[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3556":3,"related-3556":53},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"search_phrases":25,"slug":28,"view_count":15,"doi":29,"paper":30,"created_at":52},3556,"Repositioning Altar de Sacrificios on the Ancient Maya Landscape: UAS Settlement Survey of the Upper Usumacinta Confluence Zone","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1017\u002Flaq.2025.10155","Abstract Despite its record among early twentieth-century explorers and being one of the first sites excavated in southwestern Petén, Guatemala, Altar de Sacrificios has eluded Maya scholarship for much of the last half-century. This article aims to redefine Altar’s position on the ancient Maya geopolitical landscape and reconsider its role in socioeconomic exchange during the Classic period (ca. AD 200–900). We report new findings from a unmanned aerial system survey of the Upper Usumacinta Confluence Zone, contextualizing our results with other remote sensing surveys across the Maya lowlands. By examining the size, form, and distribution of settlement across this fluvial landscape, we characterize variable patterns of settlement density and organization in relation to shifting river channels and potential land use practices associated with Altar’s Classic period occupation. Synthesizing these patterns and population estimates with data from other well-documented settlements across the Maya lowlands, this study highlights the diversity of this ancient urban tradition and contributes to broader discussions on Maya urbanization—especially the connections between cities and more rural zones of human habitation.","摘要 尽管在20世纪初的探险家记录中占有一席之地，且是危地马拉佩滕省西南部最早发掘的遗址之一，祭坛德萨克里菲西奥斯（Altar de Sacrificios）在过去的半个世纪中大多为玛雅学界所忽视。本文旨在重新界定祭坛遗址在古代玛雅地缘政治格局中的位置，并重新审视其在古典期（约公元200—900年）社会经济交换中的角色。我们报告了在上乌苏马辛塔汇流区进行的无人机系统勘测的新发现，并将我们的结果与玛雅低地其他遥感勘测进行情境化对比。通过考察这一河流景观中聚落的规模、形态与分布，我们描述了聚落密度与组织模式的变异，并将其与河道变迁及与祭坛遗址古典期 occupation 相关的潜在土地利用实践联系起来。综合这些模式与人口估算，并结合玛雅低地其他有详细记录聚落的数据，本研究凸显了这一古代城市传统的多样性，并为更广泛的玛雅城市化讨论作出贡献——尤其是城市与更为乡村的人类居住区之间的联系。",null,"Latin American Antiquity","2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"该文为玛雅考古遥感测绘研究，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业等主题无关，不建议进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21,22,23,24],"无人机测绘","遥感考古","玛雅文明","聚落考古",[26,27],"Usumacinta 无人机测绘","无人机测绘 玛雅文明 聚落考古 遥感考古","Usumacinta无人机测绘-3556","10.1017\u002Flaq.2025.10155",{"doi":29,"openalex_id":31,"authors":32,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":44,"card":45,"direction":49,"ingested_from":51},"W7214160850",[33,36,39,42],{"name":34,"orcid":35},"Jessica L. Munson","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2362-3804",{"name":37,"orcid":38},"Andrés G. Mejía Ramón","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9006-2381",{"name":40,"orcid":41},"Jill Onken","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1189-5033",{"name":43,"orcid":9},"Lorena Paiz","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cambridge.org\u002Fcore\u002Fservices\u002Faop-cambridge-core\u002Fcontent\u002Fview\u002F8F2183B1AC5038EBD3447495CCF3B5A8\u002FS1045663525101557a.pdf\u002Fdiv-class-title-repositioning-altar-de-sacrificios-on-the-ancient-maya-landscape-uas-settlement-survey-of-the-upper-usumacinta-confluence-zone-div.pdf",{"tldr":46,"method":47,"finding":48,"direction":49,"opportunity":50},"用无人机航测重新定位危地马拉玛雅古城Altar de Sacrificios的聚落格局与地缘角色。","无人机航测上乌苏马辛塔河汇流区，结合玛雅低地其他遥感调查数据。","该城聚落密度与组织随河道变迁和土地利用变化，体现玛雅城市传统的多样性。","农业遥感与作物表型","可借鉴UAS聚落调查方法，研究河道变迁与古代农业土地利用的耦合关系。","openalex","2026-09-26T23:30:31.210048Z",{"total":54,"page":55,"page_size":54,"items":56},2,1,[57,96],{"id":58,"title":59,"url":60,"summary":61,"summary_zh":62,"content":9,"source_name":63,"source_url":60,"published_at":64,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":65,"sources":67,"tags":69,"search_phrases":72,"slug":75,"view_count":15,"doi":76,"paper":77,"created_at":95},3173,"LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ERIDU REGION: DISCOVERING THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OF ANCIENT FARMS","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1017\u002Firq.2025.10037","This paper presents the results of an interdisciplinary study of water management around the site of Eridu in southern Iraq, using remote sensing, field survey and scientific dating to investigate the chronology of irrigation technologies. Our area of interest (AOI) encompasses several crevasse splays and canals fanning out from the relict Euphrates close to Eridu. On satellite imagery, some channels appear to overlay others, representing a sequence of irrigation over time. These were mapped using high resolution satellite imagery including VISION-1 and imagery available via Google Earth. Fieldwork was then conducted in 2020, and samples were recovered from canals and the relict course of the Euphrates for AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry) dating. The results span from the fifth to the second millennium B.C., and therefore are consistent with the occupation of Eridu, showing that the irrigation and field systems may have been part of the agricultural hinterland of the site.","本文呈现了对伊拉克南部埃利都（Eridu）遗址周边水资源管理的跨学科研究成果，运用遥感、实地考察与科学测年技术，探究了灌溉技术的年代序列。我们的研究区域（AOI）涵盖了从埃利都附近的古幼发拉底河遗道呈扇形展开的若干决口扇和运河。在卫星图像上，一些水道似乎覆盖在其他水道之上，表明了灌溉系统随时间演进的层序。通过高分辨率卫星图像，包括VISION-1及谷歌地球提供的图像，我们绘制了这些特征。随后，在2020年进行了实地工作，从运河和幼发拉底河遗道中采集样本，用于加速器质谱（AMS）测年。测年结果跨越公元前五千纪至两千纪，因此与埃利都的居住时期相吻合，表明这些灌溉和田野系统可能是该遗址农业腹地的一部分。","Iraq","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z",{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":66},"该论文属考古学范畴，研究两河流域古代灌溉，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业等主题无关，不建议进入每日精选。",[68],{"name":63,"url":60},[70,22,71],"灌溉系统","农业起源",[73,74],"Eridu 灌溉系统","美索不达米亚 古代农业","Eridu灌溉系统-3173","10.1017\u002Firq.2025.10037",{"doi":76,"openalex_id":78,"authors":79,"venue":63,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":60,"card":90,"direction":49,"ingested_from":51},"W7213868978",[80,83,85,88],{"name":81,"orcid":82},"Louise Rayne","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3706-4409",{"name":84,"orcid":9},"Michelle de Gruchy",{"name":86,"orcid":87},"Jaafar Jotheri","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3648-3388",{"name":89,"orcid":9},"Raheem Abdan",{"tldr":91,"method":92,"finding":93,"direction":49,"opportunity":94},"利用遥感与测年技术，揭示伊拉克埃利都地区古代灌溉系统的年代序列。","高分辨率卫星影像（VISION-1、Google Earth）与2020年实地采","灌溉系统年代从公元前五千年延续至前两千年，与埃利都遗址 occupation 一致。","可借鉴多源遥感与测年结合的方法，研究历史灌溉系统对现代农业景观的长期影响。","2026-09-22T23:30:23.213656Z",{"id":97,"title":98,"url":99,"summary":100,"summary_zh":101,"content":9,"source_name":102,"source_url":99,"published_at":64,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":103,"score_detail":104,"sources":111,"tags":113,"search_phrases":118,"slug":121,"view_count":15,"doi":122,"paper":123,"created_at":150},3172,"Demining and revitalising war-affected landscapes in Ukraine: multi-actor governance responses","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs11625-026-01892-y","Abstract Ukraine faces one of the world’s largest and most complex explosive-ordnance contamination problems, affecting agricultural land, settlements, forests, and other natural ecosystems. This paper examines how global demining strategies are adapted within Ukraine’s multi-actor governance system and what this means for linking clearance with land recovery, soil restoration, and long-term environmental resilience. It addresses a gap in understanding how mine-action governance supports integrated landscape recovery in war-affected settings. We developed a seven-strategy analytical typology of mine-action and land-recovery approaches, comprising manual clearance, mechanical demining, remote sensing and mapping, community-based approaches, ecological remediation, legal and institutional frameworks, and post-conflict land-use zoning. Applying this typology to Ukraine and drawing on stakeholder analysis, policy review, and expert interviews, we found that manual clearance and mechanical land-release methods remain central, yet supported by new legal, institutional, and governance arrangements. Digital innovation in Ukraine’s mine-action sector is advancing rapidly, with UAV mapping, AI-supported detection, and integrated prioritization platforms increasingly incorporated into survey and planning processes. Uptake remains uneven, however, and interoperability and data-sharing gaps continue to limit implementation. Ukraine’s mine-action governance system is multi-actor and polycentric, but coordination remains challenging because of overlapping mandates, fragmented information flows, and differing donor priorities. These conditions reveal both opportunities and coordination challenges in linking mine action to environmental recovery and long-term land-use planning. Environmental concerns, including soil contamination in and around explosion craters, damage to forest areas, and degradation of shelterbelts, are receiving increasing attention, yet implementation remains limited and often confined to small or time-bound pilot projects. Community participation in prioritization of mine-action activities remains uneven, and interviewees reported that smallholders risk being sidelined by larger agricultural actors with greater influence over clearance demands. Scale remains a major challenge, requiring coordination across national, regional, and local levels while reconciling different humanitarian, economic, environmental, and recovery priorities. Our findings highlight that sustainable recovery depends on integrating mine action governance, environmental assessment and remediation, land-use planning, and long-term soil and ecosystem monitoring into a coherent recovery process. Ukraine’s evolving multi-actor approach offers lessons for other conflict-affected regions seeking to address explosive-ordnance contamination, environmental degradation, and landscape and livelihood recovery during and after armed conflict.","摘要：乌克兰面临着全球规模最大、最复杂的爆炸物污染问题之一，污染波及农田、居民点、森林及其他自然生态系统。本文考察了全球排雷策略如何在乌克兰的多主体治理体系中加以调适，以及这对于将排雷与土地恢复、土壤修复和长期环境韧性相衔接意味着什么。本文填补了关于排雷行动治理如何支持受战争影响地区综合景观恢复这一认知空白。我们构建了一个包含七种策略的排雷行动与土地恢复分析方法类型学，包括人工排雷、机械排雷、遥感与测绘、社区参与式方法、生态修复、法律与制度框架，以及冲突后土地利用分区。将该类型学应用于乌克兰，并结合利益相关者分析、政策审查和专家访谈，我们发现人工排雷和机械土地释放方法仍居核心地位，但得到了新的法律、制度和治理安排的支撑。乌克兰排雷行动领域的数字创新正在快速发展，无人机测绘、人工智能辅助探测和综合优先级排序平台日益融入调查与规划流程。然而，应用程度仍不均衡，互操作性和数据共享方面的差距继续制约着实施。乌克兰的排雷行动治理体系是多主体和多中心的，但由于职责重叠、信息流动碎片化以及捐助方优先事项各异，协调仍面临挑战。这些条件既揭示了将排雷行动与环境恢复和长期土地利用规划相衔接的机遇，也暴露了其中的协调难题。环境关切——包括爆炸坑内及周边的土壤污染、林区破坏和林带退化——正受到越来越多的关注，但实施仍然有限，且往往局限于小规模或有时限的试点项目。社区在排雷行动活动优先级排序中的参与仍不均衡，受访者反映，小农户有可能被对排雷需求拥有更大影响力的大型农业主体边缘化。规模仍是一大挑战，需要在国家、区域和地方各级之间进行协调，同时兼顾人道主义、经济、环境和恢复等不同优先事项。我们的发现凸显了……","Sustainability Science",82,{"impact":105,"substance":106,"depth":107,"authority":108,"freshness":109,"relevant":55,"comment":110},18,22,19,14,9,"核心期刊论文，系统剖析乌克兰排雷治理与土地生态恢复的多主体协同机制，对冲突地区农业用地修复与遥感数字化应用有借鉴价值。",[112],{"name":102,"url":99},[114,115,116,117,21],"生态修复","遥感监测","排雷治理","土地复垦",[119,120],"乌克兰 排雷 土地恢复","地雷污染 农业用地 遥感","乌克兰排雷土地恢复-3172","10.1007\u002Fs11625-026-01892-y",{"doi":122,"openalex_id":124,"authors":125,"venue":102,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":99,"card":144,"direction":49,"ingested_from":51},"W7213868215",[126,129,132,135,138,141],{"name":127,"orcid":128},"Mariana Melnykovych","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0481-2842",{"name":130,"orcid":131},"Olena Melnyk","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5763-0431",{"name":133,"orcid":134},"Oleksandr Soshenskyi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3028-0723",{"name":136,"orcid":137},"Anna McKean","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-1107-2881",{"name":139,"orcid":140},"Владислав Дудар","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-9677-9531",{"name":142,"orcid":143},"Patrick O. Waeber","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3229-0124",{"tldr":145,"method":146,"finding":147,"direction":148,"opportunity":149},"分析乌克兰排雷与土地恢复的多主体治理，提出七类策略并评估数字技术应用。","七策略类型学、利益相关者分析、政策审查与专家访谈。","排雷治理呈多中心但协调难，数字技术应用不均，环境恢复多为小规模试点。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究排雷后土地恢复的数字化协同平台与数据共享机制，关注小农参与。","2026-09-22T23:30:23.129381Z"]