paper":235,"created_at":253},2758,"Heterogeneous impacts and transmission mechanisms of perceived development barriers on cooperative management performance: micro evidence from Shaanxi, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606","Introduction Farmer cooperatives are key to linking smallholders with modern agriculture, yet how different development barriers affect their management performance remains unclear, as prior studies focus mainly on classifying barriers. Methods Using survey data from 1,130 cooperatives in Shaanxi Province, China, this study applies ordinal logistic regression to examine the heterogeneous effects of perceived development barriers on management performance, with stepwise regression and Sobel tests identifying the mediating role of three management practices (strategic planning, resource investment, operational management). Two-period-lagged operating endowments are controlled to address reverse causality. Results The overall effect of barriers is insignificant, but dimensions differ markedly: resource and institutional barriers significantly reduce performance, whereas product-market and human-resource barriers show no overall effect. Management practices act as a channel—resource and institutional barriers exert a negative full mediating effect, product-market barriers a positive suppression effect, and human-resource barriers no effective pathway. Discussion Resource and institutional barriers are hierarchical: members’ insufficient willingness to contribute capital is the primary performance constraint, followed by land-transfer difficulties, while other policy constraints are common baseline conditions rather than core explanatory factors. Endogeneity and robustness tests support these findings.","引言 农民合作社是连接小农户与现代农业的关键，但不同发展障碍如何影响其经营绩效仍不明确，既有研究主要集中于对障碍进行分类。方法 本研究利用中国陕西省1130家合作社的调查数据，采用有序逻辑回归考察感知发展障碍对经营绩效的异质性影响，并通过逐步回归和Sobel检验识别三种管理实践（战略规划、资源投入、运营管理）的中介作用。为处理反向因果问题，研究控制了两期滞后的经营禀赋。结果 障碍的总体效应不显著，但各维度差异明显：资源障碍和制度障碍显著降低绩效，而产品市场障碍和人力资源障碍未表现出总体效应。管理实践发挥渠道作用——资源障碍和制度障碍产生负向完全中介效应，产品市场障碍产生正向抑制效应，人力资源障碍则无有效路径。讨论 资源障碍和制度障碍具有层级性：成员出资意愿不足是首要绩效约束，其次是土地流转困难，而其他政策约束属于常见基线条件而非核心解释因素。内生性和稳健性检验支持上述发现。",75,{"impact":70,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":222},"基于陕西1130家合作社微观调查，揭示资源与制度壁垒对经营绩效的异质性影响及管理实践中介机制，样本规模与方法设计扎实，对合作社扶持政策有参考价值。",[224],{"name":10,"url":217},[226,27,227,228,229],"乡村振兴","土地流转","农民合作社","农业经营主体",[231,232],"农业社会化服务 农业经营主体 农民合作社 乡村振兴","农业社会化服务 农业经营主体","农业社会化服务农业经营主体农民合作社乡村振兴-2758","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606",{"doi":234,"openalex_id":236,"authors":237,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":36,"oa_url":247,"card":248,"direction":52,"ingested_from":54},"W7213418458",[238,241,243,245],{"name":239,"orcid":240},"Shihan Chen","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9790-3174",{"name":242,"orcid":9},"Sihan Jiang",{"name":244,"orcid":9},"Haiyan Wang",{"name":246,"orcid":9},"Jikun Ma","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":249,"method":250,"finding":251,"direction":52,"opportunity":252},"基于陕西1130家合作社调查，分析感知发展障碍对管理绩效的异质性影响及传导机制。","有序Logistic回归、逐步回归与Sobel检验，控制两期滞后经营禀赋。","资源与制度障碍显著降低绩效，管理实践起中介作用，成员出资意愿不足是首要约束。","可探究数字技术能否缓解资源与制度障碍，并优化合作社管理实践的中介路径。","2026-09-17T23:30:08.060675Z"]