[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4792":3,"related-4792":61},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":25,"classification":26,"search_phrases":34,"slug":37,"view_count":15,"doi":38,"paper":39,"created_at":60},4792,"Social norms in contemporary urban food sharing contexts: a critical interpretive review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1793922","In recent decades, collective approaches to food provisioning have garnered increasing attention in agri-food studies and on the ground. A wide range of community-oriented food practices, including community gardens, urban allotments, community kitchens, social supermarkets, surplus redistribution networks and more have been documented and theorized in the academic literature. Urban food sharing, understood here as collective acts across the food system, describes any activity that involves the sharing of food, spaces and stuff for the purpose of growing produce, eating and cooking, or redistributing surplus. Furthermore, food sharing encompasses not just organizational routines, but also social expectations, norms, symbolic values, and different ways of knowing and doing. This critical interpretive review collected and summarized peer reviewed research published between 2000 and 2023 to identify how the existing literature on urban food sharing attends to social norms across geographies. Our analysis uncovers ongoing tensions between competing normative demands—such as autonomy versus safety, efficiency versus conviviality, or charity versus solidarity—especially in non-familial, semi-public settings. Having identified gaps in the literature, we call for future research into food sharing to challenge normative blind spots by taking into account dynamics of care, the conflictual politics of food sharing initiatives, and changing social norms.","近几十年来，集体性的食物供给方式在农业食品研究和实践中日益受到关注。学术文献中对各类面向社区的食品实践进行了记录和理论化，包括社区菜园、城市份地、社区厨房、社会超市、剩余食物再分配网络等。城市食物共享——在此理解为贯穿食物系统的集体行为——描述了任何涉及共享食物、空间和物资以进行作物种植、饮食烹饪或剩余食物再分配的活动。此外，食物共享不仅涵盖组织惯例，还包括社会期望、规范、象征价值以及不同的认知与实践方式。本批判性阐释综述收集并总结了2000年至2023年间发表的同行评审研究，以识别现有城市食物共享文献如何在不同地域背景下关注社会规范。我们的分析揭示了竞争性规范需求之间持续存在的张力——如自主与安全、效率与欢聚、慈善与团结——尤其是在非家庭性的半公共环境中。在识别出文献中的空白之后，我们呼吁未来的食物共享研究应纳入关怀动态、食物共享倡议的冲突性政治以及不断变化的社会规范，以挑战规范性盲点。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"该文属城市食物共享的社会规范综述，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业等主题无直接关联，不建议进入每日精选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[21,22,23,24],"社区菜园","城市食物共享","社会规范","食物再分配",[],{"status":27,"locked":14,"version":28,"method":29,"evidence":30},"unclassified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":31,"agricultural_evidence":32,"reason":33},[],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[35,36],"城市食物共享 食物再分配 社会规范 社区菜园","城市食物共享 食物再分配","城市食物共享食物再分配社会规范社区菜园-4792","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1793922",{"doi":38,"openalex_id":40,"authors":41,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":6,"card":53,"direction":57,"ingested_from":59},"W7221530353",[42,44,47,50],{"name":43,"orcid":9},"Ana-Maria Gatejel",{"name":45,"orcid":46},"Oona Morrow","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0434-8923",{"name":48,"orcid":49},"Lucie Sovová","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-2906-2144",{"name":51,"orcid":52},"Jessica Duncan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0511-0068",{"tldr":54,"method":55,"finding":56,"direction":57,"opportunity":58},"综述2000-2023年城市食物共享研究，分析社会规范如何被关注及存在的张力。","批判性解释性综述，收集并总结2000-2023年同行评议文献。","食物共享中存在自主与安全、效率与欢聚、慈善与团结等规范张力，尤其在非家庭半公共场景。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可结合数字平台研究城市食物共享中社会规范的动态演变与冲突政治。","openalex","2026-10-13T23:30:06.824285Z",{"total":62,"page":62,"page_size":62,"items":63},1,[64],{"id":65,"title":66,"url":67,"summary":68,"summary_zh":69,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":67,"published_at":70,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":71,"score_detail":72,"sources":79,"tags":81,"primary_topic":86,"secondary_topics":92,"classification":93,"search_phrases":121,"slug":124,"view_count":105,"doi":125,"paper":126,"created_at":139},2129,"Strengthening the six-dimensions of food security for new Americans: the political ecology of immigrant urban agriculture in the Twin Cities, Minnesota","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1946965","Urban agriculture (UA) frequently employs agroecological techniques in order to farm suboptimal urban land with limited resources. However, less scholarly attention has been paid to UA’s impacts on the dietary patterns of marginalized groups like immigrants, which is important to study for political debates about the expansion and purpose of UA. In this study, we examine how different forms of UA affect food security and dietary diversity for immigrants in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Using dietary surveys, food access questionnaires, and informal conversations, we determine that a simplistic definition of food security focused only on overall dietary diversity, caloric intake, and basic food access fails to reveal differences in these outcomes between UA and the control (non-UA immigrants). However, a multidimensional approach shows that UA helps immigrants access crucial micronutrients through fresh vegetables and can increase immigrant agency in the food system by allowing people to plant or eat culturally relevant crops and preserve their traditional food cultures. While this agency effect is stronger for community gardens, there is a tradeoff with availability here as farm stands can provide a wider variety of vegetables. Overall, this analysis shows significant potential for UA to substantially increase food security with increased land access, season extension, and by providing additional food groups, but this would require careful attention to place-specific dynamics, such as pressure from more profitable land uses in a growing metropolitan area, Minnesota’s harsh winters, and the unique mixtures of immigrants and cultures in a region.","城市农业（UA）常采用农业生态技术，以有限资源在欠优城市土地上耕作。然而，学界对城市农业如何影响移民等边缘群体饮食模式的关注较少，而这一议题对于围绕城市农业扩张与目标的政治辩论具有重要意义。本研究考察了不同形式的城市农业如何影响明尼苏达州双城地区移民的粮食安全与膳食多样性。通过膳食调查、食物获取问卷及非正式访谈，我们发现，仅关注总体膳食多样性、热量摄入和基本食物获取的单一粮食安全定义，无法揭示城市农业参与者与非城市农业移民对照组之间的差异。然而，多维方法表明，城市农业帮助移民通过新鲜蔬菜获取关键微量营养素，并通过允许人们种植或食用具有文化相关性的作物、保存其传统饮食文化，从而增强移民在食物体系中的能动性。这种能动性效应在社区菜园中更为显著，但此处存在与可得性的权衡，因为农场摊位能够提供更多种类的蔬菜。总体而言，本分析表明，城市农业在增加土地获取、延长季节以及提供更多食物类别的前提下，具有大幅提升粮食安全的显著潜力，但这需要审慎关注特定地点的动态因素，例如不断扩张的大都市区中更高利润土地用途带来的压力、明尼苏达州严酷的冬季，以及该地区移民与文化的独特混合。","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",67,{"impact":73,"substance":74,"depth":75,"authority":76,"freshness":77,"relevant":62,"comment":78},8,20,17,13,9,"以明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗双城移民都市农业为案例，用膳食调查与食物获取问卷揭示多维粮食安全框架的实证价值，方法扎实、结论有新意，但属美国地方性研究，对国内三农资讯读者参考有限。",[80],{"name":10,"url":67},[82,83,84,85,21],"粮食安全","都市农业","移民农业","膳食多样性",{"code":87,"slug":88,"name":89,"path":90,"parent_code":91},"A8","yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security","A",[],{"status":94,"locked":14,"version":28,"method":29,"evidence":95},"classified",{"candidates":96,"agricultural_evidence":32},[97,103,110,116],{"code":87,"score":98,"supported":32,"title":99,"abstract":101,"tags":102},15,[100],"food security",[82,100],[82],{"code":104,"score":105,"supported":32,"title":106,"abstract":107,"tags":109},"B1",3,[],[108],"蔬菜",[],{"code":111,"score":105,"supported":32,"title":112,"abstract":113,"tags":115},"H6",[],[114],"农业生态",[],{"code":117,"score":62,"supported":14,"title":118,"abstract":119,"tags":120},"B7",[],[],[83],[122,123],"膳食多样性 社区菜园 移民农业 粮食安全","膳食多样性 社区菜园","膳食多样性社区菜园移民农业粮食安全-2129","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1946965",{"doi":125,"openalex_id":127,"authors":128,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":67,"card":134,"direction":57,"ingested_from":59},"W7212122894",[129,131],{"name":130,"orcid":9},"Reece McKee",{"name":132,"orcid":133},"William G. Moseley","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0662-962X",{"tldr":135,"method":136,"finding":137,"direction":57,"opportunity":138},"研究明尼苏达双城移民城市农业如何影响其食物安全与饮食多样性。","采用饮食调查、食物获取问卷与非正式访谈，对比城市农业与对照组移民。","多维视角下城市农业助移民获取微量营养素并增强食物系统能动性，社区花园与农场摊位各有取舍。","可结合数字工具记录移民种植与饮食数据，探索城市农业空间与食物安全的多维评估模型。","2026-09-11T23:30:07.834587Z"]