[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3537":3,"related-3537":54},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":28,"search_phrases":34,"slug":37,"view_count":38,"doi":39,"paper":40,"created_at":53},3537,"INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPING FAMILY ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AGRICULTURE","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22950127","Family entrepreneurship in agriculture is an important component of rural economic development, food security, employment generation, and sustainable use of natural resources. Although family farms differ considerably in size, specialization, ownership structure, and level of commercialization, they remain a dominant organizational form of agricultural production in many countries. This article examines international approaches to the development of family entrepreneurship in agriculture and identifies policy instruments that have contributed to the economic sustainability of family farms. The study applies comparative analysis, institutional analysis, generalization, and synthesis of international policy practices. Particular attention is given to the experiences of the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Brazil. The analysis demonstrates that effective support systems for family farmers generally combine preferential financing, income support, investment assistance, access to technology, agricultural extension services, producer cooperation, market integration, and measures aimed at attracting young people to agriculture. The European Union experience demonstrates the importance of combining direct income support with environmental requirements and targeted assistance for small and young farmers. The United States provides an example of credit-guarantee and targeted lending mechanisms for family and beginning farmers. Japan emphasizes direct payments, environmental sustainability, and preservation of rural communities, while South Korea increasingly integrates family farming with smart agriculture, digital technologies, and innovation. Brazil's experience demonstrates the importance of dedicated financial and institutional mechanisms for family farming. The study concludes that there is no universal model of family entrepreneurship support; however, international experience indicates that a multidimensional policy framework combining finance, knowledge, technology, cooperation, and market access is more sustainable than isolated financial assistance.","农业中的家庭创业是农村经济发展、粮食安全、就业创造和自然资源可持续利用的重要组成部分。尽管家庭农场在规模、专业化程度、所有权结构和商业化水平方面存在显著差异，但在许多国家，它们仍然是农业生产的主导组织形式。本文考察了国际上促进农业家庭创业发展的做法，并识别了有助于家庭农场经济可持续性的政策工具。研究采用比较分析、制度分析、归纳总结以及国际政策实践综合等方法。研究特别关注欧盟、美国、日本、韩国和巴西的经验。分析表明，有效的家庭农民支持体系通常将优惠融资、收入支持、投资援助、技术获取、农业推广服务、生产者合作、市场融入以及旨在吸引年轻人从事农业的措施结合起来。欧盟的经验表明，将直接收入支持与环境要求以及对小农和年轻农民的有针对性援助相结合十分重要。美国提供了面向家庭农场和起步农民的信贷担保及定向贷款机制范例。日本强调直接支付、环境可持续性和农村社区保护，而韩国则日益将家庭农业与智慧农业、数字技术和创新相结合。巴西的经验表明，专门针对家庭农业的金融和制度机制十分重要。研究得出结论，不存在普遍适用的家庭创业支持模式；然而，国际经验表明，将金融、知识、技术、合作和市场准入相结合的多维政策框架，比孤立的财政援助更具可持续性。",null,"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","论文",25,false,77,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},18,20,17,13,9,1,"系统比较欧盟、美国、日韩、巴西家庭农业支持政策，结论具参考价值，但属综述性研究、非一手数据突破。",[25,26],{"name":10,"url":6},{"name":10,"url":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22950126",[29,30,31,32,33],"智慧农业","家庭农场","农业政策","国际比较","农村金融",[35,36],"家庭农业 国际经验 政策支持","欧盟 美国 日本 家庭农场","家庭农业国际经验政策支持-3537",0,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22950127",{"doi":39,"openalex_id":41,"authors":42,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":6,"card":45,"direction":51,"ingested_from":52},"W7214295649",[43],{"name":44,"orcid":9},"Saida Alimurod qizi Sharofova",{"tldr":46,"method":47,"finding":48,"direction":49,"opportunity":50},"比较欧盟、美国、日本、韩国、巴西支持农业家庭创业的政策工具，总结有效支持体系特征。","采用比较分析、制度分析与国际政策实践综合归纳方法。","有效支持需金融、知识、技术、合作与市场多维政策组合，无普适模式。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究数字技术如何嵌入家庭农场多维支持政策，尤其小农与青年农户的数字化服务机制。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-26T23:30:09.717058Z",{"total":55,"page":22,"page_size":55,"items":56},6,[57,89,125,165,203,246],{"id":58,"title":59,"url":60,"summary":61,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":62,"source_url":9,"published_at":63,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":65,"score_detail":66,"sources":70,"tags":72,"search_phrases":76,"slug":79,"view_count":38,"doi":9,"paper":80,"created_at":88},3433,"《数字农业发展的信贷融资效应——来自江苏省家庭农场的证据》","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanzj.com\u002Fhek\u002Fzgncgc\u002Fmulu\u002F647040.html","周月书、葛云杰使用江苏省家庭农场实地问卷调查数据考察数字农业发展的信贷融资效应及其作用机制。研究发现：数字农业发展显著提升了家庭农场的信贷可得性与信贷融资规模；机制上通过缓解信息不对称程度、降低信贷交易成本和提升风险抵御能力促进家庭农场融资；异质性分析发现数字农业发展对于所在地农业技术发展环境较好、农技人员服务水平较高的家庭农场，以及家庭农场主资本禀赋较低、金融认知能力较低以及种植粮食作物的家庭农场具有更显著的融资增进作用。","《中国农村观察》\u002F南京农业大学","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",10,78,{"impact":17,"substance":67,"depth":17,"authority":68,"freshness":55,"relevant":22,"comment":69},22,14,"基于江苏家庭农场实地调研的实证研究，机制与异质性分析扎实，对数字普惠金融与新型经营主体融资有参考价值。",[71],{"name":62,"url":60},[73,30,74,33,75],"数字农业","江苏","信贷融资",[77,78],"江苏 家庭农场 数字农业 信贷","周月书 数字农业 融资","江苏家庭农场数字农业信贷-3433",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":81,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":9,"card":82,"direction":49,"ingested_from":87},[],{"tldr":83,"method":84,"finding":85,"direction":49,"opportunity":86},"基于江苏家庭农场调查，研究数字农业发展对信贷融资的影响及机制。","江苏省家庭农场实地问卷调查数据，实证分析信贷效应与机制。","数字农业显著提升信贷可得性与规模，通过缓解信息不对称、降成本、提风险抵御力实现。","可探究数字农业融资效应在不同区域和作物类型间的差异，及金融科技的中介作用。","agent","2026-09-25T00:09:33.572434Z",{"id":90,"title":91,"url":92,"summary":93,"summary_zh":94,"content":9,"source_name":95,"source_url":92,"published_at":96,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":97,"sources":100,"tags":102,"search_phrases":105,"slug":108,"view_count":22,"doi":109,"paper":110,"created_at":124},3018,"AGROPORTAL YAGONA PLATFORMASI ORQALI YER RESURSLARI TO‘G‘RISIDAGI MA’LUMOTLARNI INTEGRATSIYALASH: MUAMMOLAR VA YECHIMLAR","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.67048\u002Fqxju2026ai128iss7m1054","This scientific article provides a systematic analysis of the current state, achieved results, and existing challenges in implementing digital technologies within the agricultural sector of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2025–2026. The paper highlights the “Digital Uzbekistan 2030” strategy, the Presidential Decree of August 2025, the unified “Digital Agriculture” platform (Agroportal), and legislative innovations concerning the digitalization of the agricultural support system. Based on statistical data and ongoing projects, prospective directions for the sector’s digital transformation are identified.","本文系统分析了2025—2026年乌兹别克斯坦共和国农业领域数字技术实施的现状、已取得的成果及现有挑战。文章重点阐述了“数字乌兹别克斯坦2030”战略、2025年8月总统令、统一的“数字农业”平台（Agroportal），以及涉及农业支持体系数字化的立法创新。基于统计数据及正在实施的项目，本文明确了该领域数字化转型的前景方向。","Agro ilm","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z",{"impact":67,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":64,"freshness":98,"relevant":22,"comment":99},8,"系统梳理乌兹别克斯坦农业数字化平台与政策进展，含2025年总统令等实质信息，对农业信息化研究有参考价值。",[101],{"name":95,"url":92},[73,29,31,103,104],"农业数据整合","数字乌兹别克斯坦",[106,107],"乌兹别克斯坦 Agroportal 数字农业","数字乌兹别克斯坦 农业数据整合 农业政策 数字农业","乌兹别克斯坦Agroportal数字农业-3018","10.67048\u002Fqxju2026ai128iss7m1054",{"doi":109,"openalex_id":111,"authors":112,"venue":95,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":92,"card":119,"direction":49,"ingested_from":52},"W7213649986",[113,116],{"name":114,"orcid":115},"Maxfuza Abdullayeva","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0000-6004-6260",{"name":117,"orcid":118},"Islam Akramov","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0009-1574-1534",{"tldr":120,"method":121,"finding":122,"direction":49,"opportunity":123},"分析乌兹别克斯坦农业数字化现状，聚焦Agroportal平台整合土地资源数据的问题与对策。","基于统计数据和政策文件，系统分析2025-2026年农业数字化进展。","Agroportal平台是土地资源数据整合的关键，但面临数据集成与制度障碍。","可研究土地资源数据跨部门整合的互操作机制与农户采纳影响因素。","2026-09-20T23:30:28.150963Z",{"id":126,"title":127,"url":128,"summary":129,"summary_zh":130,"content":9,"source_name":131,"source_url":128,"published_at":132,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":133,"score_detail":134,"sources":138,"tags":140,"search_phrases":144,"slug":147,"view_count":38,"doi":148,"paper":149,"created_at":164},2779,"INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RISKS IN FAMILY AGRICULTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.23900\u002Fartefactum.v25i9.4236","Family farming is relevant to food production, income generation and sustainable development, but it remains exposed to climatic, production, economic and operational risks. In this context, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) provide resources for monitoring, automation and decision support. This study analyzes the contributions of ICTs to risk management in family farming through a Systematic Literature Review conducted according to PRISMA 2020. Searches were carried out in Google Scholar, SciELO, the CAPES Periodicals Portal and the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, considering publications from 2018 to 2026. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 studies composed the review corpus. The results indicate that the Internet of Things, sensors, automated systems and digital platforms contribute to monitoring, risk prevention, productive efficiency and sustainability. Limitations related to infrastructure, rural connectivity, implementation costs and farmer training persist. It is concluded that ICTs are strategic instruments for risk management in family farming, although integrated models combining innovation, cooperation, monitoring and decision support are still needed.","家庭农业与粮食生产、收入创造和可持续发展密切相关，但仍面临气候、生产、经济和经营风险。在此背景下，信息与通信技术（ICTs）为监测、自动化和决策支持提供了资源。本研究通过依据PRISMA 2020开展的系统性文献综述，分析ICTs对家庭农业风险管理的贡献。检索在Google Scholar、SciELO、CAPES期刊门户和巴西数字论文与学位论文图书馆中进行，考虑2018年至2026年的出版物。在应用纳入和排除标准后，14项研究构成了综述语料库。结果表明，物联网、传感器、自动化系统和数字平台有助于监测、风险预防、生产效率提升和可持续发展。与基础设施、农村连通性、实施成本和农民培训相关的局限仍然存在。结论认为，ICTs是家庭农业风险管理的战略性工具，尽管仍需要结合创新、合作、监测和决策支持的整合模式。","Artefactum","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z",62,{"impact":135,"substance":17,"depth":136,"authority":98,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":137},12,15,"系统综述梳理物联网、传感器与数字平台在家庭农业风险管理中的作用，结论与局限清晰，但样本仅14篇且来源为行业平台，属细分领域参考性成果。",[139],{"name":131,"url":128},[141,29,142,30,143],"数字乡村","农业物联网","农业风险管理",[145,146],"农业风险管理 农业物联网 家庭农场 数字乡村","农业风险管理 农业物联网","农业风险管理农业物联网家庭农场数字乡村-2779","10.23900\u002Fartefactum.v25i9.4236",{"doi":148,"openalex_id":150,"authors":151,"venue":131,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":128,"card":159,"direction":51,"ingested_from":52},"W7213473081",[152,155,157],{"name":153,"orcid":154},"Vilson Gruber","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4092-8578",{"name":156,"orcid":9},"Samantha Ferreira da Silva",{"name":158,"orcid":9},"Dairce Londero",{"tldr":160,"method":161,"finding":162,"direction":49,"opportunity":163},"系统综述2018-2026年ICT在家庭农业风险管理中的贡献与局限。","PRISMA 2020系统文献综述，检索4个数据库，纳入14篇研究。","物联网、传感器与数字平台助力监测、风险预防与效率，但基础设施、连通性、成本与培训仍是瓶颈。","可研究面向小农户的低成本、低连通依赖的集成式风险监测与决策支持模型。","2026-09-17T23:30:20.104369Z",{"id":166,"title":167,"url":168,"summary":169,"summary_zh":170,"content":9,"source_name":171,"source_url":168,"published_at":172,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":65,"score_detail":173,"sources":176,"tags":178,"search_phrases":182,"slug":185,"view_count":38,"doi":186,"paper":187,"created_at":202},2035,"Family farm development, agricultural technical efficiency and farmers’ income","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1880985","This study examines how family farm development is associated with farmers’ income using prefecture-level panel data from China spanning 2013 to 2024. We employ a two-way fixed-effects framework with standard errors clustered at the prefecture-level city, and measure regional agricultural technical efficiency using data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale (DEA–VRS). The results show a significant positive association between family farm development and farmers' income, though the magnitude is modest. Instrumental variable estimates confirm the robustness of this association, with coefficients significantly larger than ordinary least squares results, revealing a pattern of negative selection in which family farms develop more rapidly in areas with weaker agricultural conditions. Mechanism tests indicate that agricultural technical efficiency serves as a partial mediator, while direct channels play the dominant role. Interaction-based heterogeneity analysis shows that the income-enhancing association is significantly stronger in western, non-major-grain-producing, and economically less-developed regions, consistent with diminishing marginal returns to organizational innovation. The findings provide empirical evidence for understanding the regional income effects of family farm development and inform the design of regionally differentiated policies.","本研究利用2013—2024年中国地级市面板数据，考察家庭农场发展与农民收入之间的关联。我们采用双向固定效应框架，并将标准误聚类到地级市层面，同时使用可变规模报酬下的数据包络分析（DEA–VRS）测度区域农业技术效率。结果表明，家庭农场发展与农民收入之间存在显著正相关，但幅度较为有限。工具变量估计证实了该关联的稳健性，且系数显著大于普通最小二乘结果，揭示出一种负向选择模式，即家庭农场在农业条件较弱的地区发展更快。机制检验表明，农业技术效率发挥部分中介作用，而直接渠道占主导地位。基于交互项的异质性分析显示，这种增收关联在西部、非粮食主产区和经济欠发达地区显著更强，这与组织创新的边际收益递减规律相一致。研究结论为理解家庭农场发展的区域收入效应提供了经验证据，并为区域差异化政策设计提供了参考。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-09T00:00:00Z",{"impact":17,"substance":174,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":175},21,"基于2013—2024年地级面板数据与DEA-VRS、工具变量法的实证研究，结论扎实且具区域差异化政策含义，值得进入每日精选。",[177],{"name":171,"url":168},[179,30,31,180,181],"农民增收","区域差异","农业技术效率",[183,184],"农业技术效率 农业政策 农民增收 区域差异","农业技术效率 农业政策","农业技术效率农业政策农民增收区域差异-2035","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1880985",{"doi":186,"openalex_id":188,"authors":189,"venue":171,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":168,"card":197,"direction":49,"ingested_from":52},"W7212082704",[190,193,195],{"name":191,"orcid":192},"Lin Fang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-1710-8144",{"name":194,"orcid":9},"Jingyu YIN",{"name":196,"orcid":9},"Zhou Fangzhou",{"tldr":198,"method":199,"finding":200,"direction":49,"opportunity":201},"基于中国地级市面板数据，检验家庭农场发展对农民收入的关联及农业技术效率的中介作用。","2013-2024年地级市面板数据，双向固定效应、DEA-VRS测效率、工具变量","家庭农场发展与农民收入显著正相关但幅度有限，技术效率仅部分中介，直接渠道主导，西部和欠发达地区效应更","可探究数字技术\u002F信息化服务如何增强家庭农场对农民收入的直接渠道，并关注欠发达地区的异质性机制。","2026-09-10T23:30:07.795645Z",{"id":204,"title":205,"url":206,"summary":207,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":171,"source_url":206,"published_at":208,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":209,"score_detail":210,"sources":213,"tags":215,"search_phrases":219,"slug":222,"view_count":22,"doi":223,"paper":224,"created_at":245},1241,"Cocoa climate-smart agriculture adoption in Ghana: why the synergies and trade-offs matter for policy","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1857724","The role of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in sustainable cocoa production cannot be ignored. However, studies on perceived effectiveness and the socio-economic drivers of CSA among cocoa farmers are underexplored. This study fills the gap by using Spearman’s rank correlation and a multivariate probit model with 455 cocoa farmers in Ghana. Results show high adoption of agroforestry (93.48%) and hybrid planting materials (86.30%), moderate uptake of lining and pegging (52%) and cover cropping (49%), and relatively low adoption of irrigation (23%), drainage construction (30%) and off-farm diversification (33%). Most farmers perceive agroforestry, hybrid varieties, lining and pegging, and cover cropping as effective or highly effective in reducing the impacts of climate variability. In contrast, a large proportion are uncertain about the benefits of off-farm diversification, irrigation, and drainage, revealing important information and perception gaps. There are positive and significant correlations among perceived effectiveness scores (on-farm and off-farm diversification; SWC and drainage). The study found that farming experience, farm size, household size, climate information, distance to the farm, ICT ownership, membership of farmer-based organizations, and regional location significantly shape the adoption of CSA practices. Hence, to promote sustainable cocoa production, a climate-smart cocoa policy should recognize both the complementarities and trade-offs among CSA practices. Therefore, cocoa policymakers should strengthen extension and climate information systems, promote integrated, context-specific CSA packages, improve access to irrigation, and support farmer organizations.","2026-08-26T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":17,"substance":67,"depth":18,"authority":20,"freshness":211,"relevant":22,"comment":212},2,"基于455名农户数据的实证研究，揭示气候智慧农业在可可种植中的采纳差异与协同权衡，对政策制定有参考价值。",[214],{"name":171,"url":206},[29,31,216,217,218],"气候智慧农业","可可","加纳",[220,221],"气候智慧农业 农业政策 智慧农业 加纳","气候智慧农业 农业政策","气候智慧农业农业政策智慧农业加纳-1241","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1857724",{"doi":223,"openalex_id":225,"authors":226,"venue":171,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":238,"card":239,"direction":243,"ingested_from":52},"W7204273129",[227,229,232,234,236],{"name":228,"orcid":9},"Philip Neri Zuobog",{"name":230,"orcid":231},"Gazali Issahaku","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3471-7347",{"name":233,"orcid":9},"Franklin N. Mabe",{"name":235,"orcid":9},"Abraham Zakaria",{"name":237,"orcid":9},"Abdul Razak Baba","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1857724\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":240,"method":241,"finding":242,"direction":243,"opportunity":244},"研究加纳可可农采纳气候智能农业的驱动因素及协同与权衡，为政策提供建议。","使用Spearman秩相关和多元probit模型分析455名农户数据。","采纳率差异大，感知有效性影响采纳，社会经济因素显著驱动。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探索不同区域CSA实践间的协同与权衡机制，以及如何通过政策组合优化采纳效果。","2026-09-01T04:03:09.298237Z",{"id":247,"title":248,"url":249,"summary":250,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":251,"source_url":9,"published_at":63,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":64,"is_selected":14,"score":65,"score_detail":252,"sources":254,"tags":256,"search_phrases":261,"slug":264,"view_count":38,"doi":9,"paper":265,"created_at":273},3602,"Advancing pig lameness detection with a multi-task framework: Leveraging multi-view 3D pose estimation and wavelet convolution（多任务框架推进生猪跛行检测：利用多视角3D姿态估计与小波卷积）","https:\u002F\u002Fm2.mtmt.hu\u002Fapi\u002Fpublication\u002F36981064?&labelLang=hun","Xiang Li、Wang Haidong、Hu Zixuan、Norton Tomas、Jiang Tian、Xue Yueju等在Biosystems Engineering 1537-5110 Vol. 263 Paper: 104393（2026）发表。研究针对生猪跛行检测提出PoseGait-MT多任务分类框架，可同时检测跛行严重程度与受影响肢体。框架从多视角2D视频重建3D骨骼以缓解遮挡与视角依赖问题；提取3D步态时空特征（空间跟踪距离sTRK、头部上下振幅HBA、关节屈曲角JFA），并结合小波卷积（WTConv）增强低频特征提取、抑制高频噪声。实验结果显示：PoseGait-MT在5折交叉验证下对跛行严重程度分类平均准确率94.7%、受影响肢体识别95.7%；独立测试集上分别89%、91.4%。","Biosystems Engineering Vol. 263 2026-09-20",{"impact":17,"substance":67,"depth":17,"authority":68,"freshness":55,"relevant":22,"comment":253},"核心期刊论文，方法新颖且实验数据扎实，对智慧养殖中的动物健康监测有实质参考价值，值得进入每日精选。",[255],{"name":251,"url":249},[29,257,258,259,260],"计算机视觉","生猪养殖","3D姿态估计","动物健康监测",[262,263],"PoseGait-MT 生猪跛行检测","多视角3D姿态估计 生猪","PoseGait-MT生猪跛行检测-3602",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":266,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":38,"oa_url":9,"card":267,"direction":271,"ingested_from":87},[],{"tldr":268,"method":269,"finding":270,"direction":271,"opportunity":272},"提出PoseGait-MT多任务框架，用多视角3D姿态与小波卷积同时检测生猪跛行程度和患肢。","多视角2D视频重建3D骨骼，提取步态时空特征，结合小波卷积WTConv。","5折交叉验证跛行程度准确率94.7%、患肢识别95.7%，独立测试集为89%和91.4%。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可探索轻量化实时部署与跨农场泛化，并融合多模态数据提升早期跛行预警能力。","2026-09-27T00:05:18.483996Z"]