[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3377":3,"related-3377":38},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":8,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"search_phrases":32,"slug":35,"view_count":36,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":37},3377,"农业农村部、市场监管总局、国家知识产权局联合印发《农业品牌保护专项行动实施方案（2026—2027年）》","https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Fcontent\u002F890127250274385920","近日三部门联合印发《农业品牌保护专项行动实施方案（2026—2027年）》，部署四大重点任务：一是品牌农产品质量安全监管执法，全面落实承诺达标合格证制度；二是打击涉农商标、专利领域违法行为，重点查处地理标志侵权、假冒专利及农产品网络销售、直播带货中侵权假冒行为；三是打击不正当竞争行为；四是涉农知识产权行政保护，支持品牌主体通过商标、专利、地理标志、植物新品种等多维度知识产权布局，强化品牌权益保护。",null,"*   [![Image 1](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fhebei\u002Fbaoding\u002Fimages\u002Fnav\u002Fnav-home.png)首页](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002F)\n*   [![Image 2](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213910310088719.png)信用动态](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F102)\n*   [![Image 3](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213924351033562.png)政策法规](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F106)\n*   [![Image 4](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694629349035186.png)信用公示](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fxushuiqu\u002Fcredit\u002Fcreditpublicity\u002F595546555902066688)\n*   [![Image 5](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694727052065730.png)信用服务](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F104)\n*   [![Image 6](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694788313001529.png)联合奖惩](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Funion\u002FrewardsAndPunish\u002Findex\u002F203)\n*   [![Image 7](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2025\u002F02\u002F19\u002F1739928857521074065.png)信用+](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fxinyijia\u002Fjia\u002FtoList\u002F201)\n*   [![Image 8](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213995251083828.png)诚信文化](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F430986271020548096)\n\n**保定市**[[区县切换](javascript:void(0))]\n\n*   [保定市](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002F)\n\n*   [竞秀区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fjingxiuqu)\n\n*   [莲池区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Flianchiqu)\n\n*   [满城区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fmanchengqu)\n\n*   [清苑区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fqingyuanqu)\n\n*   [徐水区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fxushuiqu)\n\n*   [涞水县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Flaishuixian)\n\n*   [阜平县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffupingxian)\n\n*   [定兴县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fdingxingxian)\n\n*   [唐县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ftangxian)\n\n*   [高阳县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fgaoyangxian)\n\n*   [涞源县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Flaiyuanxian)\n\n*   [望都县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fwangduxian)\n\n*   [易县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fyixian)\n\n*   [曲阳县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fquyangxian)\n\n*   [蠡县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Flixian)\n\n*   [顺平县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fshunpingxian)\n\n*   [博野县](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fboyexian)\n\n*   [涿州市](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fzhuozhoushi)\n\n*   [安国市](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fanguoshi)\n\n*   [高碑店市](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fgaobeidianshi)\n\n*   [高新区](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fgaoxinqu)\n\n*   [白沟新城](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fbaigouxincheng)\n\n[智能客服](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Frobot\u002Fanswer)[无障碍浏览](javascript:ld_accessibility.Function.show.Start();)[进入适老模式](javascript:void(0))[登录](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fuser\u002Ftologin)|[注册](https:\u002F\u002Fzwfw.hebei.gov.cn\u002Fhbjis\u002Ffront\u002Flogin.do?uuid=yBWyRAG5eTSr&userType=1&gotoUrl=aHR0cDovL3h5LmJhb2RpbmcuZ292LmNuL3VzZXIvdG9sb2dpbg==)\n\n[信用中国（河北保定）](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002F)\n\n[信用信息](javascript:void(0))[统一社会信用代码](javascript:void(0))[本站文章](javascript:void(0))\n\n[![Image 9](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fhebei\u002Fbaoding\u002Fimages\u002Fsearch-icon.png)搜索](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Fcontent\u002F890127250274385920)\n\n*   [![Image 10](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fhebei\u002Fbaoding\u002Fimages\u002Fnav\u002Fnav-home.png)首页](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002F)\n*   [![Image 11](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213910310088719.png)信用动态](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F102)\n*   [![Image 12](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213924351033562.png)政策法规](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F106)\n*   [![Image 13](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694629349035186.png)信用公示](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fxushuiqu\u002Fcredit\u002Fcreditpublicity\u002F595546555902066688)\n*   [![Image 14](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694727052065730.png)信用服务](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F104)\n*   [![Image 15](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F29\u002F1782694788313001529.png)联合奖惩](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Funion\u002FrewardsAndPunish\u002Findex\u002F203)\n*   [![Image 16](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2025\u002F02\u002F19\u002F1739928857521074065.png)信用+](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fxinyijia\u002Fjia\u002FtoList\u002F201)\n*   [![Image 17](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2023\u002F04\u002F23\u002F1682213995251083828.png)诚信文化](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F430986271020548096)\n\n[](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Fcontent\u002F890127250274385920)\n\n您所在位置：[首页](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002F)>[信用动态](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F102)>[外地动态](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F122)\n\n农业农村部等三部门联合实施农业品牌保护专项行动\n\n时间： 2026-09-22\n\n来源：新华网\n\n#### [微信扫一扫：分享 ![Image 18](blob:http:\u002F\u002Flocalhost\u002F0ff713be46ff2664f087946f4b1aa3a1) 微信里点“发现”，扫一下 二维码便可将本文分享至朋友圈。](javascript:;)[](https:\u002F\u002Fservice.weibo.com\u002Fshare\u002Fshare.php?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fnews%2Fcontent%2F890127250274385920&title=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%86%9C%E6%9D%91%E9%83%A8%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%89%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E8%81%94%E5%90%88%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E4%BF%9D%E6%8A%A4%E4%B8%93%E9%A1%B9%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8&pic=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fhebei%2Fbaoding%2Fimages%2Fnav%2Fnav-home.png&appkey=)[](http:\u002F\u002Fsns.qzone.qq.com\u002Fcgi-bin\u002Fqzshare\u002Fcgi_qzshare_onekey?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fnews%2Fcontent%2F890127250274385920&title=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%86%9C%E6%9D%91%E9%83%A8%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%89%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E8%81%94%E5%90%88%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E4%BF%9D%E6%8A%A4%E4%B8%93%E9%A1%B9%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8&desc=%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%9C%A8%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BA%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E7%9A%84%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%8C%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E5%90%84%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E7%9A%84%E4%BF%A1%20%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%EF%BC%8C%E9%80%9A%E8%BF%87%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E3%80%81%E5%8A%A0%E5%B7%A5%E3%80%81%E5%A4%84%E7%90%86%E3%80%81%E6%A0%A1%E9%AA%8C%E5%90%8E%E5%BD%A2%E6%88%90%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E5%B9%B6%E4%BA%A7%E7%94%9F%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A%E7%AD%89%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81%2C%E4%B8%BA%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E5%90%84%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%20%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%9A%84%E6%9F%A5%E8%AF%A2%E5%92%8C%E5%BA%94%E7%94%A8%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E3%80%82%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%88%E6%B2%B3%E5%8C%97%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%EF%BC%89%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8&summary=%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%9C%A8%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BA%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E7%9A%84%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%8C%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E5%90%84%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E7%9A%84%E4%BF%A1%20%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%EF%BC%8C%E9%80%9A%E8%BF%87%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E3%80%81%E5%8A%A0%E5%B7%A5%E3%80%81%E5%A4%84%E7%90%86%E3%80%81%E6%A0%A1%E9%AA%8C%E5%90%8E%E5%BD%A2%E6%88%90%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E5%B9%B6%E4%BA%A7%E7%94%9F%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A%E7%AD%89%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81%2C%E4%B8%BA%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E5%90%84%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%20%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%9A%84%E6%9F%A5%E8%AF%A2%E5%92%8C%E5%BA%94%E7%94%A8%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E3%80%82%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%88%E6%B2%B3%E5%8C%97%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%EF%BC%89%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8&site=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%86%9C%E6%9D%91%E9%83%A8%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%89%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E8%81%94%E5%90%88%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E4%BF%9D%E6%8A%A4%E4%B8%93%E9%A1%B9%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8&pics=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fhebei%2Fbaoding%2Fimages%2Fnav%2Fnav-home.png)[](http:\u002F\u002Fconnect.qq.com\u002Fwidget\u002Fshareqq\u002Findex.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fnews%2Fcontent%2F890127250274385920&title=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%86%9C%E6%9D%91%E9%83%A8%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%89%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E8%81%94%E5%90%88%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E4%BF%9D%E6%8A%A4%E4%B8%93%E9%A1%B9%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8&source=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%86%9C%E6%9D%91%E9%83%A8%E7%AD%89%E4%B8%89%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E8%81%94%E5%90%88%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E4%BF%9D%E6%8A%A4%E4%B8%93%E9%A1%B9%E8%A1%8C%E5%8A%A8&desc=%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%9C%A8%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E4%BA%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E7%9A%84%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%8C%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E5%90%84%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E7%9A%84%E4%BF%A1%20%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%EF%BC%8C%E9%80%9A%E8%BF%87%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E9%87%87%E9%9B%86%E3%80%81%E5%8A%A0%E5%B7%A5%E3%80%81%E5%A4%84%E7%90%86%E3%80%81%E6%A0%A1%E9%AA%8C%E5%90%8E%E5%BD%A2%E6%88%90%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E5%B9%B6%E4%BA%A7%E7%94%9F%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A%E7%AD%89%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81%2C%E4%B8%BA%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E5%90%84%E9%83%A8%E9%97%A8%E3%80%81%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%20%E4%BA%8B%E4%B8%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%81%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%9A%84%E6%9F%A5%E8%AF%A2%E5%92%8C%E5%BA%94%E7%94%A8%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E3%80%82%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%88%E6%B2%B3%E5%8C%97%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%EF%BC%89%2C%E4%BF%A1%E7%94%A8&pics=https%3A%2F%2Fxy.baoding.gov.cn%2Fhebei%2Fbaoding%2Fimages%2Fnav%2Fnav-home.png)\n\n近日，农业农村部、市场监管总局和国家知识产权局联合印发《农业品牌保护专项行动实施方案（2026—2027年）》，提出完善部门协同保护机制，健全覆盖农业品牌培育、管理、使用、推广的全链条保护体系，增强消费信心、提升品牌价值。\n\n本次专项行动围绕四大重点任务展开。在品牌农产品质量安全监管执法方面，全面落实承诺达标合格证制度，健全问题通报和协查机制，强化产地准出分类监管。\n\n在打击涉农商标、专利领域违法行为方面，严厉查处涉农商标侵权、地理标志侵权、假冒专利等违法行为，强化对农产品网络销售、直播带货中侵权假冒行为的查处力度，严厉打击恶意抢注或侵犯老字号商标、驰名商标的行为。\n\n在打击不正当竞争行为方面，要求重点查处擅自使用知名区域公用品牌、地理标志品牌等特有的和近似的名称、包装、装潢等混淆行为，重点查处经营者对其商品性能、功能、质量、销售状况、用户评价、曾获荣誉等作虚假或者引人误解的商业宣传，以及通过商业诋毁等方式损害竞争对手的行为。\n\n在涉农知识产权行政保护方面，支持农业品牌主体通过商标、专利、地理标志、植物新品种等多维度知识产权布局，强化品牌权益保护。推动知识产权公共服务机构聚焦重点农业产业，提供维权咨询、侵权判定、纠纷调解等专业化公益服务，提升农业品牌主体知识产权管理能力。\n\n[【打印本页】](javascript:print();)[【关闭窗口】](javascript:window.opener=null;window.open('','_self');window.close();)\n\n[![Image 19](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fhebei\u002Fbaoding\u002Fimages\u002Fbs_0403.png)](http:\u002F\u002Fbszs.conac.cn\u002Fsitename?method=show&id=B9C45121CFF3E804E05310291AAC8168)\n\n![Image 20](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fhebei\u002Fbaoding\u002Fimages\u002Fcommon\u002Fjiucuo.png?v=1306000043)\n\n[互动交流](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002FmessageBoard)  \n[联系我们](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Fnews\u002Findex\u002F445868384748306432)  \n[网站地图](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002FsiteMap)\n\n主办单位：保定市行政审批局（政务服务管理办公室）  \n[主体备案号：冀ICP备18006804号 网站备案号：冀ICP备18006804号-4](https:\u002F\u002Fbeian.miit.gov.cn\u002F)政府网站标识码：1306000043 版权所有 侵权必究   \n[![Image 21](https:\u002F\u002Fxy.baoding.gov.cn\u002Ffile\u002Fueditorgroup\u002Fbaoding\u002Fueditor\u002Fjsp\u002Fupload\u002Fimage\u002F2024\u002F07\u002F10\u002F1720590074755032591.png)冀公网安备 13060602001211号](http:\u002F\u002Fwww.beian.gov.cn\u002Fportal\u002FregisterSystemInfo?recordcode=13060602001211)地址：河北省保定市乐凯北大街3088号电谷科技中心1号楼保定市民服务中心","新华网（保定信用转载）2026-09-22","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","政策",10,false,86,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},27,22,16,13,8,1,"三部门联合印发农业品牌保护两年行动方案，属全国性政策部署，条款与部门分工明确，对农业品牌与地理标志保护有直接指导意义，值得进入每日精选。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"知识产权","地理标志","专项行动","品牌强农","农业品牌保护",[33,34],"农业农村部 市场监管总局 国家知识产权局 农业品牌","农业品牌保护 专项行动 品牌强农 地理标志","农业农村部市场监管总局国家知识产权局农业品牌-3377",0,"2026-09-25T00:09:26.888100Z",{"total":39,"page":22,"page_size":39,"items":40},6,[41,70,116,143,167,190],{"id":42,"title":43,"url":44,"summary":45,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":46,"source_url":8,"published_at":47,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":48,"is_selected":49,"score":50,"score_detail":51,"sources":56,"tags":61,"search_phrases":65,"slug":68,"view_count":36,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":69},2809,"三部门联合印发《农业品牌保护专项行动实施方案(2026—2027年)》","https:\u002F\u002Fszb.farmer.com.cn\u002Fnmrb\u002Fhtml\u002F2026\u002F20260918\u002F20260918_1\u002Fnmrb_20260918_13408_1_2100697050475761675.html","近日,农业农村部、市场监管总局、国家知识产权局联合印发《方案》,提出带动一批特色品牌、壮大一批品牌主体,集中力量查办一批侵权违法案件,完善部门协同保护机制。围绕品牌农产品质量安全监管、涉农商标专利违法行为、不正当竞争行为、涉农知识产权行政保护四大重点任务,专项行动自印发之日起至2027年12月31日,分动员部署、组织实施、总结提升三阶段推进。","农民日报 2026年9月18日 头版","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z",25,true,93,{"impact":17,"substance":52,"depth":53,"authority":54,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":55},23,18,15,"三部门联合印发的全国性农业品牌保护专项行动方案，任务分工与时间节点明确，政策增量足、权威性强，值得进入每日精选。",[57,58],{"name":46,"url":44},{"name":59,"url":60},"新华社·人民网","https:\u002F\u002Ffinance.people.com.cn\u002FBIG5\u002Fn1\u002F2026\u002F0917\u002Fc1004-40800714.html",[62,63,64,29,30],"农业品牌","市场监管","知识产权保护",[66,67],"知识产权保护 专项行动 农业品牌 品牌强农","知识产权保护 专项行动","知识产权保护专项行动农业品牌品牌强农-2809","2026-09-18T00:03:24.162035Z",{"id":71,"title":72,"url":73,"summary":74,"summary_zh":75,"content":8,"source_name":76,"source_url":73,"published_at":77,"category":78,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":79,"score_detail":80,"sources":83,"tags":85,"search_phrases":90,"slug":93,"view_count":36,"doi":94,"paper":95,"created_at":115},3056,"Agricultural geographical indication certification and county cropland area in China: evidence from a multi-period difference-in-differences analysis","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1954068","Agricultural geographical indication (AGI) certification is promoted as a market-based instrument for place-based food systems, yet whether it protects the agricultural land base remains contested. Because county cropland area is the quantity on which grain production capacity is calculated, whether certification changes that quantity is a first-order policy question. This study estimates the effect of a county’s first AGI certification on cropland area using a panel of Chinese counties, remotely sensed land-cover data, and a multi-period difference-in-differences design. The outcome measures current cropland area relative to a county-specific historical average and therefore captures land-cover quantity rather than land quality. Because certification is granted in different years across counties, a heterogeneity-robust group-time estimator serves as the primary specification and conventional two-way fixed effects provide the benchmark. The benchmark model returns a positive and significant association, whereas the group-time estimator returns a positive but statistically imprecise average effect. A decomposition shows that most of the benchmark coefficient rests on comparisons between counties certified in different years. Excluding the earliest certified cohort leaves the average effect unchanged and reveals a positive dynamic response that emerges only after several years. Agricultural labor productivity transmits a small share of the association, whereas agricultural service output intensity is not robust once the sample is held constant. The choice of estimand therefore determines whether certification appears to protect cropland.","农业地理标志（AGI）认证被推广为一种面向地方食物体系的基于市场的工具，但其能否保护农业用地基础仍存争议。由于县域耕地面积是计算粮食生产能力所依据的数量，认证是否改变这一数量是一个首要的政策问题。本研究利用中国县域面板数据、遥感土地覆盖数据和多期双重差分设计，估计一个县首次获得AGI认证对耕地面积的影响。结果变量衡量的是当前耕地面积相对于该县特定历史平均水平的比值，因此捕捉的是土地覆盖数量而非土地质量。由于各县获得认证的年份不同，异质性稳健的组别—时期估计量作为主要设定，传统双向固定效应作为基准。基准模型返回正向且显著的关联，而组别—时期估计量返回正向但统计上不精确的平均效应。分解表明，基准系数主要依赖于不同年份获得认证的县之间的比较。排除最早获得认证的队列后，平均效应保持不变，并揭示出一种仅在数年后才出现的正向动态响应。农业劳动生产率传递了该关联的一小部分，而一旦样本保持不变，农业服务产出强度便不再稳健。因此，估计量的选择决定了认证是否看起来保护了耕地。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z","论文",80,{"impact":53,"substance":18,"depth":53,"authority":20,"freshness":81,"relevant":22,"comment":82},9,"基于遥感与多期双重差分的县域实证研究，方法规范、结论对地理标志与耕地保护政策有参考价值，但属学术论文、影响面偏细分领域。",[84],{"name":76,"url":73},[86,28,87,88,89],"乡村振兴","耕地保护","遥感监测","粮食产能",[91,92],"农业地理标志 耕地面积","多期双重差分 耕地","农业地理标志耕地面积-3056","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1954068",{"doi":94,"openalex_id":96,"authors":97,"venue":76,"cited_by_count":36,"oa_url":73,"card":108,"direction":112,"ingested_from":114},"W7213780571",[98,101,103,105],{"name":99,"orcid":100},"Ruofan Liao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0009-5058-7368",{"name":102,"orcid":8},"Qingqing Fan",{"name":104,"orcid":8},"Mi Tan",{"name":106,"orcid":107},"Jianxu Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2128-6015",{"tldr":109,"method":110,"finding":111,"direction":112,"opportunity":113},"用多期双重差分法估计中国县域首次获农产品地理标志认证对耕地面积的影响。","中国县域面板、遥感土地覆盖数据、多期DID与异质性稳健组时估计量。","基准模型显示正向显著关联，但组时估计量不精确，效应主要来自不同认证年份县间比较。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可结合遥感与因果推断，检验地理标志认证对耕地保护、农业服务与劳动力生产率的长期动态机制。","openalex","2026-09-21T23:30:07.723086Z",{"id":117,"title":118,"url":119,"summary":120,"summary_zh":8,"content":121,"source_name":122,"source_url":8,"published_at":123,"category":124,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":125,"score_detail":126,"sources":131,"tags":133,"search_phrases":138,"slug":141,"view_count":22,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":142},772,"[黑龙江省农科院]中国农业科技管理研究会农业科技成果转化与知识产权保护工作委员会2026年年会在哈尔滨举办","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.toutiao.com\u002Farticle\u002F7675556493994869294\u002F","中国农业科技管理研究会农业科技成果转化与知识产权保护工作委员会2026年年会8月18日在哈尔滨开幕,中国工程院唐华俊院士、张新友院士和黑龙江省农业科学院党组书记、院长陈宇辉分别作主旨报告。来自全国各地的农业科技界专家学者300余人参加会议。会议恰逢黑龙江省农业科学院建院70周年,会议期间同步举办了科技成果市民开放日和系列学术活动。陈宇辉介绍黑龙江省农科院构建「四有」成果转化模式:有的转、有人转、有地转、有招转。","## 专家学者共话农业科技与产业创新发展\n\n本报18日讯（记者梁金池）18日，中国农业科技管理研究会农业科技成果转化与知识产权保护工作委员会2026年年会在哈尔滨举办，来自全国各地的农业科技界专家学者300余人参加会议。\n\n本次会议由中国农业科技管理研究会主办，中国农业科技管理研究会农业科技成果转化与知识产权保护工作委员会、黑龙江省农业科学院、黑龙江省龙科农业科技成果转移服务中心有限公司共同承办。会上，中国工程院唐华俊院士、张新友院士和黑龙江省农业科学院党组书记、院长陈宇辉分别以《农业发展千年之变与新时期农业发展战略》《践行产业科技理念 以科技创新引领产业创新 团队四十年花生育种与成果转化实践》和《构建“四有”成果转化模式，加速推进科技创新与产业创新深度融合》为题作主旨报告。\n\n会议期间，与会人员聚焦“推动科技创新与产业创新深度融合”“科研项目管理创新”“强化企业创新主体地位”等话题开展深入研讨。大家一致认为，当前农业科技已进入与产业需求深度融合的新阶段，必须打通从实验室到生产田的“最后一公里”，让科研成果真正转化为支撑粮食安全、驱动产业升级的现实生产力。\n\n本次会议恰逢黑龙江省农业科学院建院 70 周年，会议期间同步举办了科技成果市民开放日和系列学术活动，围绕高端智能农机装备技术创新与产业升级、土壤资源保护技术与新质生产力提升、东北四省区五院农业科技成果转化等展开深入交流研讨，为寒地农业高质量发展把脉问诊，以农科智慧赋能龙江实践，为加快农业农村现代化发展注入强劲科技动能。","黑龙江新闻网 2026-08-18","2026-08-18T01:59:00Z","报道",64,{"impact":127,"substance":54,"depth":128,"authority":13,"freshness":129,"relevant":22,"comment":130},20,12,7,"全国性农业科技管理年会，聚焦成果转化与产业融合，有院士报告和具体议题，但内容偏会议通稿，深度一般。",[132],{"name":122,"url":119},[27,134,135,136,137],"成果转化","哈尔滨","农业科技管理","黑龙江省农科院70周年",[139,140],"黑龙江省农科院70周年 农业科技管理 成果转化 知识产权","黑龙江省农科院70周年 农业科技管理","黑龙江省农科院70周年农业科技管理成果转化知识产权-772","2026-08-21T00:05:56.101310Z",{"id":144,"title":145,"url":146,"summary":147,"summary_zh":8,"content":148,"source_name":149,"source_url":8,"published_at":150,"category":78,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":151,"score_detail":152,"sources":155,"tags":157,"search_phrases":162,"slug":165,"view_count":22,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":166},512,"Can Certification of Geographical Indication Agricultural Products Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? Moderation and Threshold Effects from China","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265","Chunlan Zou与Zaijin Zou(西南林业大学经济管理学院)基于2012—2023年中国31个省份面板数据,采用双向固定效应模型估计基准效应,调节效应模型检验农业产业集聚作用,面板门槛回归捕捉潜在非线性关系。研究表明:地理标志农产品认证显著提高AGTFP,每个认证在1%显著性水平上提高AGTFP约0.001单位;农业产业集聚正向调节这一关系,认证效应仅在高集聚地区显著;认证效应呈门槛依赖型,低于农业发展水平0.048时呈显著负效应-0.0023,高于时呈显著正效应0.0015。","## 1. Introduction\n\nThe green transformation of agriculture is a central pillar of China’s agricultural modernization agenda. At the end of 2024, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs officially issued the Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Comprehensive Green Transformation of Agricultural Development and Promoting Ecological Revitalization in Rural Areas, marking a new, more systematic phase of China’s agricultural green transformation [[1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B1-sustainability-18-08265)]. The Plan for Accelerating the Construction of an Agricultural Powerhouse (2024–2035) further emphasizes the need to enhance total factor productivity in agriculture and to build a modern production system that is both resource-efficient and environmentally friendly [[2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B2-sustainability-18-08265)]. This policy momentum, however, contrasts sharply with the persistent challenges that remain in practice.\n\nDespite this policy momentum, the gap between policy ambition and practical implementation remains substantial. According to the China Agricultural Green Development Report 2024, total agricultural fertilizer application nationwide reached 49.88 million metric tons in 2024. This figure indicates continued pressure on agricultural pollution control and, correspondingly, considerable room for improvement in Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity (AGTFP). It also suggests that technological progress and increased use of inputs alone are insufficient to achieve a fundamental breakthrough in agriculture’s green transformation. Institutional mechanisms that combine regulatory constraints with market-based incentives are equally indispensable.\n\nAgainst this backdrop, a notable tension has emerged in China’s agricultural sector. The number of registered Geographical Indication (GI) products reached approximately 82,000 in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 7% [[3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B3-sustainability-18-08265)]. Yet agricultural non-point source pollution continues to impose a heavy environmental burden. The Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development explicitly identifies green and branded agriculture as strategic priorities for agricultural modernization, calling for the vigorous development of GI products and distinctive agricultural brands [[4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B4-sustainability-18-08265)]. This juxtaposition raises a question of both theoretical and practical urgency: can GI certification—an institution originally designed to protect origin-specific product quality—simultaneously boost agricultural output and reduce pollution, thereby contributing to AGTFP improvement? Addressing this question is the central motivation of the present study.\n\nA substantial body of literature has examined the determinants of AGTFP, which can be broadly grouped into four strands. The first strand focuses on digital technology and financial innovation. Studies show that digital village construction [[5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B5-sustainability-18-08265)], digital inclusive finance [[6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B6-sustainability-18-08265)], and agricultural technological innovation and modernization [[7](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B7-sustainability-18-08265)] enhance AGTFP by improving information accessibility, resource allocation efficiency, and innovation capacity. The second strand examines policy and institutional factors, including environmental regulation [[8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B8-sustainability-18-08265)], fiscal support for agriculture [[9](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B9-sustainability-18-08265)], agricultural insurance [[10](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B10-sustainability-18-08265)], and farmland transfer rights [[11](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B11-sustainability-18-08265)]. These studies consistently find that the effectiveness of such policy instruments varies considerably across regional and institutional contexts [[12](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B12-sustainability-18-08265),[13](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B13-sustainability-18-08265)]. The third strand investigates industrial development and factor endowments, including agricultural industrial agglomeration [[14](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B14-sustainability-18-08265)], agricultural product trade [[15](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B15-sustainability-18-08265)], rural population aging [[16](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B16-sustainability-18-08265)], and agricultural socialized services [[17](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B17-sustainability-18-08265),[18](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B18-sustainability-18-08265)]. This research shows that structural transformations in the agricultural economy can affect AGTFP through multiple pathways, with some studies reporting positive effects and others reporting negative or insignificant effects [[19](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B19-sustainability-18-08265),[20](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B20-sustainability-18-08265)]. The fourth strand considers macroeconomic factors, such as market conditions and urbanization, which also shape AGTFP at the aggregate level [[21](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B21-sustainability-18-08265)]. Collectively, this literature has identified diverse technological, institutional, structural, and macroeconomic drivers of AGTFP, though most studies examine these determinants in isolation, leaving the role of market-based quality certification schemes such as GI largely unexplored.\n\nResearch on GI agricultural products has predominantly focused on the economic effects of certification. A substantial body of research confirms that GI certification raises farm household income, primarily through price premiums and improved market access [[22](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B22-sustainability-18-08265)]. Other studies link GI certification to rural industrial development [[23](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B23-sustainability-18-08265)] and county-level economic growth [[24](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B24-sustainability-18-08265)], emphasizing the roles of brand value and agritourism in stimulating local economies [[25](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B25-sustainability-18-08265)]. A smaller but growing body of literature examines the link between GI certification and environmentally sustainable production at the farm level. Several studies find that certified producers adopt environmentally friendly inputs and practices significantly more often than non-certified producers [[26](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B26-sustainability-18-08265)]. These findings suggest that GI certification has meaningful implications for sustainable production. However, few studies have systematically examined the effects of GI certification on AGTFP specifically, and the conditions under which its potential environmental benefits are realized remain underexplored.\n\nIntegrating these two research streams reveals a critical blind spot. Although existing research has established that GI certification shapes producer behavior and that structural and institutional factors drive AGTFP, no systematic framework has yet been developed to examine whether GI certification can function as an institutional driver of green productivity improvement. Three questions remain unanswered. Does GI certification, as a formal institutional arrangement, exert a meaningful effect on AGTFP? If so, under what regional conditions is this effect realized—and why does it appear to vary so markedly across contexts? And is the relationship between certification and green productivity truly linear and homogeneous, or might it exhibit threshold-dependent non-linearities that prior studies have been unable to detect? Accordingly, this study draws on provincial panel data from China spanning 2012 to 2023 and employs a two-way fixed-effects model, a moderation model, and a panel threshold regression model to conduct a systematic empirical analysis.\n\nThis study offers three principal contributions to the existing literature. First, we integrate Geographical Indication (GI) certification into the analytical framework for AGTFP determinants. Unlike prior research that primarily focuses on command-and-control policy instruments such as environmental regulations [[8](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B8-sustainability-18-08265),[9](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B9-sustainability-18-08265)], this study conceptualizes GI certification as a market-based institutional mechanism. From an institutional economics perspective, we show that GI certification functions as a governance tool that embeds environmental constraints into production standards, thereby extending the institutional dimension of AGTFP research beyond conventional policy instruments [[20](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B20-sustainability-18-08265)].\n\nSecond, we move beyond aggregate-level analysis to explain regional heterogeneity in certification outcomes by introducing agricultural industrial agglomeration as a moderating variable. We theorize that industrial agglomeration amplifies the green productivity effects of GI certification through two interrelated channels: improved factor supply conditions and the diffusion of green technology. This helps explain regional variations in policy effectiveness and offers empirical grounding for coordinating GI promotion with industrial policy.\n\nThird, this study identifies non-linearities in the certification effect that prior empirical studies have largely overlooked. Using a panel threshold regression model, we identify a critical agricultural development threshold: below this threshold, GI certification has a statistically significant negative effect on AGTFP, whereas above it, the effect reverses and becomes statistically significant and positive. This finding challenges the implicit assumption that certification effects are linear and homogeneous across regions and provides evidence supporting more targeted, region-specific design of agricultural green transformation policies.\n\n## 2. Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses\n\n### 2.1. The Direct Effect of GI Agricultural Product Certification on AGTFP\n\nGeographical Indication (GI) certification is more than a market label; it is an institutional system with a built-in green development orientation, typically requiring products to originate from a specific region and adhere to traditional ecological production standards that limit chemical inputs and protect the production environment. Because this green transformation occurs at the source, Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity (AGTFP)—which integrates traditional inputs such as land, labor, and machinery while accounting for reductions in fertilizers, pesticides, and plastic mulch—provides an suitable indicator for capturing the resulting environmental and economic performance.\n\nAs illustrated in the “direct effect” section of [Figure 1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#fig_body_display_sustainability-18-08265-f001), this study identifies three interrelated channels through which GI certification affects AGTFP: standard constraints, market incentives, and collective organization.\n\n**Figure 1.** Mechanism framework of GI agricultural products and AGTFP.\n\nFirst, the certification standards system imposes binding constraints on production inputs at the source. GI certification is governed by national standards and local regulations covering the production environment, cultivation techniques, and input use, with core requirements including pollutant limits and maximum pesticide residue levels [[27](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B27-sustainability-18-08265)]. Through the credible-commitment mechanism of granting and revoking certification status, producers who violate input standards face certification disqualification and the loss of premium revenues, creating endogenous incentives for compliance. This constrains the use of pesticides and fertilizers, directly regulates pollution-generating behavior, and improves the coordination between origin-environment protection and factor-use efficiency—collectively driving AGTFP improvement.\n\nSecond, market price premiums provide sustained economic incentives for green production. Because information asymmetry prevents consumers from independently verifying product quality and ecological attributes—a problem long recognized in the signaling literature on quality uncertainty [[28](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B28-sustainability-18-08265)]—GI certification serves as an officially endorsed quality signal that reduces search costs and raises consumers’ willingness to pay, generating stable premiums. When the long-term returns from retaining these premiums exceed the short-term gains from non-compliance, producers rationally reduce chemical inputs and adopt greener production methods, directly improving AGTFP. This mechanism’s effectiveness, however, depends on consumers’ ability to identify green attributes and on the maturity of market-based reputation systems.\n\nThird, drawing on the theory of collective action and knowledge spillovers [[29](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B29-sustainability-18-08265)], the collective certification application process fosters coordinated constraints on green production at the regional level. Because GI applications are submitted on behalf of regional producers by cooperatives or industry associations, dispersed farm households, cooperatives, and agribusinesses must adopt unified production standards. This common regulatory framework accelerates the diffusion of green technologies, enables centralized processing of agricultural waste, and internalizes externalities that arise from fragmented, decentralized management—reducing redundant resource use and promoting AGTFP growth through improved technical efficiency and regional factor allocation. Based on the above analysis, we propose the following hypothesis:\n\n**H1.**\n\nGI agricultural product certification has a positive and significant effect on agricultural green total factor productivity.\n\n### 2.2. The Moderating Role of Agricultural Industrial Agglomeration in the Relationship Between GI Certification and AGTFP\n\nThe direct channels discussed in [Section 2.1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#sec2dot1-sustainability-18-08265) do not operate in isolation from the broader industrial environment. As illustrated in the moderating-effect component of [Figure 1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#fig_body_display_sustainability-18-08265-f001), the extent to which certification’s green incentives translate into actual productivity gains depends critically on the level of agricultural industrial agglomeration surrounding certified producers. Two interrelated channels underlie this moderating role: a factor supply channel rooted in agglomeration economies, and a technology diffusion channel rooted in knowledge spillover theory.\n\nFrom the factor-supply perspective, agglomeration economy theory suggests that the spatial concentration of production activities improves factor market efficiency by lowering transaction costs and enhancing resource matching [[30](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B30-sustainability-18-08265),[31](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B31-sustainability-18-08265)]. Realizing the productivity effects of GI certification requires not only willingness but also the capacity to comply: producers need adequate financial resources, technological inputs, and human capital to implement certification standards effectively. In regions with higher industrial agglomeration, factor markets are more developed and resource acquisition is more accessible, providing the resources needed to convert certification compliance into genuine efficiency gains. Conversely, where agglomeration is low, factor market segmentation and restricted mobility create binding financial and technological constraints, leaving certified producers unable to implement green production standards in practice and diminishing certification’s net effect on AGTFP.\n\nFrom the technology-diffusion perspective, knowledge spillover theory holds that geographic proximity facilitates the transmission of tacit knowledge, which attenuates rapidly with distance [[32](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B32-sustainability-18-08265),[33](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B33-sustainability-18-08265)]. Green agricultural production relies heavily on tacit, hard-to-codify knowledge—such as site-specific cultivation techniques and input management experience—that spreads primarily through direct interaction. Industrial agglomeration reduces information transmission costs and provides an effective channel for such knowledge to diffuse between certified and non-certified producers. In regions with higher agglomeration density, more frequent interaction among producers lowers the marginal cost of adopting new green technologies, amplifying the overall effect of GI certification on AGTFP. In regions with lower agglomeration density, by contrast, dispersed producers weaken learning and demonstration effects among producers, leaving green production knowledge localized and adoption costs high, such that the spillover benefits fail to materialize.\n\nTaken together, these two channels indicate that industrial agglomeration does not merely provide a favorable context for GI certification—it actively amplifies certification’s green productivity effects through both factor supply and knowledge diffusion. The moderating role of agglomeration is therefore structural rather than incidental: it determines the extent to which the institutional incentives embedded in GI certification are converted into realized productivity gains. Based on the above analysis, we propose the following hypothesis:\n\n**H2.**\n\nThe positive effect of GI agricultural product certification on AGTFP is strengthened as agricultural industrial agglomeration increases.\n\n### 2.3. The Non-Linear Effect of GI Agricultural Product Certification on AGTFP\n\nThe direct and moderating effects discussed in [Section 2.1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#sec2dot1-sustainability-18-08265) and [Section 2.2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#sec2dot2-sustainability-18-08265) suggest that the green productivity effects of GI certification are neither universal nor uniform. As illustrated in the threshold-effect component of [Figure 1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#fig_body_display_sustainability-18-08265-f001), this relationship may also exhibit structural non-linearity that varies with the level of regional agricultural development, giving rise to two distinct regimes: a sub-threshold regime in which certification suppresses AGTFP, and a supra-threshold regime in which its positive effects are activated. This pattern reflects institutional complementarity: GI certification cannot generate green productivity effects in isolation but requires complementary conditions—adequate infrastructure, functioning market access, and accessible factor supply—to activate its embedded incentives [[34](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F16\u002F8265#B34-sustainability-18-08265)]. These conditions do not accumulate gradually but form in a threshold-dependent manner; below a critical level of agricultural development, key complementary conditions remain absent and the certification system’s incentive structure breaks down, whereas above it, these conditions become sufficiently developed to unlock the institution’s full potential.\n\nBelow the threshold, the inhibitory effect operates ","Sustainability 2026-08-12","2026-08-11T16:00:00Z",72,{"impact":53,"substance":18,"depth":53,"authority":128,"freshness":153,"relevant":22,"comment":154},2,"论文探讨地理标志认证对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响，主题相关，有实证数据，但发表于MDPI期刊，权威性一般，且非最新发布。",[156],{"name":149,"url":146},[158,159,28,160,161],"中国","门槛效应","Sustainability","绿色全要素生产率",[163,164],"绿色全要素生产率 地理标志 门槛效应 中国","绿色全要素生产率 地理标志","绿色全要素生产率地理标志门槛效应中国-512","2026-08-13T23:53:47.475503Z",{"id":168,"title":169,"url":170,"summary":171,"summary_zh":8,"content":172,"source_name":173,"source_url":8,"published_at":174,"category":124,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":175,"score_detail":176,"sources":178,"tags":180,"search_phrases":185,"slug":188,"view_count":22,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":189},392,"戈壁结出'黄金果'——新疆伽师县新梅高质量发展观察,出口扩展至马来西亚印尼泰国越南","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.farmer.com.cn\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F10\u002F991025681.html","农民日报8月10日报道:新疆伽师县新梅产业从种植到加工销售全链条发展,将传统20天的集中销售期延长至6个月,大幅提升产品附加值。2023年8月20吨伽师新梅首次出口马来西亚实现零的突破,2024年广东中荔农业集团按进口国标准建设6000亩出口种植园,计划全年出口1000吨,逐步拓展至印度尼西亚、泰国、越南等国。喀什海关实施'一企一策'帮扶,指导企业完善质量追溯体系。全县20余万名群众通过新梅产业实现就近就业,人均增收超1.7万元。新梅同时构建全产业链质量追溯体系,深挖'药食同源'价值,联合科研机构推进中药制剂、低糖深加工产品研发。","物流的畅通带动了市场的拓展。伽师县积极构建“线上+线下”两张网，线下对接北京、广州等全国多个大型果品交易市场，线上利用京东、抖音等平台实现“一键直达”。同时，引进京东、汇源、百果园等20家龙头企业，研发果干、果汁、果酒等22种精深加工产品，形成了集种植、采摘、分选、冷藏、包装、加工、销售于一体的全产业链条。广东英贝健生物科技有限公司董事长刘忠爱在采访中表示，作为国内西梅汁饮品领域的代表性品牌，他们每年采购伽师新梅原料约1200吨，对山梨糖醇含量、无菌冷灌装等技术指标有着严格要求，这与伽师新梅“药食同源”的定位高度契合。产业链的延伸，不仅拉长了销售周期，将传统20天的集中销售期延长至6个月，更极大地提升了产品附加值，让新梅产业具备了更强的抗风险能力。\n\n国际化步伐也同步加快。2023年8月，20吨伽师新梅首次出口马来西亚，实现零的突破；2024年，广东中荔农业集团按进口国标准建设6000亩出口种植园，计划全年出口1000吨，并逐步拓展至印度尼西亚、泰国、越南等国。喀什海关实施“一企一策”帮扶，指导企业完善质量追溯体系，助力“伽师新梅”从南疆戈壁走向东南亚餐桌。","农民日报 2026-08-10","2026-08-10T04:00:00Z",74,{"impact":18,"substance":53,"depth":54,"authority":128,"freshness":129,"relevant":22,"comment":177},"报道新疆伽师新梅全产业链发展及出口拓展，涉及农业产业升级与国际化，信息具体，来源权威，但时效性稍逊。",[179],{"name":173,"url":170},[181,182,28,183,184],"新疆","县域经济","伽师新梅","对外贸易",[186,187],"伽师新梅 县域经济 地理标志 对外贸易","伽师新梅 县域经济","伽师新梅县域经济地理标志对外贸易-392","2026-08-11T23:57:00.109025Z",{"id":191,"title":192,"url":193,"summary":194,"summary_zh":8,"content":195,"source_name":196,"source_url":8,"published_at":197,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":198,"score_detail":199,"sources":201,"tags":203,"search_phrases":207,"slug":210,"view_count":22,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":211},343,"农业农村部答复第3633号建议:支持特色农产品品牌建设与市场开拓","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.moa.gov.cn\u002Fgovpublic\u002FSCYJJXXS\u002F202608\u002Ft20260810_6486538.htm","针对王连增代表提出的特色农产品品牌建设和市场开拓建议,农业农村部经商商务部、市场监管总局、供销合作总社答复:印发《农业品牌精品培育计划(2022—2025年)》培育一批精品品牌,已建立123个国家地理标志保护示范区,持续优化信贷直通车服务、完善农业信贷担保体系、扩大农业农村有效投资。下一步将组织产销对接、品牌推介、消费促进等标志性活动,编制'十五五'全国农产品产地市场体系发展规划,持续推动产地冷藏保鲜设施、集配中心和产后处理能力建设,深化执法改革打击冒用质量标志与制售假劣农资违法行为。","农业农村部加大龙头企业、农民合作社等主体培育力度,指导建立完善利益联结机制,带动农民增收和产业提质。一是增强农民合作社服务带动农户发展能力。依托新型农业经营主体辅导员队伍,指导农民合作社开展品种培优、品质提升、品牌打造和标准化生产。二是引导龙头企业加强与农户的利益联结。印发《分类培育壮大农业企业工作方案》,明确分行业培育龙头企业、全产业链打造“链主”企业、强化联农带农等重点任务,促进农业企业做强做大,引导农业企业建立更加紧密的利益联结机制。总结推广龙头企业联农带农的5大模式、10种类型、20个案例,引导龙头企业通过订单收购、收益分成、就近就业、联合合作等形式,加强与农户的利益联结。三是发展多种联农带农机制。指导各地以优势特色产业集群、农业产业强镇等农业产业融合发展项目建设为契机,推广订单农业、保底分红、股份合作等多种联农带农机制,引导农民深度嵌入产业链,分享产业链增值收益。","农业农村部网站 2026-08-10","2026-08-10T00:00:00Z",85,{"impact":48,"substance":127,"depth":54,"authority":54,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":200},"农业农村部官方答复，涉及品牌建设与联农带农机制，政策层级高，内容具体，时效性强。",[202],{"name":196,"url":193},[204,205,28,206],"品牌建设","农产品","产销对接",[208,209],"产销对接 品牌建设 地理标志 农产品","产销对接 品牌建设","产销对接品牌建设地理标志农产品-343","2026-08-10T23:54:40.861686Z"]