[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3565":3,"related-3565":59},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":22,"tags":27,"search_phrases":33,"slug":36,"view_count":37,"doi":38,"paper":39,"created_at":58},3565,"An Automata-Driven Cognitive Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Climate-Adaptive Precision Agriculture and Environmental Sustainability","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.7759\u002Fs44389-026-00295-5","An Automata-Driven Cognitive Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Climate-Adaptive Precision Agriculture and Environmental Sustainability。Cureus Journal of Computer Science.",null,"Cureus Journal of Computer Science.","2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","论文",25,false,39,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":17,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":21},8,6,10,9,1,"主题契合智慧农业与农业AI，但摘要仅重复标题、无方法与数据细节，信息增量有限，暂不建议进入每日精选。",[23,24],{"name":9,"url":6},{"name":25,"url":26},"Cureus Journal of Computer Science 2026-09-25","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cureusjournals.com\u002Farticles\u002F20543",[28,29,30,31,32],"智慧农业","农业人工智能","可解释AI","精准农业","气候适应",[34,35],"气候适应 精准农业 可解释AI","农业人工智能 智慧农业 气候适应 精准农业","气候适应精准农业可解释AI-3565",0,"10.7759\u002Fs44389-026-00295-5",{"doi":38,"openalex_id":40,"authors":41,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":6,"card":8,"direction":56,"ingested_from":57},"W7214363342",[42,45,48,50,52,54],{"name":43,"orcid":44},"Mritunjay Kr. Ranjan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0240-4909",{"name":46,"orcid":47},"Rohit Gupta","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4436-8275",{"name":49,"orcid":8},"Nitin  D Mali",{"name":51,"orcid":8},"Ansh  A Rajore",{"name":53,"orcid":8},"Gaurav Narendra Patil",{"name":55,"orcid":8},"Ankita  N Patil","农业人工智能与决策模型","openalex","2026-09-26T23:30:47.893666Z",{"total":17,"page":20,"page_size":17,"items":60},[61,97,132,177,216,253],{"id":62,"title":63,"url":64,"summary":65,"summary_zh":66,"content":8,"source_name":67,"source_url":64,"published_at":68,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":13,"score":69,"score_detail":70,"sources":76,"tags":78,"search_phrases":80,"slug":83,"view_count":20,"doi":84,"paper":85,"created_at":96},2518,"AI-Driven Transformation in Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.18805\u002Fijare.a-6627","The agriculture sector is facing unprecedented pressure from a rapidly growing global population, erratic weather conditions and declining water availability. Traditional farming methods are increasingly proving insufficient in meeting the rising food demand, necessitating a shift towards technology-driven solutions. This paper provides a critical and systematic review of the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in agriculture, analysing its impact on productivity and sustainability, while identifying potential barriers hindering adoption. Employing a Systematic Literature Review approach, this study synthesizes recent research organized around the core domains of agricultural production - crop, soil and nutrient, water and irrigation and crop-protection (pest, disease and weed) management, alongside yield forecasting - examining how data-driven tools such as machine learning, the Internet of Things, robotics and computer vision are applied within each and prioritizing studies that reported agronomically meaningful outcomes such as yield gains and resource-use efficiency. The strongest gains identified across the review fall within three agricultural areas - crop and soil monitoring, yield forecasting and robotic field operations such as targeted detection, weeding and harvesting. The technologies enabling them, chiefly machine-learning models such as convolutional neural networks combined with field and remote sensors, have delivered high in-field precision, with reported object-detection precision of up to 95.78% in field conditions. In practical terms, this translates into more efficient use of water, fertilizer and other inputs and into improved yield and crop quality. The review concludes that prioritizing Explainable AI and interoperable farm systems is central to building farmer trust and safeguarding food security under a changing climate.","农业部门正面临着来自全球人口快速增长、天气条件不稳定以及水资源日益减少的前所未有的压力。传统耕作方法在满足不断增长的粮食需求方面日益显得力不从心，因此有必要转向技术驱动的解决方案。本文对人工智能（Artificial Intelligence, AI）在农业中的应用进行了批判性和系统性的综述，分析了其对生产力和可持续性的影响，同时识别了阻碍其采用的潜在障碍。本研究采用系统性文献综述方法，围绕农业生产的核心领域——作物、土壤与养分、水资源与灌溉、作物保护（病虫害和杂草）管理以及产量预测——对近期研究进行了综合梳理，考察了机器学习、物联网、机器人技术和计算机视觉等数据驱动工具在各领域中的应用方式，并优先关注报告了具有农学意义成果（如产量提升和资源利用效率）的研究。综述中发现的最显著收益集中在三个农业领域——作物与土壤监测、产量预测以及机器人田间作业（如靶向检测、除草和收获）。实现这些收益的技术，主要是卷积神经网络等机器学习模型与田间及遥感传感器的结合，已在田间条件下实现了高精度，所报告的目标检测精度在田间条件下高达95.78%。在实际应用中，这意味着水、肥料及其他投入品的更高效利用，以及产量和作物品质的提升。综述得出结论：优先发展可解释人工智能（Explainable AI）和可互操作的农场系统，对于在气候变化背景下建立农民信任和保障粮食安全至关重要。","Indian Journal of Agricultural Research","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":71,"substance":72,"depth":73,"authority":74,"freshness":16,"relevant":20,"comment":75},18,20,17,13,"系统综述梳理AI在作物土壤监测、产量预测与机器人田间作业中的应用成效与推广障碍，结论扎实，对智慧农业方向有参考价值。",[77],{"name":67,"url":64},[28,29,79,30,31],"产量预测",[81,82],"农业人工智能 产量预测 智慧农业 精准农业","农业人工智能 产量预测","农业人工智能产量预测智慧农业精准农业-2518","10.18805\u002Fijare.a-6627",{"doi":84,"openalex_id":86,"authors":87,"venue":67,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":64,"card":90,"direction":95,"ingested_from":57},"W7212616413",[88],{"name":89,"orcid":8},"Manish Maan",{"tldr":91,"method":92,"finding":93,"direction":56,"opportunity":94},"系统综述AI在可持续农业中的应用，分析生产力与可持续性影响及推广障碍。","系统文献综述，围绕作物、土壤、水、植保和产量预测梳理ML、IoT、机器人、计算机","作物与土壤监测、产量预测和机器人田间作业收益最大，检测精度达95.78%，需可解释AI与互操作系统。","可解释AI与互操作农场系统在农户信任和气候适应中的作用尚缺实证，是值得深入的研究空白。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-15T23:30:13.705421Z",{"id":98,"title":99,"url":100,"summary":101,"summary_zh":102,"content":8,"source_name":103,"source_url":100,"published_at":104,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":13,"score":105,"score_detail":106,"sources":110,"tags":112,"search_phrases":114,"slug":117,"view_count":37,"doi":118,"paper":119,"created_at":131},2178,"Hybrid explainable DeiT-based framework for plant disease classification and severity estimation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44163-026-02191-2","The detection of plant diseases is essential for preserving agricultural productivity and food security; however, existing approaches often suffer from limited interpretability and generalization capability. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning framework based on Data-efficient Image Transformers (DeiT) for plant disease classification and severity estimation. The framework employs DeiT-Base, DeiT-Small, and DeiT-Tiny models to capture global contextual dependencies in plant leaf images. To improve interpretability, a hybrid Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) module is introduced by combining Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) for local feature attribution with Attention Rollout for global dependency visualization. In addition, HSV-based segmentation is applied after classification to isolate disease-relevant regions for damage ratio computation, severity estimation, and explanation refinement. The damage ratio is further integrated with Hybrid XAI attention maps to estimate disease severity. Experiments were conducted on the New Plant Diseases Dataset (Augmented), comprising 70,295 training images and 17,572 validation images across 38 disease classes and 14 plant species. The proposed DeiT-Base model achieved a maximum classification accuracy of 99.13%, outperforming several CNN architectures, including ResNet50, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3, EfficientNet-B4, and InceptionV3. Furthermore, the proposed Hybrid XAI framework demonstrated superior interpretability performance in terms of Focus Score, Background Noise, Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and Entropy compared with individual explanation methods. Overall, the proposed framework improves classification accuracy, enhances model transparency, and provides meaningful disease severity estimation, making it a promising solution for intelligent precision agriculture.","植物病害检测对于保障农业生产力和粮食安全至关重要，然而现有方法往往存在可解释性有限和泛化能力不足的问题。本研究提出了一种基于数据高效图像Transformer（Data-efficient Image Transformers，DeiT）的混合深度学习框架，用于植物病害分类和严重程度估计。该框架采用DeiT-Base、DeiT-Small和DeiT-Tiny模型来捕获植物叶片图像中的全局上下文依赖关系。为提高可解释性，引入了一种混合可解释人工智能（Explainable Artificial Intelligence，XAI）模块，将用于局部特征归因的梯度加权类激活映射（Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping，Grad-CAM）与用于全局依赖可视化的注意力展开（Attention Rollout）相结合。此外，在分类之后应用基于HSV的分割来分离病害相关区域，以进行损伤比率计算、严重程度估计和解释优化。损伤比率进一步与混合XAI注意力图相结合以估计病害严重程度。实验在新植物病害数据集（增强版）（New Plant Diseases Dataset (Augmented)）上进行，该数据集包含70,295张训练图像和17,572张验证图像，涵盖38个病害类别和14种植物物种。所提出的DeiT-Base模型达到了99.13%的最高分类准确率，优于多种CNN架构，包括ResNet50、DenseNet121、MobileNetV3、EfficientNet-B4和InceptionV3。此外，所提出的混合XAI框架在聚焦分数（Focus Score）、背景噪声（Background Noise）、信噪比（Signal-to-Noise Ratio，SNR）和熵（Entropy）方面表现出优于单一解释方法的可解释性性能。总体而言，所提出的框架提高了分类准确率，增强了模型透明度，并提供了有意义的病害严重程度估计，使其成为智能精准农业的一种有前景的解决方案。","Discover Artificial Intelligence","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",78,{"impact":71,"substance":107,"depth":71,"authority":108,"freshness":16,"relevant":20,"comment":109},22,12,"基于DeiT与混合可解释AI的植物病害分类与严重度估计研究，在7万张图像、38类病害上取得99.13%准确率，方法新颖、数据扎实，对智慧农业病害智能诊断有参考价值。",[111],{"name":103,"url":100},[28,29,30,31,113],"植物病害识别",[115,116],"农业人工智能 植物病害识别 智慧农业 精准农业","农业人工智能 植物病害识别","农业人工智能植物病害识别智慧农业精准农业-2178","10.1007\u002Fs44163-026-02191-2",{"doi":118,"openalex_id":120,"authors":121,"venue":103,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":100,"card":126,"direction":56,"ingested_from":57},"W7212179384",[122,124],{"name":123,"orcid":8},"Muskan Batra",{"name":125,"orcid":8},"Pooja Sharma",{"tldr":127,"method":128,"finding":129,"direction":56,"opportunity":130},"提出基于DeiT的混合可解释框架，实现植物病害分类与严重度估计。","DeiT-Base\u002FSmall\u002FTiny结合Grad-CAM与Attention","DeiT-Base分类准确率达99.13%，混合XAI可解释性指标优于单一方法。","可探索轻量化DeiT在边缘设备部署及多模态数据融合的病害严重度实时估计。","2026-09-11T23:30:47.756846Z",{"id":133,"title":134,"url":135,"summary":136,"summary_zh":137,"content":8,"source_name":138,"source_url":135,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":139,"score":140,"score_detail":141,"sources":144,"tags":146,"search_phrases":149,"slug":152,"view_count":37,"doi":153,"paper":154,"created_at":176},3564,"Research Progress on Intelligent Seeding Technology and Equipment: The Development of Seeders from Multi-Functional Integration to Agricultural Intelligent Agents","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fagronomy16191884","Seeding constitutes a key crop-production operation that governs seed spatial arrangement, crop population structure, and potential yield formation, and forms the foundation of precise, efficient, and eco-friendly farming. However, field soil properties, regional climate, and crop agronomic requirements exhibit strong spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Conventional seeding operations based on manual experience and fixed preset parameters cannot meet the demands of large-scale precision agriculture. Enabled by progress in precision agriculture, intelligent sensing, artificial intelligence, and autonomous machinery, modern intelligent seeding systems integrate precision seed metering, high-precision environmental perception, and closed-loop dynamic self-regulation. Such systems can improve plant-spacing uniformity and enable precise seeding-depth control under standard open-field conditions, yet face noticeable performance limitations in GNSS-denied complex environments including dense crop canopies and greenhouses. This review outlines the evolutionary trajectory of seeding machinery and summarizes research progress regarding precision seeding, multi-functional equipment integration, multi-source information perception, and intelligent decision-making. Integrated design principles covering mechanical optimization, electronic control, and perception-driven decision systems are elaborated. Four developmental phases of seeding equipment are identified: mechanical precision operation, electronic intelligent regulation, multi-functional module integration, and intelligent cognitive integration. Current intelligent seeding technologies are constrained by limited adaptability to complex farmland conditions, unstable multi-source data fusion, insufficient long-term operational reliability, and high deployment costs across diverse scenarios, restricting their broad field-scale adoption. Future research should combine agronomic knowledge with artificial intelligence to improve environmental awareness and autonomous decision-making capability, develop low-cost, high-reliability integrated seeding equipment, and support the construction of intelligent agricultural machinery systems.","播种是决定种子空间分布、作物群体结构和潜在产量形成的关键作物生产环节，也是精准、高效、绿色农业的基础。然而，田间土壤特性、区域气候和作物农艺要求具有强烈的时空异质性。基于人工经验和固定预设参数的传统播种作业无法满足大规模精准农业的需求。在精准农业、智能感知、人工智能和自主机械等领域的进步推动下，现代智能播种系统集成了精密排种、高精度环境感知和闭环动态自适应调节。此类系统可在标准露地条件下提高株距均匀性并实现精量播种深度控制，但在全球导航卫星系统（GNSS）拒止的复杂环境中，包括密植作物冠层和温室，仍面临明显的性能局限。本文综述了播种机械的演进轨迹，总结了精量播种、多功能装备集成、多源信息感知和智能决策方面的研究进展。阐述了涵盖机械优化、电子控制和感知驱动决策系统的集成设计原则。识别出播种装备的四个发展阶段：机械精量作业、电子智能调控、多功能模块集成和智能认知集成。当前智能播种技术受限于对复杂农田条件的适应性不足、多源数据融合不稳定、长期运行可靠性不够以及多场景部署成本高昂，制约了其在田间的广泛规模化应用。未来研究应将农艺知识与人工智能相结合，提升环境感知和自主决策能力，开发低成本、高可靠性的集成播种装备，支撑智能农机体系建设。","Agronomy",true,82,{"impact":107,"substance":142,"depth":71,"authority":74,"freshness":16,"relevant":20,"comment":143},21,"系统梳理智能播种装备从机械化到智能体四阶段演进，指出GNSS受限环境与多源数据融合瓶颈，对智慧农业装备研发有参考价值。",[145],{"name":138,"url":135},[28,29,147,31,148],"智能农机","智能播种",[150,151],"智能播种 装备","Agronomy 智能播种 装备","智能播种装备-3564","10.3390\u002Fagronomy16191884",{"doi":153,"openalex_id":155,"authors":156,"venue":138,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":135,"card":171,"direction":56,"ingested_from":57},"W7214297818",[157,159,161,163,165,168],{"name":158,"orcid":8},"Yuting Dong",{"name":160,"orcid":8},"Yapeng Wu",{"name":162,"orcid":8},"Shiguo Wang",{"name":164,"orcid":8},"Xiaohu Guo",{"name":166,"orcid":167},"Xin Lu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4462-3472",{"name":169,"orcid":170},"Zhong Tang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2724-115X",{"tldr":172,"method":173,"finding":174,"direction":95,"opportunity":175},"综述智能播种技术装备从多功能集成到农业智能体的四阶段演进及瓶颈。","文献综述，梳理精量播种、多源感知与智能决策的集成设计。","智能播种在开阔农田表现良好，但复杂环境下适应性、数据融合与成本仍受限。","GNSS拒止的冠层与温室环境下低成本高可靠感知与自主决策播种装备是研究空白。","2026-09-26T23:30:47.821171Z",{"id":178,"title":179,"url":180,"summary":181,"summary_zh":182,"content":8,"source_name":183,"source_url":180,"published_at":184,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":13,"score":185,"score_detail":186,"sources":190,"tags":192,"search_phrases":195,"slug":198,"view_count":37,"doi":199,"paper":200,"created_at":215},3514,"Artificial Intelligence for Climate Adaptation Decision Support in Data-Poor Developing Regions","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.22541\u002Fessoar.15009304\u002Fv1","Climate adaptation is a sequence of decisions taken under uncertainty, and the regions where climate risk is rising fastest are those with the least information to guide them. Only about 10 per cent of deaths are registered in the WHO African Region; nearly 90 per cent of required surface weather observations are missing across least developed countries and small island states; and only 40 per cent of African countries have multi-hazard early warning systems. This report examines whether artificial intelligence — machine learning, remote sensing and predictive analytics — can close these information gaps and improve adaptation decisions in data-poor developing regions. The report organises the problem as a decision chain with three information gaps — observation, prediction and decision — followed by an action gap that AI cannot close. It finds that AI has advanced fastest on prediction: AI weather models became operational at ECMWF in 2025, AI flood forecasts now cover 100 countries and about 700 million people, satellite nowcasts reach a continent with little radar, and AI monsoon-onset forecasts reached 38 million Indian farmers in 2025. On observation, satellite machine learning explains around 70 per cent of the variation in village wealth but only up to about half of the variation in changes over time. On decision, evidence from Togo, Bangladesh and Kenya shows that AI-assisted targeting, forecast-based triggers and satellite index insurance can deliver assistance faster and better, within clear limits. The report's central argument is the ground-truth paradox: AI stretches scarce observations further, but every AI product must be trained and verified against ground truth, so reliance on AI raises the value of each remaining station, survey and label. The 2025 interruption of FEWS NET and termination of the DHS Program show how fragile that foundation is. Because the value of information is the product of skill, lead time, reach, trust and the means to act, the highest returns usually lie not in more skilful models but in dissemination, institutions and prearranged finance. The report sets out a risk register, a six-principle policy framework, actions by actor and a roadmap to 2030.","气候适应是在不确定性下做出的一系列决策，而气候风险上升最快的地区恰恰是指导信息最匮乏的地区。世卫组织非洲区域仅登记了约10%的死亡病例；最不发达国家和小岛屿国家缺失了近90%所需的地面天气观测数据；仅有40%的非洲国家拥有多灾种早期预警系统。本报告考察人工智能——机器学习、遥感和预测分析——能否弥合这些信息缺口，改善数据匮乏的发展中地区的适应决策。报告将这一问题组织为一条决策链，包含三个信息缺口——观测、预测和决策——以及一个人工智能无法弥合的行动缺口。报告发现，人工智能在预测方面进展最快：人工智能天气模型于2025年在欧洲中期天气预报中心（ECMWF）投入业务运行，人工智能洪水预报现已覆盖100个国家和约7亿人口，卫星临近预报覆盖了一个几乎没有雷达的大陆，人工智能季风爆发预报于2025年惠及3800万印度农民。在观测方面，卫星机器学习可解释村庄财富约70%的变异，但对时间变化的解释力仅约一半。在决策方面，来自多哥、孟加拉国和肯尼亚的证据表明，人工智能辅助的目标定位、基于预报的触发机制和卫星指数保险能够在明确限度内更快、更好地提供援助。报告的核心论点是地面真值悖论：人工智能能够将稀缺的观测数据发挥更大效用，但每个人工智能产品都必须依据地面真值进行训练和验证，因此对人工智能的依赖提升了每一个剩余站点、调查和标注数据的价值。2025年FEWS NET的中断和DHS项目的终止表明这一基础何等脆弱。由于信息的价值是技能、提前期、覆盖面、信任和行动手段的乘积，最高回报通常不在于更精密的模型，而在于传播、制度和预先安排的融资。报告提出了风险登记册、六项原则的政策框架、各行为主体的行动以及到2030年的路线图。","OpenAlex","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z",86,{"impact":107,"substance":187,"depth":188,"authority":74,"freshness":16,"relevant":20,"comment":189},24,19,"系统梳理AI在数据匮乏地区气候适应决策中的观测、预测与决策三类信息缺口，提出“地面真值悖论”，数据与结论扎实，对农业信息化与智慧农业有较强参考价值。",[191],{"name":183,"url":180},[28,29,32,193,194],"遥感监测","早期预警",[196,197],"AI 气候适应 决策支持","数据匮乏地区 农业预警","AI气候适应决策支持-3514","10.22541\u002Fessoar.15009304\u002Fv1",{"doi":199,"openalex_id":201,"authors":202,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":208,"card":209,"direction":214,"ingested_from":57},"W7214097088",[203,205],{"name":204,"orcid":8},"H Heuristics",{"name":206,"orcid":207},"Hunter Hughes","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-6161-9387","https:\u002F\u002Fessopenarchive.org\u002Fdoi\u002Fpdf\u002F10.22541\u002Fessoar.15009304\u002Fv1",{"tldr":210,"method":211,"finding":212,"direction":56,"opportunity":213},"评估AI能否弥补数据匮乏地区气候适应决策的信息缺口，并提出地面真值悖论。","梳理观测、预测、决策三环节，结合AI天气模型、卫星ML与多国案例证据。","AI预测进展最快，但依赖地面真值；最高回报常在传播、制度与预置资金而非模型。","可研究AI辅助农业气候适应中地面真值稀缺下的验证与信任机制，及预置资金触发设计。","数字乡村与农业信息化","2026-09-25T23:30:46.008325Z",{"id":217,"title":218,"url":219,"summary":220,"summary_zh":221,"content":8,"source_name":222,"source_url":219,"published_at":223,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":13,"score":224,"score_detail":225,"sources":228,"tags":230,"search_phrases":231,"slug":234,"view_count":37,"doi":235,"paper":236,"created_at":252},3468,"A Study of Explainable AI In Smart Agriculture","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.64643\u002Fijirt.208800-459","A Study of Explainable AI In Smart Agriculture。International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology","可解释人工智能在智慧农业中的研究。《国际创新技术研究杂志》","International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology","2026-09-24T00:00:00Z",29,{"impact":17,"substance":226,"depth":17,"authority":226,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":227},4,"主题相关但仅标题与期刊名，无方法、数据与结论细节，信息增量不足，不宜进入每日精选。",[229],{"name":222,"url":219},[28,29,30],[232,233],"农业人工智能 智慧农业 可解释AI","农业人工智能 智慧农业","农业人工智能智慧农业可解释AI-3468","10.64643\u002Fijirt.208800-459",{"doi":235,"openalex_id":237,"authors":238,"venue":222,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":219,"card":247,"direction":95,"ingested_from":57},"W7214184415",[239,241,243,245],{"name":240,"orcid":8},"Lokesh Goregaonkar",{"name":242,"orcid":8},"Jay Kakade",{"name":244,"orcid":8},"Arnav Akhade",{"name":246,"orcid":8},"Shubhangi Gaikar",{"tldr":248,"method":249,"finding":250,"direction":56,"opportunity":251},"探讨可解释人工智能在智慧农业中的应用与挑战。","综述可解释AI方法及其在农业场景的适配。","可解释AI能提升农业模型透明度与农户信任。","可探索面向作物病害诊断的可解释模型与农户信任度实证研究。","2026-09-25T23:30:09.588043Z",{"id":254,"title":255,"url":256,"summary":257,"summary_zh":258,"content":8,"source_name":259,"source_url":256,"published_at":260,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":18,"is_selected":13,"score":261,"score_detail":262,"sources":266,"tags":268,"search_phrases":271,"slug":274,"view_count":37,"doi":275,"paper":276,"created_at":295},3368,"A PCA-based deep feature optimization framework for explainable orange fruit disease classification","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1186\u002Fs12870-026-09984-8","Accurate classification of orange fruit diseases is important for precision agriculture and yield protection. This study develops and rigorously benchmarks a hybrid deep-feature framework for classifying Black Spot, Canker, Fresh, and Greening oranges (1,090 images), combining deep feature extraction, PCA-based dimensionality reduction, and classical machine-learning classification. Eight backbones (seven CNNs and a Vision Transformer, ViT) and four classifiers (32 configurations in total) were evaluated under 5 × 5 repeated stratified cross-validation, with PCA fitted exclusively on training-fold features in every iteration to eliminate data leakage. The proposed ViT + PCA+SVM configuration achieved the highest mean accuracy, 99.12%±0.71%, significantly outperforming every CNN-based backbone, including DenseNet201 + PCA + SVM (98.48%±0.81%, p \u003C 0.001). A dedicated variance-retention sensitivity analysis justifies the 98% threshold used throughout, and ablation experiments confirm that PCA substantially reduces feature dimensionality (by ~ 55.7% for ViT and ~ 76.6% for DenseNet201) without a significant loss of accuracy for either backbone. Explainability analysis — occlusion sensitivity and SHAP for the proposed ViT model, and Grad-CAM and SHAP for the DenseNet201 comparison model — shows that both configurations base predictions on biologically relevant, disease-affected regions of the fruit rather than spurious cues. These results identify ViT + PCA+SVM as the most accurate configuration evaluated, with DenseNet201 + PCA + SVM as a closely competitive, more compact convolutional alternative for intelligent orchard disease-monitoring systems.","橙类果实病害的准确分类对精准农业和产量保护具有重要意义。本研究开发并严格基准测试了一种混合深度特征框架，用于对黑斑病、溃疡病、新鲜和黄龙病橙类（1，090张图像）进行分类，该框架结合了深度特征提取、基于PCA的降维和经典机器学习分类。在5×5重复分层交叉验证下评估了八种骨干网络（七种CNN和一种视觉Transformer，ViT）和四种分类器（共32种配置），每次迭代中PCA仅在训练折特征上拟合以消除数据泄漏。所提出的ViT + PCA+SVM配置取得了最高平均准确率，为99.12%±0.71%，显著优于所有基于CNN的骨干网络，包括DenseNet201 + PCA + SVM（98.48%±0.81%，p \u003C 0.001）。专门的方差保留敏感性分析证明了全程使用的98%阈值是合理的，消融实验证实PCA大幅降低了特征维度（ViT约降低55.7%，DenseNet201约降低76.6%），且两种骨干网络均无显著准确率损失。可解释性分析——对所提出的ViT模型采用遮挡敏感性和SHAP，对DenseNet201对比模型采用Grad-CAM和SHAP——表明两种配置均基于果实中生物学相关的病害影响区域而非虚假线索进行预测。这些结果确定ViT + PCA+SVM为所评估的最准确配置，而DenseNet201 + PCA + SVM则是一种竞争力接近且更紧凑的卷积替代方案，可用于智能果园病害监测系统。","BMC Plant Biology","2026-09-23T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":263,"substance":107,"depth":71,"authority":264,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":265},16,14,"方法严谨、数据与消融实验充分，对果园智能病害监测有实用参考价值，但属细分技术论文，产业影响有限。",[267],{"name":259,"url":256},[28,29,30,269,270],"病害识别","柑橘种植",[272,273],"柑橘病害 深度学习 分类","ViT PCA SVM 病害识别","柑橘病害深度学习分类-3368","10.1186\u002Fs12870-026-09984-8",{"doi":275,"openalex_id":277,"authors":278,"venue":259,"cited_by_count":37,"oa_url":256,"card":290,"direction":56,"ingested_from":57},"W7214068709",[279,281,283,285,288],{"name":280,"orcid":8},"Amruta Hingmire",{"name":282,"orcid":8},"Avinash Golande",{"name":284,"orcid":8},"Vinodkumar Bhutnal",{"name":286,"orcid":287},"Sagar Dhanraj Pande","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4506-6997",{"name":289,"orcid":8},"Tanuja Pande",{"tldr":291,"method":292,"finding":293,"direction":56,"opportunity":294},"提出PCA深度特征优化框架，用ViT+SVM分类橙子病害，准确率达99.12%。","8种骨干网络提取特征，PCA降维，4种分类器，5×5交叉验证。","ViT+PCA+SVM最优，PCA降维超55%且精度不降，可解释性验证有效。","可探索轻量化模型在移动端或边缘设备的实时病害检测与多作物泛化。","2026-09-24T23:30:34.116938Z"]