[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3529":3,"related-3529":59},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"search_phrases":31,"slug":34,"view_count":35,"doi":36,"paper":37,"created_at":58},3529,"Cultivated land system resilience in China’s major rice-producing areas: spatiotemporal patterns and zonal regulation strategies","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1942721","Introduction Cultivated land systems face convergent pressures from land-use change, farmland marginalization, and dietary upgrading, and thus understanding their resilience is essential for sustaining agricultural functions and food security. Methods Focusing on China’s major rice-producing areas (MRPAs), we developed a spatially explicit resilience framework that integrates internal adaptive capacities and external socio-economic conditions, and examined the spatial and temporal patterns of cultivated land system resilience using three representative years (2000, 2010, and 2023). We quantified resilience, diagnosed dominant constraints via an obstacle model, and developed differentiated regulation pathways based on the identified constraints. Results Results show that: (1) overall resilience increased with fluctuations, with a growing role of socio-economic conditions alongside persistent environmental constraints. This improvement coincided with infrastructure development and policy interventions, although urbanization pressures may have constrained resilience in peri-urban areas. (2) resilience exhibited marked spatial differentiation. Large-scale agricultural regions maintained higher resilience, coinciding with favorable natural endowments and relatively well-developed infrastructure, whereas fragmented and highly urbanized areas remained more vulnerable amid intensified human–land conflicts. (3) dominant obstacles shifted from natural background constraints to socio-economic factors over time. Four regulation zones were identified: background-restricted low-resilience, external-stress resilience risk, resource-constrained lagging recovery, and market-sensitive hidden risk. Discussion These findings provide a diagnostic basis for differentiated management by tailoring strategies to region-specific resilience constraints.","引言 耕地系统面临土地利用变化、农田边际化和饮食升级等多重趋同压力，因此理解其韧性对于维持农业功能和粮食安全至关重要。方法 本文以中国水稻主产区为研究区，构建了一个整合内部适应能力与外部社会经济条件的空间显式韧性框架，并选取2000年、2010年和2023年三个代表性年份，考察耕地系统韧性的时空格局。我们量化了韧性水平，通过障碍度模型诊断了主导约束因子，并基于识别出的约束条件提出了差异化调控路径。结果 结果表明：(1) 总体韧性呈波动上升趋势，社会经济条件的作用不断增强，而环境约束持续存在。这一改善与基础设施建设和政策干预相吻合，尽管城市化压力可能制约了城郊地区的韧性提升。(2) 韧性表现出显著的空间分异。大规模农业区域维持了较高的韧性，这与有利的自然禀赋和相对完善的基础设施相吻合，而破碎化程度高和高度城市化的区域在人地矛盾加剧的背景下仍较为脆弱。(3) 主导障碍因子随时间推移从自然本底约束转向社会经济因素。研究识别出四类调控分区：本底限制型低韧性区、外部胁迫型韧性风险区、资源约束型滞后恢复区和市场敏感型隐性风险区。讨论 这些发现为因地制宜制定差异化策略、针对区域特定韧性约束实施差异化管理提供了诊断依据。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,80,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},18,22,13,9,1,"基于2000—2023年三时相数据构建耕地系统韧性评估框架并划分四类调控区，方法新颖、结论具体，对主产区差异化治理有参考价值。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"农业遥感","粮食安全","耕地韧性","水稻主产区","分区调控",[32,33],"中国水稻主产区 耕地韧性","耕地系统韧性 时空格局","中国水稻主产区耕地韧性-3529",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1942721",{"doi":36,"openalex_id":38,"authors":39,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":6,"card":51,"direction":55,"ingested_from":57},"W7214283232",[40,43,46,49],{"name":41,"orcid":42},"Renjing Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-3257-5140",{"name":44,"orcid":45},"Xinrui Li","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8653-5828",{"name":47,"orcid":48},"Qi Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5672-7095",{"name":50,"orcid":9},"Jiayan Yang",{"tldr":52,"method":53,"finding":54,"direction":55,"opportunity":56},"构建耕地系统韧性评估框架，分析中国水稻主产区2000-2023年韧性时空格局并提出分区调控策略。","构建空间显式韧性框架，结合内部适应能力与外部社会经济条件，用障碍度模型诊断主导约","韧性总体波动上升，主导障碍由自然背景转向社会经济因素，识别出四类调控分区。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究城市化边缘区韧性下降机制，并将韧性框架与碳汇\u002F生态服务耦合，支撑分区精准调控。","openalex","2026-09-26T23:30:07.427444Z",{"total":60,"page":21,"page_size":60,"items":61},6,[62,102,126,167,195,235],{"id":63,"title":64,"url":65,"summary":66,"summary_zh":67,"content":9,"source_name":68,"source_url":65,"published_at":69,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":70,"score_detail":71,"sources":77,"tags":79,"search_phrases":83,"slug":86,"view_count":35,"doi":87,"paper":88,"created_at":101},3058,"Climate Change and Crop Production Vulnerability in Somalia: A VECM Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.22004\u002Fag.econ.412749","Somali crop production is vulnerable to climate change, as agriculture is heavily reliant on rainfall. Increased temperatures, sporadic rainfall, and higher levels of CO2 emissions threaten food security as well as the livelihoods in rural areas. While global studies discuss these issues, there is a lack of empirical research on Somalia. This research attempts to study the gap created by the absence of research regarding the vulnerability of crop production to climate change and its sustainable agriculture aspects. The study uses a vector error correction model (VECM) to evaluate how climate factors, including temperature, rainfall, CO2 emissions, land designated for agriculture, and labour, affect crop production in the short and long term. The study found that CO₂, temperature, and rainfall lead to boosted crop production in the short term because of the traditional adaptation strategies employed by farmers. In the long term, a 1% increase in CO2 emissions leads to a 57% reduction in crop production, and a similar rise in temperature causes production levels to fall over 100%. Rainfall, agricultural land, and labour continue to positively influence production levels in both periods. These results strongly indicate the necessity of climate-resilient strategies, better irrigation systems, and new forms of farming. The promotion of climate-smart agriculture will help mitigate the negative effects of climate change on the agricultural sector of Somalia while simultaneously catering to the issue of food security.","索马里作物生产易受气候变化影响，因为农业高度依赖降雨。气温升高、降雨不稳定以及二氧化碳排放量增加，威胁着粮食安全以及农村地区的生计。尽管全球研究讨论了这些问题，但缺乏关于索马里的实证研究。本研究试图填补因缺乏关于作物生产对气候变化的脆弱性及其可持续农业方面的研究而造成的空白。该研究采用向量误差修正模型（VECM），评估气候因素（包括气温、降雨、二氧化碳排放、农业用地和劳动力）在短期和长期内如何影响作物生产。研究发现，由于农民采用传统适应策略，二氧化碳、气温和降雨在短期内会促进作物生产。从长期来看，二氧化碳排放量增加1%会导致作物生产减少57%，气温类似上升会导致生产水平下降超过100%。降雨、农业用地和劳动力在两个时期都持续对生产水平产生积极影响。这些结果强烈表明，有必要采取气候韧性策略、改善灌溉系统并采用新型耕作方式。推广气候智能型农业将有助于减轻气候变化对索马里农业部门的负面影响，同时兼顾粮食安全问题。","AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",71,{"impact":72,"substance":73,"depth":74,"authority":19,"freshness":75,"relevant":21,"comment":76},12,21,17,8,"以VECM量化索马里气候因子对作物生产的短长期影响，结论具政策参考价值，但属区域国别研究，公共影响有限。",[78],{"name":68,"url":65},[26,27,80,81,82],"气候智慧农业","灌溉系统","索马里农业",[84,85],"索马里 作物生产 气候变化","VECM 气候智慧农业","索马里作物生产气候变化-3058","10.22004\u002Fag.econ.412749",{"doi":87,"openalex_id":89,"authors":90,"venue":68,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":65,"card":95,"direction":100,"ingested_from":57},"W7213772032",[91,93],{"name":92,"orcid":9},"Mohamed Nur Abdulkadir",{"name":94,"orcid":9},"Yassin Sheikh Ali Ali",{"tldr":96,"method":97,"finding":98,"direction":55,"opportunity":99},"用VECM分析索马里气候变化对作物生产的短期与长期影响。","VECM模型，变量含温度、降雨、CO2、农地、劳动力。","短期CO2、温度、降雨促产，长期CO2增1%减产57%，温度增1%减产超100%。","可结合气候智慧型农业与灌溉技术，研究小农户适应策略的长期有效性。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-21T23:30:09.204353Z",{"id":103,"title":104,"url":105,"summary":106,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":107,"source_url":9,"published_at":108,"category":109,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":110,"score":111,"score_detail":112,"sources":115,"tags":117,"search_phrases":121,"slug":124,"view_count":21,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":125},2841,"中国农科院资划所多因子监测实现小麦晚霜冻害大范围动态预警登European Journal of Agronomy","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.caas.cn\u002Fxwzx\u002Fmtxw\u002Fbe939456a5354c4da317420bf21577db.htm","近日,中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业遥感团队提出了多因子综合霜冻监测指数,提升小麦晚霜冻害监测精度。黄淮海平原是我国冬小麦核心产区,每年3至4月小麦拔节至抽穗期间频发的晚霜冻害严重威胁粮食安全。该指数综合高精度气象预报和冬小麦生长进程信息,兼顾低温强度、持续时间及不同生育期敏感性,并利用遥感土壤水分数据构建非线性调节系数,精准刻画湿润土壤对低温的缓冲效应,突破了气象站点的空间局限。","中国农业科学院 \u002F 中国科学报","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z","报道",true,87,{"impact":18,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":113,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":114},15,"国家级科研团队在核心期刊提出多因子霜冻监测指数，方法新颖、结论可靠，对黄淮海冬小麦防灾减灾有实质价值，值得进入每日精选。",[116],{"name":107,"url":105},[118,26,27,119,120],"智慧农业","小麦","农业气象",[122,123],"农业气象 农业遥感 智慧农业 粮食安全","农业气象 农业遥感","农业气象农业遥感智慧农业粮食安全-2841","2026-09-18T00:03:28.607700Z",{"id":127,"title":128,"url":129,"summary":130,"summary_zh":131,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":129,"published_at":108,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":132,"score_detail":133,"sources":136,"tags":138,"search_phrases":142,"slug":145,"view_count":21,"doi":146,"paper":147,"created_at":166},2749,"Modeling cascading drought effects in a national food supply network using minimum cost flow","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1892770","Droughts increasingly threaten food security, yet assessments often overlook how local agricultural losses cascade through complex supply chains. We developed a spatially explicit network optimization model employing a minimum cost flow algorithm to simulate food distribution within a synthetic national-scale Swedish food supply network (a model network constructed from open geospatial data) of more than 830,000 nodes. To test the system's response to extreme hydro-climatic stress, we applied a severe drought scenario analogous to the conditions experienced in 2018. The model revealed a significant spatial disconnect: while agricultural yield losses were concentrated in southern farming regions, unmet consumer demand emerged predominantly in northern municipalities. Furthermore, network analysis showed that flow reconfiguration under drought stress created new critical bottlenecks, effectively shifting the system's overall vulnerabilities. While these specific geographic results are illustrative of the framework's diagnostic capability rather than empirically verified operational failures, they demonstrate that drought impacts propagate nonlinearly through supply networks. This underscores the critical importance of considering network topology in food security assessments. Ultimately, our approach offers a scalable framework for identifying hidden vulnerabilities and informing resilience strategies in national food supply infrastructures.","干旱日益威胁粮食安全，然而现有评估往往忽视了地方农业损失如何通过复杂供应链逐级传导。我们开发了一个空间显式网络优化模型，采用最小成本流算法，在超过83万个节点的合成全国尺度瑞典食品供应网络（基于开放地理空间数据构建的模型网络）中模拟食品分配。为检验系统对极端水文气候胁迫的响应，我们应用了一个与2018年所经历条件类似的严重干旱情景。模型揭示出显著的空间错位：农业产量损失集中在南部农业区，而未被满足的消费者需求则主要出现在北部市镇。此外，网络分析表明，干旱胁迫下的流量重构形成了新的关键瓶颈，实际上转移了系统的整体脆弱性。虽然这些具体的地理结果更多体现了该框架的诊断能力，而非经验证实的实际运行故障，但它们表明干旱影响会通过供应网络非线性传播。这凸显了在粮食安全评估中考虑网络拓扑结构的关键重要性。最终，我们的方法提供了一个可扩展的框架，用于识别隐藏的脆弱性并为国家食品供应基础设施的韧性策略提供信息。",86,{"impact":18,"substance":134,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":135},23,"以83万节点最小成本流网络模型揭示干旱冲击在粮食供应链中的非线性级联与瓶颈转移，方法新颖、结论有政策参考价值，属农业信息化与粮食安全交叉领域的高质量研究。",[137],{"name":10,"url":129},[26,139,27,140,141],"农业供应链","干旱风险","网络优化",[143,144],"农业供应链 农业遥感 干旱风险 粮食安全","农业供应链 农业遥感","农业供应链农业遥感干旱风险粮食安全-2749","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1892770",{"doi":146,"openalex_id":148,"authors":149,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":129,"card":160,"direction":164,"ingested_from":57},"W7213455583",[150,152,155,157],{"name":151,"orcid":9},"Noor Bosman",{"name":153,"orcid":154},"Samuel Jonson Sutanto","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4903-6445",{"name":156,"orcid":9},"Zahra Kalantari",{"name":158,"orcid":159},"Marlon Vieira Passos","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3111-4583",{"tldr":161,"method":162,"finding":163,"direction":164,"opportunity":165},"构建瑞典全国食品供应网络最小成本流模型，模拟干旱下农业损失沿供应链级联传播。","基于开放地理数据构建83万节点网络，用最小成本流算法模拟2018年干旱情景。","南部减产却导致北部需求缺口，干旱使网络瓶颈转移，影响非线性传播。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可结合真实贸易流与多灾种情景，开发动态网络韧性评估与优化决策工具。","2026-09-17T23:30:07.182055Z",{"id":168,"title":169,"url":170,"summary":171,"summary_zh":9,"content":172,"source_name":173,"source_url":9,"published_at":174,"category":175,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":110,"score":176,"score_detail":177,"sources":182,"tags":184,"search_phrases":189,"slug":192,"view_count":193,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":194},2694,"加快农业保险高质量发展实施方案印发——2030年保险深度1.9%、密度1200元\u002F人","https:\u002F\u002Fjcs.moa.gov.cn\u002Fgzdt\u002F202609\u002Ft20260915_6487691.htm","财政部、农业农村部、金融监管总局、国家林草局联合印发《关于加快农业保险高质量发展的实施方案》,到2030年农业保险深度达到1.9%、密度达到1200元\u002F人、科技投入强度达到1%,稻谷、小麦、玉米三大粮食作物覆盖率稳定在90%左右,综合费用率不高于20%。","各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府，新疆生产建设兵团，国务院有关部委、有关直属机构：\n\n经国务院同意，现将《关于加快农业保险高质量发展的实施方案》印发给你们，请抓好贯彻落实。\n\n财政部 农业农村部\n\n金融监管总局 国家林草局\n\n2026 年 9 月 8 日\n\n**关于加快农业保险高质量发展的实施方案**\n\n为进一步加快农业保险高质量发展，稳定农户收益，服务保障国家粮食安全和农业生产能力，经国务院同意，制定本实施方案。\n\n一、总体要求\n\n坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，深入贯彻党的二十大和二十届历次全会精神，认真落实四中全会部署，全面贯彻习近平总书记关于“三农”工作的重要论述，完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念，加快构建新发展格局，着力推动高质量发展，遵循政府引导、市场运作、自主自愿、协同推进、改革创新的原则，充分发挥农业保险在价格、补贴、保险“三位一体”农业支持政策体系中的重要一环作用。\n\n到 2030 年，基本建成与农户风险保障需求相契合、与现代农业发展相适应、中央与地方分工负责的多层次农业保险体系，总体达到国际先进水平，实现补贴有效率、产业有保障、农民得实惠、机构可持续的多赢格局，政策更加普惠，发展更加均衡。农业保险深度（保费\u002F第一产业增加值）达到 1.9%，农业保险密度（保费\u002F第一产业就业人数）达到 1200 元\u002F人，农业保险科技投入强度（农业保险机构科技创新投入\u002F保费）达到 1%。稻谷、小麦、玉米三大粮食作物农业保险覆盖率稳定在 90%左右，提升特色农业保险对特色农业产业的保障水平，更好发挥富农强农作用。农业保险综合费用率不高于 20%。\n\n二、聚焦农业保险发展重点\n\n**（一）健全多层次农业保险体系。**坚持中央与地方共同推动、各部门分工负责，构建复合、多元、多层次的农业保险体系。加强对关系国计民生和粮食安全的大宗农产品以及地方特色农业的保障，稳步推进物化成本保险、完全成本保险、收入保险等险种发展，加强对小农户和农民合作社、家庭农场等新型农业经营主体的保障，强化对防止返贫致贫对象的支持。建立健全投保人、直保端、再保端等多方参与的风险分散链条，发挥好大灾风险准备金作用。\n\n**（二）增强种植业农产品风险保障。**加强主粮、棉花、油料、糖料、橡胶等大宗农产品风险保障，提高区域间农业保险发展均衡性，完善省以下保费分担机制。逐步降低产粮大县农业保险县级保费补贴承担比例，推动扩大稻谷、小麦、玉米、大豆完全成本保险和种植收入保险投保面积。完善对马铃薯、油菜、花生、甜菜、青稞等农产品以及稻谷、小麦、玉米制种的保险支持保障。\n\n**（三）促进养殖业保险规范发展。**完善养殖企业和养殖场（户）养殖保险模式，采用电子耳标、生物识别等技术加强养殖数量监控。动态调整能繁母猪、育肥猪、奶牛等养殖业保险保障水平，鼓励根据不同养殖方式提供差异化风险保障方案。做好牦牛、藏系羊等涉藏特定品种保险支持保障。\n\n**（四）推动林草保险提质增效。**坚持预防与保障并重，与现代林草业发展相适应，推动构建林草综合保险体系。完善公益林保险和商品林保险政策，探索适合相关林业保险险种特点的承保理赔模式。保险机构要合理确定森林保险防灾减损费用计提比例，据实列支。鼓励保险机构开展草原、湿地、国家公园、碳汇等保险试点，丰富林草保险产品。\n\n**（五）支持地方特色发展。**鼓励各地结合实际制定特色农业保险发展政策，加强相关资金统筹，加大支持力度，扩大保险范围，积极发展蔬菜、水果、肉牛、肉羊、禽类、渔业、林下经济等特色农业保险。\n\n**（六）完善产品供给体系。**健全“政策险+商业险”、“基本险+补充险”的农业保险产品供给体系。鼓励各地结合实际在物化成本保险等提供基本保险保障的险种基础上，设计开发相关补充保险，形成更高保障。鼓励各地因地制宜发展农业气象指数保险。支持保险机构发展商业性农业保险，开发便利农户投保的综合型保险保障方案。\n\n**（七）推广“农业保险+”模式。**深化农业保险与信贷、担保、期货等金融工具协同，探索保单质押、联合分担风险等模式。发挥农业保险增信功能，提高投保农户信用等级，促进涉农数据、科技、资产等要素资源融合，引导加大金融资源投入。\n\n**（八）逐步拓宽服务领域。**鼓励保险机构根据农业发展需要以市场化方式提供覆盖农林牧渔、涉农产业上下游、农民人身安全等方面风险的保险产品，探索开展农产品加工、仓储、运输、质量保险及高标准农田工程质量保险，为农业对外合作提供保险服务。鼓励地方和保险机构提供大棚、农房、农机、仓库等农业生产设施设备保险，以及农业绿色发展、智慧农业、民族村寨等领域保险。\n\n三、优化农业保险运行机制\n\n**（九）优化完善承保管理。**财政、发展改革、农业农村、保险监管、林业草原等部门及保险机构加强信息互通，共享农（林）地确权、流转、目标价格补贴面积以及农产品成本调查、畜禽存出栏量、病死猪无害化处理等农业生产经营数据。逐步推行“一户一单”承保模式。保险监管部门指导保险机构制定农业保险精准承保规范，提升可操作性。保险机构应加强农业保险承保精准性管理，开展验标和承保信息审核，集体投保类业务逐步提高抽查验标比例，规模经营主体投保类业务实现全部验标。\n\n**（十）加强财政补贴管理。**强化保费补贴资金管理，加强补贴资金所涉投保信息与农业生产经营数据、历史投保数据的比对核验，提高财政资金使用效益。及时向保险机构拨付保费补贴资金，优化资金拨付方式。鼓励各地实行省级财政部门与保险机构省级分公司“省级对省级”结算等模式。\n\n**（十一）完善查勘定损制度。**农业农村、保险监管、林业草原等部门结合当地种植、养殖、林业生产实际，指导保险机构制定分类或分险种查勘定损操作规范，明确查勘、抽样、定损等工作流程和标准。农业农村、林业草原等部门配合做好灾后查勘和灾损核定工作。\n\n**（十二）提升理赔服务质效。**保险监管部门指导保险机构制定完善农业保险理赔实施规范，提升理赔效率和精准度。保险机构应完善基层服务网络，简化手续、优化流程、赔款到户，建立农业大灾快速理赔响应机制，针对重大自然灾害和事故合理预付部分赔偿金，支持农户恢复生产。保险机构应通过银行转账等非现金方式将保险赔款直接支付给被保险人。\n\n**（十三）鼓励开展风险减量管理。**健全风险减量管理机制，增强事前防灾减灾、事中救灾减损、事后及时赔付相结合的一体化服务能力，推动农业保险从单一事后理赔向全流程风险管理转型。保险机构可与农业农村、林业草原、气象等领域社会化服务机构合作，开展防灾减损工作。\n\n**（十四）健全监督管理机制。**健全农业保险领域常态化监督机制，财政、农业农村、保险监管、林业草原等部门加强联动，加大监督力度。对虚构虚增保险标的、虚假理赔、骗取套取保费补贴等违法违规行为，加大打击和惩戒力度，依法依规予以处理。\n\n四、夯实农业保险发展基础\n\n**（十五）强化信息化支撑。**持续推进全国农业保险数据信息系统、全国农业保险信息管理平台建设。统一农业保险数据标准，加强部门间、中央与地方间农业保险数据信息共享。加快推动农业保险行业数字化转型，促进业务流程智能化、标准化。\n\n**（十六）推进风险区划工作。**推进三大粮食作物、主要畜产品等重要农产品保险风险区划工作，适时发布风险区划结果和保险费率参考。探索开展地方特色农业保险风险区划工作。\n\n**（十七）加强科技应用。**保险机构应加大科技投入强度，合理应用无人机、遥感、物联网、人工智能、区块链、云计算等技术工具，提高保险服务精准度。鼓励保险机构探索开发农业灾害风险模型。制定农业保险科技应用规范或标准。保险机构应开展承保理赔信息实名校验和身份认证。\n\n**（十八）加强遴选管理。**按照适度竞争原则，结合服务能力、风控能力合理确定农业保险承保机构。各省份根据保费规模等因素统筹确定承保机构数量，承保机构一经确定应保持相对稳定，服务有效期一般不少于 3 年。开展承保机构绩效评价，强化绩效评价结果应用，做好承保机构动态调整工作。审慎评估农业保险市场环境和保险机构服务能力，加强经营资格管理，优化准入退出机制。\n\n**（十九）健全政策法规。**适应农业保险发展态势和高质量发展需要，推动适时修订《农业保险条例》，进一步加强农业保险法治建设。\n\n五、健全农业保险大灾风险分散机制\n\n**（二十）完善大灾风险准备金管理。**科学设置农业保险各险种大灾风险准备金计提比例，完善大灾风险准备金触发使用标准。保险机构按照独立运作、因地制宜、分级管理、统筹使用的原则，加强大灾风险准备金使用规范性管理，进一步发挥大灾风险准备金作用。\n\n**（二十一）大力发展农业再保险。**按照约定分保和市场化分保相结合的发展模式，健全农业再保险制度。完善约定分保机制和流程，优化大灾超赔保障。鼓励发展商业性再保险，逐步提高市场化业务比重。推动完善农业再保险机构治理机制，提高运行规范性和发展可持续性。\n\n**（二十二）健全风险分散机制。**研究建立农业保险大灾风险基金，完善农业保险大灾风险分散链条。加强农业保险赔付资金与政府救灾资金协同运用。\n\n六、做好组织实施工作\n\n各地区、各有关部门要高度重视农业保险工作，夯实工作基础，形成工作合力，更好满足“三农”主体风险保障需求。各省级人民政府加强组织领导，统筹推进本行政区域内农业保险规划发展、资源统筹、政策宣传等各项工作，发挥农业保险工作小组作用，组织有关部门和保险机构加强协同配合，确保各项任务落实见效。各有关部门按职责分工做好政策设计、资金安排、监督管理等工作。保险机构切实提高服务质效，可根据业务需要设立协保员，为承保理赔等服务提供便利。","农业农村部计划财务司 2026年9月8日","2026-09-08T00:00:00Z","政策",92,{"impact":178,"substance":179,"depth":180,"authority":113,"freshness":60,"relevant":21,"comment":181},28,24,19,"四部门联合印发的全国性农业保险高质量发展实施方案，明确2030年保险深度1.9%、密度1200元\u002F人等量化目标，条款与数据详实，权威性和政策影响力突出，值得进入每日精选。",[183],{"name":173,"url":170},[185,26,27,186,187,188],"数字乡村","农业保险","风险区划","财政补贴",[190,191],"农业保险 农业遥感 数字乡村 粮食安全","农业保险 农业遥感","农业保险农业遥感数字乡村粮食安全-2694",2,"2026-09-17T00:04:35.464456Z",{"id":196,"title":197,"url":198,"summary":199,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":200,"source_url":198,"published_at":201,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":202,"score_detail":203,"sources":206,"tags":208,"search_phrases":212,"slug":215,"view_count":21,"doi":216,"paper":217,"created_at":234},2621,"Spatiotemporal mismatches in China's grain production under dual perspectives of regional comparability and global benchmarking","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104986","Spatiotemporal mismatches in China's grain production under dual perspectives of regional comparability and global benchmarking。Agricultural Systems","Agricultural Systems","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",84,{"impact":18,"substance":73,"depth":17,"authority":204,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":205},14,"核心期刊论文，从区域可比性与全球对标双视角揭示中国粮食生产时空错配，方法新颖、数据规模大，对粮食安全布局有参考价值，值得进入每日精选。",[207],{"name":200,"url":198},[26,209,27,210,211],"农业信息化","空间分析","粮食生产",[213,214],"农业信息化 农业遥感 空间分析 粮食安全","农业信息化 农业遥感","农业信息化农业遥感空间分析粮食安全-2621","10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104986",{"doi":216,"openalex_id":218,"authors":219,"venue":200,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":9,"card":9,"direction":9,"ingested_from":57},"W7213276104",[220,223,226,229,232],{"name":221,"orcid":222},"Jingchen Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-2367-852X",{"name":224,"orcid":225},"Sufen Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8767-2197",{"name":227,"orcid":228},"Yunfei Fan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-1363-6433",{"name":230,"orcid":231},"Yu Hou","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3746-2415",{"name":233,"orcid":9},"Ke Xu","2026-09-16T23:30:05.185625Z",{"id":236,"title":237,"url":238,"summary":239,"summary_zh":240,"content":9,"source_name":241,"source_url":238,"published_at":242,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":243,"score_detail":244,"sources":247,"tags":249,"search_phrases":254,"slug":257,"view_count":35,"doi":258,"paper":259,"created_at":272},2052,"Sustainable soil governance pathways toward zero food gap","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.36922\u002Feer026320034","Achieving zero food gap has become a strategic global priority in response to increasing pressures from population growth, land degradation, climate change, and resource scarcity. Despite substantial advances in agricultural technologies, persistent disparities between food demand and production highlight the need for integrated approaches that strengthen the natural resource base while improving decision-making and policy implementation. Among these resources, healthy soils constitute the foundation of sustainable food systems, making sustainable soil governance the essential first step toward resilient food production. This review synthesizes recent advances in soil science, Earth observation, artificial intelligence, and decision support systems to develop an integrated conceptual framework—Sustainable Soil Governance Pathways Toward Zero Food Gap. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, peer-reviewed literature published between 2015 and 2026 was systematically analyzed and organized into four interconnected domains: sustainable soil management, digital soil intelligence, sustainable soil governance, and enabling societal drivers. Rather than treating these domains independently, the review emphasizes their interactions in transforming scientific evidence into coordinated management and policy actions. The proposed framework identifies sustainable soil governance as the central coordinating mechanism that links healthy soils to digital innovation, evidence-based decision-making, and broader environmental, institutional, and socioeconomic conditions influencing food systems. This perspective recognizes that while soil governance is not the sole determinant of food security, it provides the foundation for integrating complementary interventions to advance the long-term vision of zero food gap. The framework offers a practical roadmap for supporting resilient, productive, and sustainable food systems.","实现零食物缺口已成为全球战略优先事项，以应对人口增长、土地退化、气候变化和资源稀缺带来的日益加剧的压力。尽管农业技术取得了实质性进展，但食物需求与生产之间持续存在的差距凸显出需要采取综合方法，在加强自然资源基础的同时改进决策和政策实施。在这些资源中，健康的土壤构成了可持续食物系统的基础，使可持续土壤治理成为迈向韧性食物生产的关键第一步。本综述综合了土壤科学、地球观测、人工智能和决策支持系统的最新进展，构建了一个整合性概念框架——面向零食物缺口的可持续土壤治理路径。遵循PRISMA 2020框架，对2015年至2026年间发表的同行评审文献进行了系统分析，并将其组织为四个相互关联的领域：可持续土壤管理、数字土壤智能、可持续土壤治理和赋能性社会驱动因素。本综述并未将这些领域独立对待，而是强调它们在将科学证据转化为协调管理和政策行动中的相互作用。所提出的框架将可持续土壤治理确定为核心协调机制，将健康土壤与数字创新、循证决策以及影响食物系统的更广泛环境、制度和社会经济条件联系起来。这一视角认识到，尽管土壤治理并非粮食安全的唯一决定因素，但它为整合互补性干预措施奠定了基础，以推进零食物缺口的长期愿景。该框架为支持韧性、高生产力和可持续的食物系统提供了实践路线图。","Explora Environment and Resource","2026-09-07T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":18,"substance":245,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":60,"relevant":21,"comment":246},20,"系统性综述提出土壤治理与数字技术融合框架，对农业信息化与粮食安全议题有参考价值，但属学术综述、时效一般，适合主题聚合而非头条精选。",[248],{"name":241,"url":238},[250,26,27,251,252,253],"农业人工智能","决策支持系统","土壤治理","数字土壤",[255,256],"农业人工智能 决策支持系统 农业遥感 土壤治理","农业人工智能 决策支持系统","农业人工智能决策支持系统农业遥感土壤治理-2052","10.36922\u002Feer026320034",{"doi":258,"openalex_id":260,"authors":261,"venue":241,"cited_by_count":35,"oa_url":265,"card":266,"direction":100,"ingested_from":57},"W7211977960",[262],{"name":263,"orcid":264},"R.R. Alí","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2483-2907","https:\u002F\u002Farticle.accscience.com\u002Fjournal\u002FEER\u002Fonline_first\u002Feer026320034\u002Farticle_eer0263200341_17c096.pdf",{"tldr":267,"method":268,"finding":269,"direction":270,"opportunity":271},"综述土壤科学、地球观测、AI与决策支持，提出可持续土壤治理实现零食物缺口的整合框架。","PRISMA 2020系统综述2015-2026年文献，构建四域整合概念框架。","可持续土壤治理是连接健康土壤、数字创新与循证决策的核心协调机制。","农业遥感与作物表型","可实证检验数字土壤智能与治理政策的耦合机制，开发面向零食物缺口的决策支持系统。","2026-09-10T23:30:17.837941Z"]